Evaluation of elm clones for tolerance to Dutch elm disease

Journal of Arboriculture

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 179-184

  Townsend, A M ^a   Douglass, L W ^b  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Clonal evaluation; Disease tolerance; Ophiostoma novo ulmi; Ophiostoma ulmi; Tree breeding and selection; Ulmus americana; Ulmus carpinifolia; Ulmus glabra; Ulmus hollandica; Ulmus parvifolia; Ulmus pumila; Ulmus wallichiana; Ulmus wilsoniana

Indexed keywords

DISEASE; DISEASE RESISTANCE; DUTCH DISEASE; HYBRID;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); FUNGI; OPHIOSTOMA; OPHIOSTOMA NOVO-ULMI; OPHIOSTOMA ULMI; ULMUS; ULMUS AMERICANA; ULMUS GLABRA; ULMUS PARVIFOLIA; ULMUS PROCERA; ULMUS PUMILA;

EID: 2342621542     PISSN: 02785226     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Guries, R.P., and E.B. Smalley 2000. Once and future elms: Classical and molecular approaches to Dutch elm disease resistance, pp 231-248. In Dunn, C.P. (Ed.). The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
2. Hall, R.W., and A.M. Townsend. 1987. Suitability of Ulmus wilsoniana, the 'Urban' elm, and their hybrids for the elm leaf beetle, Xanthogaleruca luteola (Muller) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Environ. Entomol. 16:1042-1044.
3. Hall, R.W., A.M. Townsend, and J.H. Barger. 1987. Suitability of thirteen different host species for elm leaf beetle, Xanthogaleruca luteola (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J. Environ. Hortic. 5:143-146.
4. Lester, D.T., and E.B. Smalley. 1972. Response of backcross hybrids and three-species combinations of Ulmus pumila, U. japonica, and U. rubra to inoculation with Ceratocystis ulmi. Phytopathology 62:845-848.
5. Miller, F. 2000. Insect resistance of elm genotypes, pp 137-154. In Dunn, C.P. (Ed.). The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
6. Santamour, F.S., Jr. 1973. Resistance to Dutch elm disease in Chinese elm hybrids. Plant Dis. Rep. 57:997-999.
7. SAS Institute, Inc. 1996. SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements Through Version 6.12. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.
8. Schreiber, L.R., and H.V. Main. 1976. 'Urban' elm. HortScience 11:517-518.
9. Townsend, A.M. 1975. Species crossability patterns and morphological variation among elm species and hybrids. Silvae Genet. 24-18-23.
10. Townsend, A.M. 1979. Influence of specific combining ability and sex of gametes on transmission of Ceratocystis ulmi resistance in Ulmus. Phytopathology 69:643-645.
11. Townsend, A.M. 2000. USDA genetic research on elms, pp 271-278. In Dunn, C.P. (Ed.). The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
12. Townsend, A.M., and L.W. Douglass. 1996. Variation in growth and response to Ophiostoma ulmi among advanced-generation progenies and clones of elms. J. Environ. Hortic. 14:150-154.
13. Townsend, A.M., R.W. Hall, and W.O. Masters. 1995. 'Patriot' elm. J. Environ. Hortic. 13:113-115.
14. Townsend, A.M., and W.O. Masters, 1984. 'Homestead' elm. HortScience 19:897-898.
15. Townsend, A.M., and L.R. Schreiber. 1976. Resistance of hybrid elm progenies to Ceratocystis ulmi. Phytopathology 66:1107-1110.
16. Townsend, A.M., L.R. Schreiber, W.O. Masters, and S.E. Bentz. 1991a. 'Prospector' elm. HortScience 26:81-82.
17. Townsend, A.M., 'Frontier' elm. HortScience 26:80-81.
18. Ware, G.H. 2000. The promise and the future of urban elms: a personal perspective, pp 331-339. In Dunn, C.P. (Ed.). The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
19. Wright, J.W. 1976. Introduction to Forest Genetics. Academic Press, New York, NY.