Systematic review of measures used in pictorial cigarette pack warning experiments

Nicotine and Tobacco Research

Volumn 19, Issue 10, 2017, Pages 1127-1137

  Francis, Diane B ^a,b   Hall, Marissa G ^b,c   Noar, Seth M ^b   Ribisl, Kurt M ^b,c   Brewer, Noel T ^b,c  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c IL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MOTIVATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PACKAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; SMOKING HABIT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VALIDITY; VISUAL INFORMATION; PSYCHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TOBACCO;

HUMANS; PRODUCT LABELING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TOBACCO PRODUCTS;

EID: 85030793036     PISSN: 14622203     EISSN: 1469994X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntx082     Document Type: Review

References (102)

1. Hammond D. Health warning messages on tobacco products: a review. Tob Control. 2011;20(5):327-337
2. World Health Organization. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2008
3. Canadian Cancer Society. Cigarette Package Warning Size and Use of Pictures: International Summary. Toronto, ON, Canada: Canadian Cancer Society; 2016
4. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Measures to assess the effectiveness of restrictions on tobacco product labeling policies. Methods for evaluating tobacco control policies. Vol 12. Lyon, France: World Health Organization; 2008
5. Monárrez-Espino J, Liu B, Greiner F, Bremberg S, Galanti R. Systematic review of the effect of pictorial warnings on cigarette packages in smoking behavior. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(10):e11-e30
6. Noar SM, Hall MG, Brewer NT. Pictorial cigarette pack warnings have important effects. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(3):e1
7. Noar SM, Francis DB, Bridges C, Sontag JM, Ribisl KM, Brewer NT. The impact of strengthening cigarette pack warnings: systematic review of longitudinal observational studies. Soc Sci Med. 2016;164:118-129
8. Noar SM, Hall MG, Francis DB, Ribisl KM, Pepper JK, Brewer NT. Pictorial cigarette pack warnings: a meta-analysis of experimental studies. Tob Control. 2016;25(3):341-354
9. Noar SM, Francis DB, Bridges C, Sontag JM, Brewer NT, Ribisl KM. Effects of strengthening cigarette pack warnings on attention and message processing: a systematic review. Journal Mass Commun Q. 2016. DOI:10.1177/1077699016674188
10. Hammond D. Tobacco packaging and labeling policies under the U.S. Tobacco Control Act: research needs and priorities. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012;14(1):62-74
11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cigarette package health warnings and interest in quitting smoking-14 countries, 2008-2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(20):645-651
12. National Cancer Institute. The role of the media in promoting and reducing tobacco use. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 2008
13. National Cancer Institute. Cigarette Warning Labels, Packaging & Product Labeling: Current Science & Practice to Identify Research Priorities. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health; 2009
14. McGuire WJ. Theoretical foundations of campaigns. In: Rice RE, Atkin C, eds. Public Communication Campaigns. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1989:43-67
15. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2010
16. Petty RE, Cacioppo JT. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 1986;19:123-205
17. Southwell BG, Yzer MC. The roles of interpersonal communication in mass media campaigns. Commun Yearb. 2007;31(1):420-462
18. Noar SM, Zimmerman RS. Health Behavior Theory and cumulative knowledge regarding health behaviors: are we moving in the right direction? Health Educ Res. 2005;20(3):275-290
19. Cane J, O'Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:37
20. Witte K. Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Commun Monogr. 1992;59(4):329-349
21. Nonnemaker J, Farrelly M, Kamyab K, Busey A, Mann N. Experimental study of graphic cigarette warning labels: Final results report. Prepared for Center for Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration; 2010
22. Fong GT, Cummings KM, Borland R, et al. The conceptual framework of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Policy Evaluation Project. Tob Control. 2006;15(Suppl 3):iii3-11.10.1136/tc.2005.015438
23. Strahan EJ, White K, Fong GT, Fabrigar LR, Zanna MP, Cameron R. Enhancing the effectiveness of tobacco package warning labels: a social psychological perspective. Tob Control. 2002;11(3):183-190
24. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37-46
25. Gygax PM, Bosson M, Gay C, Ribordy F. Relevance of health warnings on cigarette packs: a psycholinguistic investigation. Health Commun. 2010;25(5):397-409
26. Nan X, Zhao X, Yang B, Iles I. Effectiveness of cigarette warning labels: examining the impact of graphics, message framing, and temporal framing. Health Commun. 2015;30(1):81-89
27. Zhao X, Nan X, Yang B, Alexandra Iles I. Cigarette warning labels: graphics, framing, and identity. Health Educ. 2014;114(2):101-117
28. Erceg-Hurn DM, Steed LG. Does exposure to cigarette health warnings elicit psychological reactance in smokers? J Appl Soc Psychol. 2011;41(1):219-237
29. Hall MG, Sheeran P, Noar SM, Ribisl KM, Bach LE, Brewer NT. Reactance to health warnings scale: development and validation. Ann Behav Med. 2016;epub ahead of print.10.1007/s12160-016-9799-3
30. LaVoie NR, Quick BL, Riles JM, Lambert NJ. Are graphic cigarette warning labels an effective message strategy? a test of psychological reactance theory and source appraisal. Communic Res. 2015. 10.1177/0093650215609669
31. McQueen A, Kreuter MW, Boyum S, et al. Reactions to FDA-proposed graphic warning labels affixed to U.S. smokers' cigarette packs. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17(7):784-795
32. Glock S, Kneer J. Are deterrent pictures effective? The impact of warning labels on cognitive dissonance in smokers. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2009;1(3):356-373
33. Glock S, Müller BC, Ritter SM. Warning labels formulated as questions positively influence smoking-related risk perception. J Health Psychol. 2013;18(2):252-262
34. Süssenbach P, Niemeier S, Glock S. Effects of and attention to graphic warning labels on cigarette packages. Psychol Health. 2013;28(10):1192-1206
35. Cameron LD, Williams B. Which images and features in graphic cigarette warnings predict their perceived effectiveness? findings from an online survey of residents in the UK. Ann Behav Med. 2015;49(5):639-649
36. Magnan RE, Cameron LD. Do young adults perceive that cigarette graphic warnings provide new knowledge about the harms of smoking? Ann Behav Med. 2015;49(4):594-604
37. Veer E, Rank T. Warning! The following packet contains shocking images: the impact of mortality salience on the effectiveness of graphic cigarette warning labels. J Consum Behav. 2012;11(3):225-233
38. Byrne S, Katz SJ, Mathios A, Niederdeppe J. Do the ends justify the means? A test of alternatives to the FDA proposed cigarette warning labels. Health Commun. 2015;30(7):680-693
39. Dijkstra A, Bos C. The effects of repeated exposure to graphic fear appeals on cigarette packages: A field experiment. Psychol Addict Behav. 2015;29(1):82-90
40. Witte K, Allen M. A meta-analysis of fear appeals: implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Educ Behav. 2000;27(5):591-615
41. Chéron E. Effect of graphic images in cigarette health warning: a call for stricter packaging regulation in Japan. J Int Consum Mark. 2015;27(2):137-151
42. Jansen C, van der Berg M, Buurman C, Smits M. The scarier, the better? Effects of adding images to verbal warnings on cigarette packages. In: Carliner S, Verckens JP, de Waele C, eds. Information and Document Design: Varieties on recent research. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company; 2006
43. Kees J, Burton S, Andrews JC, Kozup J. Understanding how graphic pictorial warnings work on cigarette packaging. J Public Policy Mark. 2010;29(2):265-276
44. Kempf DS, Harmon SK. Examining the effectiveness of proposed cigarette package warning labels with graphic images among US college students. Acad Mark Studies J. 2006;10(2)
45. Nagelhout GE, Janssen E, Ruiter RA, de Vries H. Pictorial cigarette warning labels: effects of severity and likelihood of risk messages. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016;18(5):1315-1323
46. Peters E, Romer D, Slovic P, et al. The impact and acceptability of Canadian-style cigarette warning labels among U.S. smokers and nonsmokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2007;9(4):473-481
47. Racela OC, Thoumrungroje A. The perceived ethicality and efficacy of fear appeals: the use of graphic warning labels in Thailand. J Int Bus Econ. 2012;12(4):106-113
48. Schneider S, Gadinger M, Fischer A. Does the effect go up in smoke? A randomized controlled trial of pictorial warnings on cigarette packaging. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;86(1):77-83
49. Lin PN, Zimmermann MH, Bover Manderski MT, Schmelzer AC, Steinberg MB. Evaluation of graphic cigarette warning images on cravings to smoke. J Smok Cessat. 2011;6(2):85-88
50. Bansal-Travers M, Hammond D, Smith P, Cummings KM. The impact of cigarette pack design, descriptors, and warning labels on risk perception in the U.S. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(6):674-682
51. Cantrell J, Vallone DM, Thrasher JF, et al. Impact of tobacco-related health warning labels across socioeconomic, race and ethnic groups: results from a randomized web-based experiment. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e52206
52. Fathelrahman AI, Omar M, Awang R, Cummings KM, Borland R, Bin Mohd Samin AS. Impact of the new Malaysian cigarette pack warnings on smokers' awareness of health risks and interest in quitting smoking. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010;7(11):4089-4099
53. Loeber S, Vollstädt-Klein S, Wilden S, et al. The effect of pictorial warnings on cigarette packages on attentional bias of smokers. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2011;98(2):292-298
54. Alaouie H, Afifi RA, Haddad P, Mahfoud Z, Nakkash R. Effectiveness of pictorial health warnings on cigarette packs among Lebanese school and university students. Tob Control. 2015;24(e1):e72-e80
55. Evans AT, Peters E, Strasser AA, Emery LF, Sheerin KM, Romer D. Graphic warning labels elicit affective and thoughtful responses from smokers: results of a randomized clinical trial. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0142879
56. Shankleman M, Sykes C, Mandeville KL, Di Costa S, Yarrow K. Standardised (plain) cigarette packaging increases attention to both text-based and graphical health warnings: experimental evidence. Public Health. 2015;129(1):37-42
57. Duffy SA, Burton D. Cartoon characters as tobacco warning labels. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154(12):1230-1236
58. Hoek J, Maubach N, Gendall P. Effects of cigarette on-pack warning labels on smokers' perceptions and behavior. Paper presented at: Advances in Consumer Research-Asia-Pacific Conference Proceedings; 2006; Sydney, Australia
59. Kees J, Burton S, Andrews JC, Kozup J. Tests of graphic visuals and cigarette package warning combinations: implications for the framework convention on tobacco control. J Public Policy Mark. 2006;25(2):212
60. O'Hegarty M, Pederson LL, Nelson DE, Mowery P, Gable JM, Wortley P. Reactions of young adult smokers to warning labels on cigarette packages. Am J Prev Med. 2006;30(6):467-473
61. Romer D, Peters E, Strasser AA, Langleben D. Desire versus efficacy in smokers' paradoxical reactions to pictorial health warnings for cigarettes. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54937
62. Thrasher JF, Carpenter MJ, Andrews JO, et al. Cigarette warning label policy alternatives and smoking-related health disparities. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(6):590-600
63. Vardavas CI, Connolly G, Karamanolis K, Kafatos A. Adolescents perceived effectiveness of the proposed European graphic tobacco warning labels. Eur J Public Health. 2009;19(2):212-217
64. Andrews JC, Netemeyer RG, Burton S, Kees J. Effects of plain package branding and graphic health warnings on adolescent smokers in the USA, Spain and France. Tob Control. 2016;25(e2):e120-e126
65. Cameron LD, Pepper JK, Brewer NT. Responses of young adults to graphic warning labels for cigarette packages. Tob Control. 2015;24(e1):e14-e22
66. Emery LF, Romer D, Sheerin KM, Jamieson KH, Peters E. Affective and cognitive mediators of the impact of cigarette warning labels. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014;16(3):263-269
67. Gibson L, Brennan E, Momjian A, Shapiro-Luft D, Seitz H, Cappella JN. Assessing the consequences of implementing graphic warning labels on cigarette packs for tobacco-related health disparities. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17(8):898-907
68. Paudel B, Paudel K, Timilsina D. Reactions of nepali adults to warning labels on cigarette packages: a survey with employee and medical students of a tertiary care medical college of Western region of Nepal. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(10):2216-2222
69. Dillard JP, Shen L. On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Commun Monogr. 2005;72(2):144-168
70. Golmier I, Chebat JC, Gélinas-Chebat C. Can cigarette warnings counterbalance effects of smoking scenes in movies? Psychol Rep. 2007;100(1):3-18
71. Sabbane LI, Bellavance F, Chebat J-C. Recency versus repetition priming effects of cigarette warnings on nonsmoking teenagers: the moderating effects of cigarette-brand familiarity. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2009;39(3):656-682
72. Sabbane LI, Lowrey TM, Chebat J-C. The effectiveness of cigarette warning label threats on nonsmoking adolescents. J Consumer Affairs. 2009;43(2):332-345
73. Macy JT, Chassin L, Presson CC, Yeung E. Exposure to graphic warning labels on cigarette packages: effects on implicit and explicit attitudes towards smoking among young adults. Psychol Health. 2016;31(3):349-363
74. Pepper JK, Cameron LD, Reiter PL, McRee AL, Brewer NT. Nonsmoking male adolescents' reactions to cigarette warnings. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e65533
75. Malouff JM, Schutte NS, Rooke SE, MacDonell G. Effects on smokers of exposure to graphic warning images. Am J Addict. 2012;21(6): 555-557
76. Thrasher JF, Rousu MC, Anaya-Ocampo R, Reynales-Shigematsu LM, Arillo-Santillán E, Hernández-Avila M. Estimating the impact of different cigarette package warning label policies: the auction method. Addict Behav. 2007;32(12):2916-2925
77. Thrasher JF, Rousu MC, Hammond D, Navarro A, Corrigan JR. Estimating the impact of pictorial health warnings and "plain" cigarette packaging: evidence from experimental auctions among adult smokers in the United States. Health Policy. 2011;102(1):41-48
78. Rousu MC, Marette S, Thrasher JF, Lusk JL. The economic value to smokers of graphic warning labels on cigarettes: Evidence from combining market and experimental auction data. J Econ Behav Organ. 2014;108:123-134
79. Rousu MC, Thrasher JF. Examining the relationship between psychosocial and behavioral proxies for future consumption behavior: self-reported impact and bidding behavior in an experimental auction study on cigarette labeling. Health Educ Res. 2014;29(2):183-194
80. Healey B, Hoek J. Young adult smokers' and prior-smokers' evaluations of novel tobacco warning images. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016;18(1):93-97
81. Huang LL, Thrasher JF, Reid JL, Hammond D. Predictive and external validity of a pre-market study to determine the most effective pictorial health warning label content for cigarette packages. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016;18(5):1376-1381
82. Mannocci A, Colamesta V, Conti V, et al. Demographic characteristics, nicotine dependence, and motivation to quit as possible determinants of smoking behaviors and acceptability of shocking warnings in Italy. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:723035
83. Mannocci A, Colamesta V, Mipatrini D, et al. From directive to practice: are pictorial warnings and plain packaging effective to reduce the tobacco addiction? Public Health. 2015;129(12):1563-1570
84. Hammond D, Thrasher J, Reid JL, Driezen P, Boudreau C, Santillán EA. Perceived effectiveness of pictorial health warnings among Mexican youth and adults: a population-level intervention with potential to reduce tobaccorelated inequities. Cancer Causes Control. 2012;23(suppl 1):57-67
85. Qin Y, Wu M, Pan X, et al. Reactions of Chinese adults to warning labels on cigarette packages: a survey in Jiangsu Province. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:133
86. Nimbarte A, Aghazadeh F, Harvey C. Comparison of current U.S. and Canadian cigarette pack warnings. Int Q Community Health Educ. 2005;24(1):3-27
87. Wade B, Merrill RM, Lindsay GB. Cigarette pack warning labels in Russia: how graphic should they be? Eur J Public Health. 2011;21(3):366-372
88. Fong GT, Hammond D, Jiang Y, et al.; ITC China Project Team. Perceptions of tobacco health warnings in China compared with picture and text-only health warnings from other countries: an experimental study. Tob Control. 2010;19 Suppl 2:i69-i77
89. Dillard JP, Shen L, Vail RG. Does perceived message effectiveness cause persuasion or vice versa? 17 Consistent answers. Hum Commun Res. 2007;33(4):467-488
90. Dillard JP, Weber KM, Vail RG. The relationship between the perceived and actual effectiveness of persuasive messages: a meta-analysis with implications for formative campaign research. J Commun. 2007;57(4):613-631
91. Dillard JP, Ye S. The perceived effectiveness of persuasive messages: questions of structure, referent, and bias. J Health Commun. 2008;13(2):149-168
92. Yzer M, LoRusso S, Nagler RH. On the conceptual ambiguity surrounding perceived message effectiveness. Health Commun. 2015;30(2):125-134
93. Brewer NT, Hall MG, Noar SM, et al. Effect of pictorial cigarette pack warnings on changes in smoking behavior: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(7):905-912
94. Curran-Everett D, Benos DJ; American Physiological Society. Guidelines for reporting statistics in journals published by the American Physiological Society. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2004;287(2):E189-E191
95. Frings C, Schneider KK, Fox E. The negative priming paradigm: an update and implications for selective attention. Psychon Bull Rev. 2015;22(6):1577-1597
96. Brewer NT, Weinstein ND, Cuite CL, Herrington JE. Risk perceptions and their relation to risk behavior. Ann Behav Med. 2004;27(2):125-130
97. Earp JA, Ennett ST. Conceptual models for health education research and practice. Health Educ Res. 1991;6(2):163-171
98. Bless H, Bohner G, Schwarz N, Strack F. Mood and persuasion a cognitive response analysis. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1990;16(2):331-345
99. Brandon TH, Baker TB. The Smoking Consequences Questionnaire: the subjective expected utility of smoking in college students. Psychol Assess. 1991;3(3):484
100. Pepper JK, Emery SL, Ribisl KM, Rini CM, Brewer NT. How risky is it to use e-cigarettes? Smokers' beliefs about their health risks from using novel and traditional tobacco products. J Behav Med. 2015;38(2):318-326
101. Armitage CJ. Efficacy of a brief worksite intervention to reduce smoking: the roles of behavioral and implementation intentions. J Occup Health Psychol. 2007;12(4):376-390
102. Klein WM, Zajac LE, Monin MM. Worry as a moderator of the association between risk perceptions and quitting intentions in young adult and adult smokers. Ann Behav Med. 2009;38(3):256-261