Family Firms' International Commitment: The Influence of Family-Related Factors

Family Business Review

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 125-135

  Claver, Enrique ^a   Rienda, Laura ^a   Quer, Diego ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALICANTE   (Spain)

Author keywords

family factors; family firms; international commitment

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649233936     PISSN: 08944865     EISSN: 17416248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0894486508330054     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Choice of foreign market entry mode: Impact of ownership, location and internalisation factors.Journal of International Business Studies. 1992;23 (1): 1-27.
2. Power, performance, and succession in the large corporation.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1982;27 (4): 538-547.
3. Managerial perceptions and strategic behavior.Academy of Management Journal. 1975;18 (4): 811-823.
4. Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions.Journal of International Business Studies. 1986;17 (3): 1-26.
5. Antecedents and performance implications of channel integration in foreign markets.Journal of International Business Studies. 1997;28 (1): 145-175.
6. Transferring power in the family business.Harvard Business Review. 1976;54 (4): 105-114.
7. The resource-based model of the firm: Origins, implications, and prospects.Journal of Management. 1991;17 (1): 99-120.
8. The development of organization structure in the family firm.Journal of General Management. 1975;3 (1): 42-60.
9. Common factors underlying barriers to export: A Comparative study in the US paper industry.Journal of International Studies. 1985;16 (3): 111-123.
10. Succession in the family firm.Journal of Small Business Management. 1986;24 (3): 36-43.
11. The internalization of exports: Firm- and location-specific factors in a middle-income country.Management Science. 1999;45 (11): 1463-1478.
12. Small firm growth, access to capital markets and financial structure: Review of issues and an empirical investigation.Small Business Economics. 1996;8 (1): 59-67.
13. The influence of national culture and family involvement on entrepreneurial perceptions and performance at the state level.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2002;26 (4): 113-130.
14. Capturing ordinal properties of categorical dependent variables: A review with application to modes of foreign entry.International Journal of Research in Marketing. 1992;9 (2): 149-160.
15. Succession and nonsuccession concerns of family firms and agency relationship with nonfamily managers.Family Business Review. 2003;16 (2): 89-107.
16. Modal choice in a world of alliances: Analyzing organizational forms in the international hotel sector.Journal of International Business Studies. 1998;29 (2): 325-356.
17. Family firms are different.Review of Business. 1991;13 (1 2): 3-5.
18. Alternative methodologies for identifying family- versus nonfamily-managed businesses.Journal of Small Business Management. 1993;31 (2): 79-90.
19. Towards a stewardship theory of management.Academy of Management Review. 1997;22:20-47.
20. Identifying differences between high- and low-involvement exporters.International Marketing Review. 1988;5 (2): 52-60.
21. Internationalization and ownership: Family versus non-family enterprises. Paper presented at the Fifth Family Business Network Conference; Lausanne;.
22. Are family businesses really different? European experience from STRATOS.Family Business Review. 1991;4 (2): 149-160.
23. International production and the multinational enterprise. London: Allen & Unwin; 1981:.
24. Integrating professional management into a family owned business.Family Business Review. 1989;2 (3): 221-235.
25. Entrepreneurship and family business: Exploring the connections.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 1994;19 (1): 71-83.
26. Experiential knowledge and cost in the internationalization process.Journal of International Business Studies. 1997;28 (2): 337-360.
27. The experience factor in foreign market entry behaviour of service firms.Journal of International Business Studies. 1991;22 (3): 479-501.
28. Internationalization strategy of small and medium-sized family businesses: Some influential factors.Family Business Review. 2005;18 (1): 77-89.
29. Impact of ownership on the international involvement of SMEs.Journal of International Business Studies. 2006;37 (3): 340-351.
30. Outside directors and the privately owned firm: Are they necessary.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 1988;13 (1): 49-57.
31. Ownership and diversification: Agency theory or stewardship theory.Journal of Management Studies. 1994;31:69-81.
32. Empresa familiar. Textos y casos [Family Business. Text and Cases]. Barcelona: Praxis; 1995:.
33. Important factors in family business internationalization.Family Business Review. 1996;9 (1): 45-59.
34. Internacionalización: Un cambio desafiante para las empresas familiares [Internationalization. A Challenging Change for Family Business] La Empresa Familiar 4. Barcelona: Publicaciones de la Cátedra de Empresa Familiar, Estudios y Ediciones IESE; 1991 1993:.
35. Internationalizing the family business: Facilitating and restraining factors.Family Business Review. 1991;4 (2): 181-190.
36. Finance in family business.Family Business Review. 1996;9 (4): 387-401.
37. A financial perspective on structure, conduct, and performance in the family firm: An empirical study.Family Business Review. 1998;11 (1): 5-48.
38. The multinational corporation's degree of control over foreign subsidiaries: An empirical test of a transaction cost explanation.Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization. 1988;4 (2): 305-336.
39. The effect of ownership on the organization structure in small firms.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1984;29 (2): 232-237.
40. Empresas familiares. Generación a generación [Generation to Generation: Life Cycles of the Family Business]. McGraw-Hill Interamericana Editores; 1997:.
41. A cluster analysis approach to financial structure in small firms in the United States. Paper presented at the annual national conference of the United States Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship; Reno;.
42. Internationalisation of the family business: A longitudinal perspective.International Journal of Globalisation and Small Business. 2004;1 (1): 7-27.
43. A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms.Family Business Review. 1999;12 (1): 1-25.
44. Is strategy different for the family-owned business.Family Business Review. 1994;7 (2): 159-174.
45. Searching for a dynamic theory of the multinational enterprise: A transaction cost model.Strategic Management Journal. 1988;9:93-104.
46. Market entry and locational strategies in international expansion: A theoretical approach based on the incremental model and its extension. Paper presented at the 26th annual conference of the European International Business Academy; Maastricht;.
47. Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure.Journal of Financial Economics. 1976;3:305-360.
48. The internationalization process of the firm. A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments.Journal of International Business Studies. 1977;8 (1): 23-32.
49. Comparative analysis of export-oriented and foreign production-oriented firms' foreign market entry decisions.Management International Review. 1995;35 (4): 325-336.
50. Conflicts that plague family businesses.Harvard Business Review. 1971;49 (2): 90-98.
51. An inquiry into successful exporting.European Journal of Marketing. 1991;25 (6): 7-23.
52. Cost, value and foreign market entry mode: The transaction and the firm.Strategic Management Journal. 1997;18 (1): 39-61.
53. Founding family controlled firms: Performance, risk, and value.Journal of Small Business Management. 2001;39 (1): 31-49.
54. Explaining the formation of international new ventures: The limits of theories from international business research.Journal of Business Venturing. 1994;9 (6): 469-487.
55. Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities.Family Business Review. 2006;19 (1): 73-87.
56. Founding family control and capital structure: The risk of loss of control and the aversion to debt.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 1999;23 (4): 53-64.
57. On the internal correlates of export stage development: An empirical investigation in the Korean electronics.International Marketing Review. 1990;7 (5): 16-26.
58. Agency problems in large family business groups.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2003;27 (4): 367-382.
59. The capital structure puzzle.Journal of Finance. 1984;39 (3): 575-592.
60. Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information investors do not have it.Journal of Financial Economics. 1984;13 (2): 187-221.
61. Applied linear statistical models: Regression, analysis of variance and experimental designs. 1985). Applied linear statistical models: Regression, analysis of variance and experimental designs (2nd ed.). Homewood, IL: Irwin.Homewood, IL: Irwin; 1985:.
62. Internationalization of family businesses: Evidence from northwest Ohio, USA.Family Business Review. 1999;12 (2): 147-158.
63. Toward a theory of international new ventures.Journal of International Business Studies. 1994;25 (1): 45-64.
64. The internationalization of entrepreneurship.Journal of International Business Studies. 2005;36 (1): 2-8.
65. The hierarchical model of market entry modes.Journal of International Business Studies. 2000;31 (4): 535-554.
66. The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: John Wiley; 1959:.
67. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view.Strategic Management Journal. 1993;14:179-191.
68. The decision-maker and export entry and expansion.Journal of International Business Studies. 1981;12 (2): 101-112.
69. Exploring channel internalization among Spanish exporters.International Marketing Review. 2002;19 (2): 133-155.
70. Capital structure decision making: A model for family business.Journal of Business Venturing. 2001;16 (3): 285-310.
71. Strategic management of the family business: Past research and future challenges.Family Business Review. 1997;10 (1): 1-35.
72. Managing the multinational enterprise. Organization of the firm and ownership of the subsidiaries. New York: Basic Books; 1972:.
73. On the goals of successful family companies.Family Business Review. 1992;5 (2): 105-117.
74. Internationalization, globalization, and capability-based strategy.California Management Review. 2002;45 (1): 116-135.
75. Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest european companies.Strategic Management Journal. 2000;21:689-705.
76. The family business dimension of entrepreneurship Entrepreneurship 2000. Chicago: Upstart; 1997:243-266.
77. An empirical investigation of the production function of the family firm.Journal of Small Business Management. 1998;36 (2): 24-32.
78. Growing the family business: Special challenges and best practices.Family Business Review. 1997;10 (4): 323-337.
79. How family affects strategy.Small Business Forum. 1994;:85-90.
80. Family firm research: The need for a methodological rethink.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 1998;23 (1): 31-56.
81. Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms.Family Business Review. 2005;18 (1): 23-40.
82. Cognition and international entrepreneurship: Implications for research on international opportunity recognition and exploitation.International Business Review. 2005;14:129-146.
83. Transaction cost determinants and ownership-based entry mode choice: A meta-analytical review.Journal of International Business Studies. 2004;35:524-544.