Game-based versus to non-game-based: The impact of student response systems on students'achievements, engagements and test anxieties

Informatics in Education

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 105-116

  Turan, Zeynep ^a   Meral, Elif ^a  

^a ATATÜRK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Achievement; Engagement; Game based student response system; Student response system; Test anxiety

Indexed keywords

EID: 85045566553     PISSN: 16485831     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.15388/infedu.2018.07     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Adesope, O.O., Nesbit, J.C. (2013). Learning with animated and static concept maps. Learning and Instruction, 27, 1-10.
2. Aljaloud, A., Gromik, N., Billingsley, W., Kwan, P. (2015). Research trends in student response systems: a literature review. International Journal of Learning Technology, 10(4), 313-325.
3. Annetta, L.A., Minogue, J., Holmes, S.Y., Cheng, M.T. (2009). Investigating the impact of video games on high school students' engagement and learning about genetics. Computers and Education, 53(1), 74-85.
4. Bergtrom, G. (2006). Clicker sets as learning objects. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 2, 105-110.
5. Bessler, W.C., Nisbet, J.J. (1971). The use of an electronic response system in teaching biology. Science Education, 55(3), 275-284.
6. Burns, R.A. (1985). Information impact and factors affecting recall. Paper presented at Annual National Conference on Teaching Excellence and Conference of Administrators, Austin, TX.
7. Boyle, E.A., Connolly, T.M., Hainey, T., Boyle, J.M. (2012). Engagement in digital entertainment games: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 771-780.
8. Caldwell, J.E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 9-20.
9. Cassady, J.C., Johnson, R.E. (2002). Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 270-295.
10. Chang, K.E., Wu, L.J., Weng, S.E., Sung, Y.T. (2012). Embedding game-based problem-solving phase into problem-posing system for mathematics learning. Computers & Education, 58(2), 775-786.
11. Coca, D.M., Slisko, J. (2013). Software socrative and smartphones as tools for implementation of basic processes of active physics learning in classroom: an initial feasibility study with prospective teachers. European Journal of Physics Education, 4(2), 17-24.
12. Duncan, D. (2005). Clickers in the Classroom: How to Enhance Science Teaching Using Classroom Response Systems. New York: Addison Wesley and Benjamin Cummings.
13. Eren, A. (2013). Prospective teachers' perceptions of instrumentality, boredom coping strategies, & four aspects of engagement. Teaching Education, 24(3), 302-326.
14. Falaye, B.A. (2010). Cognitive test anxiety and learning outcomes of selected undergraduate students. The African Symposium. 10(2), 69-74.
15. Fies, C., Marshall, J. (2006). Classroom response systems: a review of the literatüre. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 100-109.
16. Habel, C., Stubbs, M. (2014). Mobile phone voting for participation and engagement in a large compulsory law course. Research in Learning Technology, 22, 1-15.
17. Hunsu, N.J., Adesope, O., Bayly, D.J. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of audience response systems (clicker-based technologies) on cognition and affect. Computers & Education, 94, 102-119.
18. Jennett, C., Cox, A.L., Cairns, P., Dhoparaee, S., Epps, A., Tijs, T., Walton, A. (2008). Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66, 641-661.
19. Johnson, K., Lillis, C. (2010). Clickers in the laboratory: student thoughts and views. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge and Management, 5, 139-151.
20. Jones, S., Henderson, D., Sealover, P. (2009). "Clickers" in the classroom. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 4(1), 2-5.
21. Judson, E., Sawada, D. (2002). Learning from past and present: electronic response systems in college lecture halls. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21(2), 167-181.
22. Kocadere, S.A., Çağlar, S. (2015). The design and implementation of a gamified assessment. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 11(3), 85-99.
23. Kortemeyer, G. (2016). The psychometric properties of classroom response system data: a case study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 561-574.
24. Mavridis, A. Tsiatsos, T. (2016). Game-based assessment: investigating the impact on test anxiety and exam performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12170
25. McMillan, J.H., Schumacher, S. (2014). Research in Education: Evidence-Based Inquiry (7th Edition). London: Pearson.
26. Morling, B., McAuliffe, M., Cohen, L., DiLorenzo, T.M. (2008). Efficacy of personal response systems ("clickers") in large, introductory psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology, 35, 45-50.
27. Mula, J.M., Kavanagh, M. (2009). Click go the students, click-click-click: the efficacy of a student response system for engaging students to improve feedback and performance. E-Journal of Business Education and Scholarship of Teaching, 3(1), 1-17.
28. Oblinger, D. (2004). The next generation of educational engagement. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 8, 1-18.
29. Pettit, R.K., McCoy, L., Kinney, M., Schwartz, F.N. (2015). Student perceptions of gamified audience response system interactions in large group lectures and via lecture capture technology. BMC Medical Education, 15(1), 92.
30. Poirier, C.R., Feldman, S.R. (2007). Promoting active learning using individual response technology in large introductory psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology, 34(3), 194-196.
31. Reeve, J., Tseng, C.-M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students' engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 257-267.
32. Richardson, A.M., Dunn, P.K., McDonald, C., Oprescu, F. (2015). Crisp: an instrument for assessing student perceptions of classroom response systems. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(4), 432-447.
33. Roedriger, H.L., Karpicke, J.D. (2006). The power of testing memory: basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 1(3), 181-210.
34. Sarason, I.G. (1978). The test anxiety scale: concept and research. In: C.D. Spielberger I.G. Sarason (Eds.), Stress and Anxiety (Vol. 5). Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere Publishing Corp, 193-216.
35. Schüler, J. (2007). Arousal of flow-experience in a learning setting and its effects on exam-performance and affect. Zeitschrift für Padagogische Psychologie, 21, 217-227.
36. Schwabe, G., Göth, C. (2005). Mobile learning with a mobile game: design and motivational effects. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(3), 204-216.
37. Simpson, V., Oliver, M. (2007). Electronic voting systems for lectures then and now: a comparison of research and practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(2), 187-208.
38. Smits, J., Charlier, N. (2011). Game-based assessment and the effect on test anxiety: a case study. In European Conference on Game Based Learning (p.562). Academic Conferences International Limited.
39. Song, D., Oh, E.Y., Glazewski, K. (2017). Student-generated questioning activity in second language courses using a customized personal response system: a case study. Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9520-7.
40. Spielberger, C.D. (1980). Preliminary Professional Manual for the Test Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
41. Wang, A.I. (2015). The wear out effect of a game-based student response system. Computers & Education, 82, 217-227.
42. Wang, T.H. (2008). Web-based quiz-game-like formative assessment: development and evaluation. Computers & Education, 51, 1247-1263.