Genetic variation and heritability estimates of Ulmus minor and Ulmus pumila hybrids for budburst, growth and tolerance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi

IForest

Volumn 8, Issue AUG2015, 2015, Pages 422-430

  Solla, Alejandro ^a   López Almansa, Juan Carlos ^b   Martín, Juan A ^c   Gil, Luis ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXTREMADURA   (Spain)

^b Catholic University of Avila   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Additive genetic variance; Genetic gain; Heterosis; Inheritance; Invasive pathogen; Non additive genetic variance; Quantitative genetics; Tree breeding

Indexed keywords

COLEOPTERA; OPHIOSTOMA NOVO-ULMI; SCOLYTINAE; ULMUS; ULMUS MINOR; ULMUS PUMILA;

EID: 84938783326     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19717458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3832/ifor1227-007     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bloom JS, Ehrenreich IM, Loo W, Vo Lite TL, Kruglyak L (2013). Finding the sources of missing heritability in a yeast cross. Nature 494: 234- 237. - doi: 10.1038/nature11867
2. Brasier CM (2000). Intercontinental spread and continuing evolution of the Dutch elm disease pathogens. In "The Elms: Breeding, Conservation and Disease Management" (Dunn CP ed). Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, NY, USA, pp. 61-72. - doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615- 4507-1_4
3. Bridgewater F (1992). Mating designs. In: "Handbook of quantitative forest genetics" (Fins L, Friedman ST, Brotschol JV eds). Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 69-95. - doi: 10.1007/978-94-015-7987-2
4. Cogolludo-Agustín MA, Agúndez D, Gil L (2000). Identification of native and hybrid elms in Spain using isozyme gene markers. Heredity 85: 157-166. - doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000. 00740.x
5. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996). Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longmann & co, London, UK, pp. 464.
6. Fehr WR (1987). Principles of cultivar development'theory and technique (vol. 1). Iowa State University Press, Ames, USA, pp. 539.
7. Ghelardini L, Santini A (2009). Avoidance by early flushing: a new perspective on Dutch elm disease research. iForest 2: 143-153. - doi: 10.3832/ifor0508-002
8. Hallauer AR, Miranda JB (1988). Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA, pp. 468.
9. Helander ML, Vuorinen P, Saikkonen K, Lappalainen J (1998). Evidence for resistance of mountain birch (Betula pubescens ssp. czerepanovii) to birch rust (Melampsoridium betulinum). Mycological Research 102: 63-66. - doi: 10.1017/S0953756297004437
10. Heslop-Harrison J, Heslop-Harrison Y (1970). Evaluation of pollen viability by enzymatically induced fluorescence: intracellular hydrolysis of fluorescein diacetate. Stain Technology 45: 115- 120. - [online] URL: http://informahealthcare.- com/doi/abs/10.3109/10520297009085351
11. Heybroek HM (1957). Elm breeding in the Netherlands. Silvae Genetica 6: 112-117.
12. Le Cocq TL, Quiring D, Verrez A, Park YS (2005). Genetically based resistance of black spruce (Picea mariana) to the yellowheaded spruce sawfly (Pikonema alaskensis). Forest Ecology and Management 215: 84-90. - doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.05.006
13. Lefevre F, Pichot C, Pinon J. (1994). Intraspecific and interspecific inheritance of some components of the resistance to leaf rust (Melampsoralarici populina Kleb) in poplars. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 88: 501-507. - doi: 10.1007/ BF00223668
14. Lester DT, Smalley EB (1972a). Response of backcross hybrids and three-species combinations of Ulmus pumila, Ulmus japonica, and U. rubra to inoculation with Ceratocystis ulmi. Phytopathology 62: 845-848. - doi: 10.1094/Phy to-62-845
15. Lester DT, Smalley EB (1972b). Response of Ulmus pumila and Ulmus pumila × rubra hybrids to inoculation with Ceratocystis ulmi. Phytopathology 62: 848-852. - doi: 10.1094/Phyto- 62-848
16. Lester DT, Smalley EB (1972c). Variation in ornamental traits and disease resistance among crosses of Ulmus pumila, U. rubra, and putative natural hybrids. Silvae Genetica 21: 193-197. [online] URL: http://allgemeineforstundjagdzei tung.com/fileadmin/content/dokument/archiv/silvaegenetica/ 21_1972/21-5-193.pdf
17. López-Almansa JC, Pannell JR, Gil L (2003). Female sterility in Ulmus minor (Ulmaceae): a hypothesis invoking the cost of sex in a clonal plant. American Journal of Botany 90: 603-609. - doi: 10.3732/ajb.90.4.603
18. López-Almansa JC, Yeung EC, Gil L (2004). Abortive seed development in Ulmus minor (Ulmaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 145: 455-467. - doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339. 2004.00297.x
19. Martín JA, Solla A, Woodward S, Gil L (2005). FT-IR spectroscopy as a new method for evaluating host resistance in the Dutch elm disease complex. Tree Physiology 25: 1331-1338. - doi: 10.1093/treephys/25.10.1331
20. Martín JA, Solla A, Domingues MR, Coimbra MA, Gil L (2008). Exogenous phenol increase resistance of Ulmus minor to Dutch elm disease through formation of suberin-like compounds on xylem tissues. Environmental and Experimental Botany 64: 97-104. - doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot. 2008.05.004
21. Martín JA, Solla A, Esteban LG, de Palacios P, Gil L (2009). Bordered pit and ray morphology involvement in elm resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 39: 420-429. - doi: 10.1139/X08-183
22. Martín JA, Solla A, Witzell J, Gil L, García- Vallejo MC (2010). Antifungal effect and reduction of Ulmus minor symptoms to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi by carvacrol and salicylic acid. European Journal of Plant Pathology 127: 21-32. - doi: 10.1007/s10658-009-9567-3
23. Martín JA, Solla A, García-Vallejo MC, Gil L (2012). Chemical changes in Ulmus minor xylem tissue after salicylic acid or carvacrol treatments are associated with enhanced resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Phytochemistry 83: 104- 109. - doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2012.07.017
24. Martín JA, Solla A, Ruiz-Villar M, Gil L (2013). Vessel length and conductivity of Ulmus branches: ontogenetic changes and relation to resistance to Dutch elm disease. Trees 27: 1239- 1248. - doi: 10.1007/s00468-013-0872-2
25. Martín JA, Solla A, Venturas M, Collada C, Domínguez J, Miranda E, Fuentes P, Burón M, Iglesias S, Gil L (2014). Seven Ulmus minor clones tolerant to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi registered as forest reproductive material in Spain. iForest (early view): e1-e9. - doi: 10.3832/ifor 1224-008
26. Mittempergher L, La Porta N (1991). Hybridization studies in the Eurasian species of elm (Ulmus spp.). Silvae Genetica 40: 237-243.
27. Mittempergher L, Santini A (2004). The history of elm breeding. Investigación Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 13: 161-177. [online] URL: http://www.inia.es/gcontrec/pub/161-177-(14)- the_history_1161943529015.pdf
28. Nyquist WE (1991). Estimation of heritability and prediction of selection response in plant populations. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 10: 235-322. - doi: 10.1080/07352689109382313
29. Pinon J, Husson C, Collin E (2005). Susceptibility of native French elm clones to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Annals of Forest Science 62: 689- 696. - doi: 10.1051/forest:2005066
30. Pope SA (1943). Some studies on the Dutch Elm Disease and the causal organism. Doctoral thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA, pp. 61.
31. Richens RH (1983). Elm. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 347. [online] URL: http://www.cabdirect.org/abstracts/19840690795.html
32. Santini A, Ghelardini L, Falusi M, Bohnens J, Buron M, Collin E, Solla A, Vanden Broeck A (2004). Vegetative budburst variability of Euro pean elms. Investigación Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 13: 37-45. [online] URL: http://revistas.inia.es/index.php/fs/article/viewAr ticle/811
33. Santini A, Fagnani A, Ferrini F, Ghelardini L, Mittempergher L (2005). Variation among Italian and French elm clones in their response to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi inoculation. Forest Pathology 35: 183-193. - doi: 10.1111/j.1439-03 29.2005.00401.x
34. Solla A, Gil L (2002). Influence of water stress on Dutch elm disease symptoms in Ulmus minor Miller. Canadian Journal of Botany 80: 810-817. - doi: 10.1139/b02-067
35. Solla A, Gil L (2003). Evaluating Verticillium dahliae for biological control of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi in Ulmus minor. Plant Pathology 52: 579-585. - doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3059.2003.0092 1.x
36. Solla A, Bohnens J, Collin E, Diamandis S, Franke A, Gil L, Burón M, Santini A, Mittempergher L, Pinon J, Vanden Broek A (2005a). Screening European elms for resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Forest Science 51: 134- 141. [online] URL: http://www.ingentaconnect.- com/content/saf/fs/2005/00000051/00000002/art 00005
37. Solla A, Martín JA, Ouellette G, Gil L (2005b). Influence of plant age on symptom development in Ulmus minor following inoculation by Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Plant Disease 89: 1035- 1040. - doi: 10.1094/PD-89-1035
38. Solla A, Dacasa MC, Nasmith C, Hubbes M, Gil L (2008). Analysis of Spanish populations of Ophiostoma ulmi and O. novo-ulmi using phenotypic characteristics and RAPD markers. Plant Pathology 57: 33-44. - doi: 10.1111/j.1365- 3059.2007.01692.x
39. Strong DR, Larsson S, Gullberg U (1993). Heritability of host plant resistance to herbivory changes with gall midge density during an outbreak on willow. Evolution 47: 291-300. - doi: 10.2307/2410136
40. Tchernoff V (1965). Methods for screening and for the rapid selection of elms for resistance to Dutch elm disease. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 14: 409-452. - doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.1965. tb00204.x
41. Venturas M, López R, Martín JA, Gascó A, Gil L (2014). Heritability of Ulmus minor resistance to Dutch elm disease and its relationship to vessel size, but not to xylem vulnerability to drought. Plant Pathology 63: 500-509. - doi: 10.1111/ppa. 12115
42. Vivas M, Martín JA, Gil L, Solla A (2012a). Evaluating methyl jasmonate for induction of resistance to Fusarium oxysporum, F. circinatum and Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Forest Systems 21: 289- 299. - doi: 10.5424/fs/2012212-02172
43. Vivas M, Zas R, Solla A (2012b). Screening of Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) for resistance to Fusarium circinatum, the causal agent of Pitch Canker disease. Forestry 25: 185-192. - doi: 10.1093/forestry/cpr055
44. White TL, Adams WT, Neale DB (2007). Forest genetics. CABI Publications, Cambridge, MA, USA, pp. 682. [online] URL: http://books.- google.com/books?hl=en&id=_MKWuexx52YC
45. Zas R, Solla A, Sampedro L (2007). Variography and kriging allow screening Pinus pinaster resistant to Armillaria ostoyae in field conditions. Forestry 80 (2): 201-209. - doi: 10.1093/forestry/ cpl050
46. Zürcher ER (1986). Sprossachsen-Ontogenie der Bergulme (Ulmus glabra Huds.), bei Normalund Langtagbedingungen [Stem ontogeny of Wych elm (Ulmus glabra Huds.) under normal and long day conditions]. Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich 131: 235-294.