Family firm internationalization: Heritage assets and the impact of bifurcation bias

Global Strategy Journal

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 158-183

  Kano, Liena ^a   Verbeke, Alain ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

bifurcation bias; family firm; heritage assets; internalization theory; international governance; location choice; operating mode

Indexed keywords

EID: 85040671738     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20425805     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/gsj.1186     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. Alkaabi, S. K., & Dixon, C. (2014). Factors affecting internationalization decision making in family businesses: An integrated literature review. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 19(2), 53–77.
2. Arregle, J. L., Duran, P., Hitt, M. A., & Van Essen, M. (2017). Why is family firms' internationalization unique? A meta-analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41 (5), 801–831.
3. Arregle, J. L., Naldi, L., Nordqvist, M., & Hitt, M. A. (2012). Internationalization of family-controlled firms: A study of the effects of external involvement in governance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1115–1143.
4. Banalieva, E., & Eddleston, K. (2011). Home-region focus and performance of family firms: The role of family vs. non-family leaders. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(8), 1060–1072.
5. Banfield, E. C. (1958). The moral basis of a backward society. New York, NY: Glencol.
6. Bennedsen, M., & Foss, N. (2015). Family assets and liabilities in the innovation process. California Management Review, 58(1), 65–81.
7. Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Larraza-Kintana, M. (2010). Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less? Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 82–113.
8. Bloom, N, & Van Reenen, J. (2006). Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries (Working paper No. w12216). London, U.K.: National Bureau of Economic Research, LSE.
9. Bloom, N., & Van Reenen, J. (2010). Why do management practices differ across firms and countries? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(1), 203–224.
10. Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. (1976). The future of the multinational enterprise. Basingstoke and London, U.K.: Macmillan.
11. Calabrò, A., Torchia, M., Pukall, T., & Mussolino, D. (2013). The influence of ownership structure and board strategic involvement on international sales: The moderating effect of family involvement. International Business Review, 22(3), 509–523.
12. Carlock, R. S., & Ward, J. L. (2001). Strategic planning for the family business: Parallel planning to unify the family and business. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
13. Carney, M. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 249–265.
14. Carney, M., Gedajlovic, E., & Strike, V. M. (2014). Dead money: Inheritance law and the longevity of family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(6), 1261–1283.
15. Carr, C., & Bateman, S. (2009). International strategy configurations of the world's top family firms. Management International Review, 49(6), 733–758.
16. Cerrato, D., & Piva, M. (2012). The internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises: The effect of family management, human capital and foreign ownership. Journal of Management & Governance, 16(4), 617–644.
17. Chen, S. F. S. (2005). Extending internalization theory: A new perspective on international technology transfer and its generalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(2), 231–245.
18. Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., De Massis, A., Frattini, F., & Wright, M. (2015). The ability and willingness paradox in family firm innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 310–318.
19. Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Sharma, P. (2005). Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 555–576.
20. Chrisman, J. J., Fang, H., Kotlar, J., & De Massis, A. (2015). A note on family influence and the adoption of discontinuous technologies in family firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 384–388.
21. Chrisman, J. J., Memili, E., & Misra, K. (2014). Nonfamily managers, family firms, and the winner's curse: The influence of noneconomic goals and bounded rationality. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(5), 1103–1127.
22. Chrisman, J. J., & Patel, P. C. (2012). Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 976–997.
23. Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & De Massis, A. (2015). A closer look at socioemotional wealth: Its flows, stocks, and prospects for moving forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(2), 173–182.
24. Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. (2003). Succession and nonsuccession concerns of family firms and agency relationship with nonfamily managers. Family Business Review, 16(2), 89–107.
25. Claver, E., Rienda, L., & Quer, D. (2009). Family firms' international commitment: The influence of family-related factors. Family Business Review, 22(2), 125–135.
26. Cruz, C., Larraza-Kintana, M., Garcés-Galdeano, L., & Berrone, P. (2014). Are family firms really more socially responsible? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(6), 1295–1316.
27. Currah, D. (2016, December 8). 2 major problems grounding Bombardier, Inc. The Motley Fool. Retrieved from https://www.fool.ca/2016/12/08/2-major-problems-grounding-bombardier-inc/
28. Damaraju, N. L., Chowdhary, H. S., Khanna, D., & Ajuha, D. (2012). Alliance management at Forbes Marshall. London, Canada: Richard Ivey School of Business.
29. Day, A. M. (2008). Family business daughters: The ties that bind and divide. (Unpublished Theses and Dissertations). Paper 203. Scholar Commons@USF, Tampa, FL.
30. De Massis, A., Di Minin, A., & Frattini, F. (2015). Family-driven innovation: Resolving the paradox in family firms. California Management Review, 58(1), 5–19.
31. De Massis, A., Kotlar, J., Chua, J. H., & Chrisman, J. J. (2014). Ability and willingness as sufficiency conditions for family-oriented particularistic behavior: Implications for theory and empirical studies. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(2), 344–364.
32. De Massis, A., Kotlar, J., Frattini, F., Chrisman, J. J., & Nordqvist, M. (2016). Family governance at work: Organizing for new product development in family SMEs. Family Business Review, 29(2), 189–213.
33. De Massis, A., Kotlar, J., Mazzola, P., Minola, T., & Sciascia, S. Conflicting selves: Family owners' multiple goals and self-control agency problems in private firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, forthcoming.
34. Dieleman, M., & Mittal, M. (2010). The IOI group: Creating a Malaysian palm oil multinational. London, Canada: Richard Ivey School of Business.
35. Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. (2008). Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Cheltenham, U.K. and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
36. Eghbali-Zarch, M., & Beamish, P. W. (2011). Tavazo Co. London, Canada: Richard Ivey School of Business.
37. Fernandez, Z., & Nieto, M. (2006). Impact of ownership on the international involvement of SMEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3), 340–351.
38. Gallo, M. A., & Pont, C. G. (1996). Important factors in family business internationalization. Family Business Review, 9(1), 45–59.
39. George, B., & McLean, A. N. (2005). Marilyn Carlson Nelson and the Carlson companies’ renaissance. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
40. Ghemawat, P. (2001). Distance still matters. Harvard Business Review, 79(8), 137–147.
41. Glemser, A. C., & Leleux, B. (2011). The Mercks of Darmstadt: What family can do (A). Lausanne, Switzerland: IMD International.
42. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Haynes, K., Nunez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137.
43. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Makri, M., & Larraza-Kintana, M. L. (2010). Diversification decisions in family-controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 223–252.
44. Graves, C., & Thomas, J. (2006). Internationalization of Australian family firms: A managerial capabilities perspective. Family Business Review, 19(3), 207–224.
45. Graves, C., & Thomas, J. (2008). Determinants of the internationalization pathways of family firms: An examination of family influence. Family Business Review, 21(2), 151–167.
46. Grøgaard, B., & Verbeke, A. (2012). Twenty key hypotheses that make internalization theory the general theory of international strategic management. In A.Verbeke & H.Merchant (Eds.), Handbook of research in international strategic management (pp. 7–30). Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
47. Hambrick, D. C., & Finkelstein, S. (1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views in organizational outcomes. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 369–406.
48. Hennart, J. F. (1993). Explaining the swollen middle: Why most transactions are a mix of “market” and “hierarchy.” Organization Science, 4(4), 529–547.
49. Hennart, J. F. (1994). The “comparative institutional” theory of the firm: Some implications for corporate strategy. Journal of Management Studies, 31(2), 193–208.
50. Hennart, J. F. (2009). Down with MNE centric theories! Market entry and expansion as the bundling of MNE and local assets. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1432–1454.
51. Hennart, J. F., & Majocchi, A. (2013, July). Are family firms more internationally involved than non-family firms? The case of Italy. AIB 2013 Annual Meeting, Istanbul, Turkey.
52. Holt, D. T., & Daspit, J. J. (2015). Diagnosing innovation readiness in family firms. California Management Review, 58(1), 82–96.
53. Huchet, J. F., & Ruet, J. (2008). Chinese and Indian multinationals out to conquer the world. In C.Jaffrelot (Ed.), The emerging states: The wellspring of a new world order (pp. 186–196). London, U.K.: Hurst and Company.
54. Ilias, N. (2006). Families and firms: Agency costs and labor market imperfections in Sialkot's surgical industry. Journal of Development Economics, 80(2), 329–349.
55. Jennings, J. E., Dempsey, D., & James, A. E. Bifurcated HR practices in family firms: Insights from the normative-adaptive approach to stepfamilies. Human Resource Management Review, forthcoming.
56. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1411–1431.
57. Kano, L., & Verbeke, A. (2015). The three faces of bounded reliability: Alfred Chandler and the micro-foundations of management theory. California Management Review, 58(1), 97–122.
58. Kennelly, J. J. (2014). Cooley distillery: The independent spirit of Ireland. Saratoga Springs, NY: Case Research Journal: North American Case Research Association, Inc.
59. Khanna, T., Palepu, K. G., & Sinha, J. (2005). Strategies that fit emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 83(6), 63–76.
60. König, A., Kammerlander, N., & Enders, A. (2013). The family innovator's dilemma: How family influence affects the adoption of discontinuous technologies by incumbent firms. Academy of Management Review, 38(3), 418–441.
61. Kontinen, T., & Ojala, A. (2010). The internationalization of family businesses: A review of extant research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(2), 97–107.
62. Kotlar, J., & De Massis, A. (2013). Goal setting in family firms: Goal diversity, social interactions, and collective commitment to family-centered goals. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6), 1263–1288.
63. Kristensen, T., Gabrielsen, G., & Zaichkowsky, J. L. (2012). How valuable is a well-crafted design and name brand? Recognition and willingness to pay. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11(1), 44–55.
64. Kuznetsov, A. (2010). Urgent tasks for research on Russian TNCs. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Paper No. 42702). Moscow, Russia: Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Science.
65. Larsen, M. M., Pedersen, T., & Slepniov, D. (2010). LEGO group: An outsourcing journey. London, Canada: Richard Ivey School of Business.
66. Majocchi, A., & Strange, R. (2012). International diversification: The impact of ownership structure, the market for corporate control and board independence. Management International Review, 52(6), 879–900.
67. Marowits, R. (2017, February 7). Bombardier to get $372.5 million in government loans. The Canadian Press. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com/business/2017/02/07/bombardier-announcement-expected-in-montreal.html
68. Melin, L., & Nordqvist, M. (2007). The reflexive dynamics of institutionalization: The case of the family business. Strategic Organization, 5(3), 321–333.
69. Memili, E., Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., Chang, E. P. C., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2011). The determinants of family firms’ subcontracting: A transaction cost perspective. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2(1), 26–33.
70. Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2005). Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
71. Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2006). Lessons from family firms about managing for the long run. Leader to Leader, 2006(39), 13–17.
72. Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Scholnick, B. (2008). Stewardship vs. stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 51–78.
73. Miller, D., Wright, M., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Scholes, L. (2015). Resources and innovation in family businesses: The Janus-face of socioemotional preferences. California Management Review, 58(1), 20–40.
74. Narula, R., & Verbeke, A. (2015). Making internalization theory good for practice: The essence of Alan Rugman's contributions to international business. Journal of World Business, 50(4), 612–622.
75. Neumann, A., & Tapies, J. (2007). Balancing family and business needs at Merck KGaA. Navarra, Spain: IESE.
76. Nielsen, B. B., Pedersen, T., & Pyndt, J. (2008). ECCO A/S: Global value chain management. London, Canada: Richard Ivey School of Business.
77. Nordqvist, M. (2005). Understanding the role of ownership in strategizing: A study of family firms. (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping, Sweden.
78. Owram, K. (2016, March 11). How Bombardier Inc. suppresses information about how much government funding it receives. Financial Post. Retrieved from http://business.financialpost.com/transportation/how-bombardier-inc-suppresses-information-about-how-much-government-funding-it-receives
79. Patel, P. C., & Chrisman, J. J. (2014). Risk abatement as a strategy for R&D investments in family firms. Strategic Management Journal, 35(4), 617–627.
80. Patel, V. K., Pieper, T. M., & Hair, J. F. (2012). The global family business: Challenges and drivers for cross-border growth. Business Horizons, 55(3), 231–239.
81. Pinho, C. J. (2007). The impact of ownership: Location-specific advantages and managerial characteristics on SME foreign entry mode choices. International Marketing Review, 24(6), 715–734.
82. Pukall, T. J., & Calabrò, A. (2014). The internationalization of family firms: A critical review and integrative model. Family Business Review, 27(2), 103–125.
83. Remiorz, R. (2017, May 11). Top-level change loosens grip of Bombardier founding family. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved from https://beta.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/top-level-change-loosens-grip-of-bombardier-founding-family/article34953784/?ref=http://www.theglobeandmail.com&1
84. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2004). A perspective on regional and global strategies of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(1), 3–18.
85. Rugman, A. M., Verbeke, A., & Nguyen, P. C. Q. T. (2011). Fifty years of international business theory and beyond. Management International Review, 51(6), 755–786.
86. Sciascia, S., Mazzola, P., Astrachan, J., & Pieper, T. (2012). The role of family ownership in international entrepreneurship: Exploring nonlinear effects. Small Business Economics, 38(1), 15–31.
87. Sciascia, S., Mazzola, P., Astrachan, J., & Pieper, T. (2013). Family involvement in the board of directors: Effects on sales internationalization. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(1), 83–99.
88. Simon, H. (1961). Administrative behavior (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
89. Smyth, J. (2015, October 21). Commodities: Gina Rinehart is queen of Australia's desert. Financial Post. Retrieved from http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/047b7ab0-7643-11e5-a95a-27d368e1ddf7.html#axzz3rIm23d6T
90. Suen, B., Shen, N., & Tang, J. (2011). Internationalization of Koyo jeans from Hong Kong. London, Canada: Richard Ivey School of Business.
91. Van Praet, N, & Fife, R. (2016, April 15). Federal talks over Bombardier bailout stalls over dual class shares. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved from https://beta.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/bombardier-ottawa-at-odds-over-bailout-conditions/article29643628/?ref=http://www.theglobeandmail.com&
92. Verbeke, A. (2013). International business strategy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
93. Verbeke, A., & Kano, L. (2012). The transaction cost economics theory of the family firm: Family-based human asset specificity and the bifurcation bias. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1183–1205.
94. Verbeke, A., & Kano, L. (2015). The new internalization theory and multinational enterprises from emerging economies: A business history perspective. Business History Review, 89(03), 415–445.
95. Verbeke, A., & Kano, L. (2016). An internalization theory perspective on the global and regional strategies of multinational enterprises. Journal of World Business, 51(1), 83–92.
96. Verbeke, A., & Kenworthy, T. (2008). Multidivisional versus metanational governance of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6), 940–956.
97. Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2007). Ayala corporation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
98. Williamson, O. E. (1981). The modern corporation: Origins, evolution, attributes. Journal of Economic Literature, 19(4), 1537–1568.
99. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. New York, NY: Free Press.
100. Williamson, O. E. (1993). Opportunism and its critics. Managerial and Decision Economics, 14(2), 97–107.
101. Williamson, O. E. (1996). The mechanisms of governance. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
102. Wright, M., Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Steier, L. P. (2014). Family enterprise and context. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(6), 1247–1260.
103. Yakabuski, K. (2017, April 4). At Bombardier, ownership is a relative term. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved from http://www.globeinvestor.com/servlet/ArticleNews/story/GAM/20170404/RBCOYAKABUSKI
104. Yrkkö, J. M. P., Rouvinen, P., & Ylä-Anttila, P. (2007). Family business and globalization in Finland. Helsinki, Finland: The Research Institute of Finnish Economy.
105. Zahra, S. A. (2003). International expansion of U.S. manufacturing family businesses: The effect of ownership and involvement. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 495–512.
106. Zahra, S. A. (2005). Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family Business Review, 18(1), 23–40.