De novo assembly of a new Solanum pennellii accession using nanopore sequencing

Plant Cell

Volumn 29, Issue 10, 2017, Pages 2336-2348

  Schmidt, Maximilian H W ^a   Vogel, Alexander ^a   Denton, Alisandra K ^a   Istace, Benjamin ^b   Wormit, Alexandra ^a   van de Geest, Henri ^c,j   Bolger, Marie E ^d   Alseekh, Saleh ^e   Maß, Janina ^d   Pfaff, Christian ^d   Schurr, Ulrich ^d   Chetelat, Roger ^f   Maumus, Florian ^g   Aury, Jean Marc ^b   Koren, Sergey ^h   Fernie, Alisdair R ^e   Zamir, Dani ⁱ   Bolger, Anthony M ^a   Usadel, Björn ^a,d  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b CENTRE NATIONAL DE SÉQUENÇAGE   (France)

^c WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

^e MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR PLANT PHYSIOLOGY   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^h NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

ⁱ HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^j Genetwister Technologies BV   (Netherlands)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; NANOPORE; PROCEDURES; SOLANUM;

HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; NANOPORES; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SOLANUM;

EID: 85033690821     PISSN: 10404651     EISSN: 1532298X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.17.00521     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Aflitos, S., et al.; 100 Tomato Genome Sequencing Consortium (2014). Exploring genetic variation in the tomato (Solanum section lycopersicon) clade by whole-genome sequencing. Plant J. 80: 136–148.
2. Alseekh, S., et al. (2015). Identification and mode of inheritance of quantitative trait loci for secondary metabolite abundance in tomato. Plant Cell 27: 485–512.
3. Berlin, K., Koren, S., Chin, C.S., Drake, J.P., Landolin, J.M., and Phillippy, A.M. (2015). Assembling large genomes with single-molecule sequencing and locality-sensitive hashing. Nat. Biotechnol. 33: 623–630.
4. Bolger, A., et al. (2014a). The genome of the stress-tolerant wild tomato species Solanum pennellii. Nat. Genet. 46: 1034–1038.
5. Bolger, A.M., Lohse, M., and Usadel, B. (2014b). Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30: 2114–2120.
6. Bolger, M.E., Arsova, B., and Usadel, B. (2017). Plant genome and transcriptome annotations: from misconceptions to simple solutions. Brief. Bioinform. pii: bbw135.
7. Camacho, C., Coulouris, G., Avagyan, V., Ma, N., Papadopoulos, J., Bealer, K., and Madden, T.L. (2009). BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10: 421.
8. Datema, E., Hulzink, R.J.M., Blommers, L., Espejo Valle-Inclan, J., Van Orsouw, N., Wittenberg, A.H.J., and De Vos, M. (2016). The megabase-sized fungal genome of Rhizoctonia solani assembled from nanopore reads only. bioRxiv doi/10.1101/084772.
9. Davis, A.M., et al. (2016). Using MinION nanopore sequencing to generate a de novo eukaryotic draft genome: preliminary physiological and genomic description of the extremophilic red alga Gal-dieria sulphuraria strain SAG 107.79. bioRxiv doi/10.1101/076208.
10. Delcher, A.L., Salzberg, S.L., and Phillippy, A.M. (2003). Using MUMmer to identify similar regions in large sequence sets. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics 10: 10.3.1–10.3.18.
11. Deschamps, S., Mudge, J., Cameron, C., Ramaraj, T., Anand, A., Fengler, K., Hayes, K., Llaca, V., Jones, T.J., and May, G. (2016). Characterization, correction and de novo assembly of an Oxford Nanopore genomic dataset from Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Sci. Rep. 6: 28625.
12. Eddy, S.R. (2011). Accelerated Profile HMM Searches. PLOS Comput. Biol. 7: e1002195.
13. Emms, D.M., and Kelly, S. (2015). OrthoFinder: solving fundamental biases in whole genome comparisons dramatically improves or-thogroup inference accuracy. Genome Biol. 16: 157.
14. Eshed, Y., and Zamir, D. (1995). An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTL. Genetics 141: 1147–1162.
15. Fernandez-Moreno, J.P., Levy-Samoha, D., Malitsky, S., Monforte, A.J., Orzaez, D., Aharoni, A., and Granell, A. (2017). Uncovering tomato quantitative trait loci and candidate genes for fruit cuticular lipid composition using the Solanum pennellii introgression line population. J. Exp. Bot. 68: 2703–2716.
16. Glenn, T.C. (2011). Field guide to next-generation DNA sequencers. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 11: 759–769.
17. Gurevich, A., Saveliev, V., Vyahhi, N., and Tesler, G. (2013). QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29: 1072–1075.
18. Hirsch, C.N., et al. (2016). Draft assembly of elite inbred line PH207 provides insights into genomic and transcriptome diversity in maize. Plant Cell 28: 2700–2714.
19. Ip, C.L.C., et al.; MinION Analysis and Reference Consortium (2015) MinION Analysis and Reference Consortium: Phase 1 data release and analysis. F1000 Res. 4: 1075.
20. Istace, B., et al. (2017). de novo assembly and population genomic survey of natural yeast isolates with the Oxford Nanopore MinION sequencer. Gigascience 6: 1–13.
21. Jain, M., Olsen, H.E., Paten, B., and Akeson, M. (2016). The Oxford Nanopore MinION: delivery of nanopore sequencing to the genomics community. Genome Biol. 17: 239.
22. Jarvis, D.E., et al. (2017). The genome of Chenopodium quinoa. Nature 542: 307–312.
23. Jiao, W.-B., and Schneeberger, K. (2017). The impact of third generation genomic technologies on plant genome assembly. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 36: 64–70.
24. Jiao, W.-B., et al. (2017). Improving and correcting the contiguity of long-read genome assemblies of three plant species using optical mapping and chromosome conformation capture data. Genome Res. 27: 778–786.
25. Judge, K., Harris, S.R., Reuter, S., Parkhill, J., and Peacock, S.J. (2015). Early insights into the potential of the Oxford Nanopore MinION for the detection of antimicrobial resistance genes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 70: 2775–2778.
26. Koenig, D., et al. (2013). Comparative transcriptomics reveals patterns of selection in domesticated and wild tomato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110: E2655–E2662.
27. Koren, S., Walenz, B.P., Berlin, K., Miller, J.R., Bergman, N.H., and Phillippy, A.M. (2017). Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res. 27: 722–736.
28. Kranz, A., Vogel, A., Degner, U., Kiefler, I., Bott, M., Usadel, B., and Polen, T. (2017). High precision genome sequencing of engineered Gluconobacter oxydans 621H by combining long nanopore and short accurate Illumina reads. J. Biotechnol. 258: 197–205.
29. Li, H. (2013). Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv doi/10.1101/1303.3997v2.
30. Li, H. (2016). Minimap and miniasm: fast mapping and de novo assembly for noisy long sequences. Bioinformatics 32: 2103–2110.
31. Li, H., Handsaker, B., Wysoker, A., Fennell, T., Ruan, J., Homer, N., Marth, G., Abecasis, G., and Durbin, R, 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup (2009). The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25: 2078–2079.
32. Lin, T., et al. (2014). Genomic analyses provide insights into the history of tomato breeding. Nat. Genet. 46: 1220–1226.
33. Lippman, Z.B., Semel, Y., and Zamir, D. (2007). An integrated view of quantitative trait variation using tomato interspecific introgression lines. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 17: 545–552.
34. Lisec, J., Schauer, N., Kopka, J., Willmitzer, L., and Fernie, A.R. (2006). Gas chromatography mass spectrometry-based metabolite profiling in plants. Nat. Protoc. 1: 387–396.
35. Lohse, M., Nagel, A., Herter, T., May, P., Schroda, M., Zrenner, R., Tohge, T., Fernie, A.R., Stitt, M., and Usadel, B. (2014). Mercator: a fast and simple web server for genome scale functional annotation of plant sequence data. Plant Cell Environ. 37: 1250–1258.
36. Loman, N.J., Quick, J., and Simpson, J.T. (2015). A complete bacterial genome assembled de novo using only nanopore sequencing data. Nat. Methods 12: 733–735.
37. Lu, H., Giordano, F., and Ning, Z. (2016). Oxford Nanopore MinION Sequencing and Genome Assembly. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 14: 265–279.
38. Lyons, E., and Freeling, M. (2008). How to usefully compare homologous plant genes and chromosomes as DNA sequences. Plant J. 53: 661–673.
39. Marçais, G., and Kingsford, C. (2011). A fast, lock-free approach for efficient parallel counting of occurrences of k-mers. Bioinformatics 27: 764–770.
40. Michael, T. P., Jupe, F., Bemm, F., Motley, S.T., Sandoval, J.P, Loudet, O. Weigel, D., Ecker, J.R. (2017). High contiguity Arabidopsis thaliana genome assembly with a single nanopore flow cell. bioRxiv doi/10.1101/149997.
41. Molinier, J., Stamm, M.E., and Hohn, B. (2004). SNM-dependent recombinational repair of oxidatively induced DNA damage in Arabidopsis thaliana. EMBO Rep. 5: 994–999.
42. Ofner, I., Lashbrooke, J., Pleban, T., Aharoni, A., and Zamir, D. (2016). Solanum pennellii backcross inbred lines (BILs) link small genomic bins with tomato traits. Plant J. 87: 151–160.
43. Okonechnikov, K., Conesa, A., and García-Alcalde, F. (2016). Qualimap 2: advanced multi-sample quality control for high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 32: 292–294.
44. Pease, J.B., Haak, D.C., Hahn, M.W., and Moyle, L.C. (2016a). Phylogenomics reveals three sources of adaptive variation during a rapid radiation. PLoS Biol. 14: e1002379.
45. Pease, J.B., Guerrero, R.F., Sherman, N.A., Hahn, M.W., and Moyle, L.C. (2016b). Molecular mechanisms of postmating pre-zygotic reproductive isolation uncovered by transcriptome analysis. Mol. Ecol. 25: 2592–2608.
46. Peña, M.J., Zhong, R., Zhou, G.K., Richardson, E.A., O’Neill, M.A., Darvill, A.G., York, W.S., and Ye, Z.H. (2007). Arabidopsis irregular xylem8 and irregular xylem9: implications for the complexity of glucuronoxylan biosynthesis. Plant Cell 19: 549–563.
47. Quadrana, L., et al. (2014). Natural occurring epialleles determine vitamin E accumulation in tomato fruits. Nat. Commun. 5: 3027.
48. Quick, J., et al. (2015). Rapid draft sequencing and real-time nanopore sequencing in a hospital outbreak of Salmonella. Genome Biol. 16: 114.
49. Ranjan, A., Budke, J.M., Rowland, S.D., Chitwood, D.H., Kumar, R., Carriedo, L., Ichihashi, Y., Zumstein, K., Maloof, J.N., and Sinha, N.R. (2016). eQTL regulating transcript levels associated with diverse biological processes in tomato. Plant Physiol. 172: 328–340.
50. Reyes-Chin-Wo, S., et al. (2017). Genome assembly with in vitro proximity ligation data and whole-genome triplication in lettuce. Nat. Commun. 8: 14953.
51. Rick, C.M., and Tanksley, S.D. (1981). Genetic variation in Solanum pennellii: Comparisons with two other sympatric tomato species. Plant Syst. Evol. 139: 11–45.
52. Simão, F.A., Waterhouse, R.M., Ioannidis, P., Kriventseva, E.V., and Zdobnov, E.M. (2015). BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31: 3210–3212.
53. Simpson, J.T., Workman, R.E., Zuzarte, P.C., David, M., Dursi, L.J., and Timp, W. (2017). Detecting DNA cytosine methylation using nanopore sequencing. Nat. Methods 14: 407–410.
54. Sohani, M.M., Schenk, P.M., Schultz, C.J., and Schmidt, O. (2009). Phylogenetic and transcriptional analysis of a strictosidine synthase-like gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana reveals involvement in plant defence responses. Plant Biol (Stuttg.) 11: 105– 117.
55. Stanke, M., and Waack, S. (2003). Gene prediction with a hidden Markov model and a new intron submodel. Bioinformatics 19 (Suppl. 2): ii215–ii225.
56. Stanke, M., Diekhans, M., Baertsch, R., and Haussler, D. (2008). Using native and syntenically mapped cDNA alignments to improve de novo gene finding. Bioinformatics 24: 637–644.
57. Tieman, D., et al. (2017). A chemical genetic roadmap to improved tomato flavor. Science 355: 391–394.
58. Tomato Genome Consortium (2012). The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 485: 635–641.
59. VanBuren, R., et al. (2015). Single-molecule sequencing of the desiccation-tolerant grass Oropetium thomaeum. Nature 527: 508–511.
60. Vaser, R., Sović, I., Nagarajan, N., and Sikić, M. (2017). Fast and accurate de novo genome assembly from long uncorrected reads. Genome Res. 27: 737–746.
61. Walker, B.J., Abeel, T., Shea, T., Priest, M., Abouelliel, A., Sakthikumar, S., Cuomo, C.A., Zeng, Q., Wortman, J., Young, S.K., and Earl, A.M. (2014). Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 9: e112963.
62. Wang, Y., Tang, H., Debarry, J.D., Tan, X., Li, J., Wang, X., Lee, T.H., Jin, H., Marler, B., Guo, H., Kissinger, J.C., and Paterson, A.H. (2012). MCScanX: a toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 40: e49.
63. Wang, X., et al. (2017). Genomic analyses of primitive, wild and cultivated citrus provide insights into asexual reproduction. Nat. Genet. 49: 765–772.
64. Weirather, J., de Cesare, M., Wang, Y., Piazza, P., Sebastiano, V., Wang, X., Buck, D., and Au, K. (2017). Comprehensive comparison of Pacific Biosciences and Oxford Nanopore Technologies and their applications to transcriptome analysis. F1000Research 6: 100.
65. Ye, C., Hill, C.M., Wu, S., Ruan, J., and Ma, Z.S. (2016). DBG2OLC: Efficient assembly of large genomes using long erroneous reads of the third generation sequencing technologies. Sci. Rep. 6: 31900.
66. Zhong, S., Fei, Z., Chen, Y.R., Zheng, Y., Huang, M., Vrebalov, J., McQuinn, R., Gapper, N., Liu, B., Xiang, J., Shao, Y., and Giovannoni, J.J. (2013). Single-base resolution methylomes of tomato fruit development reveal epigenome modifications associated with ripening. Nat. Biotechnol. 31: 154–159.