Final reading outcomes of the national randomized field trial of success for all

American Educational Research Journal

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 701-731

  Borman, Geoffrey D ^a   Slavin, Robert E ^b   Cheung, Alan C K ^c   Chamberlain, Anne M ^d,e   Madden, Nancy A ^b,e   Chambers, Bette ^b,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c THE EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^d Success for All Foundation

^e Success for All Foundation   (United States)

Author keywords

Educational policy; Experimental design; School reform; Success for All

Indexed keywords

EID: 37649024424     PISSN: 00028312     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0002831207306743     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Adams, MJ (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Bidwell, CE (2001). Analyzing schools as organizations: Long-term permanence and short-term change. Sociology of Education, 74, 100-114.
3. Bloom, HS (Ed.) (2005). Learning more from social experiments: Evolving analytic approaches. New York: Russell Sage.
4. Bloom, HS, JM Bos, and SW Lee (1999). Using cluster random assignment to measure program impacts: Statistical implications for the evaluation of education programs. Evaluation Review, 23, 445-469.
5. Bodilly, SJ (1996). Lessons from New American Schools Development Corporations demonstration phase. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
6. Bodilly, SJ (1998). Lessons from New American Schools scale-up phase: Prospects for bringing designs to multiple schools. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
7. Borman, GD, and JV DAgostino (1996). Title I and student achievement: A meta-analysis of federal evaluation results. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18, 309-326.
8. Borman, GD, and GM Hewes (2002). Long-term effects and cost effectiveness of Success for All. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 243-266.
9. Borman, GD, GM Hewes, LT Overman, and S Brown (2003). Comprehensive school reform and achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 73, 125-230.
10. Borman, GD, RE Slavin, A Cheung, AM Chamberlain, NA Madden, and B Chambers (2005a). Success for All: First-year results from the national randomized field trial. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27, 1-22.
11. Borman, GD, RE Slavin, A Cheung, AM Chamberlain, NA Madden, and B Chambers (2005b). The national randomized field trial of Success for All: Second-year outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 673-696.
12. Campbell, FA, and CT Ramey (1994). Effects of early intervention on intellectual and academic achievement: A follow-up study of children from low-income families. Child Development, 65, 684-698.
13. Chambers, B, A Cheung, N Madden, RE Slavin, and R Gifford (2006). Achievement effects of embedded multimedia in a Success for All reading program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 232-237.
14. Chambers, B, RE Slavin, NA Madden, PC Abrami, BJ Tucker, and A Cheung (April, 2006). Technology infusion in Success for All: Reading outcomes for first graders, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
15. Cohen, J (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Comprehensive School Reform Quality Center (2005). CSRQ Center report on elementary school comprehensive school reform models. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
17. Cook, TD, and DT Campbell (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
18. Cooper, H (1981). On the effects of significance and the significance of effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 1013-1018.
19. Cuban, L (1992). What happens to reforms that last? The case of the junior high school. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 227-251.
20. Cunningham, AE, and KE Stanovich (1998). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33, 934-945.
21. Datnow, A, and M Castellano (2000). Teachers responses to Success for All: How beliefs, experiences, and adaptations shape implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 775-799.
22. Datnow, A, and S Stringfield (2000). Working together for reliable school reform. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 5, 183-204.
23. Donner, A, and N Klar (2000). Design and analysis of group randomization trials in health research. London: Arnold.
24. Ehri, L, S Nunes, S Stahl, and D Willows (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panels meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393-447.
25. Ehri, L, S Nunes, D Willows, B Schuster, Z Yaghoub-Zadeh, and T Shanahan (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panels meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250-287.
26. Ensminger, ME, and AL Slusarcick (1992). Paths to high school graduation or dropout: A longitudinal study of a first-grade cohort. Sociology of Education, 65, 95-113.
27. a(1989). Early schooling as a critical period phenomenon. In Namboodiri, K and RG Corwin (Eds.), Sociology of education and socialization (pp. 27-55). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
28. a(1999). Early schooling and social stratification. In Pianta, RC and MJ Cox (Eds.), The transition to kindergarten (pp. 13-38). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
29. Evertson, CM, ET Emmer, and ME Worsham (2000). Classroom management for elementary teachers, 5. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
30. Fullan, M (2001). The new meaning of educational change, 3. New York: Teachers College Press.
31. a(2000). The organizational context of teaching and learning: Changing theoretical perspectives. In Hallinan, MT (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of education (pp. 37-63). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
32. Garnier, H, J Stein, and J Jacobs (1997). The process of dropping out of high school: A 19-year perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 395-419.
33. Glazerman, S, DM Levy, and D Myers (2002). Nonexperimental replications of social experiments: A systematic review. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
34. Hargreaves, A, and D Fink (2000). Three dimensions of educational reform. Educational Leadership, 57 (7). 30-34.
35. Hedges, LV, and S Konstantopoulos (April, 2002). How large an effect should we expect from school reform programs?, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
36. Hoover, WA, and PB Gough (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 127-160.
37. Husen, T (1969). Talent, opportunity, and career. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
38. Johnson, DW, and RT Johnson (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
39. Kerckoff, AC (1993). Diverging pathways: Social structure and career deflections. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Kirst, M, and G Meister (1985). Turbulence in American secondary schools. What reforms last? Curriculum Inquiry, 15, 169-186.
41. Kraus, PE (1973). Yesterdays children. New York: John Wiley.
42. Levin, HM (2002). The cost effectiveness of whole school reforms (ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education, Urban Diversity Series 114). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
43. Little, RJA, and DB Rubin (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: John Wiley.
44. Lloyd, DN (1978). Prediction of school failure from third-grade data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 1193-1200.
45. Mosteller, F and R Boruch (Eds.) (2002). Evidence matters: Randomized trials in educational research. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
46. Muncey, DE, and PJ McQuillan (1996). Reform and resistance in schools and classrooms: An ethnographic view of the Coalition of Essential Schools. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
47. Murray, DM (1998). Design and analysis of group-randomized trials. New York: Oxford University Press.
48. National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
49. Nunnery, J (1998). Reform ideology and the locus of development problem in educational restructuring: Enduring lessons from studies of educational innovation. Education and Urban Society, 30, 277-295.
50. Nye, B, LV Hedges, and S Konstantopoulos (1999). The long-term effects of small classes: A five-year follow-up of the Tennessee class size experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 127-142.
51. Odden, A, and S Archibald (2000). Reallocating resources: How to boost student achievement without asking for more. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
52. Pressley, M, and V Woloshyn (1995). Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves childrens academic performance, 2. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
53. Raudenbush, SW (1997). Statistical analysis and optimal design for cluster randomized trials. Psychological Methods, 2, 173-185.
54. a(1990). Commitment and control: Alternative strategies for the organizational design of schools. In Cazden, CB (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 353-389). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
55. Rubin, DB (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63, 581-592.
56. Schweinhart, LJ, J Montie, Z Xiang, WS Barnett, CR Belfield, and M Nores (2005). Lifetime effects: The High/Scope Perry Preschool study through age 40 (Monographs of the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation, 14). Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.
57. Shavelson, RJ and L Towne (Eds.) (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
58. Siegel, LS (1993). The development of reading. Advances in Child Development and Behaviour, 24, 63-97.
59. Slavin, RE (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice, 2. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
60. Slavin, RE (2003). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31 (7). 15-21.
61. Slavin, RE (2004). Built to last: Long term maintenance of Success for All. Remedial and Special Education, 25 (1). 61-67.
62. Slavin, RE and NA Madden (Eds.) (2001). One million children: Success for All. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
63. Slavin, RE, NA Madden, LJ Dolan, BA Wasik, SM Ross, and LM Smith (1994). Whenever and wherever we choose: The replication of Success for All. Phi Delta Kappan, 75, 639-647.
64. Tyack, D, and L Cuban (1995). Tinkering toward utopia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
65. US Department of Education (2005). The nations report card; Reading 2005 (NCES 2006451). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
66. Weick, KE (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1-19.
67. a(2001). Emergent literacy: Development from pre-readers to readers. In Neuman, SB and DK Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 11-29). New York: Guilford.
68. Wood, FB, and RH Felton (1994). Separate linguistic and attentional factors in the development of reading. Topics in Language Disorders, 14 (4). 42-57.