OrthoFinder: solving fundamental biases in whole genome comparisons dramatically improves orthogroup inference accuracy

Genome Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Emms, David M ^a   Kelly, Steven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTOME; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GENE CLUSTER; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; MULTIGENE FAMILY; NONHUMAN; ORTHOLOGY; PLANT GENOME; PROBLEM SOLVING; QUALITY CONTROL; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SPECIES COMPARISON; ALGORITHM; EVALUATION STUDY; GENETICS; GENOMICS; PHYLOGENY; PLANT GENE; PROCEDURES; SOFTWARE;

ALGORITHMS; GENES, PLANT; GENOMICS; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PHYLOGENY; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 84938582898     PISSN: 14747596     EISSN: 1474760X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-015-0721-2     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alexeyenko A, Tamas I, Liu G, Sonnhammer ELL. Automatic clustering of orthologs and inparalogs shared by multiple proteomes. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:E9-15.
2. Altenhoff AM, Schneider A, Gonnet GH, Dessimoz C. OMA 2011: orthology inference among 1000 complete genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:D289-94.
3. Tatusov RL, Koonin EV, Lipman DJ. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science. 1997;278:631-7.
4. Fitch WM. Homology - a personal view on some of the problems. Trends Genet. 2000;16:227-31.
5. Trachana K, Larsson TA, Powell S, Chen WH, Doerks T, Muller J, et al. Orthology prediction methods: a quality assessment using curated protein families. Bioessays. 2011;33:769-80.
6. Waterhouse RM, Tegenfeldt F, Li J, Zdobnov EM, Kriventseva EV. OrthoDB: a hierarchical catalog of animal, fungal and bacterial orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D358-65.
7. Chen F, Mackey AJ, Stoeckert CJ, Roos DS. OrthoMCL-DB: querying a comprehensive multi-species collection of ortholog groups. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:D363-8.
8. Powell S, Forslund K, Szklarczyk D, Trachana K, Roth A, Huerta-Cepas J, et al. eggNOG v4.0: nested orthology inference across 3686 organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D231-9.
9. Tatusov RL, Fedorova ND, Jackson JD, Jacobs AR, Kiryutin B, Koonin EV, et al. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2003;4:41.
10. Simola DF, Wissler L, Donahue G, Waterhouse RM, Helmkampf M, Roux J, et al. Social insect genomes exhibit dramatic evolution in gene composition and regulation while preserving regulatory features linked to sociality. Genome Res. 2013;23:1235-47.
11. Waterhouse RM, Zdobnov EM, Kriventseva EV. Correlating traits of gene retention, sequence divergence, duplicability and essentiality in vertebrates, arthropods, and fungi. Genome Biol Evol. 2011;3:75-86.
12. Wapinski I, Pfeffer A, Friedman N, Regev A. Natural history and evolutionary principles of gene duplication in fungi. Nature. 2007;449:54-U36.
13. Li L, Stoeckert CJ, Roos DS. OrthoMCL: Identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 2003;13:2178-89.
14. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403-10.
15. van Dongen S. A cluster algorithm for graphs. Amsterdam: CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science); 2000.
16. Soderlund C, Bomhoff M, Nelson WM. SyMAP v3.4: a turnkey synteny system with application to plant genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39, e68.
17. Jun J, Mandoiu II, Nelson CE. Identification of mammalian orthologs using local synteny. BMC Genomics. 2009;10:630.
18. Daniels JP, Gull K, Wickstead B. Cell biology of the trypanosome genome. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2010;74:552-69.
19. www.stevekellylab.com/software/orthofinder .
20. https://github.com/davidemms/OrthoFinder .
21. Kriventseva EV, Rahman N, Espinosa O, Zdobnov EM. OrthoDB: the hierarchical catalog of eukaryotic orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:D271-5.
22. O'Brien KP, Remm M, Sonnhammer ELL. Inparanoid: a comprehensive database of eukaryotic orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:D476-80.
23. Li H, Coghlan A, Ruan J, Coin LJ, Heriche JK, Osmotherly L, et al. TreeFam: a curated database of phylogenetic trees of animal gene families. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:D572-80.
24. Kelly S, Maini PK. DendroBLAST: approximate phylogenetic trees in the absence of multiple sequence alignments. Plos One. 2013;8, e58537.
25. Wall DP, Fraser HB, Hirsh AE. Detecting putative orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:1710-1.
26. Wolf YI, Koonin EV. A tight link between orthologs and bidirectional best hits in bacterial and archaeal genomes. Genome Biol Evol. 2012;4:1286-94.
27. Dalquen DA, Dessimoz C. Bidirectional best hits miss many orthologs in duplication-rich clades such as plants and animals. Genome Biol Evol. 2013;5:1800-6.
28. Goodstein DM, Shu SQ, Howson R, Neupane R, Hayes RD, Fazo J, et al. Phytozome: a comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D1178-86.
29. Freeling M. Bias in plant gene content following different sorts of duplication: tandem, whole-genome, segmental, or by transposition. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2009;60:433-53.
30. Blanc G, Wolfe KH. Functional divergence of duplicated genes formed by polyploidy during Arabidopsis evolution. Plant Cell. 2004;16:1679-91.
31. Jin J, Zhang H, Kong L, Gao G, Luo J. PlantTFDB 3.0: a portal for the functional and evolutionary study of plant transcription factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D1182-7.
32. Pires N, Dolan L. Origin and diversification of basic-helix-loop-helix proteins in plants. Mol Biol Evol. 2010;27:862-74.
33. Dessimoz C, Gabaldon T, Roos DS, Sonnhammer ELL, Herrero J, Consortium QO. Toward community standards in the quest for orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:900-4.
34. Jensen LJ, Julien P, Kuhn M, von Mering C, Muller J, Doerks T, et al. eggNOG: automated construction and annotation of orthologous groups of genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:D250-4.
35. Jones E, Oliphant T, Peterson P. SciPy: Open source scientific tools for Python. 2001. Available at: http://www.scipy.org/ .
36. International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Nomenclature Committee, Webb EC. Enzyme nomenclature 1992: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology on the nomenclature and classification of enzymes. San Diego: Published for the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology by Academic Press; 1992.
37. Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:772-80.
38. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2-approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. Plos One. 2010;5, e9490.
39. Wu YC, Rasmussen MD, Bansal MS, Kellis M. Most parsimonious reconciliation in the presence of gene duplication, loss, and deep coalescence using labeled coalescent trees. Genome Res. 2014;24:475-86.