Joint supplier selection and scheduling of customer orders under disruption risks: Single vs. dual sourcing

Omega (United Kingdom)

Volumn 43, Issue , 2014, Pages 83-95

  Sawik, Tadeusz ^a  

^a AGH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Disruption risks; Mixed integer programming; Single vs. dual sourcing; Stochastic scheduling; Supplier selection

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887148474     PISSN: 03050483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2013.06.007     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Fuller T. Floodwaters are gone, but supply chain issues linger. NY: The New York Times; January 21, 2012.
2. Park Y., Hong P., Roh J.J. Supply chain lessons from the catastrophic natural disaster in Japan. Business Horizon 2013, 56(1):75-85.
3. Chen Z.L., Vairaktarakis G.L. Integrated scheduling of production and distribution operations. Management Science 2005, 51(4):614-628.
4. Chen Z.L., Pundoor G. Order assignment and scheduling in a supply chain. Operations Research 2006, 54(3):555-572.
5. Pundoor G., Chen Z.L. Joint cyclic production and delivery scheduling in a two-stage supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics 2009, 119(1):55-74.
6. Lei L., Liu S., Ruszczynski A., Park S. On the integrated production, inventory and distribution routing problem. IIE Transactions 2006, 38(11):955-970.
7. Bard J.F., Nananukul N. The integrated production-inventory-distribution-routing problem. Journal of Scheduling 2009, 12(3):257-280.
8. Wang G., Lei L. Polynomial-time solvable cases of the capacitated multi-echelon shipping network scheduling problem with delivery deadlines. International Journal of Production Economics 2012, 137:263-271.
9. Liu S., Papageorgiou L.G. Multiobjective optimisation of production, distribution and capacity planning of global supply chains in the process industry. Omega. The International Journal of Management Science 2013, 41(2):369-382.
10. Sawik T. Monolithic versus hierarchical approach to integrated scheduling in a supply chain. International Journal of Production Research 2009, 47(21):5881-5910.
11. Sawik T. Scheduling in supply chains using mixed integer programming 2011, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
12. Arshinder, Kanda A, Deshmukh SG. Supply chain coordination: perspectives, empirical studies and research directions. International Journal of Production Economics 2008;115:316-35.
13. Li X., Wang Q. Coordination mechanisms of supply chain systems. European Journal of Operational Research 2007, 179:1-16.
14. Hezarkhani B., Kubiak W. Coordinating contracts in SCM. a review of methods and literature. Decision Making in Manufacturing and Services 2010, 4(1-2):5-28.
15. Berger P.D., Gerstenfeld A., Zeng A.Z. How many suppliers are best? A decision-analysis approach. Omega. The International Journal of Management Science 2004, 32(1):9-15.
16. Ruiz-Torres A.J., Mahmoodi F. The optimal number of suppliers considering the costs of individual supplier failures. Omega. The International Journal of Management Science 2007, 35(1):104-115.
17. Berger P.D., Zeng A.Z. Single versus multiple sourcing in the presence of risks. Journal of the Operational Research Society 2006, 57(3):250-261.
18. Yu H., Zeng A.Z., Zhao L. Single or dual sourcing. decision-making in the presence of supply chain disruption risks. Omega. The International Journal of Management Science 2009, 37:788-800.
19. Yue J., Xia Y., Tran T. Selecting sourcing partners for a make-to-order supply chain. Omega. The International Journal of Management Science 2010, 38:136-144.
20. Ravindran A.R., Bilsel R.U., Wadhwa V., Yang T. Risk adjusted multicriteria supplier selection models with applications. International Journal of Production Research 2012, 48(2):405-424.
21. Xanthopoulos A., Vlachos D., Iakovou E. Optimal newsvendor policies for dual-sourcing supply chains. a disruption risk management framework. Computers and Operations Research 2012, 39:350-357.
22. Sawik T. Selection of supply portfolio under disruption risks. Omega. The International Journal of Management Science 2011, 39:194-208.
23. Sawik T. Selection of resilient supply portfolio under disruption risks. Omega. The International Journal of Management Science 2013, 41(2):259-269.
24. Sarykalin S., Serraino G., Uryasev S. Value-at-risk vs. conditional value-at-risk in risk management and optimization. Tutorials in Operations Research, INFORMS 2008, 270-294.
25. Yao H., Li Z., Lai Y. Mean-CVaR portfolio selection. A nonparametric estimation framework. Computers and Operations Research 2013, 40:1014-1022.
26. Sawik T. A lexicographic approach to bi-objective scheduling of single-period orders in make-to-order manufacturing. European Journal of Operational Research 2007, 180(3):1060-1075.
27. Rockafellar R.T., Uryasev S. Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. The Journal of Risk 2000, 2(3):21-41.
28. Uryasev S. Conditional value-at-risk. optimization algorithms and applications. Financial Engineering News 2000, 14(2).
29. Chahar K., Taaffe K. Risk averse demand selection with all-or-nothing orders. Omega. The International Journal of Management Science 2009, 37(5):996-1006.
30. Sawik B. Bi-criteria portfolio optimization models with percentile and symmetric risk measures by mathematical programming. Przeglad Elektrotechniczny 2012, 88(10B):176-180.
31. Mansini R., Savelsbergh M.W.P., Tocchella B. The supplier selection problem with quantity discounts and truckload shipping. Omega. The International Journal of Management Science 2012, 40:445-455.