Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value

Strategic Management Journal

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 555-575

  Cho, Hee Jae ^a   Pucik, Vladimir ^b  

^a Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology (SAIT)   (South Korea)

^b IMD   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Growth; Innovativeness; Market value; Mediation effect; Profitability; Quality

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; DATA ACQUISITION; INTERNET; MARKETING; QUALITY CONTROL; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

FIRM PERFORMANCE; INNOVATIVENESS; MARKET VALUE; PROFITABILITY;

STRATEGIC PLANNING;

EID: 18744392280     PISSN: 01432095     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/smj.461     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Aaker DA, Jacobson R. 1994. The financial information content of perceived quality. Journal of Marketing Research 31(2): 191-201.
2. Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103(3): 411-423.
3. Bagozzi RP, Phillips LW. 1982. Representing and testing organizational theories: a holistic construal. Administrative Science Quarterly 27(3): 459-489.
4. Barney JB. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17(1): 99-120.
5. Barney JB. 1997. Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.
6. Baron RM, Kenny DA. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(6): 1173-1182.
7. Baucus MS. 1995. Halo-adjusted residuals: prolonging the life of a terminally ill measure of corporate social performance. Business and Society 34(2): 227-235.
8. Bentler PM, Bonett DG. 1980. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin 88(3): 588-606.
9. Brainard W, Tobin J. 1968. Pitfalls in financial model building. American Economic Review 58(2): 99-122.
10. Brealey RA, Myers SC. 2000. Principles of Corporate Finance. McGraw-Hill: New York.
11. Brown B, Perry S. 1994. Removing the financial performance halo from Fortune's 'most admired' companies. Academy of Management Journal 37(5): 1347-1359.
12. Brown B, Perry S. 1995. Halo-removed residuals of Fortune's 'Responsibility to the Community and Environment': a decade of data. Business and Society 34(2): 199-215.
13. Brown E. 1999. America's most admired companies. Fortune 139(1 March): 68-73.
14. Browne MW, Cudeck R. 1993. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Testing Structural Equation Models, Bollen KA, Long JS (eds). Sage: Newbury Park, CA; 136-162.
15. Busija EC, O'Neill HM, Zeithaml CP. 1997. Diversification strategy, entry mode, and performance: evidence of choice and constraints. Strategic Management Journal 18(4): 321-327.
16. Buzzell RD, Gale BT. 1987. The PIMS Principles: Linking Strategy to Performance. Free Press: New York.
17. Capraro AJ, Srivastava RK. 1997. Has the influence of financial performance on reputation measures been overstated? Corporate Reputation Review 1(1): 86-92.
18. Cho HJ, Pucik V. 2004. Reliability and validity of the Fortune Reputation Survey: measuring innovativeness and quality. Working paper 2004-6, IMD.
19. Chung KH, Pruitt SW. 1994. A simple approximation of Tobin's q. Financial Management 23(3): 70-74.
20. Colvin G. 2000. America's most admired companies. Fortune 141(21 February): 108-116.
21. Combs JG, Ketchen DJ. 1999. Explaining interfirm cooperation and performance: toward a reconciliation of predictions from the resource-based view and organizational economics. Strategic Management Journal 20(9): 867-888.
22. Cooper RG. 1990. New products: what distinguishes the winners. Research-Technology Management 33(6): 27-31.
23. Cooper RG, Brentani UD. 1991. New industrial financial services: what distinguishes the winners. Journal of Product Innovation Management 8(2): 75-90.
24. Cooper RG, Kleinschmidt EJ. 1995. Benchmarking the firm's critical success factors in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management.12(5): 374-391.
25. Cooper RG, Kleinschmidt EJ. 1996. Winning businesses in product development: the critical success factors. Research-Technology Management 39(4): 18-29.
26. Damanpour F. 1996. Organizational complexity and innovation: developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management Science 42(5): 693-716.
27. Damanpour F, Evan WM. 1984. Organizational innovation and performance: the problem of 'organizational lag.' Administrative Science Quarterly 29(3): 392-409.
28. Delios A, Beamish PW. 1999. Ownership strategy of Japanese firms: transactional, institutional, and experience influences. Strategic Management Journal 20(10): 915-933.
29. Dess GG, Lumpkin GT, Covin JG. 1997. Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: tests of contingency and configurational models. Strategic Management Journal 18(9): 677-695.
30. Dess GG, Robinson RB, 1984. Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: the case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal 5(3): 265-273.
31. Diba A, Munoz L. 2001. America's most admired companies. Fortune 143(19 February): 64-66.
32. Drucker PF. 1993. Post-Capitalist Society. Harper-Collins: New York.
33. Evans P, Pucik V, Barsoux JL. 2002. The Global Challenge: Frameworks for International Human Resource Management. McGraw-Hill/Irwin: New York.
34. Farjoun M. 1998. The independent and joint effects of the skill and physical bases of relatedness in diversification. Strategic Management Journal 19(7): 611-630.
35. Fiol CM. 1996. Squeezing harder doesn't always work: continuing the search for consistency in innovation research. Academy of Management Review 21(4): 1012-1021.
36. Fombrun CJ, Shanley M, 1990. What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal 33(2): 233-258.
37. Fornell C, Johnson MD, Anderson EW, Cha J, Bryant BE. 1996. The American Customer Satisfaction Index: nature, purpose, and findings. Journal of Marketing 60(4): 7-18.
38. Fortune. 1999. America's most admired companies, 1 March. http://www.pathfinder.com/fortune/[ 18 April 1999].
39. Fortune. 2000. America's most admired companies, 24 February, http://www.pathfinder.com/fortune/mostadmired [11 March 2000].
40. Fortune. 2001. America's most admired companies. 19 February, http://www.pathfinder.com/fortune/mostadmired [20 February 2001].
41. Fryxell GE, Wang J. 1994. The Fortune Corporate 'Reputation' Index: reputation for what? Journal of Management 20(1): 1-14.
42. Garvin DA. 1988. Managing Quality: The Strategic and Competitive Edge. Free Press: New York.
43. Gopalakrishnan S, Damanpour F. 1997. A review of innovation research in economics, sociology and technology management. Omega 25(1): 15-28.
44. Grant RM. 1991. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review 33(3): 114-135.
45. Hall R. 1992. The strategic analysis of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal 13(2): 135-144.
46. Heskett JL, Jones TO, Loveman GW, Sasser WE, Schlesinger LA. 1994. Putting the service-profit chain to work. Harvard Business Review 72(2): 164-174.
47. Holmbeck GN. 1997. Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 65(4): 599-610.
48. Hoyle RH, Smith GT. 1994. Formulating clinical research hypotheses as structural equation models: a conceptual overview. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 62(3): 429-440.
49. Hu L-T, Bentler PM. 1998. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods 3(4): 424-453.
50. Ittner CD, Larcker DF. 1996. Measuring the impact of quality initiatives on firm financial performance. In Advances in the Management of Organizational Quality, Vol. l, Fedor DB, Ghosh S (eds). JAI Press: Greenwich, CT; 1-37.
51. James LR, Brett JM. 1984. Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology 69(2): 307-321.
52. Johansson JK, Yip GS. 1994. Exploiting globalization potential: U.S. and Japanese strategies. Strategic Management Journal 15(8): 579-601.
53. Jöreskog K, Sörborn D. 1996. LISREL 8: User's Reference Guide. Scientific Software International: Chicago, IL.
54. Keats BW, Hitt MA. 1988. A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance. Academy of Management Journal 31(3): 570-598.
55. Kim WC, Mauborgne R. 1997. Value innovation: the strategic logic of high growth. Harvard Business Review 75(1): 102-112.
56. Kleinschmidt EJ, Cooper RG. 1991. The impact of product innovativeness on performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management 8(4): 240-251.
57. Klem L. 2000. Structural equation modeling. In Reading and Understanding More Multivariate Statistics, Grimm LG, Yarnold PR (eds). American Psychological Association: Washington, DC; 227-259.
58. Lee DE, Tompkins JG. 1999. A modified version of the Lewellen and Badrinath measure of Tobin's q. Financial Management 28(1): 20-31.
59. MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM. 1996. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods 1(2): 130-149.
60. March JG. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2(1): 71-87.
61. Maruyama GM. 1998. Basics of Structural Equation Modeling. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
62. McGahan AM. 1999. Competition, strategy, and business performance. California Management Review 41(3): 74-101.
63. McGuire JB, Schneeweis T, Branch B. 1990. Perceptions of firm quality: a cause or result of firm performance. Journal of Management 16(1): 167-180.
64. Megna P, Klock M. 1993. The impact of intangible capital on Tobin's q in the semiconductor industry. American Economic Review 83(2): 265-269.
65. Miller WJ. 1996. A working definition for total quality management (TQM) researchers. Journal of Quality Management 1(2): 149-159.
66. Montgomery CA, Thomas AR, Kamath R. 1984. Divestiture, market valuation, and strategy. Academy of Management Journal 27(4): 830-840.
67. Nguyen TH, Seror A, Devinney TM. 1990. Diversification strategy and performance in Canadian manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal 11(5): 411-418.
68. Nohria N, Ghoshal S. 1994. Differentiated fit and shared values: alternatives for managing headquarters-subsidiary relations. Strategic Management Journal 15(6): 491-502.
69. Nonaka I. 1991. The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review 69(6): 96-104.
70. Penrose ET. 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Wiley: New York.
71. Peteraf MA. 1993. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal 14(3): 179-191.
72. Phillips LW, Chang DR, Buzzell RD. 1983. Product quality, cost position, and business performance: a test of some key hypotheses. Journal of Marketing 47(2): 26-43.
73. Powell TC. 1996. How much does industry matter? An alternative empirical test. Strategic Management Journal 17(4): 323-334.
74. Rucci AJ, Kim SP, Quinn RT. 1998. The employee-customer-profit chain at Sears. Harvard Business Review 76(1): 82-97.
75. Russell RS, Taylor BW. 1995. Production and Operations Management: Focusing on Quality and Competitiveness. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, CA.
76. Schoeffler S, Buzzell RD, Heany DF. 1974. Impact of strategic planning on profit performance. Harvard Business Review 52(2): 137-145.
77. Stone-Romero EF, Stone DL, Grewal D. 1997. Development of a multidimensional measure of perceived product quality. Journal of Quality Management 2(1): 87-111.
78. Subramanian A, Nilakanta S. 1996. Organizational innovativeness: exploring the relationship between organizational determinants of innovation, types of innovations, and measures of organizational performance. Omega 24(6): 631-647.
79. Switzer FSI, Roth PL, Switzer DM. 1998. Systematic data loss in HRM settings: a Monte Carlo analysis. Journal of Management 24(6): 763-779.
80. Szwajkowski E, Figlewicz RE. 1997. Of babies and bathwater. Business and Society 36(4): 362-386.
81. Szwajkowski E, Figlewicz RE. 1999. Evaluating corporate performance: a comparison of the Fortune reputation survey and the SOCRATES social rating database. Journal of Managerial Issues 11(2): 137-154.
82. Varaiya N, Kerin RA, Weeks D. 1987. The relationship between growth, profitability, and firm value. Strategic Management Journal 8(5): 487-497.
83. Wagner HM. 1984. Profit wonders, investment blunders. Harvard Business Review 62(5): 121-135.
84. Wernerfelt B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5(2): 171-180.
85. Wheaton B, Muthén B, Alwin D, Summers G. 1977. Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. In Sociological Methodology, Heise DR (ed). Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA; 84-136.
86. Wiersema MF, Liebeskind JP. 1995. The effects of leveraged buyouts on corporate growth and diversification in large firms. Strategic Management Journal 16(6): 447-460.
87. Wolfe RA. 1994. Organizational innovation: review, critique and suggested research directions. Journal of Management Studies 31(3): 405-431.
88. Woo CY, Willard GE, Daellenbach US. 1992. Spin-off performance: a case of overstated expectations? Strategic Management Journal 13(6): 433-447.
89. Zajac EJ, Kraatz MS, Bresser RKF. 2000. Modeling the dynamics of strategic fit: a normative approach to strategic change. Strategic Management Journal 21(4): 429-453.