Relative resistance or susceptibility of landscape-suitable Elms (Ulmus spp.) to multiple insect pests

Arboriculture and Urban Forestry

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 236-243

  Potter, Daniel A ^a   Redmond, Carl T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cockscomb gall aphid; Dutch elm disease; Eriococcus spuria; Eriosoma spp.; European elm flea weevil; National elm trial; Oedophrys hilleri; Parthenolecanium corni; Ulmus spp

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; CULTIVAR; DECIDUOUS TREE; FLEA; HONEYDEW; HYBRID; LANDSCAPE; PEST CONTROL; PEST OUTBREAK;

KENTUCKY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84884410736     PISSN: 02785226     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Analytical Software. 2008. Statistix version 9.0;.
2. User's manual. Analytical Software, Tallahassee, Florida, U.S.
3. Brasier, C.M., and M.D. Mehrotra. 1995. Ophiostoma himal-ulmi sp. Nov., a new species of Dutch elm disease fungus endemic to the Himalayas. Mycological Research 99:205-215.
4. Brown, M.W., and C.R. Mathews. 2009. Biology of Oedophrys hilleri (Faust) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): A potential new pest of peach in the eastern United States. Entomological News 120:185-193.
5. Condra, J.M., C.M. Brady, and D.A. Potter. 2010. Resistance of landscapesuitable elms to Japanese beetle, gall aphids, and leaf miners, with notes on life history of Orchestes alni and Agromyza aristata in Kentucky. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 36:101-109.
6. Dreistadt, S.H., and K.S. Hagen. 1994. European elm scale (Homoptera: Eriococcidae) abundance and parasitism in northern California. Pan- Pacific Entomologist 70:240-253.
7. Gibb, T.J., C.M.F. Pierce, and R.D. Waltz. 2005. A synopsis of insect activity in Indiana during 2005. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 116:42-49.
8. Hodges, A.C., and G. Hodges. 2001. Notes on members of the Vespidae foraging on honeydew secretions from the European fruit lecanium, Parthenolecanium corni (Bouche). Journal of Entomological Science 36:312-314.
9. Hubbes, M. 1999. The American elm and Dutch elm disease. Forestry Chronicle 75:265-273.
10. Jacobi, W., J. Klett, and J. Walla. 2009. National Elm Trial overview. .
11. Johnson, W.T., and H.H. Lyon. 1988. Insects That Feed on Trees and Shrubs, 2nd edition. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, New York, U.S.
12. Merkle, S.A., G.M. Andrade, C.J. Nairn, W.A. Powell, and C.A. Maynard. 2007. Restoration of threatened species: A noble cause for transgenic trees. Tree Genetics & Genomes 3:111-118.
13. Patch, E.M. 1910. Gall aphids of the elm. Maine Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 181, Orono, Maine, U.S.
14. Raupp, M.J., A.B. Cumming, and E.C. Raupp. 2006. Street tree diversity in eastern North America and its potential for tree loss to exotic borers. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 32:297-304.
15. Smalley, E.B., and R.P. Guries. 1993. Breeding elms for resistance to Dutch elm disease. Annual Review of Phytopathology 31:325-352.
16. Vanek, S.J., and D.A. Potter. 2010. Ant exclusion to promote biological control of soft scales (Hemiptera: Coccidae) on landscape plants. Environmental Entomology 39:1829-1837.