Experimental design for single-cell RNA sequencing

Briefings in Functional Genomics

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 233-239

  Baran Gale, Jeanette ^a   Chandra, Tamir ^b   Kirschner, Kristina ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

10x Chromium; Drop Seq; Experimental design; Single cell RNA sequencing; Smart Seq 2

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; HUMAN CELL; RNA SEQUENCE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; MICROFLUIDIC ANALYSIS; PROCEDURES; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS;

GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; MICROFLUIDIC ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, RNA; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS;

EID: 85043529587     PISSN: 20412649     EISSN: 20412657     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/elx035     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Grover A, Sanjuan-Pla A, Thongjuea S, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals molecular and functional platelet bias of aged haematopoietic stem cells. Nat Commun 2016;7:11075.
2. Kirschner K, Chandra T, Kiselev V, et al. Proliferation drives aging-related functional decline in a subpopulation of the hem-atopoietic stem cell compartment. Cell Rep 2017;19(8):1503-11.
3. Pollen AA, Nowakowski TJ, Shuga J, et al. Low-coverage single-cell mRNA sequencing reveals cellular heterogeneity and activated signaling pathways in developing cerebral cortex. Nat Biotech 2014;32(10):1053-8.
4. Halpern KB, Shenhav R, Matcovitch-Natan O, et al. Single-cell spatial reconstruction reveals global division of labour in the mammalian liver. Nature 2017;542(7641):352-6.
5. Picelli S, Faridani OR, Björklund ÅK, et al. Full-length RNA-seq from single cells using Smart-seq2. Nat Protoc 2014;9(1):171-81.
6. Cao J, Packer JS, Ramani V, et al. Comprehensive single-cell transcriptional profiling of a multicellular organism. Science 2017;357(6352):661-7.
7. Klein AM, Mazutis L, Akartuna I, et al. Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells. Cell 2015;161(5):1187-201.
8. Macosko EZ, Basu A, Satija R, et al. Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell 2015;161(5):1202-14.
9. Alles J, Karaiskos N, Praktiknjo SD, et al. Cell fixation and preservation for droplet-based single-cell transcriptomics. BMC Biol 2017;15(1):44.
10. Villani AC, Satija R, Reynolds G, et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals new types of human blood dendritic cells, monocytes, and progenitors. Science 2017;356(6335).
11. Bacher R, Kendziorski C. Design and computational analysis of single-cell RNA-sequencing experiments. Genome Biol 2016; 17(1):63.
12. Stegle O, Teichmann SA, Marioni JC. Computational and analytical challenges in single-cell transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet 2015;16(3):133-45.
13. Lun ATL, Calero-Nieto FJ, Haim-Vilmovsky L, et al. Assessing the reliability of spike-in normalization for analyses of single-cell RNA sequencing data. bioRxiv 2017.
14. Islam S, Zeisel A, Joost S, et al. Quantitative single-cell RNA-seq with unique molecular identifiers. Nat Methods 2014;11(2):163-6.
15. Tung PY, Blischak JD, Hsiao CJ, et al. Batch effects and the effective design of single-cell gene expression studies. Sci Rep 2017;7:39921.
16. Auer PL, Doerge RW. Statistical design and analysis of RNA-seq data. Genetics 2010;185(2):405-16.
17. Churchill GA. Fundamentals of experimental design for cDNA microarrays. Nat Genet 2002;32:490-5.
18. Kerr MK, Churchill GA. Experimental design for gene expression microarrays. Biostatistics 2001;2(2):183-201.
19. Hicks SC, Teng M, Irizarry RA. On the widespread and critical impact of systematic bias and batch effects in single-cell RNA-Seq data. bioRxiv 2015.
20. Lee ML, Kuo FC, Whitmore GA, et al. Importance of replication in microarray gene expression studies: statistical methods and evidence from repetitive cDNA hybridizations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97(18):9834-9.
21. Leek JT, Scharpf RB, Bravo HC, et al. Tackling the widespread and critical impact of batch effects in high-throughput data. Nat Rev Genet 2010;11(10):733-9.
22. Dyrskjøt L, Kruhøffer M, Thykjaer T, et al. Gene expression in the urinary bladder: a common carcinoma in situ gene expression signature exists disregarding histopathological classification. Cancer Res 2004;64(11):4040-8.
23. Kumar RM, Cahan P, Shalek AK, et al. Deconstructing transcriptional heterogeneity in pluripotent stem cells. Nature 2014;516(7529):56-61.
24. Lin S, Lin Y, Nery JR, et al. Comparison of the transcriptional landscapes between human and mouse tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014;111(48):17224-9.
25. Patel AP, Tirosh I, Trombetta JJ, et al. Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblast-oma. Science 2014;344(6190):1396-401.
26. Gilad Y, Mizrahi-Man O. A reanalysis of mouse ENCODE comparative gene expression data. F1000Res 2015;4:121.
27. Zilliox MJ, Irizarry RA. A gene expression barcode for microarray data. Nat Methods 2007;4(11):911-13.
28. Haghverdi L, Lun ATL, Morgan MD, et al. Correcting batch effects in single-cell RNA sequencing data by matching mutual nearest neighbours. bioRxiv 2017.
29. Svensson V, Natarajan KN, Ly LH, et al. Power analysis of single-cell RNA-sequencing experiments. Nat Meth 2017;14(4):381-7.