Student engagement with computer-generated feedback: A case study

ELT Journal

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 317-328

  Zhang, Zhe Victor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85023608786     PISSN: 09510893     EISSN: 14774526     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/elt/ccw089     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Attali, Y. 2004. 'Exploring the feedback and revision features of Criterion'. Paper presented at the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME), 12-14 April, San Diego, CA.
2. Chen, C. F. E. and W. Y. E. Cheng. 2008. 'Beyond the design of automated writing evaluation: pedagogical practices and perceived learning effectiveness in EFL writing classes'. Language Learning & Technology 12/2: 94-112.
3. Dikli, S. 2006. 'An overview of automated scoring of essays'. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment 5/1: 1-35.
4. El Ebyary, K. and S. Windeatt. 2010. 'The impact of computer-based feedback on students' written work'. International Journal of English Studies 10/2: 121-42.
5. Fredricks, J., P. C. Blumenfeld, and A. Paris. 2004. 'School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence'. Review of Educational Research 74/1: 59-109.
6. Li, Z., S. Link, H. Ma, H. Yang, and V. Hegelheimer. 2014. 'The role of automated writing evaluation holistic scores in the ESL classroom'. System 44: 66-78.
7. Mann, S. 2001. 'Alternative perspectives on the student experience: alienation and engagement'. Studies in Higher Education 26/1: 7-19.
8. New, E. 1999. 'Computer-aided writing in French as a foreign language: a qualitative and quantitative look at the process of revision'. The Modern Language Journal 83/1: 80-97.
9. Shermis, M. D. and J. C. Burstein (eds.). 2003. Automated Essay Scoring: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Stevenson, M. and A. Phakiti. 2014. 'The effects of computer-generated feedback on the quality of writing'. Assessing Writing 19/1: 51-65.
11. Warschauer, M. and P. Ware. 2006. 'Automated writing evaluation: defining the classroom research agenda'. Language Teaching Research 10/2: 157-80.
12. Whalen, K. and N. Ménard. 1995. 'L1 and L2 writers' strategic and linguistic knowledge: a model of multiple-level discourse processing'. Language Learning 45/3: 381-418.
13. Willms, J. 2003. Student Engagement at School: A Sense of Belonging and Participation. Results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD. Available at https://www.oecd.org/edu/ school/programmeforinternational studentassessmentpisa/33689437.pdf (accessed on 1 May 2015).
14. Willms, J., S. Friesen, and P. Milton. 2009. What Did You Do in School Today? Transforming Classrooms through Social, Academic and Intellectual Engagement. Toronto: Canadian Education Association. Available at http://cea-ace.ca/sites/ cea-ace.ca/files/cea-2009-wdydist.pdf (accessed on 30 October 2014).