Elms revisited

Arboriculture and Urban Forestry

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 217-241

  Marcotrigiano, Michael ^a  

^a SMITH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

American elm; Dutch elm disease; Elm; Elm bark beetle; Elm yellows; Germplasm storage; Ophiostoma novo ulmi; Transgenic tree; Tree breeding; Ulmus

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; BREEDING; CULTIVAR; DECIDUOUS TREE; DISEASE RESISTANCE; FUNGAL DISEASE; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GERMPLASM; PATHOGEN;

UNITED STATES;

CANDIDATUS PHYTOPLASMA; CASTANEA DENTATA; COLEOPTERA; HEXAPODA; OPHIOSTOMA NOVO-ULMI; SCOLYTINAE; ULMUS; ULMUS AMERICANA;

EID: 85035007109     PISSN: 19355297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (157)

1. Acquaah, G. 2012. Polyploidy in plant breeding. pp. 452-469. In: G. Acquaah. Principles of Plant Genetics and Breeding, second edition. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, New Jersey, U.S. 740 pp.
2. Adams, J.M., G. Piovesan, S. Strauss, and S. Brown. 2002. The case for genetic engineering of native and landscape trees against introduced pests and diseases. Conservation Biology 16:874-879.
3. Ager, A.A., and R. Guries. 1982. Barriers to interspecific hybridization in Ulmus americana. Euphytica 31:909-920.
4. Aoun, M., D. Rioux, M. Simard, and L. Bernier. 2009. Fungal colonization and host defense reactions in Ulmus americana callus cultures inoculated with Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Biochemistry and Cell Biology 99:42-650.
5. Aoun, M., V. Jacobi, B. Boyle, and L. Bernier. 2010. Identification and monitoring of Ulmus americana transcripts during in vitro interactions with the Dutch elm disease pathogen Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 74:254-266.
6. APG III. 2009. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 161:105-121.
7. Baker, W.L. 1948. Transmission by leaf hoppers of the virus causing elm phloem necrosis of American elm. Science 17:307-308.
8. Becker, H. 1996. New American elms restore stately trees. Agricultural Research. Accessed 30 December 2015. 〈http://agresearchmag.ars.usda.gov/AR/archive/1996/Jul/elms.pdf〉.
9. Bernier, L., M. Aoun, G.F. Bouvet, A. Comeau, J. Dufour, E.S. Naruzawa, and K.V. Plourde. 2015. Genomics of the Dutch elm disease pathosystem: Are we there yet? Journal of Biogeosciences & Forestry 8:149-157. Accessed 30 December 2015. 〈www.sisef.it/iforest/contents/?id=ifor1211-008〉.
10. Bettini, P.P., A. Frascella, M. Kolarík, C. Comparini, A.L. Pepori, A. Santini, F. Scala, and A. Scala. 2014. Widespread horizontal transfer of the cerato-ulmin gene between Ophiostoma novoulmi and Geosmithia species. Fungal Biology 118:663-674.
11. Bey, C.F. 1990. Ulmus americana. pp. 801-807. In: R.M. Burns and B.H. Honkala (Eds.). Silvics of North America, Volume 2. Hardwoods. Agricultural Handbook 654. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Forest Service. Washington, D.C. 877 pp.
12. Bintz, T., and C. Canevascini. 1996. Xylanases from the Dutch elm disease pathogens Ophiostoma ulmi and Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 49:159-175.
13. Blanchette, R.A. 2012. Finding disease resistant elm trees in Minnesota. Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) M.L. 2013 Work Plan. Accessed 30 December 2015. 〈www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2013/draft-wp/2013-03h.pdf〉.
14. Bolyard, M.G., and M. B. Sticklen. 1993. Strategies for the production of disease-resistant elms. pp. 171-180. In: M.B. Sticklen and J.L. Sherald (Eds.). Dutch Elm Disease Research: Cellular and Molecular Approaches. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, U.S. 344 pp.
15. Bosu, P.P., F. Miller, and M.R. Wagner. 2007. Susceptibility of 32 elm species and hybrids (Ulmus spp.) to the elm leaf beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) under field conditions in Arizona. Journal of Economic Entomology 100:1808-1814.
16. Brasier, C.M. 1991. Ophiostoma novo-ulmi sp. novi., causal agent of the current Dutch elm disease pandemic. Mycopathologia 115:151-161.
17. Brasier, C.M. 2000. Intercontinental spread and continuing evaluation of Dutch elm disease pathogens. pp. 61-72. In: C.P. Dunn (Ed.). The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S. 361 pp.
18. Brasier, C.M., and M.D. Mehrotra. 1995. Ophiostoma himal-ulmi sp. nov., a new species of Dutch elm disease fungus endemic to the Himalayas. Mycological Research 99:205-215.
19. Brasier, C.M., and S.A. Kirk. 2001. Designation of the EAN and NAN races of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi as subspecies. Mycological Research 105:547-554.
20. Brasier, C.M., S.A. Kirk, and S. Tegli. 1995. Naturally occurring non cerato-ulmin producing mutants of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi are pathogenic but lack aerial mycelium. Mycological Research 99:436-440.
21. Büchel, K., T. Fenning, J. Gershenzon, M. Hilder, and T. Meiners. 2015. Elm defense against herbivores and pathogens: Morphological, chemical, and molecular regulation aspects. Phytochemistry Reviews. Accessed 22 April 2015. 〈doi: 10.1007/s11101-015-9442-0〉.
22. Buiteveld, J., B. Van Der Werf, and J.A. Hiemstra. 2015. Comparison of commercial elm cultivars and promising Dutch clones for resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry 8:1-7.
23. Campanella, T.J. 2003. Republic of Shade-New England and the American Elm. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, U.S. 228 pp.
24. Ceasar, S.A., and S. Ignacimuthu. 2012. Generic engineering of crop plants for fungal resistance: Role of antifungal genes. Biotechnology Letters 34:995-1002.
25. Comai, L. 2005. The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid. Nature Reviews Genetics 6(11):836-846.
26. Comeau, A.M., J. Dufour, G.F. Bouvet, V. Jacobi, M. Nigg, B. Henrissat, J. Laroche, R.C. Levesque, and L. Bernier. 2015. Functional annotation of the Ophiostoma novo-ulmi genome: Insights into the phytopathogenicity of the fungal agent of Dutch elm disease. Genome Biology and Evolution 7:410-430.
27. Condra, J.M., C.M. Brady, and D.A. Potter. 2010. Resistance of landscape-suitable elms to Japanese beetle, gall aphids, and leaf miners, with notes on life history of Orchestes alni and Agromyza aristata in Kentucky. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 36:101-109.
28. Costello, L.R., S.R. Scott, and C.M. Drake. 2005. A 10-year evaluation of the performance of four elm cultivars in California, U.S. Journal of Arboriculture 30:114-122.
29. D'Arcy, C.J. 2000. Dutch elm disease. The Plant Health Instructor. American Phytopathological Society. Accessed 12 December 2015. 〈www.apsnet.org/edcenter/intropp/lessons/fungi/ascomycetes/Pages/DutchElm.aspx〉.
30. Del Sorbo, F. Scala, G. Parrella, M. Lorito, C. Comparini, M. Ruocco, and A. Scala. 2000. Functional expression of the gene cu, encoding the phytotoxic hydrophobin cerato-ulmin, enables Ophiostoma quercus, a nonpathogen on elm, to cause symptoms of Dutch elm disease. Molecular Plant Microbe Interaction 13:43-53.
31. Dermen, H., and C. May. 1966. Colchiploidy of Ulmus pumila and its possible use in hybridization with U. americana. Forest Science 12:140-146.
32. Dixon, R.A., L. Achnine, P. Kota, C-J. Jun Liu, M.S. Srinivasa Reddy, and L. Wang. 2002. The phenylpropanoid pathway and plant defense-A genomics perspective. Molecular Plant Pathology 3:371-390.
33. Duchesne, L.C. 1993. Mechanisms of resistance: Can they help save susceptible elms? pp. 239-254. In: M.B. Sticklen and J.L. Sherald (Eds.). Dutch Elm Disease Research: Cellular and Molecular Approaches. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, U.S. 344 pp.
34. Dunn, C.P. 2000. The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S. 361 pp.
35. Eisele, M. 2015. Resista® Ulmus Resista. Accessed 17 November 2015. 〈www.resista-elms.com/kontakt〉.
36. Elgersma, D.M. 1970. Length and diameter of xylem vessels as a factor in resistance of elms to Ceratocystis ulmi. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 76:179-182.
37. Elgersma, D.M. 1973. Tylose formation in elms after inoculation with Ceratocystis ulmi, a possible resistance mechanism. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology Elm Recovery Project 2015 University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada. Accessed 11 November 2015. 79:218-220. 〈www.uoguelph.ca/arboretum/collectionsandresearch/elmrecovery.shtml〉.
38. Eshita, S.M., J.M. Slavicek, and J.C. Kamalay. 2004. Generation of American elm trees with enhanced tolerance/resistance to Dutch elm disease through genetics. p. 20. In: K.W. Gottschalk (Ed.). Proceedings-U.S. Department of Agriculture interagency forum on gypsy moth and other invasive species. General Technical Report NE-315.
39. Et-Touil, A., C.M. Brasier, and L. Bernier. 1999. Localization of a pathogenicity gene in Ophiostoma novo-ulmi and evidence that it may be introgressed from O. ulmi. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 12:6-15.
40. Et-Touil, A., D. Rioux, F. Mathieu, and L. Bernier. 2005. External symptoms and histopathological changes following inoculation of genetically close strains of Ophiostoma to elms putatively resistant to Dutch elm disease. Canadian Journal of Botany 83:656-667.
41. Forgetta, V., G. Leveque, J. Dian, D. Grove, R. Lyons Jr., S. Genik, C. Wright, S. Singh, N. Peterson, et al. 2013. Sequencing the Dutch elm disease fungus genome using the Roche/454 GS-FLX Titanium System in a comparison of multiple genomics core facilities. Journal of Biomolecular Techniques 24:39-49.
42. Gartland, K.M.A., A.T. McHugh, R.M. Crow, A. Garg, and J.S. Gartland. 2005. 2004 SIVB Congress symposium proceeding: Biotechnological progress in dealing with Dutch elm disease. In vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology. Plant 41:364-367.
43. Ghelardini, L., and A. Santini. 2009. Avoidance by early flushing: A new perspective on Dutch elm disease research. iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry 2:143-153.
44. Guries, R.P., and E. B. Smalley. 1990. Selecting and testing of elms: The Wisconsin elm breeding program. pp. 21-29. In: Proceedings of the seventh conference of the Metropolitan Tree Improvement Alliance-METRIA 7: Trees for the Nineties. The Morton Arboretum, Lisle, Illinois, 11-12 June 1990.
45. Guries, R.P., and E.B. Smalley. 2000. Once and future elms: Classical and molecular approaches to Dutch elm disease resistance. pp. 231-248. In: C.P. Dunn (Ed.). The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S. 361 pp.
46. Hammond, J. 2006. Dutch elm disease update. Agricultural Research Magazine. United States Department of Agriculture. Accessed 14 December 2015. 〈http://agresearchmag.ars.usda.gov/2006/jun/elm〉.
47. Herath, P., G.A. Hoover, E. Angelini, and G.W. Moorman. 2010. Detection of elm yellows phytoplasma in elms and insects using real-time PCR. Plant Disease 94:1355-1360.
48. Heybroek, H. 1993a. Why bother about the elm? pp. 1-8. In: M.B. Sticklen and J.L. Sherald (Eds.). Dutch Elm Disease Research: Cellular and Molecular Approaches. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, U.S. 344 pp.
49. Heybroek, H. 1993b. The Dutch elm breeding program. pp. 16-25. In: M.B. Sticklen and J.L. Sherald (Eds.). Dutch Elm Disease Research: Cellular and Molecular Approaches. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, U.S. 344 pp.
50. Hollingsworth, P.M., M.L. Hollingsworth, and M. Coleman. 2000. The European elms: molecular markers, population genetics, and biosystematics. pp. 3-20. In: C.P. Dunn (Ed.). The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S. 361 pp.
51. Holmes, F.W. 1993. Seven Dutch women scientist whose early research is basic to our knowledge of the "Dutch Elm Disease." pp. 9-15. Dutch Elm Disease Research: Cellular and Molecular Approaches. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, U.S. 344 pp.
52. Hunt, S. 2011. Columbus Dispatch-Forestry scientist seek Dutch elm disease survivors-public asked to help find trees untouched by the disease. Accessed 17 November 2015. 〈www.dispatch.com/content/stories/science/2011/04/17/in-search-ofsurvivors.html〉.
53. Jacobi, W., J. Klett, and J. Walla. 2015. National Elm Trial. College of Agricultural Sciences. University of Colorado. Accessed 02 November 2015. 〈http://bspm.agsci.colostate.edu/people-button/faculty-new/william-jacobi/national-elm-trial〉.
54. Jacobi, W.R., R.D. Koski, J.F. Negron, and J.N. Gibbs. 2013. Dutch elm disease pathogen transmission by the banded elm bark beetle Scolytus schevyrewi. Forest Pathology 43:232-237.
55. Jensen, B. 2013. Grow with KARE: The story of the St. Croix elm. Accessed 17 November 2015. 〈http://archive.kare11.com/life/grow/article/1036578/7/Grow-with-KARE-The-story-of-the-St-Croix-Elm〉.
56. Johnson, B. 2014. Dutch elm disease resistant tree introduced. Fergus Falls Daily Journal 22 December 2014. 2 pp.
57. Jovic, J., T. Cvrkovic, M. Mitrovic, A. Petrovic, O. Krstic, S. Krnjajic, and I. Toševski. 2011. Multigene sequence data and genetic diversity among 'Candidatus Phytoplasma ulmi' strains infecting Ulmus spp. in Serbia. Plant Pathology 60:356-358.
58. Khoshraftar, S., S. Hung, S. Khan, Y. Gong, V. Tyagi, J. Parkinson, M. Sain, A.M. Moses, and D. Christendat. 2013. Sequencing and annotation of the Ophiostoma ulmi genome. BMC Genomics 14:162. Accessed 10 September 2015. 〈doi:10.1186/1471-2164-14-162〉.
59. Konrad, H., T. Kirisits, M. Riegler, E. Halmschlager, and C. Stauffer. 2002. Genetic evidence for natural hybridization between the Dutch elm disease pathogens Ophiostoma novo-ulmi ssp. novoulmi and O. novo-ulmi ssp. americana. Plant Pathology 51:78-84.
60. Kulkarni, R.K., and K.W. Nickerson. 1981. Nutritional control of dimorphism in Ceratocystis ulmi. Experimental Mycology 5:148-154.
61. Kumar, V., S. Rout, M.J. Tak, and K.R. Depak. 2015. Applications of biotechnology in forestry: current status and future perspective. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology 14:645-653.
62. Lang, C. 2004. Genetically modified trees-The ultimate threat to forests. Friends of the Earth International. Accessed 14 March 2016. 〈http://wrm.org.uy/oldsite/subjects/GMTrees/text.pdf〉.
63. Lee, I-M., M. Martini, C. Marcone, and S.F. Zhu. 2004. Classification of phytoplasma strains in the elm yellows group (16SrV) and proposal of 'Candidatus Phytoplasma ulmi' for the phytoplasma associated with elm yellows. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 54:337-347.
64. Lee, J.C., J.F. Negrón, S.J. McElwey, L. Williams, J.J. Witcosky, J.B. Popp, and S.J. Seybold. 2011. Biology of the invasive banded elm bark beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidea) in the Western United States. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 104(4):705-717.
65. Lester, D.T. 1971. Notes: An attempt to induce polyhaploidy in American elm. Forest Science 16:137-138.
66. Li, M., R. Lpez, M. Venturas, J.A. Martín, J. Domínguez, G.G. Gordaliza, L. Gil, and J. Rodríguez-Calcerrada. 2016. Physiological and biochemical differences among Ulmus minor genotypes showing a gradient of resistance to Dutch elm disease. Forest Pathology 46:215-228.
67. Martin J.A., A. Solla, S. Woodward, and L. Gil. 2007. Detection of differential changes in lignin composition of elm xylem tissues inoculated with Ophiostoma novo-ulmi using Fourier transforminfrared spectroscopy. Forest Pathology 37:187-191.
68. Martin, J.A., A. Solla, M. Ruiz-Villar, and L. Gil. 2013. Vessel length and conductivity of Ulmus branches: Ontogenetic changes and relation to resistance to Dutch elm disease. Trees 27:1239-1248.
69. Masuya, H., C. Brasier, Y. Ichihara, T. Kubono, and N. Kanzaki. 2010. First report of Dutch elm disease pathogens Ophiostoma ulmi and O. novo-ulmi in Japan. Plant Pathology 59:805.
70. May, C. 1934. Outbreaks of the Dutch elm disease in the United States. Circular No. 322. United States Department of Agriculture.
71. McLeod, G., R. Gries, S.H. von Reuss, J.E. Rahe, R. McIntosh, W.A. König, and G. Gries. 2005. The pathogen causing Dutch elm disease makes host trees attract insect vectors. Proceeding of the Royal Society. Biological Sciences 272:2499-2503.
72. McNabb, H.S. Jr., H.M. Heybroek, and W.L. Macdonald. 1970. Anatomical factors in resistance to Dutch elm disease. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 76:196-204.
73. Meier, F.G., and W.R. Remphrey. 1997. Accumulation of mansonones in callus cultures of Ulmus americana L. in the absence of a fungal-derived elicitor. Canadian Journal of Botany 75:513-517.
74. Merkle, S., G. Andrade, C. Nairn, W.A. Powell, and C. Maynard. 2007. Restoration of threatened species: A noble cause for transgenic trees. Tree Genetics & Genomes 3:111-118.
75. Miller, F. 2000. Insect resistance of elm genotypes. pp. 138-154. In: C.P. Dunn (Ed.). The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S. 361 pp.
76. Mittempergher, L. 2000. Elm yellows in Europe. pp. 103-119. In: C.P. Dunn (Ed.). The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S. 361 pp.
77. Mittempergher, L., and A. Santini. 2004. The history of elm breeding. Investigación Agraria Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 13:161-177.
78. Moser, J.C., H. Konrad, S.R. Blomquist, and T. Kirisits. 2010. Do mites phoretic on elm bark beetles contribute to the transmission of Dutch elm disease? Naturwissenschaften 97:219-227.
79. Nature Conservancy. 2016. Connecticut River-Restoring floodplains with the American elm. Accessed 26 February 2016. 〈www.nature.org/ourinitiatives/regions/northamerica/areas/connecticutriver/restoring-floodplains-with-american-elm.xml〉.
80. Newbanks, D., A. Bosch, and M.H. Zimmerman. 1983. Evidence of xylem dysfunction by embolization in Dutch elm disease. Phytopathology 73:1060-1063.
81. Newhouse, A., F. Schrodt, C. Maynard, and W. Powell. 2006. American elm (Ulmus americana). pp. 99-112. In: K. Wang (Ed.). Agrobacterium Protocols, second edition. Methods in Molecular Biology Book Series #344. Humana Press, Inc., Totowa, New Jersey, U.S. 485 pp.
82. Newhouse, A.E., F. Schrodt, H. Liang, C.A. Maynard, and W.A. Powell. 2007. Transgenic American elm shows reduced Dutch elm disease symptoms and normal mycorrhizal colonization. Plant Cell Reports 26:977-987.
83. Newhouse, A.E., L.D. Polin-McGuigan, K.A. Baier, K.E.R. Valletta, W.H. Rottmann, T.J. Tschaplinski, C.A. Maynard, and W.A. Powell. 2014. Transgenic American chestnut shows enhanced blight resistance and transmit the trait to T1 progeny. Plant Science 228:88-97.
84. Oakes, A.D., N.A. Kazcmar, C.A. Maynard, and W.A. Powell. 2012. Vegetative propagation of American elm (Ulmus americana) varieties from softwood cuttings. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 30:73-76.
85. Palmer, K. 2015. Disease-resistant St. Croix elm making its way to Twin Cities garden centers. StarTribune, 26 May 2015. Accessed 17 November 2015. 〈www.startribune.com/diseaseresistant-st-croix-elm-making-its-way-to-twin-cities-gardencenters/305035841〉.
86. Paoletti, M., K.W. Buck, and C.M. Brasier. 2006. Selective acquisition of novel mating type and vegetative incompatibility genes via interspecies gene transfer in the globally invading eukaryote Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Molecular Ecology 15:249-262.
87. Pataky, N. 1998. Elm yellows (elm phloem necrosis). Home Yard and Garden Pest Newsletter. University of Illinois Extension. Accessed 11 February 2016. 〈http://hyg.ipm.illinois.edu/pastpest/199804g.html〉.
88. Peduto-Hand, F., J. Boggs, and J. Chatfield. 2014. A "new" old disease. American Nurseryman (July 2014):16-18.
89. Pepori, A.L., M. Kolarík, P.P. Bettini, A.M. Vettraino, and A. Santini. 2015. Morphological and molecular characterization of Geosmithia species on European elms. Fungal Biology 119:1063-1074.
90. Perdiguero, P., M. Venturas, M.T. Cereva, L. Gil, and C. Collada. 2015. Massive sequencing of Ulmus minor's transcriptome provides new molecular tools for a genus under the constant threat of Dutch elm disease. Frontiers in Plant Science 6:article 541. Accessed 15 December 2015. 〈http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2015.00541/full〉.
91. Pinchot, C.C., S.L Clark, S.E. Schlarbaum, A.M. Saxton, S-J.S. Sung, and F.V. Hebard. 2015. Effects of temporal dynamics, nut weight, and nut size on growth of American chestnut, Chinese chestnut, and backcross generations in a commercial nursery. Forests 6(5):1537-1556.
92. Pinon, J., C. Lohou, and A. Cadic. 1998. Hybrid elms (Ulmus spp.): Adaptability in Paris and behavior towards Dutch elm disease (Ophiostoma novo-ulmi). Acta Horticulturae 496:107-114.
93. Pooler, M.R., and A.M. Townsend. 2005. DNA fingerprinting of clones and hybrids of American elm and other elm species with AFLP markers. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 23:113-117.
94. Potter, D.A., and C.T. Redmond. 2013. Relative resistance or susceptibility of landscape elms (Ulmus spp.) to multiple insect pests. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 39:236-243.
95. Powell, W. 2014. The American chestnut's genetic rebirth. Scientific American 310:68-73.
96. Przybyl, K., H. Dahm, A. Ciesielska, and K. Molínski. 2006. Celluolytic activity and virulence of Ophiostoma ulmi and O. novoulmi isolates. Forest Pathology 36:58-67.
97. Rioux, D., and G.B. Ouellette. 1989. Light microscope observation of histological changes induced by Ophiostoma ulmi in various nonhost trees and shrubs. Canadian Journal of Botany 67:2335-2351.
98. Rioux, D., and G.B. Ouellette. 1991. Barrier zone formation in host and nonhost trees inoculated with Ophiostoma ulmi. I. Anatomy and histochemistry. Canadian Journal of Botany 69:2055-2073.
99. Rosa, C., E. McCarthy, K. Duong, G. Hoover, and G. Moorman. 2014. First report of the spittlebug Lepyronia quadrangularis and the leafhopper Latalus sp. as vectors of the elm yellows associated phytoplasma, 'Candidatus Phytoplasma ulmi' in North America. Plant Disease 98:154.
100. Rothrock, R.E., L. Polin-McGuigan, A.E. Newhouse, W.A. Powell, and C.A. Maynard. 2007. Plate flooding as an alternative Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method for American chestnut somatic embryos. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 88:92-99.
101. Santamour, F.S. Jr. 1984. 'Dynasty' Chinese elm. HortScience 19:898-899.
102. Santamour, F.S. Jr., and G.H. Ware. 1997. Chromosome numbers of new Ulmus (elm) taxa introduced from China. Rhodora 99:148-151.
103. Santamour, F.S. Jr., and S.E. Bentz. 1995. Updated checklist of elm (Ulmus) cultivars for use in North America. Journal of Arboriculture 21(3):122-131.
104. Santini, A., A. Fagnani, F. Ferrini, and L. Mittempergher. 2002. 'San Zanobi' and 'Plinio' elm trees. HortScience 37:1139-1141.
105. Santini, A., A. Fagnani, F. Ferrini, L. Ghelardini, and L. Mittempergher. 2007. 'Fiorente' and 'Arno' elm trees. HortScience 42:712-714.
106. Santini, A., and M. Faccoli. 2014. Dutch elm disease and elm bark beetles: A century of association. iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry 8:126-134.
107. Santini, A., F. Pecori, and L. Ghelardini. Alexander, and S.J. Frankel 2012. The Italian elm breeding program for Dutch elm disease resistance. Proceedings of the fourth international workshop on the genetics of host-parasite interactions in forestry: Disease and insect resistance in forest trees. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-240. Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service,. pp. 326-335. In: R.A. Sniezko, A.D. Yanchuk, J.T. Kliejunas, K.M. Palmieri, J.M. United States Department of Agriculture, Albany, California;U S
108. Santini, A., N. La Porta, L. Ghelardini, and L. Mittempergher. 2008. Breeding against Dutch elm disease adapted to the Mediterranean climate. Euphytica 163:45-56.
109. Schreiber, L.R., and H.V. Main. 1976. 'Urban' elm. HortScience 11:517-518.
110. Select Trees. Accessed 01 December 2015. 〈http://selecttrees.com/pgs/Portfolio.php?TREE=36〉.
111. Sherald, J.L., F.S. Santamour Jr., R.K. Hajela, N. Hajela, and M.B. Sticklen. 1994. A Dutch elm disease resistant triploid elm. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 24:647-653.
112. Sherif, S.M., M.R. Shukla, S.J. Murch, L. Berier, and P.K. Saxena. 2016. Simultaneous induction of jasmonic acid and diseaseresponsive genes signifies tolerance of American elm to Dutch elm disease. Scientific Reports 6, 21934.
113. Shigo, A., and J.T. Tippett. 1981. Compartmentalization of American elm tissues infected by Ceratocystis ulmi. Plant Disease 65:715-718.
114. Shigo, A.L., and H.G. Marx. 1977. Compartmentalization of decay in trees. Agricultural Information Bulletin No. 405. Forest Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture.
115. Sinclair, W.A. 2000. Elm yellows in North America. pp. 121-136. In: C.P. Dunn (Ed.). The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S. 361 pp.
116. Sinclair, W.A., A.M. Townsend, H.M. Griffiths, and T.H. Whitlow. 2000. Response of six Eurasian Ulmus cultivars to a North American elm yellows phytoplasma. Plant Disease 84:1266-1270.
117. Sinclair, W.A., D.S. Welch, K.G. Parker, and R.J. Tyler. 1974. Selection of American elms for resistance to Ceratocystis ulmi. Plant Disease Reporter 58:784-788.
118. Slavicek, J.M., and K.S. Knight. 2012. Generation of American elm trees with tolerance to Dutch elm disease though controlled crosses and selection. pp. 342-346. In: R.A. Sniezko, A.D. Yanchuk, J.T. Kliejunas, K.M. Palmieri, J.M. Alexander, and S.J. Frankel (technical coords.). Proceedings of the fourth international workshop on the genetics of host-parasite interactions in forestry: Disease and insect resistance in forest trees. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-240. Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Albany, California, U.S.
119. Smalley, E.B., and R.P. Guries. 1993. Breeding elms for resistance to Dutch elm disease. Annual Review of Phytopathology 31:325-352.
120. Smalley, E.B., and R.P. Guries. 2000. Asian elms: Sources of disease and insect resistance. pp. 215-230. In: C.P. Dunn (Ed.). The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S. 361 pp.
121. Smalley, E.B., R.P. Guries, and D.T. Lester. 1993. American Liberty elms and beyond: Going from the impossible to the difficult. pp. 26-45. In: M.B. Sticklen and J.L. Sherald (Eds.). Dutch Elm Disease Research: Cellular and Molecular Approaches. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, U.S. 344 pp.
122. Solla, A., J.A. Martin, G.B. Ouellette, and L. Gil. 2005. Influence of plant age on symptom development in Ulmus minor inoculation by Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Plant Disease 89:1035-1040.
123. Solla, A., J.C. López-Almansa, J.A. Martín, and L. Gil. 2014. Genetic variation and heritability estimates of Ulmus minor and Ulmus pumila hybrids for budburst, growth, and tolerance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry 8:422-430.
124. Spongberg, S.A. 1991. Cultivar registration at the Arnold Arboretum. HortScience 26:476.
125. Stevenson, K.J., A. Slater, and S. Takai. 1979. Cerato-ulmin-A wilting toxin of Dutch elm disease fungus. Phytochemistry 18:235-238.
126. Stipes, R.J. 2000. The management of Dutch elm disease. pp. 157-172. In: C.P. Dunn (Ed.). The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S. 361 pp.
127. Strauss, S.H., S.P. DiFazio, and R. Meilan. 2001. Genetically modified poplars in context. The Forest Chronicle 77:271-279.
128. Svaldi, R., and D.M. Elgersma. 1982. Further studies on the activity of cell wall degrading enzymes of aggressive and non-aggressive isolates of Ophiostoma ulmi. European Journal of Forest Pathology 12:29-36.
129. Takai, S., and E.S. Kondo. 1979. Seasonal development of Dutch elm disease on white elms in central Ontario, Canada. I. Following wound inoculation. Canadian Journal of Botany 57:341-352.
130. Takai, S., E.S. Kondo, and J.B. Thomas. 1979. Seasonal development of Dutch elm disease on white elms in central Ontario, Canada. II. Following feeding by North American native elm bark beetle. Canadian Journal of Botany 57:353-359.
131. Tchernoff, V. 1965. Methods for screening and for rapid selection of elms for resistance to Dutch elm disease. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 14:409-452.
132. Temple, B., and P.A. Horgen. 2000. Biological roles for ceratoulmin, a hydrophobin secreted by the elm pathogens, Ophiostoma ulmi and O. novo-ulmi. Mycologia 92:1-9.
133. Temple, B., L. Bernier, and W.E. Hintz. 2009. Characterization of the polygalacturonase gene of the Dutch elm disease pathogen Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 39:29-37.
134. Temple, B., P.A. Horgen, L. Bernier, and W.E. Hintz. 1997. Ceratoulmin, a hydrophobin secreted by the causal agents of Dutch elm disease, is a parasitic fitness factor. Fungal Genetics and Biology 22:39-53.
135. Tomlinson, I., and C. Potter. 2010. 'Too little, too late'? Science, policy, and Dutch elm disease in the UK. Journal of Historical Geography 36:121-131.
136. Townsend, A.M., and L.W. Douglass. 2001. Variation among American elm clones in long-term dieback, growth, and survival following Ophiostoma inoculation. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 19:100-103.
137. Townsend, A.M. 2000. USDA genetic research on elms. pp. 272-278. In: C.P. Dunn (Ed.). The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S. 361 pp.
138. Townsend, A.M., and L.W. Douglass. 2004. Evaluation of elm clones for tolerance to Dutch elm disease. Journal of Arboriculture 30:179-184.
139. Townsend, A.M., and W.O. Masters. 1984a. 'Homestead' elm. Hort-Science 19:897-898.
140. Townsend, A.M., and W.O. Masters. 1984b. 'Pioneer' elm. Hort-Science 19:900.
141. Townsend, A.M., L.R. Schreiber, W.O. Masters, and S.E. Bentz. 1991a. 'Prospector' elm. HortScience 26:81-82.
142. Townsend, A.M., L.R. Schreiber, W.O. Masters, and S.E. Bentz. 1991b. 'Frontier' elm. HortScience 26:80-81.
143. Townsend, A.M., R.W. Hall, and W.O. Masters. 1995a. 'Patriot' elm. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 13:113-115.
144. Townsend, A.M., S.E. Bentz, and G.R. Johnson. 1995b. Variation in response of selected American elm clones to Ophiostoma ulmi. Journal of Environmental Horticulture. 13:126-128.
145. Townsend, A.M., S.E. Bentz, and L.W. Douglass. 2005. Evaluation of 19 American elm clones for tolerance to Dutch elm disease. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 23:21-24.
146. USDA Forest Service. 2012. Pest Alert-Elm yellows. Accessed 09 July 2016. 〈http://na.fs.fed.us/pubs/palerts/elm-yellows/elm- yellows-pest-alert-120709-high-res.pdf〉.
147. Veilleux, J., J. Leferin, and N.J. Holliday. 2012. Rapid removal of symptomatic trees reduces Dutch elm disease infection rates. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 38:99-104.
148. Venturas, M., R. Lopez, J.A. Martin, A. Gascó, and L. Gil. 2014. Heritability of Ulmus minor resistance to Dutch elm disease and its relationship to vessel size, but not to xylem vulnerability to drought. Plant Pathology 63:500-509.
149. Ware, G.H. 1995. Little-known elms from China: Landscape tree possibilities. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 21:284-288.
150. Ware, G.H. 2000. The promise and future of urban elms: a personal perspective. pp. 331-339. In: C.P. Dunn (Ed.). The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S. 361 pp.
151. Watson, B.G. 2012. Dutch elm disease: Then and now. Arbor Age 32(4):18-19.
152. Webber, J.F. 2000. Insect vector behavior and the evolution of Dutch elm disease. pp. 47-60. In: C.P. Dunn (Ed.). The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S. 361 pp.
153. Whittemore, A.T., and R.T. Olsen. 2011. Ulmus americana (Ulmaceae) is a polyploidy complex. American Journal of Botany 98:754-760.
154. Wiegrefe, S.J., K.J. Systma, and R.P Guries. 1994. Phylogeny of elms (Ulmus, Ulmaceae): molecular evidence for a sectional classification. Systematic Botany 19:590-612.
155. Yaguchi, M., M. Pusztai-Carey, C. Roy, W.K. Surewicz, P.R. Carey, K.J. Stevenson, W.C. Richards, and S. Takai. 1993. Amino acid sequence and spectroscopic studies of Dutch elm disease toxin, cerato-ulmin. pp. 152-170. In: M.B. Sticklen and J.L. Sherald (Eds.). Dutch Elm Disease Research: Cellular and Molecular Approaches. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, U.S. 344 pp.
156. Young, C., and R.W. Hall. 1986. Factors influencing suitability of elms for elm leaf beetle, Xanthogaleruca luteola (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Environmental Entomology 15:843-849.
157. Zhang, B., A.D. Oakes, A.E. Newhouse, K.M. Baier, C.A. Maynard, and W.A. Powell. 2013. A threshold level of oxalate oxidase transgene expression reduces Cryphonectria parasitica-induced necrosis in transgenic American chestnut (Castanea dentata) leaf bioassay. Transgenic Research 22:973-982.