Use of an instructional management system to enhance math instruction of gifted and talented students

Journal for the Education of the Gifted

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 293-310

  Ysseldyke, Jim ^a   Tardrew, Steve ^b   Betts, Joe ^a   Thill, Teri ^b   Hannigan, Eileen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b Renaissance Learning   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 13544269528     PISSN: 01623532     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4219/jeg-2004-319     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Algozzine, B., & Ysseldyke, J. (1992). Strategies and tactics for effective instruction. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
2. Archambault, F., Westberg, K., Brown, S., Hallmark, B., Zhang, W., & Emmons, C. (1993). Classroom practices used with gifted third and fourth grade students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16(2), 13-28.
3. Beaton, A., Mullis, I., Martin, M., Gonzalez, E., Kelly, D., & Smith, T. (1996). Mathematics achievement in the middle school years: IEA's third international mathematics and science study (TIMSS). Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
4. Berger, S. (1991). Differentiating curriculum for gifted students (ERIC digest #E510). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 342 175)
5. Callahan, C. (1997). Giftedness. In G. Bear, K. Minke, & A. Thomas (Eds.), Children's needs II: Development, problems, and alternatives (pp. 431-448). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
6. Davis, G., & Rimm, S. (1994). Education of the gifted and talented. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
7. Howell, D. (2002). Statistical methods for psychology. Duxbury, MA: Thomas Learning.
8. Lappan, G. (1999). Mathematics for all must include high-ability and highly motivated students. NCTM News Bulletin, 35(8), 3.
9. Miller, R. (1990). Discovering mathematical talent. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 321 487)
10. Reese, C., Miller, K., Mazzeo, J., & Dossey, J. (1997). NAEP 1996 mathematics report card for the nation and the states: Findings from the national assessment of educational progress (Publication No. NCES 97-488). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
11. Renaissance Learning (1998a). Accelerated math [Computer software]. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author (http://www.renlearn.com).
12. Renaissance Learning. (1998b). STAR Math users manual. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author. (See also http://www.renlearn.com)
13. Renzulli, J., & Reis, S. (1998). Talent development through curriculum differentiation. NASSP Bulletin, 82, 61-74.
14. Roets, L. (1993). Modifying standard curriculum for high ability students. New York: Leadership Publishers.
15. Sheffield, J. (1994). The development of gifted and talented mathematics students and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Standards. Storrs: University of Connecticut, National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
16. Spicuzza, R., Ysseldyke, J., Lemkuil, A., Kosciolek, S., Boys, C., & Teelucksingh, E. (2001). Journal of School Psychology, 39, 521-542.
17. Stanley, J., & Benbow, C. (1983). SMPY's first decade: Ten years of posing problems and solving them. Journal of Special Education, 17, 11-25.
18. Tomlinson, C. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
19. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1993a). National excellence: A case for developing America's talent. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
20. U.S. Department of Education. (1993b). Anthology on gifted and talented education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
21. Walberg, H. (1984). Improving the productivity of America's schools. Educational Leadership, 41(8), 19-27
22. Waxman, B., Robinson, N., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (1996). Teachers nurturing math-talented young children. Storrs: University of Connecticut, National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
23. Westberg, K., Archambault, F., Dobyns, S., & Salvin, T. (1993). The classroom practices observation study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16(2), 29-56.
24. Ysseldyke, J., & Christenson, S. (1987). Evaluating students instructional environments. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 17-24.
25. Ysseldyke, J., & Elliott, J. (1999). Effective instructional practices: Implications for assessing instructional environments. In C. Reynolds & T. Gutkin (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology. New York: Wiley.
26. Ysseldyke, J., & Tardrew, S. (2002). Differentiating math instruction: A large scale study of Accelerated Math. Madison, WI: Renaissance Learning.
27. Ysseldyke, J., Spicuzza, R., Kosciolek, S., & Boys, C. (2003). Effects of a learning information system on mathematics achievement and classroom structure. Journal of Educational Research, 96, 163-173.
28. Ysseldyke, J., Spicuzza, R., Kosciolek, S., Teelucksingh, E., Boys, C., & Lemkuil, A. (2003). Using a curriculum-based instructional management system to enhance math achievement in urban schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 8, 247-265.