The effect of training on the temporal dominance of sensations method: A study with milk protein hydrolysates

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2017, Pages

  Hutchings, Scott C ^a   de Casanove, Aude ^b   Schlich, Pascal ^c   O'Riordan, Dolores ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^c CENTRE DES SCIENCES DU GOÛT ET DE L ALIMENTATION   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROLYSIS; SENSORY ANALYSIS; SUGAR SUBSTITUTES;

CASEIN HYDROLYSATE; MASKING AGENTS; MILK PROTEIN; PROTEIN HYDROLYSATE; QUALITY DATA; SENSORY ATTRIBUTES; SENSORY PROPERTIES; TEMPORAL CHANGE;

PROTEINS;

EID: 85036459612     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: 1745459X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/joss.12303     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Albert, A., Salvador, A., Schlich, P., & Fiszman, S. (2012). Comparison between temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) and key-attribute sensory profiling for evaluating solid food with contrasting textural layers: Fish sticks. Food and Quality Preference, 24, 111–118.
2. Bruzzone, F., Ares, G., & Giménez, A. (2013). Temporal aspects of yoghurt texture perception. International Dairy Journal, 29, 124–134.
3. Chambers, D. H., Allison, A.-M. A., & Chambers, E. (2004). Training effects on performance of descriptive panelists. Journal of Sensory Studies, 19, 486–499.
4. Chambers, E., & Smith, E. A. (1993). Effects of testing experience on performance of trained sensory panelists. Journal of Sensory Studies, 8, 155–166.
5. Delarue, J., Lawlor, B., & Rogeaux, M. (2014). Rapid sensory profiling techniques. Applications in new product development and consumer research. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
6. Devezeaux de Lavergne, M., van Delft, M., van de Velde, F., van Boekel, M. A. J. S., & Stieger, M. (2015). Dynamic texture perception and oral processing of semi-solid food gels: Part 1: Comparison between QDA, progressive profiling and TDS. Food Hydrocolloids, 43, 207–217.
7. di Monaco, R., Su, C., Masi, P., & Cavella, S. (2014). Temporal dominance of sensations: A review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 38, 104–112.
8. Galmarini, M. V., Visalli, M., & Schlich, P. (2017). Advances in representation and analysis of mono and multi-intake Temporal Dominance of Sensations data. Food Quality and Preference, 56, 247–255.
9. Hoyle, N. T., & Merritt, J. H. (1994). Quality of Fish Protein Hydrolysates from Herring (Clupea harengus). Journal of Food Science, 59, 76–79.
10. Humiski, L. M., & Aluko, R. E. (2007). Physicochemical and bitterness properties of enzymatic pea protein hydrolysates. Journal of Food Science, 72, 605–611.
11. Hutchings, S. C., Foster, K. D., Grigor, J. M. V., Bronlund, J. E., & Morgenstern, M. P. (2014a). Temporal dominance of sensations: A comparison between younger and older panelists for the perception of food texture. Food Quality and Preference, 31, 106–115.
12. Hutchings, S. C., Foster, K. D., Hedderley, D. I., & Morgenstern, M. P. (2014b). Differences between age groups in the use of the temporal dominance of sensations technique across a range of food textures. Journal of Texture Studies, 45, 206–219.
13. Hutchings, S. C., Horner, K. M., Dible, V. A., Grigor, J. M. V., & O'Riordan, D. (2017). Modification of aftertaste with a menthol mouthwash reduces food wanting, liking, and ad libitum intake of potato crisps. Appetite, 108, 57–67.
14. Hutchings, S. C., O'Sullivan, M., Jacquier, J.-C., & O'Riordan, D. (2015). The effect of inhomogeneous quinine and hydrocolloid distributions on the bitterness of model gels. Food Quality and Preference, 45, 132–139.
15. Keast, R. S. J., & Breslin, P. A. S. (2003). An overview of binary taste–taste interactions. Food Quality and Preference, 14, 111–124.
16. Kroeze, J. H. A., & Bartoshuk, L. M. (1985). Bitterness suppression as revealed by split-tongue taste stimulation in humans. Physiology & Behavior, 35, 779–783.
17. Laguna, L., Varela, P., Salvador, A., & Fiszman, S. (2013). A new sensory tool to analyse the oral trajectory of biscuits with different fat and fibre contents. Food Research International, 51, 544–553.
18. Lawless, H. T., Rapacki, F., Horne, J., Hayes, A., & Wang, G. (2004). The taste of calcium chloride in mixtures with NaCl, sucrose and citric acid. Food Quality and Preference, 15, 83–89.
19. Leksrisompong, P., Gerard, P., Lopetcharat, K., & Drake, M. (2012). Bitter taste inhibiting agents for whey protein hydrolysate and whey protein hydrolysate beverages. Journal of Food Science, 77, S282–S287.
20. Leksrisompong, P. P., Miracle, R. E., & Drake, M. (2010). Characterization of flavor of whey protein hydrolysates. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry, 58, 6318–6327.
21. Meillon, S., Urbano, C., & Schlich, P. (2009). Contribution of the Temporal Dominance of Sensations (TDS) method to the sensory description of subtle differences in partially dealcoholized red wines. Food Quality and Preference, 20, 490–499.
22. Nagpal, R., Behare, P., Rana, R., Kumar, A., Kumar, M., Arora, S., … Yadav, H. (2011). Bioactive peptides derived from milk proteins and their health beneficial potentials: an update. Food Function, 2, 18–27.
23. Newman, J., O'Riordan, D., Jacquier, J., & O'Sullivan, M. (2014). Development of a sensory lexicon for dairy protein hydrolysates. Journal of Sensory Studies, 29, 413–424.
24. Newman, J., O'Riordan, D., Jacquier, J. C., & O'Sullivan, M. (2015). Masking of bitterness in dairy protein hydrolysates: Comparison of an electronic tongue and a trained sensory panel as means of directing the masking strategy. LWT Food Science & Technology, 63, 751–757.
25. Ng, M., Lawlor, J. B., Chandra, S., Chaya, C., Hewson, L., & Hort, J. (2012). Using quantitative descriptive analysis and temporal dominance of sensations analysis as complementary methods for profiling commercial blackcurrant squashes. Food Quality and Preference, 25, 121–134.
26. Nongonierma, A., O'Keeffe, M., & Fitzgerald, R. (2016). Milk protein hydrolysates and bioactive peptides. Advanced Dairy Chemistry (pp. 417–482). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
27. Pineau, N., Schlich, P., Cordelle, S., Mathonnière, C., Issanchou, S., Imbert, A., & Köster, E. (2009). Temporal dominance of sensations: Construction of the TDS curves and comparison with time–intensity. Food Quality and Preference, 20, 450–455.
28. Rodrigues, J. F., Souza, V. R. D., Lima, R. R., Carneiro, J. D. D. S., Nunes, C. A., & Pinheiro, A. C. M. (2016). Temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) panel behavior: A preliminary study with chocolate. Food Quality and Preference, 54, 51–57.
29. Saint-Eve, A., Déléris, I., Panouillé, M., Dakowski, F., Cordelle, S., Schlich, P., & Souchon, I. (2011). How texture influences aroma and taste perception over time in candies. Chemosensory Perception, 4, 32–41.
30. Thomas, A., van der Stelt, A. J., Prokop, J., Lawlor, J. B., & Schlich, P. (2016). Alternating temporal dominance of sensations and liking scales during the intake of a full portion of an oral nutritional supplement. Food Quality and Preference, 53, 159–167.
31. Thomas, A., Visalli, M., Cordelle, S., & Schlich, P. (2015). Temporal drivers of liking. Food Quality and Preference, 40, 365–375.
32. Wiet, S. G., & Beyts, P. K. (1992). Sensory characteristics of sucralose and other high intensity sweeteners. Journal of Food Science, 57, 1014–1019.
33. Zorn, S., Alcaire, F., Vidal, L., Giménez, A., & Ares, G. (2014). Application of multiple-sip temporal dominance of sensations to the evaluation of sweeteners. Food Quality and Preference, 36, 135–143.