An integrated approach for performance evaluation in sustainable supply chain networks (with a case study)

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 137, Issue , 2016, Pages 579-597

  Motevali Haghighi, S ^a,b   Torabi, S A ^a   Ghasemi, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

^b ESFARAYEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Balanced scorecard; Data envelopment analysis; Performance evaluation; Plastic recycling; Sustainable supply chain

Indexed keywords

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; MANAGERS; RECYCLING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

BALANCED SCORECARDS; GOLESTAN PROVINCES; INTEGRATED APPROACH; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; PLASTIC RECYCLING; QUANTITATIVE INDICATORS; SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS; SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAINS;

SUPPLY CHAINS;

EID: 84989925448     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.119     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Agrell, P.J., Hatami-Marbini, A., Frontier-based performance analysis models for supply chain management: state of the art and research directions. Comput. Ind. Eng. 66 (2013), 567–583.
2. Ahi, P., Searcy, C., A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 52 (2013), 329–341.
3. Aissaoui, N., Haouari, M., Hassini, E., Supplier selection and order allocation modeling: a review. Comput. Oper. Res. 34:12 (2007), 3516–3540.
4. An, H., Searcy, S.W., Economic and energy evaluation of a logistics system based on biomass modules. Biomass bioenergy 46 (2012), 190–202.
5. Bansia, M., Varkey, J.K., Agrawal, S., Development of a reverse logistics performance measurement system for a battery manufacturer. Procedia Mater. Sci. 6 (2014), 1419–1427.
6. Bhagwat, R., Sharma, M.K., Performance measurement of supply chain management: a balanced scorecard approach. Comput. Ind. Eng. 53:1 (2007), 43–62.
7. Biehl, M., Prater, E., Realff, M.J., Assessing performance and uncertainty in developing carpet reverse logistics systems. Comput. Oper. Res. 34 (2007), 443–463.
8. Boukherroub, T., Ruiz, A., Guinet, A., Fondrevelle, J., An integrated approach for sustainable supply chain planning. Comput. Oper. Res. 54 (2015), 180–194.
9. Carter, R.C., Rogers, D.S., A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 38:5 (2008), 360–387.
10. Chaabane, A., Ramudhin, A., Paquet, M., Design of sustainable supply chains under the emission trading scheme. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 135 (2012), 37–49.
11. Chalmeta, R., Palomero, S., Methodological proposal for business sustainability management by means of the balanced scorecard. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 62:7 (2011), 1344–1356.
12. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E., Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2 (1978), 429–444.
13. Chen, I.J., Paulraj, A., Understanding supply chain management: critical research and a theoretical framework. Int. J. Prod. Res. 42 (2004), 131–163.
14. Chia, A., Goh, M., Hum, S.H., Performance measurement in supply chain entities: balanced scorecard perspective. Benchmarking An Int. J. 16:5 (2009), 605–620.
15. Cho, D.W., Lee, Y.H., Ahn, S.H., Hwang, M.K., Framework for measuring the performance of service supply chain management. Comput. Ind. Eng. 62 (2012), 801–818.
16. Cooper, W.W., Park, K.S., Yu, G., IDEA and AR-IDEA: models for dealing with imprecise data in DEA. Manag. Sci. 45:4 (1999), 597–607.
17. Costantino, F., Gravio, G.D., Shaban, A., Tronci, M., The impact of information sharing and inventory control coordination on supply chain performances. Comput. Ind. Eng. 76 (2014), 292–306.
18. Daugherty, P.J., Richey, R.G., Genchev, S.E., Chen, H., Reverse logistics: superior performance through focused resource commitments to information technology. Transp. Res. Part E 41 (2005), 77–92.
19. Dias-Sardinha, I., Reijnders, L., Evaluating environmental and social performance of large Portuguese companies: a balanced scorecard approach. Bus. Strategy Environ. 14:2 (2005), 73–91.
20. Epstein, M.J., Roy, M.J., Using ISO 14000 for improved organizational learning and environmental management. Environ. Qual. Manag. 7:1 (1997), 21–30.
21. Epstein, M.J., Wisner, P.S., Using a balanced scorecard to implement sustainability. Environ. Qual. Manag. 11:2 (2001), 1–10.
22. Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., Wagner, M., The sustainability balanced scorecard–linking sustainability management to business strategy. Bus. strategy Environ. 11:5 (2002), 269–284.
23. Golany, B., An interactive MOLP procedure for the extension of DEA to effectiveness analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 39 (1988), 725–734.
24. Govindan, K., Soleimani, H., Kannan, D., Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: a comprehensive review to explore the future. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 240:3 (2015), 603–626.
25. Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., Tirtiroglu, E., Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain environment. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 21:1/2 (2001), 71–87.
26. Hart, S.L., Milstein, M.B., Creating sustainable value. Acad. Manag. Exec. 17:2 (2003), 56–67.
27. Hassini, E., Surti, C., Searcy, C., A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 140:1 (2012), 69–82.
28. Heikkilä, J., From supply to demand chain management: efficiency and customer satisfaction. J. Oper. Manag. 20:6 (2002), 747–767.
29. Hsu, Y.L., Liu, C.C., Environmental performance evaluation and strategy management using balanced scorecard. Environ. Monit. Assess. 170:1–4 (2010), 599–607.
30. Hu, A.H., Hsu, C.W., Critical factors for implementing green supply chain management practice: an empirical study of electrical and electronics industries in Taiwan. Manag. Res. Rev. 33:6 (2010), 586–608.
31. Kaplan, R., Noton, D., The Balanced Scorecard. 1996, HBS Press, Boston.
32. Kapłan, R.S., Norton, D.P., The balanced scorecard-measures that drive performance. Harv. Bus. Rev., 1(70), 1992.
33. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P., The Strategy-focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. 2001, Harvard Business Press.
34. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P., The office of strategy management. Strateg. Financ., 87(4), 2005, 8.
35. Kim, S.H., Park, C.G., Park, K.S., An application of data envelopment analysis in telephone offices evaluation with partial data. Comput. Oper. Res. 26:1 (1999), 59–72.
36. Lueg, R., Carvalho-e-Silva, A.L., When one size does not fit all: a literature review on the modifications of the balanced scorecard. Problems Perspect. Manag. 11:3 (2013), 61–69.
37. Lueg, R., Pedersen, M.M., Clemmensen, S.N., The role of corporate sustainability in a low-cost business model–a case study in the scandinavian fashion industry. Bus. Strategy Environ. 24:5 (2015), 344–359.
38. Manzini, R., Accorsi, R., The new conceptual framework for food supply chain assessment. J. Food Eng. 115 (2013), 251–263.
39. Norreklit, H., The balance on the balanced scorecard a critical analysis of some of its assumptions. Manag. Account. Res. 11:1 (2000), 65–88.
40. Olugu, E.U., Wong, K.Y., An expert fuzzy rule-based system for closed-loop supply chain performance assessment in the automotive industry. Expert Syst. Appl. 39 (2012), 375–384.
41. Olugu, E.U., Wong, K.Y., Shaharoun, A.M., Development of key performance measures for the automobile green supply chain. Resources. Conserv. Recycl. 55 (2011), 567–579.
42. Park, J.H., Lee, J.K., Yoo, J.S., A framework for designing the balanced supply chain scorecard. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 14:4 (2005), 335–346.
43. Ramos, T.R.P., Gomes, M.I., Barbosa-Póvoa, A.P., Planning a sustainable reverse logistics system: balancing costs with environmental and social concerns. Omega 48 (2014), 60–74.
44. Rao, P., Greening the supply chain: a new initiative in South East Asia. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 22:6 (2002), 632–655.
45. Rao, P., Holt, D., Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance?. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 25:9 (2005), 898–916.
46. Ravi, V., Shankar, Ravi, Tiwari, M.K., Analyzing alternatives in reverse logistics for end-of-life computers: ANP and balanced scorecard approach. Comput. Ind. Eng. 48 (2005), 327–356.
47. Saranga, H., Moser, R., Performance evaluation of purchasing and supply management using value chain DEA approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 207 (2010), 197–205.
48. Seiford, L.M., Zhu, J., Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 142 (2002), 16–20.
49. Shafiee, M., Lotfi, F.H., Saleh, H., Supply chain performance evaluation with data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard approach. Appl. Math. Model. 38:21–22 (2014), 5092–5112.
50. Shaik, M.N., Abdul-Kader, W., Comprehensive performance measurement and causal-effect decision making model for reverse logistics enterprise. Comput. Ind. Eng. 68 (2014), 87–103.
51. Sharma, M.K., Bhagwat, R., An integrated BSC-AHP approach for supply chain management evaluation. Meas. Bus. Excell. 11:3 (2007), 57–68.
52. Smeets, E.M.W., Lewandowski, I.M., Faaij, A.P.C., The economical and environmental performance of miscanthus and switchgrass production and supply chains in a European setting. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 13 (2009), 1230–1245.
53. Songini, L., Pistoni, A., Accounting, auditing and control for sustainability. Manag. Account. Res. 23:3 (2012), 202–204.
54. Spronk, J., Post, T., Performance benchmarking using interactive data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 115 (1999), 472–487.
55. Tajbakhsh, A., Hassini, E., A data envelopment analysis approach to evaluate sustainability in supply chain networks. J. Clean. Prod. 105 (2015), 74–86.
56. Tavana, M., Mirzagoltabar, H., Mirhedayatian, S.M., Farzipoor Saen, R., Azadi, M., A new network epsilon-based DEA model for supply chain performance evaluation. Comput. Ind. Eng. 66 (2013), 501–513.
57. Torabi, S.A., Baghersad, M., Mansouri, S.A., Resilient supplier selection and order allocation under operational and disruption risks. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 79 (2015), 22–48.
58. Trappey, A.J.C., Trappey, C.V., Wu, C.R., Genetic algorithm dynamic performance evaluation for RFID reverse logistic management. Expert Syst. Appl. 37 (2010), 7329–7335.
59. Tsai, W.H., Chou, W.C., Hsu, W., The sustainability balanced scorecard as a framework for selecting socially responsible investment: an effective MCDM model. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 60:10 (2009), 1396–1410.
60. Young, A., Kielkiewicz-Young, A., Sustainable supply network management. Corp. Environ. Strategy 8:3 (2001), 260–268.
61. Zhu, J., Imprecise data envelopment analysis (IDEA): a review and improvement with an application. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 144:3 (2003), 513–529.