Dutch elm disease and elm bark beetles: A century of association

IForest

Volumn 8, Issue , 2014, Pages 126-134

  Santini, Alberto ^a   Faccoli, Massimo ^b  

^a INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE PLANT PROTECTION   (Italy)

^b Agripolis ^*  (Italy)

Author keywords

Avoidance Mechanisms; DED Cycle; Disease Escape; Dutch Elm Disease; Elm Bark Beetles; Resistance; Scolytus Ophiostoma Interactions

Indexed keywords

COLEOPTERA; FUNGI; HEXAPODA; OPHIOSTOMA; OPHIOSTOMA ULMI; SCOLYTINAE; SCOLYTUS; SCOLYTUS MULTISTRIATUS; SCOLYTUS SCOLYTUS; ULMUS;

EID: 84925300703     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19717458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3832/ifor1231-008     Document Type: Article

References (147)

1. Agrios GN (1988). Plant diseases caused by fungi. In: “Plant Pathology”. Academic Press, S. Diego, CA, USA, pp. 265-509.
2. Aoun M, Rioux D, Simard M, Bernier L (2009). Fungal colonization and host defense reactions in Ulmus americana callus cultures inoculated with Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Phytopathology 99: 642-650. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-99-6-0642
3. Balachowsky A (1949). Faune de France n° 50: Coléoptères Scolytides. Libraire de la Faculté des Sciences, Lechevalier, Paris, France, pp. 320. [in French]
4. Banfield WM (1941). Distribution by the sap stream of spores of three fungi that induce vascular wilt diseases of elm. Journal of Agricultural Research 62: 637-681.
5. Banfield WM (1968). Dutch elm disease recurrence and recovery in American elm. Phytopathologische Zeitschrift 62: 21-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0434.1968.tb02345.x
6. Basset Y, Favaro A, Springate ND, Battisti A (1992). Observations on the relative effectiveness of Scolytus multistriatus (Marsham) and Scolytus pygmaeus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera, Sco- lytidae) as vectors of the Dutch Elm Disease. Bulletin de la Société Entomologique Suisse 65: 61-67.
7. Batra LR (1963). Ecology of ambrosia fungi and their dissemination by beetles. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 66: 213-236. doi: 10.2307/3626562
8. Battisti A, Favaro A, Faccoli M, Masutti L (1994). Suscettibilità dei ceppi di Ulmus sp. all’attacco primario di Scolytus sp.pl. (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) [Susceptibility of Ulmus species to primary infestation of Scolytus species (Coleoptera, Scolytidae)]. In: “Innovazioni e Prospettive nella Difesa Fitosanitaria” (Istituto Sperimentale di Patologia Vegetale, Roma). Convegno MiRAAF, Ferrara, Italy, pp. 351-354. [in Italian]
9. Battisti A, Roques A, Colombari F, Frigimelica G, Guido M (1999). Efficient transmission of an introduced pathogen via an ancient insect-fungus association. Naturwissenschaften 86: 479-483. doi: 10.1007/s001140050658
10. Beaver RA (1989). Insect-Fungus Relationships in the Bark and Ambrosia Beetles. In: Proceedings of the 14th Symposium of the Royal Entomological Society of London/British Mycological Society “Insect-Fungus Interactions” (Wilding N, Collins NM, Hammond PM, Webber JF eds). Academic Press, London, UK, pp. 121-143.
11. Berryman AA (1989). Adaptive pathways in scolytid- fungus associations. In: Proceedings of the 14th Symposium of the Royal Entomological Society of London/British Mycological Society “Insect-Fungus Interactions” (Wilding N, Collins NM, Hammond PM, Webber JF eds). Academic Press, London, UK, pp. 145-160
12. Betrem JG (1929). De iepenziekte en de iepenspintkevers [The elm disease and elm bark beetles]. Tijdschr Plantenziekten 35: 272-289. [in Dutch] doi: 10.1007/BF02810222
13. Bonsen KJM, Scheffer RJ, Elgersma DM (1985). Barrier zone formation as a resistance mechanism of elms to Dutch elm disease. IAWA Bulletin 6: 71-77. doi: 10.1163/22941932-90000916
14. Brasier CM (1979). Dual origin of recent Dutch Elm disease outbreaks in Europe. Nature 281: 78-79. doi: 10.1038/281078a0
15. Brasier CM (1983). A citoplasmically transmitted disease of Ceratocystis ulmi. Nature 305: 220- 223. doi: 10.1038/305220a0
16. Brasier CM (1990). China and the origins of Dutch elm disease: an appraisal. Plant Pathology 39: 5-16. doi: 10.1111/j.365-3059.1990.tb02470.x
17. Brasier CM (1991). Ophiostoma novo-ulmi sp. nov., causative agent of current Dutch elm disease pandemics. Mycopathologia 115: 151-161. doi: 10.1007/BF00462219
18. Brasier CM (2000). Intercontinental spread and continuing evolution of the Dutch elm disease pathogens. In: “The elms: breeding, conservation and disease management” (Dunn CP ed). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. pp. 61-72.
19. Brasier CM, Kirk SA (2001). Designation of the EAN and NAN races of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi as subspecies: their perithecial size differences and geographical distributions. Mycological Research 105: 547-554. doi: 10.1017/S0953756201004087
20. Brasier CM, Kirk SA (2010). Rapid emergence of hybrids between the two subspecies of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi with a high level of pathogenic fitness. Plant Pathology 59: 186-199. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2009.02157.x
21. Brasier CM, Mehrotra MD (1995). Ophiostoma himal-ulmi sp. nov., a new species of Dutch elm disease fungus endemic to the Himalayas. Mycological Research 99: 205-215. doi: 10.1016/S 0953-7562(09)80887-3
22. Brunet J, Zalapa JE, Pecori F, Santini A (2013). Hybridization and introgression between the exotic Siberian elm, Ulmus pumila, and the native Field elm, U. minor, in Italy. Biological Invasions 15: 2717-2730 doi: 10.1007/s10530-013-0486-z
23. Buisman C (1932). De olmen- of iepenziekte [The elms and elm disease]. Dirix-Van Riet K, Antwerpen, Belgium, pp. 15. [in Dutch]
24. Burdekin D (1979). Beetle and fungus: the unholy alliance. Heinemann, London, UK, pp. 65-79.
25. Carraro L, Ferrini F, Ermacora P, Loi N, Martini M, Osler R (2004). Macropsis mendax as a vector of elm yellows phytoplasma of Ulmus species. Plant Pathology 53: 90-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2004.00940.x
26. Chang H, Liu Q, Hao D, Liu Y, An Y, Qian L, Yang X (2014). DNA barcodes and molecular diagnostics for distinguishing introduced Xyleborus (Coleoptera: Scolytinae) species in China. Mitochondrial DNA 25: 63-69. doi: 10.3109/19401736.2013.779260
27. Chapman JW (1910). The introduction of an European scolytid, the smaller bark beetle, Scolytus multistriatus (Marsham) into Massachusetts. Psyche 17: 63-68. doi: 10.1155/1910/76129
28. Collins CW, Buchanan WD, Witten RR, Hoffman CH (1936). Bark beetles and other possible insect vectors of Dutch elm disease Ceratostomella ulmi (Schwarz) Buisman. Journal of Economic Entomology 29: 169-176.
29. Covassi M, Masutti L (1980). Generalità sull’entomofauna degli olmi con particolare riguardo ai coleotteri scolitidi vettori della grafiosi [Review of the elm entomofauna with particular regard to bark beetles vectors of DED]. Informatore Fitopatologico 30: 19-26. [in Italian]
30. Della Beffa G (1949). Gli insetti dannosi all’agricoltura e i moderni mezzi e metodi di lotta [The insects harmful to agriculture and the modern control means and methods]. Hoepli, Milano, Italy, pp. 978. [in Italian]
31. Duchesne LC, Jeng RS, Hubbes M (1985). Accumulation of phytoalexins in Ulmus americana in response to infection by a nonaggressive strain of Ophiostoma ulmi. Canadian Journal of Botany 63: 678-680. doi: 10.1139/b85-086
32. Dunn CP (2000). The elms: breeding, conservation and disease management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, USA, pp. 228.
33. Elgersma DM (1970). Length and diameter of xylem vessels as a factors in resistance of elms to Ceratocystis ulmi. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 76: 179-182 doi: 10.1007/BF01974328
34. Elgersma DM (1973). Tylose formation in elms after inoculation with Ceratocystis ulmi, a possible resistance mechanism. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 79: 218-220. doi: 10.1007/BF01974237
35. Elgersma DM (1982). Susceptibility and possible mechanisms of resistance to Dutch elm disease. In: Proceedings of the “Dutch elm disease symposium and workshop” (Kondo ES, Hiratsuka Y, Denyer WBG eds). Winnipeg (Canada) 5-9 October 1981, pp. 169-177.
36. Elgersma DM, Heybroek HM (1979). Spread and survival of an aggressive and a non-aggressive strain of Ophiostoma ulmi in elms. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 85: 235-240. doi: 10.1007/BF01977595
37. Et-Touil A, Rioux D, Mathieu FM, Bernier L (2005). External symptoms and histopathological changes following inoculation of elms putatively resistant to Dutch elm disease with genetically close strains of Ophiostoma. Canadian Journal of Botany 83: 656-667. doi: 10.1139/b05-037
38. Ewers FW, Fisher JB, Chiu ST (1990). A survey of vessel dimensions in stems of tropical lianas and other growth forms. Oecologia 84: 544-552. doi: 10.1007/BF00328172
39. Faccoli M (1995). Coleotteri scolitidi e grafiosi dell’olmo. Prove di controllo combinato [Elm bark beetles and the Dutch elm disease: trials of combined control]. Master thesis in Forest Sciences, University of Padua, Italy, pp. 79. [in Italian]
40. Faccoli M (2001). Elm bark beetles and Dutch elm disease: tests of combined control. Journal of Pest Science 74: 22-29. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0280.2001.00033.x
41. Faccoli M (2004). Scolytus scolytus (F.). In: “Crop Protection Compendium 2004 Edition”. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, CD-ROM.
42. Faccoli M, Battisti A (1997). Observations on the transmission of Ophiostoma ulmi by the Smaller Elm Bark Beetles (Scolytus spp.). In: Proceeding of the IUFRO meeting “Integrating cultural tactics into the management of bark beetles and reforestation pest”. Vallombrosa (Italy) 1-4 Sep 1996. General Technical Report NE-236, USDA Forest Service, pp. 172-176.
43. Faccoli M, Zanocco D, Battisti A, Masutti L (1998). Chiave semplificata per la determinazione degli Scolytus Geoffroy (Coleoptera Scolytidae) italiani viventi sugli olmi [Morphological key for determination of the Italian elm bark beetles of the genus Scolytus Geoffroy (Coleoptera Scolytidae)]. Redia 81: 183-197. [in Italian]
44. Favaro A, Battisti A (1993). Observations on the elm bark beetle Scolytus pygmaeus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) as possible vector of the fungus Ophiostoma ulmi (Schwarz) Nannfeld. Redia 76: 459-466.
45. Francke-Grosmann H (1956a). Hautdrüsen als Träger der Pilzsymbiose bei Ambrosiakäfern [Mycangia as carriers of the fungus symbiosis with ambrosia beetles]. Zeitschrift für Morpholo- gie und Ökologie der Tiere 45: 275-308. [in German] doi: 10.1007/BF00430256
46. Francke-Grosmann H (1956b). Grundlagen der Symbiose bei pilzzüchtenden Holzinsekten [Basics of symbiosis with fungus-growing wood insects]. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft Hamburg, Leipzig, Germany, pp. 112-118. [in German]
47. Francke-Grosmann H (1963a). Some new aspects in forest entomology. Annual Review of Entomology 8: 415-438. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.08.010163.002215
48. Francke-Grosmann H (1963b). Zur Übertragung der Pilzflora bei dem Borkenkäfer Ips acuminatus [Transfer of the fungal flora in the bark beetle Ips acuminatus]. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 52: 355-361. [in German] doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.1963.tb02 046.x
49. Francke-Grosmann H (1967). Ectosymbiosis in wood inhabiting insects. In: “Symbiosis. Associations of invertebrates, birds, ruminants and other biota (vol. 2)” (Henry SH ed). Academic Press, New York, USA, pp. 141-205.
50. Fransen JJ (1931). Enkele gegevens omtrent de verspreiding van de door Graphium ulmi Schwarz veroorzaakte iepenziekte door de iepenspintkevers, Eccoptogaster (Scolytus) scolytus F. en Eccoptogaster (Scolytus) multistriatus Marsh. in verband met de bestijding dezer ziekte [Comparing some data about spreading of Graphium ulmi Schwarz elm disease caused by the elm bark beetles, Eccoptogaster (Scolytus) Scolytus F. and Eccoptogaster (Scolytus) multistriatus Marsh. in connection with this disease]. Tijdschrift over Plantenziekten 37: 49-62. [in Dutch]
51. Fransen JJ (1939). Iepenziekte, iepenspintkevers en beider bestrijding [Elm disease, elm bark beetles and their control]. Veenman and Zonen, Wageningen, The Netherland, pp. 118. [in Dutch]
52. Fransen JJ, Buisman C (1935). Infectieproeven op verschillende iepensoorten met behulp van de iepenspintkever [Experiments on different species of elm with the bark beetles]. Tijdschrift over Plantenziekten 41: 221-239. [in Dutch]
53. Ghelardini L, Santini A (2009). Avoidance by early flushing: a new perspective on Dutch elm disease research. iForest 2: 143-153. doi: 10.3832/ifor0508-002
54. Ghelardini L, Falusi M, Santini A (2006). Variation in timing of bud-burst of Ulmus minor clones from different geographical origins. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36: 1982-1991. doi: 10.1139/x06-092
55. Ghelardini L, Santini A, Black-Samuelsson S, Myking T, Falusi M (2010). Bud dormancy release in elm (Ulmus spp.) clones - a case study of photoperiod and temperature responses. Tree Physiology 30: 264-274. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpp110
56. Gibbs JN (1974). Biology of Dutch elm disease Ceratocystsi ulmi. Forest Record 94: 1-9.
57. Gibbs JN (1978). Intercontinental epidemiology of Dutch elm disease. Annual Review of Phytopathology 16: 287-307. doi: 10.1146/annurev.py.16.090178.001443
58. Gibbs JN, Brasier CM (1973). Correlation between cultural characters and pathogenicity in Ceratocystis ulmi from Britain, Europe and North America. Nature 241: 381-383. doi: 10.1038/241381a0
59. Gibbs JN, Smith ME (1978). Antagonism during the saprophytic phase of the life cycles of two pathogens of woody host - Heterobasidium annosum and Ceratocystis ulmi. Annals of Applied Biology 89: 125-128. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1978.tb02586.x
60. Goidanich G (1936). La moria dell’olmo (Graphium ulmi) [The elm disease (Graphium ulmi)]. Reda, Roma, Italy, pp 124. [in Italian]
61. Goidanich A, Goidanich G (1937). Moria degli olmi e scolitidi [Elm decline and bark beetles]. Italia Agricola 71: 941-948. [in Italian]
62. Guries RP (2001). Elms: past, present, and future. In: Proceeding of the “National conference on wilt diseases of shade trees” (Ash CL ed). St. Paul (MN, USA) August 1999. APS Press, USA, pp. 29-36.
63. Herms DA, Mattson WJ (1992). The dilemma of plants - To grow or defend. Quarterly Review of Biology 67: 283-335. doi: 10.1086/417659
64. Heybroek HM, Elgersma DM, Scheffer RJ (1982). Dutch elm disease: an ecological accident. Outlook on Agriculture 11: 1-9.
65. Jacobi WR, Koski RD, Harrington TC, Witcosky JJ (2007). Association of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi with Scolytus schevyrewi (Scolytidae) in Colorado. Plant Disease 91: 245-247. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-91-3-0245
66. Jacot AP (1934). Acarina as possible vector of the Dutch elm disease. Journal of Economic Entomology 27: 858-859.
67. Jacot AP (1936). Three possible mites vector of the Dutch elm disease. Entomological Society of America 29: 627-635.
68. Jeng RS, Alfenas AC, Hubbes M, Dumas MT (1983). Presence and accumulation of fungitoxic substances against Ceratocystis ulmi in Ulmus americana: possible relation to induced resistance. European Journal of Forest Pathology 13: 239-244. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0329.1983.tb00124.x
69. Kirisits T (2013). Dutch elm disease and other Ophiostoma diseases. In: “Infectious forest diseases” (Gonthier P, Nicolotti G eds). CABI, Wallingford, UK, pp. 256-282.
70. Kletecka Z (1996). The xylophagus beetles (Insecta, Coleoptera) community and its succession on Scotch elm (Ulmus glabra) branches. Biologia 51: 143-152. [online] URL: http://www.cabdirect.org/abstracts/19971100241.html
71. Lanier GN, Peacock JW (1981). Vectors of the pathogen. In: “Compendium of elm diseases” (Stipes RJ, Campana RJ eds). The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN, USA, pp. 14-16.
72. Lea T (1977). A comparison of the saprophytic and parasitic stages of Ceratocystis ulmi. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London, London, UK, pp. 77.
73. Lévieux J, Cassier P, Guillaumin D, Roques A (1991). Structures implicated in the transportation of pathogenic fungi by the European bark beetle, Ips sexdentatus Boerner: ultrastructure of a mycangium. Canadian Entomologist 123: 245- 254. doi: 10.4039/Ent123245-2
74. Lorio PL (1986). Growth-differentiation balance provides a basis for understanding southern pine beetle-tree interactions. Forest Ecology and Management 14: 259-273. doi: 10.1016/0378-1127(86)90172-6
75. Lunderstadt J, Rohde M (1993). Biologie, Ausbreitungsstrategie und Bekampfungsmoglichkeiten der Ulmensplintkafer [Biology, dispersal strategy and possible fungus acquisition of the elm bark beetles]. Hessische Forstliche Versuchsanstalt, Hann Munden 16: 26-29. [in German]
76. Luchi N, Mancini V, Feducci M, Santini A, Capretti P (2012). Leptoglossus occidentalis and Diplodia pinea: a new insect-fungus association in Mediterranean forests. Forest Pathology 42: 246-251. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2011.00750.x
77. MacHardy WE, Beckman CH (1973). Water relations in American elm infected with Ceratocystis ulmi. Phytopathology 63: 98-103. doi: 10.1094/Phyto-63-98
78. Manojlovic B, Sivcev I (1995). The effect of elm bark thickness on Scolytus scolytus (F.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) growth in laboratory conditions. Zastita Bilja 46: 35-42. [online] URL: http://www.cabdirect.org/abstracts/19961100386.html
79. Marcelis LFM (1996). Sink strength as a determinant of dry matter partitioning in the whole plant. Journal of Experimental Botany 47: 1281-1291. doi: 10.1093/jxb/47.Special_Issue.1281
80. Marchal E (1927). Rapport sur les résultats des recherches effectuées à la station de Phytopatologie de l’Etat à Gembloux sur la maladie de l’orme [Report on the research results of the Plant Pathology State Station of Gembloux's about elm disease]. Forestière de Belgique 35: 162-164. [in French]
81. Martín JA, Solla A, Esteban LG, de Palacios P, Gil L (2009). Bordered pit and ray morphology involvement in elm resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 39: 420-429. doi: 10.1139/X08-183
82. Martin JA, Solla A, Ruiz-Villar M, Gil L (2013). Vessel length and conductivity of Ulmus branches: ontogenetic changes and relation to resistance to Dutch elm disease. Trees 27: 1239- 1248. doi: 10.1007/s00468-013-0872-2
83. McNabb HS, Heybroek HM, McDonald WL (1970). Anatomical factors in resistance to Dutch elm disease. Netherland Journal of Plant Pathology 76: 196-204. doi: 10.1007/BF01974 331
84. Meyer HJ, Norris DM (1967). Vanillin and syringaldehyde as attractants for Scolytus multistriatus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 60: 858-859. [online] URL: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/esa/aesa/1967/00000060/00000004/art0 0024
85. Michalski J (1973). Revision of the paleartic species of the Scolytus Geoffroy (Coleoptera, Scolytidae). Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszava, Krakow, Poland, pp. 214.
86. Mittempergher L (1989). Il declino dell’olmo: da latifoglia nobile a cespuglio [The elm decline: from tree to shrub]. Annali Accademia Italiana Scienze Forestali 38: 585-609.
87. Mittempergher L, Santini A (2004). The history of elm breeding. Investigación agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 13: 161-177. [online] URL: http://revistas.inia.es/index.php/fs/article/view/821
88. Moser JC, Konrad H, Blomquist SR, Kirisits T (2010). Do mites phoretic on elm bark beetles contribute to the transmission of Dutch elm disease? Naturwissenschaften 97: 219-227 doi: 10.1007/s00114-009-0630-x
89. Neely D (1968). Twig inoculations on American elm with Ceratocystis ulmi. Phytopathology 58: 1566-1570.
90. Neely D (1970). Dutch elm disease symptom progression. Plant Disease Report 54: 127-129.
91. Newbanks D, Bosh A, Zimmermann MH (1983). Evidence for xylem dysfunction by embolization in Dutch elm disease. Phytopatology 73: 1060- 1063. doi: 10.1094/Phyto-73-1060
92. Ouellette GB, Rioux D (1992). Anatomical and physiological aspects of resistance to Dutch elm disease. In: “Defense mechanisms in woody plants against fungi” (Blanchette A, Biggs R eds). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 257- 305.
93. Ouellette GB, Rioux D, Simard M, Cherif M (2004a). Ultrastructural and cytochemical studies of host and pathogens in some fungal wilt diseases: retro- and introspection towards a better understanding. Investigación agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 13: 119-145. [online] URL: http://revistas.inia.es/index.php/fs/article/view/819
94. Ouellette GB, Rioux D, Simard M, Chamberland H, Cherif M, Baayen RP (2004b). Ultrastructure of the alveolar network and its relation to coating on vessel walls in elms infected by Ophiostoma novo-ulmi and in other plants affected with similar wilt diseases. Investigación agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 13: 147-160. [online] URL: http://revistas.inia.es/index.php/fs/article/ view/820
95. Parker KG, Rankin WH, Collins DL (1941). Dutch Elm Disease fungus prevalent in bark beetle infested wood. Journal of Economic Entomology 34: 548-551.
96. Peacock JW, Lincoln AC, Simeone JB, Silverstein RM (1971). Attraction of Scolytus multistriatus (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) to a virgin female produced pheromone in the field. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 64: 1143-1149. [online] URL: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/ content/esa/aesa/1971/00000064/00000005/art0 0031
97. Pearce GT, Gore WE, Silverstein RM, Peacock JW, Cuthbert RA, Lanier GN, Simeone JB (1975). Chemical attractants for the smaller European elm bark beetle Scolytus multistriatus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 1: 115-124. doi: 10.1007/BF00987724
98. Pecori F, Bottacci A, Migliorini D, Santini A (2013). Monitoring Wych elm population in southern Apennines. In: Proceedings of the “3rd International Elm Conference. The elm after 10 years of Dutch elm disease” (Manzo R ed). Florence (Italy) 9-11 October 2013. IPP-CNR, Florence, Italy, pp. 40. [online] URL: http://elm2013.ipp.cnr.it/downloads/book_of_abstracts. pdf
99. Pfeffer A (1995). Zentral- und westpaläarktische Borken- und Kernkäfer (Coleoptera: Scolytidae, Platypodidae) [Central and Western Palearctic Bark and Ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae, Platypodidae)]. Pro Entomologica, Naturhistorisches Museum Basel, Switzerland, pp. 310.
100. Pomerleau R (1965). The period of susceptibility of Ulmus americana to Ceratocystis ulmi under conditions prevailing in Quebec. Canadian Journal of Botany 43: 787-792. doi: 10.1139/b65-089
101. Pomerleau R (1968). Progression et localisation de l’infection par le Ceratocystis ulmi dans l’orme d’Amérique [Progression and localization of the infection by Ceratocystis ulmi in the American elm]. Phytopathologische Zeitschrift 63: 301-327. [in French] doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0434.1968.tb02396.x
102. Pope SA (1943). Some studies on the Dutch elm disease and the causal organism. Doctoral Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA, pp. 66.
103. Rioux D, Ouellette GB (1991a). Barrier zone formation in host and nonhost trees inoculated with Ophiostoma ulmi. I. Anatomy and histochemistry. Canadian Journal of Botany 69: 2055- 2073. doi: 10.1139/b91-258
104. Rioux D, Ouellette GB (1991b). Barrier zone formation in host and nonhost trees inoculated with Ophiostoma ulmi. II. Ultrastructure. Canadian Journal of Botany 69: 2074-2083. doi: 10.1139/b91-259
105. Rioux D, Nicole M, Simard M, Ouellette GB (1998). Immunocytochemical evidence that secretion of pectin occurs during gel (gum) and tylosis formation in trees. Phytopathology 88: 494-505. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.1998.88.6.494
106. Rohring E (1996). Elms in Europe: ecology and Dutch elm disease. Forstarchiv 67: 179-198.
107. Rudinsky JA (1962). Ecology of Scolytidae. Annual Review of Entomology 7: 327-348 doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.07.010162.001551
108. Sacchetti P, Tiberi R, Mittempergher L (1990). Preferenza di Scolytus multistriatus (Marsham) durante la fase di maturazione delle gonadi nei confronti di due specie di olmo [Preference of Scolytus multistriatus (Marsham) during the maturation feeding for two species of elm]. Redia, pp. 347-354. [in Italian]
109. Santini A, Fagnani A, Ferrini F, Ghelardini L, Mittempergher L (2005a). Variation among Italian and French elm clones in their response to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi inoculation. Forest Pathology 35: 183-193. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2005.00401.x
110. Santini A, Ghelardini L, Falusi M, Bohnens J, Buron M, Collin E, Solla A, Van den Broeck, A (2004). Vegetative bud-burst variability of European elms. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Elm Conference “New approaches to elm conservation”. Valsaìn (Spain) 20-23 May 2003. Investigatión Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 13: 37-45. [online] URL: http://revistas.inia.es/index.php/fs/article/view/811
111. Santini A, Montaghi A, Vendramin GG, Capretti P (2005b). Analysis of the Italian Dutch elm disease population. Journal of Phytopathology 153: 73-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2004.00931.x
112. Schwarz MB (1922). The twig vascular disease of the elm. Das Zweig-sterben der Ulmen, Trauerweiden und Pfirsichbaume [The twig vascular disease of the elm, willows and peach trees]. Medelingen uit het Phytopathologisch laboratorium Willie Commelin Scholten 5: 1-73. [in German]
113. Sengonca C, Leisse N (1984). Bedeutung der Borkenkafer (Col., Scolytidae) bei der Verbreitung des Erregers der Hollandischen Ulmenkrankheit im Raum Euskirchen [Importance of bark beetles (Col., Scolytidae) in the dissemination the causal agent of the Dutch-Indian elm disease in the area of Euskirchen]. Journal of Applied Entomology 98: 413-423. [in German]
114. Shigo AL (1982). Dutch elm disease: a CODIT perspective. In: Proceedings of the “Dutch elm disease symposium and workshop” (Kondo ES, Hiratsuka Y, Denyer WBG eds). Winnipeg (Canada) 5-9 October 1981, pp. 151-168.
115. Shigo AL, Tippet JT (1981). Compartmentalization of America elm tissues infected with Ceratocystis ulmi. Plant Disease 65: 715-718. doi: 10.1094/PD-65-715
116. Sinclair WA, Campana RJ (1978). Dutch elm disease: perspectives after 60 years. Plant Pathology 1: 5-52. [online] URL: http://www.cabdirect.org/abstracts/19800671247.html
117. Sinclair WA, Zahand JP, Melching JB (1975). Anatomical markers for resistance of Ulmus americana to Ceratocystis ulmi. Phytopathology 65: 349-352. doi: 10.1094/Phyto-65-349
118. Six DL (2012). Ecological and evolutionary determinants of bark beetle-fungus symbioses. Insects 3: 339-366. doi: 10.3390/insects3010339
119. Smalley EB, Guries RP (2000). Asian elms: source of disease and pest resistance. In: “The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management” (Dunn CP ed). Kluver Academic Publishers, Boston, USA, pp. 215-230.
120. Smalley EB, Kais AG (1966). Seasonal variation in the resistance of various elm species to Dutch elm disease. In: “Breeding Pest-Resistant Trees” (Gerhold HD, Schreiner EJ, Mc Dermott RE, Winieski JA eds). Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY, USA, pp. 279-292.
121. Smalley EG (1963). Seasonal fluctuations in susceptibility of young elm seedlings to Dutch elm disease. Phytopathology 53: 846-853.
122. Smucker SJ (1935). Air currents as possible carriers of Ceratostomella ulmi. Phytopathology 25: 442-443.
123. Solla A, Gil L (2002a). Influence of water stress on Dutch elm disease symptoms in Ulmus minor Miller. Canadian Journal of Botany 80: 810-817. doi: 10.1139/b02-067
124. Solla A, Gil L (2002b). Xylem vessel diameter as a factor in resistance of Ulmus minor to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Forest Pathology 32: 123-134. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0329.2002.00274.x
125. Solla A, Martin JA, Corral P, Gil L (2005a). Seasonal changes in wood formation of Ulmus pumila and U. minor and its relation with Dutch elm disease. New Phytologist 166: 1025-1034. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01384.x
126. Solla A, Martin JA, Ouellette G, Gil L (2005b). Influence of plant age on symptom development in Ulmus minor following inoculation by Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Plant Disease 89: 1035-1040. doi: 10.1094/PD-89-1035
127. Spierenburg T (1921). Een onbekende ziekte in de iepen [An unknown disease in elm]. Tijdschrift over Plantenziekten 27: 53-61.
128. Stark VN (1952). Fauna SSSR, vol. 31 (Scolytidae). Koroedy, Akad N SSSR, Moskva, Leningrad, Russia, pp 462.
129. Sticklen MB, Bolyard MG, Hajela RK, Duchesne LC (1991). Molecular and cellular aspects of Dutch elm disease. Phytoprotection 72: 1-13. doi: 10.7202/705997ar
130. Stipes RJ, Campana R (1981). Compendium of elm diseases. American Phytopathological Society, St Paul, MN, USA, pp 66. [online] URL: http://www.cabdirect.org/abstracts/19811376781.html
131. Sutherland ML, Brasier CM (1997). A comparison of thirteen d-factors as potential biological control of agents of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Plant Pathology 46: 680-693. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3059.1997.d01-62.x
132. Svihra P, Clark JK (1980). The courtship of the elm bark beetles. California Agriculture 4: 7-9.
133. Takai S, Kondo ES (1979). Seasonal development of Dutch elm disease on white elms in Central Ontario, Canada. I. Following wound inoculation. Canadian Journal of Botany 57: 341-352. doi: 10.1139/b79-046
134. Tchernoff V (1965). Methods for screening and for the rapid selection of elms for resistance to Dutch elm disease. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 14: 409-452. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.1965.tb00204.x
135. Tyree MT, Zimmermann MH (2002). Xylem structure and the ascent of sap. Springer Verlag, NY, USA, pp. 285.
136. Ware G (1995). Little-known elms from China: landscape tree possibilities. Journal of Arboriculture 21: 284-288.
137. Webber JF (1990). Relative effectiveness of Scolytus scolytus, S. multistiatus and S. Kirsch as vectors of Dutch elm disease. European Journal of Forest Pathology 20: 184-192. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0329.1990.tb01129.x
138. Webber JF (2000). Insect vector behaviour and the evolution of Dutch elm disease. In: “The elms: breeding, conservation and disease management” (Dunn CP ed). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, USA, pp. 47-60.
139. Webber JF, Brasier CM (1984). The transmission of Dutch elm disease: a study of the process involved. In: “Invertebrate-Microbial Interactions” (Anderson JM, Rayner ADM, Walton D eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 271-306.
140. Webber JF, Gibbs JN (1989). Insect dissemination of fungal pathogens of trees. In: Proceedings of the 14th Symposium of the Royal Entomological Society of London/British Mycological Society “Insect-Fungus Interactions” (Wilding N, Collins NM, Hammond PM, Webber JF eds). Academic Press, London, UK, pp. 541-546.
141. Webber JF, Kirby JN (1983). Host feeding preference of Scolytus scolytus. Forest Commission Bulletin 60: 47-49.
142. Westerdijk J, Buisman C (1929). De iepenziekte. Rapport over het ondeszoek verricht op verzoek van de Nederlandsche Heidemaatschappij [The elm disease. Report on the probe looking out at the request by the Dutch Society Heath]. Arnhem, The Netherlands, pp. 122. [in Dutch]
143. Wood DL (1982). The role of pheromones, kairomones, and allomones in the host selectioin and colonization behaviour of bark beetles. Annual Review of Entomology 27: 411-446. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.27.010182.002211
144. Wood SL, Bright DE (1992). A catalogue of Scolytidae and Platypodidae (Coleoptera), part 2: taxonomic index. Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs 13: 1-1553.
145. Zalapa JE, Brunet J, Guries RP (2009). Patterns of hybridization and introgression between invasive Ulmus pumila (Ulmaceae) and native U. rubra. American Journal of Botany 96: 1116-1128. doi: 10.3732/ajb.0800334
146. Zanta F, Battisti A (1990). Notes on the distribution and biology of the elm bark beetles in northeastern Italy (Coleoptera Scolytidae). Gortania - Atti Museo Friulano di Storia Naturale, Udine 11: 189-205.
147. Zimmermann MH, McDonough J (1978). Dysfunction in the flow of food. In: “Plant disease – an advanced treatise, vol 3: How plants suffer from disease” (Horsfall JG, Cowling ED eds). Academic Press, New York, USA, pp. 117-140.