Animated and static concept maps enhance learning from spoken narration

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 27, Issue , 2013, Pages 1-10

  Adesope, Olusola O ^a   Nesbit, John C ^b  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Animation; Audio; Concept map; Multimedia; Narration

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877318486     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Adesope O.O., Nesbit J.C. A systematic review of research on collaborative learning with concept maps. Handbook of research on collaborative learning using concept mapping 2009, 238-255. IGI Global, Hershey, PA. P.L. Torres, R.C.V. Marriott (Eds.).
2. Adesope O.O., Nesbit J.C. Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning environments: a meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology 2012, 104:250-263.
3. Amadieu F., van Gog T., Paas F., Tricot A., Mariné C. Effects of prior knowledge and concept-map structure on disorientation, cognitive load, and learning. Learning and Instruction 2009, 19:376-386. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.005.
4. A taxonomy for learning teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives 2001, Addison, Wesley, Longman, New York. L.W. Anderson, D.R. Krathwohl (Eds.).
5. Bahr G.S., Dansereau D.F. Bilingual knowledge maps (BiK-Maps) in second-language vocabulary learning. Journal of Experimental Education 2001, 70:5-24. 10.1080/00220970109599496.
6. Bahr G.S., Dansereau D.F. Bilingual knowledge maps (BiK-Maps) as a presentation format: delayed recall and training effects. Journal of Experimental Education 2005, 73:101-118. 10.3200/JEXE.73.2.101-118.
7. Bétrancourt M. The animation and interactivity principles in multimedia learning. Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning 2005, 287-296. Cambridge University Press, New York. 10.1017/CBO9780511816819.019. R.E. Mayer (Ed.).
8. Bétrancourt M., Tversky B. Effect of computer animation on users' performance: a review. Le Travail Humain 2000, 63:311-330.
9. Blankenship J., Dansereau D.F. The effect of animated node-link displays on information recall. Journal of Experimental Education 2000, 68:293-308. 10.1080/00220970009600640.
10. Cañas A.J., Coffey J.W., Carnot M.J., Feltovich P., Hoffman R.R., Feltovich J., et al. A summary of literature pertaining to the use of concept mapping techniques and technologies for education and performance support 2003, Report from the Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.
11. Chang K., Sung Y., Chen I. The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. Journal of Experimental Education 2002, 71:5-23. 10.1080/00220970209602054.
12. Czerniak C.M., Haney J.J. The effect of collaborative concept mapping on elementary preservice teachers' anxiety, efficacy, and achievement in physical science. Journal of Science Teacher Education 1998, 9:303-320. 10.1023/A:1009431400397.
13. Dansereau D.F., Dees S.M., Simpson D.D. Cognitive modularity: implications for counseling and the representation of personal issues. The Journal of Counseling Psychology 1994, 41:513-523. 10.1037//0022-0167.41.4.513.
14. van Gerven P.W.M., Paas F., Van Merriënboer J.J.G., Schmidt H. Memory load and the cognitive pupillary response in aging. Psychophysiology 2004, 41:167-174. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2003.00148.x.
15. van Gog T., Scheiter K. Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction 2010, 20:95-99. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.009.
16. Hall R.H., Dansereau D.F., Skaggs L.P. Knowledge maps and the presentation of related information domains. Journal of Experimental Education 1992, 61:5-18. 10.1080/00220973.1992.9943845.
17. Haugwitz M., Nesbit J., Sandmann A. Cognitive ability and the instructional efficacy of collaborative concept mapping. Learning and Individual Differences 2010, 20:536-543. 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.04.004.
18. Hegarty M. Eye fixations and diagrammatic reasoning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2006, 4045:13-15. 10.1007/11783183_3.
19. Henderson J.M. Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7:498-504. 10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.006.
20. Höffler T.N., Leutner D. Instructional animation versus static pictures: a meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction 2007, 17:722-738. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.013.
21. Holley C., Dansereau D. Spatial learning strategies 1984, Academic Press, New York.
22. Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 1979, 6:65-70.
23. Jang J., Schunn C.D., Nokes T.J. Spatially distributed instructions improve learning outcomes and efficiency. Journal of Educational Psychology 2011, 103:60-72. 10.1037/a0021994.
24. Johnson C.I., Mayer R.E. A testing effect with multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 2009, 101:621-629. 10.1037/a0015183.
25. Korner C. Sequential processing in comprehension of hierarchical graphs. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2004, 18:467-480. 10.1002/acp.997.
26. Lambiotte J.G., Dansereau D.F. Effects of knowledge maps and prior knowledge on recall of science lecture content. Journal of Experimental Education 1992, 60:189-201. 10.1080/00220973.1992.9943875.
27. Lambiotte J.G., Skaggs L.P., Dansereau D.F. Learning from lectures: effects of knowledge maps and cooperative review strategies. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1993, 7:483-497. 10.1002/acp.2350070604.
28. Low R., Sweller J. The modality principle in multimedia learning. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning 2005, 147-158. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. 10.1017/CBO9780511816819.010. R.E. Mayer (Ed.).
29. Lowe R.K., Boucheix J. Cueing complex animations: does direction of attention foster learning processes?. Learning and Instruction 2011, 21:650-663. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.02.002.
30. Lowe R.K., Schnotz W. Learning with animation: Research and design implications 2008, Cambridge University Press, New York.
31. Mayer R.E. Multimedia learning 2009, Cambridge University Press, New York. 2nd ed, 10.1017/CBO9780511811678.
32. Mayer R.E., Hegarty M., Mayer S., Campbell J. When static media promote active learning: annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2005, 11:256-265. 10.1037/1076-898X.11.4.256.
33. Meyer K., Rasch T., Schnotz W. Effects of animation's speed of presentation on perceptual processing and learning. Learning and Instruction 2010, 20:136-145. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.016.
34. Nesbit J.C., Adesope O.O. Learning with concept and knowledge maps: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 2006, 76:413-448.
35. Nesbit J.C., Adesope O.O. Learning from animated concept maps with concurrent audio narration. Journal of Experimental Education 2011, 79:209-230.
36. Nesbit J.C., Adesope O.O. Animated and static concept maps. Learning through visual displays 2013, 303-328. Information Age, Greenwich, CT. G. Schraw, M. McCrudden, D. Robinson (Eds.).
37. Nesbit J., Larios H., Adesope O. How students read concept maps: a study of eye movements. Proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications 2007, 2007:3961-3970.
38. Newbern D., Dansereau D.F., Dees S.M. Node-link mapping in substance abuse: probationers' ratings of group counseling. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 1997, 25:83-95. 10.1300/J076v25n01_05.
39. Newbern D., Dansereau D.F., Patterson M.E. Spatial-semantic display processing: the role of spatial structure on recall. Contemporary Educational Psychology 1997, 22:319-337. 10.1006/ceps.1997.0936.
40. Novak J.D. Meaningful learning: the essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners. Science Education 2002, 86:548-571. 10.1002/sce.10032.
41. O'Donnell A.M. Searching for information in knowledge maps and text. Contemporary Educational Psychology 1993, 18:222-239. 10.1006/ceps.1993.1018.
42. Okebukola P.A. Concept mapping with a cooperative learning flavor. American Biology Teacher 1992, 54:218-221. 10.1080/0013188920340304.
43. Okebukola P.A., Jegede O.J. Cognitive preference and learning-mode as determinants of meaningful learning through concept mapping. Science Education 1988, 72:489-500. 10.1002/sce.3730720408.
44. O'Donnell A.M., Dansereau D.F., Hall R.H. Knowledge maps as scaffolds for cognitive processing. Educational Psychology Review 2002, 14:71-86. 10.1023/A:1013132527007.
45. Pelz J.B., Canosa R. Oculomotor behavior and perceptual strategies in complex tasks. Vision Research 2001, 41:3587-3596. 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00245-0.
46. Perry N.E., Winne P.H. Learning from learning kits: gStudy traces of students' self-regulated engagements using software. Educational Psychology Review 2006, 18:211-228. 10.1007/s10648-006-9014-3.
47. Ploetzner R., Lowe R. A systematic characterization of expository animations. Computers in Human Behavior 2012, 28:781-794. 10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.001.
48. Potelle H., Rouet J. Effect of content representation and readers' prior knowledge on the comprehension of hypertext. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2003, 58:327-345. 10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00016-8.
49. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 1998, 124:372-422. 10.1037//0033-2909.124.3.372.
50. Redford J.S., Thiede K.W., Wiley J., Griffin T.D. Concept mapping improves metacomprehension accuracy among 7th graders. Learning and Instruction 2012, 22:262-270. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.007.
51. Rewey K.L., Dansereau D.F., Peel J.L. Knowledge maps and information processing strategies. Contemporary Educational Psychology 1991, 16:203-214. 10.1016/0361-476X(91)90021-C.
52. Rewey K.L., Dansereau D.F., Skaggs L.P., Hall R., Pitre U. Effects of scripted cooperation and knowledge maps on the processing of technical material. Journal of Educational Psychology 1989, 81:604-609. 10.1037/0022-0663.81.4.604.
53. Rudmann D.S., McConkie G.W., Zheng X.S. Eyetracking in cognitive state detection for HCI. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on multimodal interfaces 2003 2003, 159-163. ACM Press, New York. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/958432.958464.
54. Salvucci D.D. An interactive model-based environment for eye-movement protocol analysis and visualization. Proceedings of the eye tracking research and applications symposium 2000, ACM Press, New York.
55. Tabachnick B.G., Fidell L.S. Using multivariate statistics 2006, Allyn & Bacon, Boston. 5th ed.
56. Tversky B., Morrison J.B., Betrancourt M. Animation: can it facilitate?. International Journal of Human-computer Studies 2002, 57:247-262. 10.1006/ijhc.2002.1017.
57. Underwood G., Jebbett L., Roberts K. Inspecting pictures for information to verify a sentence: eye movements in general encoding and in focused search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2004, 57:165-182. 10.1080/02724980343000189.
58. Winne P.H., Nesbit J.C., Kumar V., Hadwin A.F., Lajoie S.P., Azevedo R.A., et al. Supporting self-regulated learning with gStudy software: the Learning Kit Project. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning 2006, 3:105-113.