Influence of plant age on symptom development in Ulmus minor following inoculation by Ophiostoma novo-ulmi

Plant Disease

Volumn 89, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 1035-1040

  Solla, A ^a   Martin J A ^b   Ouellette, G B ^c   Gil, L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXTREMADURA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c LAURENTIAN FORESTRY CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Hydraulic conductance; Juvenility; Plant resistance

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY;

GROWING CONDITIONS; JUVENILITY; PLANT RESISTANCE;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

FORESTRY; PLANTS;

FUNGI; OPHIOSTOMA NOVO-ULMI; ULMACEAE; ULMUS; ULMUS MINOR; ULMUS PUMILA;

EID: 25144433351     PISSN: 01912917     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1094/PD-89-1035     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Brasier, C. M. 1986. Comparison of pathogenicity and cultural characteristics in the EAN and NAN aggressive subgroups of Ophiostoma ulmi. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 87:1-13.
2. Caroselli, N. E., and Feldman, A. W. 1951. Dutch elm disease in young elm seedlings. Phytopathology 41:46-51.
3. Duchesne, L. C. 1993. Mechanisms of resistance: Can they help save susceptible elms? Pages 239-254 in: Dutch Elm Disease Research. Cellular and Molecular Approaches. M. Sticklen and J. Sherald, eds. Springer-Verlag, New York.
4. Elgersma, D. M. 1970. Length and diameter of xylem vessels as factors in resistance of elms to Ceratocystis ulmi. Neth. J. Plant Pathol. 76:179-182.
5. Elgersma, D. M. 1973. Tylosis formation in elms after inoculation with Ceratocystis ulmi, a possible resistance mechanism. Neth. J. Plant Pathol. 79:218-220.
6. Elgersma, D. M., and Miller, H. J. 1977. Tylosis formation in elms after inoculation with an aggressive or a non aggressive strain of Ophiostoma ulmi or with a non-pathogen in elms. Neth. J. Plant Pathol. 83:241-243.
7. Ellmore, G. S., and Ewers, F. W. 1985. Hydraulic conductivity in trunk xylem of Elm, Ulmus americana. IAWA Bull. 4:303-307.
8. Gil, L., Fuentes-Utrilla, P., Soto, A., Cervera, M. T., and Collada, C. 2004. English elm is a 2,000-year-old Roman clone. Nature 431:1053.
9. Giordano, R., Salleo, S., and Wanderlingh, F. 1978. Flow in xylem vessels and Poiseuille's law. Can. J. Bot. 56:333-338.
10. Green, C. E., Guries, R. P., and Smalley, E. B. 1985. Early screening of elms for resistance to Ceratocystis ulmi. Plant Dis. 69:60-63.
11. Heybroek, H. M. 1957. Elm breeding in the Netherlands. Silvae Genet. 6:112-117.
12. Lovisolo, C., and Schubert, A. 1998. Effects of water stress on vessel size and xylem hydraulic conductivity in Vitis vinifera L. J. Exp. Bot. 49:693-700.
13. McNabb, H. S., Jr., Heybroek, H. M., and Mcdonald, W. L. 1970. Anatomical factors in resistance to Dutch elm disease. Neth. J. Plant Pathol. 76:196-204.
14. Mittempergher, L., and La Porta, N. 1993. Ophiostoma ulmi/Olmo. Pages 412-432 in: Miglioramento Genetico delle Piante per Resistenza a Patogeni e Parassiti. P. Crinò, A. Sonnino, F. Saccardo, M. Buiatti, A. PortaPuglia, and G. Surico, eds. Edagricole, Bologne, Italy.
15. Mittempergher, L., and Santini, A. 2004. The history of elm breeding. Invest. Agrar: Sist. Recur. For. 3:161-177.
16. Neely, D. 1968. Twig inoculations on American elm with Ceratocystis ulmi. Phytopathology 58:1566-1570.
17. Ouellette, G. B., Rioux, D., Simard, M., and Cherif, M. 2004. Ultrastructural and cytochemical studies of host and pathogens in some fungal wilt diseases: Retro- and introspection towards a better understanding of DED. Invest. Agrar: Sist. Recur. For. 13:119-145.
18. Richens, R. H. 1983. Elm. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
19. Schreiber, L. R., and Stipes, R. J. 1967. The effect of inoculum spore concentration on the development of foliar symptoms of Dutch Elm Disease. Phytopathology 57:1269.
20. Seiwa, K. 1999. Ontogenetic changes in leaf phenology of Ulmus davidiana var. japonica, a deciduous broad-leaved tree. Tree Physiol. 19:793-797.
21. Shapiro, S. S., and Wilks, M. B. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52:591-611.
22. Sinclair, W. A., and Brener, W. D. 1974. Dutch elm disease in clones from white elms resistant and susceptible to Ceratocystis ulmi. Phytopathology 64:675-679.
23. Sinclair, W. A., Zahand, J. P., and Melching, J. B. 1975. Anatomical markers for resistance of Ulmus americana to Ceratocystis ulmi. Phytopathology 65:349-352.
24. Smalley, E. B. 1963. Seasonal fluctuations in susceptibility of young elm seedlings to Dutch elm disease. Phytopathology 53:846-853.
25. Smalley, E. B., and Guries, R. P. 1993. Breeding elms for resistance to Dutch elm disease. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 31:325-352.
26. Smalley, E. B., and Guries, R. P. 2000. Asian Elms: Sources of disease and insect resistance. Pages 215-230 in: The Elms. Breeding, Conservation and Disease Management. C. P. Dunn, ed. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
27. Smalley, E. B., and Kais, A. G. 1966. Seasonal variations in the resistance of various elm species to Dutch elm disease. Pages 279-287 in: Proc. Breed. Pest-Resistant Trees. H. D. Gerhold, E. J. Schreiner, R. E. McDermott, and J. A. Winieski, eds. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.
28. Solla, A., Bohnens, J., Collin, E., Diamandis, S., Franke, A., Gil, L., Burón, M., Santini, A., Mittempergher, L., Pinon, J., and Vanden Broek, A. 2005. Screening European elms for resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. For. Sci. 51: 134-141.
29. Solla, A., Burón, M., Iglesias, S., and Gil, L. 2000. Spanish program for the conservation and breeding of elms against DED. Pages 295-303 in: The Elms. Breeding, Conservation and Disease Management. C. P. Dunn, ed. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
30. Solla, A., and Gil, L. 2002. Influence of water stress on Dutch elm disease symptoms in Ulmus minor Miller. Can. J. Bot. 80:810-817.
31. Solla, A., and Gil, L. 2002. Xylem vessel diameter as a factor in resistance of Ulmus minor to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. For. Pathol. 32:123-134.
32. Solla, A., Martin, J. A., Corral, P., and Gil, L. 2005. Seasonal changes in wood formation of Ulmus pumila and U. minor and its relation with Dutch elm disease. New Phytol. 166:1025-1034.
33. Sutherland, M. L., Pearson, S., and Brasier, C. M. 1997. The influence of temperature and light on defoliation levels of elm by Dutch elm disease. Phytopathology 87:576-581.
34. Tchernoff, V. 1965. Methods for screening and for the rapid selection of elms for resistance to Dutch elm disease. Acta Bot. Neerl. 14:409-452.
35. Townsend, A. M. 1971. Relative resistance of diploid Ulmus species to Ceratocystis ulmi. Plant Dis. Rep. 55:980-982.
36. Tyree, M. T., and Zimmermann, M. H. 2002. Xylem Structure and the Ascent of Sap. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
37. Utsumi, Y., Sano, Y., Funada, R., Fujikawa, S., and Ohtani, J. 1999. The progression of cavitation in earlywood vessels of Fraxinus mandshurica var japonica during freezing and thawing. Plant Physiol. 121:897-904.
38. Went, J. C. 1954. The Dutch Elm Disease. Summary of fifteen years hybridisation and selection work (1937-1952). Tijdschr. Plantenziekten 60:109-127.
39. Wright, J. W. 1968. A first step in breeding resistant elms. Pages 18-25 in: Proc. Central States For. Tree Improve. Conf. 6th. D. T. Funk, ed. U.S. Forest Service, Carbondale, IL.