Clickers in the laboratory: Student thoughts and views

Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management

Volumn 5, Issue , 2010, Pages 139-151

  Johnson, Kevin ^a   Lillis, Catherine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIMERICK   (Ireland)

Author keywords

And learning; Audience; Response; System; Technology

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; TECHNOLOGY;

AND LEARNING; AUDIENCE; AUDIENCE RESPONSE SYSTEMS; LABORATORY SESSIONS; NURSING EDUCATION; RESPONSE; STUDENT ENGAGEMENT; SYSTEM;

STUDENTS;

EID: 79954481980     PISSN: 15551229     EISSN: 15551237     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.28945/1133     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Barber, M., & Njus, D. (2007). Clicker evolution: Seeking intelligent design. CBE Life Science Education, 6, 1-20.
2. Barell, J. (2003). Developing more curious minds. Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
3. d'Inverno, R. A., Davis, H. C., & White, S. (2003). Using a personal response system for promoting student interaction. Teaching Mathematics Applications, 22(4), 163-169. (Pubitemid 38143260)
4. Fies, C., & Marshall, C. (2006). Classroom response systems: A review of the literature. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 101-109. (Pubitemid 44757013)
5. Fink, L. D. (2005). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(6), 819-819.
6. Fitch, J. (2004). Student feedback in the college classroom: A technology solution. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(1), 71-77.
7. Hatch, J., Jensen, M., & Moore, R. (2005). Manna from heaven or "clickers" from hell: Experiences with an electronic response system. Journal of College Science Teaching, 34(7), 36-42.
8. Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York: Vintage Books.
9. Johnson, D., & McLeod, S. (2005). Get answers: Using student response systems to see students' thinking. Learning and Leading with Technology, 32(4), 18-23.
10. Kennedy, G., & Cutts, Q. (2005). The association between students' use of an electronic voting system and their learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(4), 260-268. (Pubitemid 41053300)
11. Lowery, R. (2006). Clickers in the classroom: A comparison of interactive student-response keypad systems. Paper presented at the The National Technology and Social Science Conference.
12. Medina, M. S., Medina, P. J., Wanzer, D. S., Wilson, J. E., Er, N., & Britton, M. L. (2008). Use of an audience response system (ARS) in a dual-campus classroom environment. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72 (Article 38).
13. Moredich, C., & Moore, E. (2007). Engaging students through the use of classroom response systems. Nurse Educator, 32(3), 113-116.
14. Nicol, D. J., & Boyle, J. T. (2003). Peer instruction versus class-wide discussion in large classes: A comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom. Studies in Higher Education, 28(4), 457-473. (Pubitemid 37291695)
15. Poulis, J., Massen, C., Robens, E., & Gilbert, M. (1998). Physics lecturing with audience paced feedback. American Journal of Physics, 66(5), 439-441.
16. Ribbens, E. (2007). Why I like personal response systems. Journal of College Science Teaching, 37(2), 60-62.
17. Richardson, K., & Trudeau, K. J. (2003). A case for problem-based collaborative learning in the nursing classroom. Nurse Educator, 28(2), 83-88.
18. Risquez, A. (2006). Exploration of faculty perceptions of a new learning management system (Sakai) in an Irish university. Paper presented at the EdTech2006, Seventh Annual Irish Educational Technology Users' Conference, Sligo, Ireland, 25-26 May.
19. Roberts, G. (2005). Technology and learning expectations of the net generation. In D. G. Oblinger & J. L. E. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the net generation (pp. 3.1-3.7). EDUCAUSE.
20. Roschelle, J., Penuel, W. R., & Abrahamson, L. A. (2004). The networked classroom. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 50-54. (Pubitemid 38284402)
21. Simpson, V., & Oliver, M. (2007). Electronic voting system for lectures then and now: A comparison of research and practice. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(2), 187-208.
22. Skiba, D., & Barton, A. (2006). Adapting your teaching to accommodate the net generation of learners. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 11(2), 15. Retrieved from http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/Tableof Contents/Volume112006/No2May06/tpc30- 416076.aspx
23. Stein, P., Challman, S. D., & Brueckner, J. K. (2006). Using audience response technology for pretest reviews in an undergraduate nursing course. Journal of Nursing Education, 45(11), 469-473. (Pubitemid 44785499)
24. Trapskin, P. J., Smith, K. M., Armitstead, J. A., & Davis, G. A. (2006). Use of an audience response system to introduce an anticoagulation guide to physicians, pharmacists, and pharmacy students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 69 (Article 28).
25. Trotter, A. (2005). Technology turns test-prep into clicking experience. Education Week, 24(36), 8-9.
26. Weimer, M. (2002). Learner centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.