Beyond the design of automated writing evaluation: Pedagogical practices and perceived learning effectiveness in efl writing classes

Language Learning and Technology

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 94-112

  Chen, Chi Fen Emily ^a   Cheng, Wei Yuan Eugene ^a  

^a NATIONAL KAOHSIUNG UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 45349108880     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10943501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Attali, Y. (2004). Exploring the feedback and revision features of Criterion. Paper presented at the National Council on Measurement in Education in San Diego, CA. April, 2004.
2. Attali, Y., & Burstein, J. (2006). Automated essay scoring with e-rater v.2. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 4(3), 1-30.
3. Beatty, K. (2003). Teaching and researching computer-assisted language learning. New York: Longman.
4. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74.
5. Chapelle, C. A. (2003). English language learning and technology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
6. Cheville, J. (2004). Automated scoring technologies and the rising influence of error. English Journal, 93(4), 47-52.
7. Conference on College Composition and Communication (2006). Writing assessment: A position statement. Retrieved July 20, 2007, from http://www.ncte.org/cccc/resources/positions/123784.htm.
8. Chung, G. K. W. K., & Baker, E. L. (2003). Issues in the reliability and validity of automated scoring of constructed responses. In M. D. Shermis & J. Burstein (Eds.), Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective (pp. 23-40). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Dikli, S. (2006). An overview of automated scoring of essays. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 5(1), 1-35.
10. Elliot, S. (2003). IntelliMetric: From here to validity. In M. D. Shermis & J. Burstein (Eds.). Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective (pp. 71-86). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Elliot, S., Darlington, K., & Mikulas, C. (2004). But does it really work? A national study of MY Access! Effectiveness. Paper presented at the National Council on Measurement in Education in San Diego, CA. April, 2004.
12. Ericsson, P. F. (2006). The meaning of meaning: Is a paragraph more than an equation? In P. F. Ericsson & R. Haswell (Eds.), Machine scoring of student essays: Truth and consequences (pp. 28-37). Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
13. Ericsson, P. F., & Haswell, R. (Eds.) (2006). Machine scoring of student essays: Truth and consequences. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
14. Flower, L. (1994). The construction of negotiated meaning: A social cognitive theory of writing. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
15. Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. (1996). Theory and practice of writing. Harlow: Longman.
16. Grimes, D., & Warschauer, M. (2006). Automated essay scoring in the classroom. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association in San Francisco, California. April 7-11, 2006.
17. Herrington, A., & Moran, C. (2001). What happens when machines read our students' writing? College English, 63(4), 480-499.
18. Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students' writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83-101.
20. Keith, T. Z. (2003). Validity and automated essay scoring systems. In M. D. Shermis & J. Burstein (Eds.), Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective (pp. 147-167). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Levy, M., & Stockwell, G. (2006). CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer-assisted language learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Page, E. (2003). Project essay grade: PEG. In M.D. Shermis & J. Burstein (Eds.), Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective (pp. 43-54). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Phillips, S. M. (2007). Automated essay scoring: A literature review. Kelowna, B. C., Canada: Society for the Advancement of Excellence in Education. Retrieved July 24, 2007, from http://www.saee.ca/pdfs/036.pdf
24. Powers, D. E., Burstein, J. C., Chodorow, M., Fowles, M. E., & Kukich, K. (2002). Stamping e-rater: Challenging the validity of automated essay scoring. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(2), 103-134.
25. Rothermel, B. A. (2006). Automated writing instruction: Computer-assisted or computer-driven pedagogies? In P. F. Ericsson & R. Haswell (Eds.), Machine scoring of student essays: Truth and consequences (pp. 199-210). Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
26. Shermis, M. D., & Burstein, J. (Eds.) (2003a). Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27. Shermis, M. D., & Burstein, J. (2003b). Introduction. In M. D. Shermis & J. Burstein (Eds.), Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective (pp. xiii-xvi). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28. Stockwell, G. (2007). A review of technology choice for teaching language skills and areas in the CALL literature. ReCALL, 19(2), 105-120.
29. Vantage Learning. (2005). MY Access! (Version 5.0) [computer software]. Newtown, PA: Vantage Learning.
30. Vantage Learning. (2007). MY Access! Efficacy Report. Newtown, PA: Vantage Learning. Retrieved December 2, 2007, from http://www.vantagelearning. com/school/research/myaccess.html.
31. Ware, P. (2005). Automated writing evaluation as a pedagogical tool for writing assessment. In A. Pandian, G. Chakravarthy, P. Kell, & S. Kaur (Eds.), Strategies and practices for improving learning and literacy (pp. 174-184). Selangor, Malaysia: Universiti Putra Malaysia Press.
32. Warschauer, M., & Ware, P. (2006). Automated writing evaluation: Defining the classroom research agenda. Language Teaching Research, 10(2), 1-24.
33. Weir, C. J. (2005). Language testing and validation: An evidence-based approach. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
34. Whithaus, C. (2006). Always already: Automated essay scoring and grammar-checkers in college writing courses. In P. F. Ericsson & R. Haswell (Eds.), Machine scoring of student essays: Truth and consequences (pp. 166-176). Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
35. Williamson, M. M. (2004). Validity of automated scoring: Prologue for a continuing discussion of machine scoring student writing. Journal of Writing Assessment, 1(2), 85-104.
36. Yang, N. D. (2004). Using MyAccess in EFL writing. The proceedings of 2004 International Conference and Workshop on TEFL & Applied Linguistics (pp. 550-564). Taipei, Taiwan: Ming Chuan University.
37. Yeh, Y. L., & Yu, Y. T. (2004). Computerized feedback and bilingual concordancer for EFL college students' writing. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China (pp. 35-48). Taichung, Taiwan: Chaoyang University of Technology.