Health warning messages on tobacco products: A review

Tobacco Control

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 327-337

  Hammond, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATION; METHODOLOGY; PACKAGING; REVIEW; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION;

HEALTH COMMUNICATION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; PRODUCT LABELING; PRODUCT PACKAGING; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION;

EID: 84860390142     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: 14683318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tc.2010.037630     Document Type: Review

References (135)

1. World Health Organization. Tobacco Free Initiative. Information on Global Tobacco Use. http://www.who.int/tobacco/health_priority/en/index.html (accessed 14 Jul 2009).
2. WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2008. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2008. http://www.who.int/tobacco/mpower/en (accessed 12 Apr 2010).
3. US Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, Georgia: Dept of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health: Washington, DC, 2004.
4. Slade J. The pack as advertisement. Tob Control 1997; 6: 169-70.
5. Wakefield M, Morley C, Horan JK, et al. The cigarette pack as image: new evidence from tobacco industry documents. Tob Control 2002; 11 (Suppl 1): I73-80.
6. RW. The Role of Packaging Seen Through Industry Documents. Expert Report prepared for: JTI-Macdonald., Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd and Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. v. Attorney General of Canada and Canadian Cancer Society (intervenor). Supreme Court, Province of Quebec, District of Montreal, 2001. Defense Exhibit D-116.
7. Dewhirst T. POP goes the power wall? Taking aim at tobacco promotional strategies utilised at retail. Tob Control 2004; 13: 209-10.
8. World Health Organization. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2003. http://www.who.int/tobacco/framework/en (accessed 12 Apr 2010).
9. 9. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Elaboration of Guidelines for Implementation of Article 11 of the Convention, 2008. http://apps.who.int/gb/fctc/PDF/cop3/FCTC_COP3_7-en.pdf.
10. Aftab M, Kolben D, Lurie P. International cigarette labeling practices. Tob Control 1999; 8: 368-72.
11. Hammond D. Tobacco Labeling Resource. Waterloo, ON. http://www.tobaccolabels.org (accessed 12 Apr 2010).
12. Fathelrahman AI, Omar M, Awang R, et al. Smokers' responses towards cigarette pack warning labels in predicting quit intention, stage of change, and self-efficacy. Nicotine Tob Res 2009; 11: 248-53.
13. Elliott & Shanahan Research. Evaluation of the Health Warnings and Explanatory Health Messages on Tobacco Products. Canberra: Department of Health and Aged Care, 2000. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/474DA5DAC70608F2CA2571A1001C7DFE/$File/execsumm.pdf (accessed 12 Apr 2010).
14. Chaiton M, Cohen J, Kaiserman MJ, et al. Beliefs and Attitudes. In: 2002 Youth Smoking Survey-Technical Report. Health Canada, 2004. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hc-ps/pubs/tobac-tabac/yss-etj-2002/index-eng.php (accessed 12 Apr 2010).
15. Environics Research Group. The Health Effects of Tobacco and Health Warning Messages on Cigarette PackagesdSurvey of Adults and Adults Smokers: Wave 12 Surveys. Prepared for Health Canada. Toronto, Canada: Environics Research Group, 2007.
16. Moodie C, Mackintosh AM, Hammond D. Adolescents' response to text-only tobacco health warnings: Results from the 2008 UK Youth Tobacco Policy Survey. Eur J Public Health 2010; 20: 463-9.
17. European Commission. Eurobarometer: Survey on Tobacco (Analytical Report). 2009. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_253_en.pdf (accessed 12 Apr 2010).
18. Environics Research Group. Canadian Adult and Youth Opinions on the Sizing of Health Warning Messages. Environics Research Group Limited, 1999. http://dsppsd.pwgsc.gc.ca/Collection/H49-134-1999E.pdf (accessed 12 Apr 2010).
19. Les Études De Marche Createc. Quantitative Study of Canadian Youth Smokers and Vulnerable Non Smokers: Effects of Modified Packaging Through Increasing the Size of Warnings on Cigarette Packages. Prepared for Health Canada. 2008. http://www.tobaccolabels.ca/healt/canada2008w3 (accessed 12 Apr 2010).
20. Les Études de Marche Createc. Quantitative Study of Canadian Adult Smokers: Effects of Modified Packaging Through Increasing the Size of Warnings on Cigarette Packages, 2008. Health Canada, (accessed 5 Jan 2008). http://www.tobaccolabels.ca/healt/canadaw7 (accessed 12 Apr 2010).
21. Environics Research Group. The Health Effects of Tobacco and Health Warning Messages on Cigarette PackagesdSurvey of Youth: Wave 12 Surveys. Prepared for Health Canada. 2007.
22. Borland R, Hill D. Initial impact of the new Australian tobacco health warnings on knowledge and beliefs. Tob Control 1997; 6: 317-25.
23. Hammond D, Fong GT, McDonald P, et al. Impact of the graphic Canadian warning labels on adult smoking behaviour. Tob Control 2003; 12: 391-5.
24. Shanahan P, Elliott D. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Graphic Health Warnings on Tobacco Product Packaging 2008. Canberra: Australian GovernmentDepartment of Health and Ageing, 2009. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/health-pubhlth-strateg-drugs-tobacco-warnings.htm (accessed 12 Apr 2010).
25. Cavalcante TM. Labelling and Packaging in Brazil. National Cancer Institute, Health Ministry of Brazil; World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/tobacco/training/success_stories/en/best_practices_brazil_labelling.pdf (accessed 12 Apr 2010).
26. International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project. FCTC Article 11eTobacco Warning Labels: Evidence and Recommendations from the ITC Project. 2009. http://www.itcproject.org (accessed 22 Jun 2009).
27. Hammond D, Fong GT, Borland R, et al. Effectiveness of cigarette warning labels in informing smokers about the risks of smoking: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control 2006; 15 (Suppl III): iii19-25.
28. Crawford MA, Balch GI, Mermelstein R, et al. Responses to tobacco control policies among youth. Tob Control 2002; 11: 14-19.
29. Fischer PM, Richards EJB, Krugman DM. Recall and eye tracking study of adolescents viewing tobacco advertisements. JAMA 1989; 261: 84-9.
30. BRC Marketing & Social Research. Smoking Health Warnings Stage 2: Optimising Smoking Health Warnings-Text Graphics, Size, and Colour Testing. Prepared for the New Zealand Ministry of Health, 2004. http://www.ndp.govt.nz/moh.nsf/indexcm/ndp-publications-smokinghealthwarningsstage2aug2004 (accessed 12 Jul 2009).
31. Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, ACCV. Health Warnings and Contents Labelling on Tobacco Products. Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, 1992.
32. Linthwaite P. Health warnings. Health Educ J 1985; 44: 218-19.
33. Rootman I, Flay BR. A Study on Youth Smoking: Cigarette Packaging and Event Marketing Increases the Attractiveness of Smoking. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto, 1995. http://www.tobaccolabels.ca/prohibit/canadaandu (accessed 12 Apr 2010).
34. Teeboom Y. Waarschuwende teksten op sigarettenpakjes, 2002. http://www.stivoro.nl/upload/_publdocs/o_w2002_jeugd.pdf (accessed 12 Apr 2010).
35. Nilsson T. Legibility of Tobacco Health Messages with Respect to Distance. A Report to the Tobacco Products Division of the Health Protection Branch of Health and Welfare Canada, 1991. http://dsp-psd.pwgsc.gc.ca/Collection/H49-132-1999E.pdf (accessed 12 Apr 2009).
36. Tandemar Research Inc. Cigarette Packaging Study: The Evaluation of New Health Warning Messages. Toronto, ON: Tandemar Research Inc., 1996.
37. Devlin E, Anderson S, Hastings G, et al. Targeting smokers with tobacco warning labels - opportunities and challenges for Pan European health promotion. Health Promot Int 2005; 20: 41-9.
38. Fong GT, Ratte S, Craig L, et al. Évaluation des politiques de lutte contre le tabagisme en France: résultats de la premie're vague de l'enquěte ITC France. Evaluating tobacco control policies in France: Results of the first wave of the ITC France Survey. Bulletin Épidémiologique Hebdomadaire (Numéro thématiquedJournée mondiale sans tabac 2008. Weekly Epidemiological Bulletin (Special IssuedWorld No Tobacco Day 2008) 2007; 22: 183-7.
39. Borland R, Yong HH, Wilson N, et al. How reaction to cigarette packet health warnings influence quitting: findings from the ITC Four Country survey. Addiction 2009; 104: 669-75.
40. Portillo F, Antonanzas F. Information disclosure and smoking risk perceptions: potential short-term impact on Spanish students of the new European Union directive on tobacco products. Eur J Public Health 2002; 12: 295-301.
41. IPSOS survey, Belgium. Effectiveness of picture warnings on behalf of the Belgium Cancer Foundation, 2007.
42. Strahan EJ, White K, Fong GT, et al. Enhancing the effectiveness of tobacco package warning labels: a social psychological perspective. Tob Control 2002; 11: 183-90.
43. Levie WH, Lentz R. Effects of text illustrations: a review of research. Educ Comm Technol J 1982; 30: 195-232.
44. Braun CC, Kline PB, Silver NC. The influence of colour on warning label perceptions. Int J Ind Ergon 1995; 15: 179-87.
45. Sherman SJ, Cialdini RB, Schwartzman DF, et al. Imagining can heighten or lower the perceived likelihood of contracting a disease: the mediating effect of ease of imagery. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1985; 11: 118-27.
46. Leventhal H. Findings and theory in the study of fear communications. In: Berkowitz L, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 5. New York: Academic Press, 1970: 119-86.
47. Dewar RE. Design and evaluation of public information symbols. In: Zwaga HJG, Boersma T, Hoonhout HCM, eds. Visual Information for Everyday Use: Design and Research Perspectives. London: Taylor and Francis, 1999: 285-303.
48. Kalsher MJ, Wogalter MS, Racicot BM. Pharmaceutical container labels and warnings: Preference and perceived readability of alternative designs and pictorials. Int J Indus Ergon 1996; 18: 83-90.
49. Leonard SD, Otani H, Wogalter MS. Comprehension and memory. In: Wogalter MS, DeJoy DM, Laughery KR, eds. Warnings and Risk Communication. London: Taylor and Francis, 1999: 149-87.
50. Winder C, Azzi R, Wagner D. The development of the globally harmonized system (GHS) of classification and labelling of hazardous chemicals. J Hazard Mater 2000; 125: 29-44.
51. Liefeld JP. The Relative Importance of the Size, Content and Pictures on Cigarette Package Warning Messages. Prepared for Health Canada. Guelph, Canada: Department of Consumer Studies, University of Guelph, 1999.
52. O'Hegarty M, Pederson LL, Nelson DE, et al. Reactions of young adult smokers to warning labels on cigarette packages. Am J Prev Med 2006; 30: 467-73.
53. Vardavas CI, Connolly G, Karamanolis K, et al. Adolescents perceived effectiveness of the proposed European graphic tobacco warning labels. Eur J Public Health 2009; 19: 212-17.
54. Kees J, Burton S, Andrews JC, et al. Tests of graphic visuals and cigarette package warning combinations: implications for the framework convention on tobacco control. J Public Policy Marketing 2006; 25: 212-23.
55. Kees J, Burton S, Andrews JC, et al. Understanding how graphic pictorial warnings work on cigarette packaging. J Public Policy Marketing 2010; 29: 115-26.
56. Sabbane LI, Bellavance F, Chebat JC. Recency versus repetition priming effects of cigarette warnings on nonsmoking teenagers: the moderating effects of cigarettebrand familiarity. J Appl Soc Psychol 2009; 39: 656-82.
57. Fong GT, Hammond D, Yuan J, et al. Perceptions of Tobacco Health Warnings in China Compared to Picture and Text-Only Health Warnings From Other Countries: An Experimental Study. Tob Control 2010; 19 (Suppl 2): i69-i77.
58. Environics Research Group. Testing New Health Warning Messages for Cigarette packages: A Summary of Three Phases of Focus Group Research: Final Report. Prepared for Health Canada, 2000. http://www.tobaccolabels.ca/healt/canada (accessed 12 Jul 2009).
59. Corporate Research Associates. Creative Concept Testing for Health Warning Messages. Prepared for Health Canada, 2005. http://www.tobaccolabels.ca/healt/canada2005 (accessed 13 Jul 2009).
60. Clemenger BBDO. Marketing Inputs to Assist the Development of Health Warnings for Tobacco Packaging. Report to the Ministry of Health: Review of the Smoke-free Environments Regulations, 2004. http://www.ndp.govt.nz/moh.nsf/indexcm/ndppublications-marketinginputsmay2006 (accessed 13 Jul 2009).
61. BRC Marketing & Social Research. Smoking Health Warnings Stage 1: The Effectiveness of Different (Pictorial) Health Warnings in Helping People Consider their Smoking-Related Behaviour. Prepared for the New Zealand Ministry of Health, 2004.
62. Elliott & Shanahan (E&S) Research. Developmental Research for New Australian Health Warnings on Tobacco Products: Stage 1. Prepared for the Population Health Division Department of Health and Ageing. Commonwealth of Australia, 2002. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/474DA5DAC70608F2CA2571A1001C7DFE/$File/warnings_stage1.pdf (accessed 13 Jul 2009).
63. Elliott & Shanahan (E&S) Research. Developmental Research for New Australian Health Warnings on Tobacco Products Stage 2. Prepared for: The Australian Population Health Division Department of Health and Ageing. Commonwealth of Australia, 2003. http://www.tobaccolabels.ca/healt/australia2 (accessed 13 Jul 2009).
64. Gallopel-Morvan K, Gabriel P, Le Gall-Ely M, et al. The use of visual warnings in social marketing: The case of tobacco. Journal of Business Research 2011; 64: 7-11.
65. UK Department of Health. Consultation on the Introduction of Picture Warnings on Tobacco Packs: Report on Consultation, 2007. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Responsestoconsultations/DH_077960 (accessed 13 Jul 2009).
66. Ministry of Health, Bulgaria. Most effective pictures out of 42 images e web based survey. Ministry of Health, 2008.
67. Les Etudes de Marche Createc. Final Report: Qualitative Testing of Health Warnings Messages. Prepared for the Tobacco Control Programme Health Canada. 2006.
68. Hammond D, Fong GT, Borland R, et al. Text and Graphic Warnings on Cigarette Packages: Findings from the ITC Four Country Survey. Am J Prev Med 2007; 32: 202-9.
69. Hammond D, Fong GT, McDonald P, et al. Graphic Canadian warning labels and adverse outcomes: evidence from Canadian smokers. Am J Public Health 2004; 94: 1442-5.
70. Thrasher JF, Hammond D, Fong GT. Smokers' reactions to cigarette package warnings with graphic imagery and with only text: a comparison between Mexico and Canada. Salud Publica Mex 2007;49 (Suppl 2): S233-40.
71. White V, Webster B, Wakefield M. Do graphic health warning labels have an impact on adolescents' smoking related beliefs and behaviours? Addiction 2008; 103: 1562-71.
72. Borland R, Wilson N, Fong GT, et al. Impact of graphic and text warnings on cigarette packs: findings from four countries over five years. Tob Control 2009; 18: 358-64.
73. Hassan LM, Shiu E, Thrasher JF, et al. Exploring the effectiveness of cigarette warning labels: findings from the United States and United Kingdom arms of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Int J Nonprofit Volunt Sect Mark 2008; 13: 263-74.
74. Wade B, Merrill RM, Lindsay GB. Cigarette pack warning labels in Russia: how graphic should they be? Eur J Public Health Published Online First: 21 July 2010. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckq098.
75. Petersen LE, Lieder F. Die Effektivität von schriftlichen und graphischen Warnhinweisen auf Zigarettenschachteln: Eine Überprüfung des revidierten Modells der Schutzmotivation. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 2006; 37: 245-58.
76. Sabbane LI, Lowrey TM, Chebat JC. The effectiveness of cigarette warning label threats on nonsmoking adolescents. J Consumer Affairs 2009; 43: 332-5.
77. Gygax PM, Bosson M, Gay C, et al. Relevance of health warnings on cigarette packs: a psycholinguistic investigation. Health Commun 2010; 25: 397-409.
78. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention: Tobacco Control. Volume 12. Methods for Evaluating Tobacco Control Policies. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer. http://apps.who.int/bookorders/anglais/detart1.jsp? sesslan=1&codlan=1&codcol=76&codcch=28 (accessed 13 Jul 2009).
79. Willemsen MC. The new EU cigarette health warnings benefit smokers who want to quit the habit: results from the Dutch Continuous Survey of Smoking Habits. Eur J Public Health 2005; 15: 389-92.
80. Canadian Cancer Society Evaluation of New Warnings on Cigarette Packages. Prepared by: Environics, Focus Canada 2001-3, 2001. http://www.cancer.ca/e/media/CCS/Canada%20wide/Files%20List/English%20files%20heading/pdf%20not%20in%20publications%20section/Environics%20study%20on%20cigarette%20warning%20labels%20-%20complete.ashx (accessed 13 Jul 2009).
81. Hill D. New cigarette-packet warnings: are they getting through? Med J Aust 1988; 148: 478-80.
82. Koval JJ, Aubut JA, Pederson LL, et al. The potential effectiveness of warning labels on cigarette packages: the perceptions of young adult Canadians. Can J Public Health 2005; 96: 353-6.
83. UK Department of Health. Consultation on the Introduction of Picture Warnings on Tobacco Pack, 2006. http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/13/54/96/04135496.pdf.
84. Willemsen MC, Simons C, Zeeman G. Impact of the new EU health warnings on the Dutch quit line. Tob Control 2002; 11: 382.
85. Miller CL, Hill DJ, Quester PG, et al. Impact on the Australian Quitline of new graphic cigarette pack warnings including the Quitline number. Tob Control 2009; 18: 228-34.
86. Wilson N, Li J, Hoek J, et al. Long-term benefit of increasing the prominence of a quitline number on cigarette packaging: 3 years of Quitline call data. N Z Med J 2010; 123: 109-11.
87. Hammond D, McDonald PW, Fong GT, et al. Cigarette warning labels, smoking bans, and motivation to quit smoking: evidence from former smokers. Can J Public Health 2004; 95: 201-4.
88. Gospodinov N, Irvine I. Global health warnings on tobacco packaging: evidence from the Canadian experiment. Top Econ Anal Pol 2004; 4: 30.
89. Health Canada. Canadian Tobacco Use Monitoring Survey (CTUMS). http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hc-ps/tobac-tabac/research-recherche/stat/ctums-esutc_2008-eng.php (accessed 13 Jul 2009).
90. Flay BR, Burton D. In: Atkin C, Wallack L, eds. Mass Communication for Public Health. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1990: 129-46.
91. Sweet KM, Willis SK, Ashida S, et al. Use of fear-appeal techniques in the design of tailored cancer risk communication messages: implications for healthcare providers. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 3375-6.
92. Peters E, Romer D, Slovic P, et al. The impact and acceptability of Canadian-style cigarette warning labels among U.S. smokers and nonsmokers. Nicotine Tob Res 2007; 9: 473-81.
93. Rozin P, Haidt J, McCauley CR. Disgust. In: Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM, eds, Handbook of emotions, 2nd edn. New York: Guilford Press, 2000: 637-53.
94. Dillard JP, Pfau M. The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2002.
95. Donovan RJ, Jalleh G, Carter OBJ. Tobacco industry smoking prevention advertisements; impact on youth motivation for smoking in the future. Soc Marketing Q 2006; 7: 3-13.
96. Nascimento BEM, Oliveira L, Vieira AS, et al. Avoidance of smoking: the impact of warning in Brazil. Tob Control 2008; 17: 405-9.
97. Hammond D, Thrasher JF, Reid J. Mexico Health Warning Study: International Packaging Study, 2010. http://davidhammond.ca/downloads/Mexico%20Packaging%20Study/ (accessed 20 Jan 2010).
98. Western Opinion/NRG Research Group. Illustration-Based Health Information Messages: Concept Testing. Prepared for Health Canada, 2006. http://www. tobaccolabels.ca/healt/canada2006 (accessed 12 Apr 2010).
99. Decima Research Testing of Health Warning Messages and Health Information Messages for Tobacco Products Executive Summary. Prepared on behalf of Health Canada, 2009.
100. Goodall C, Appiah O. Adolescents' perceptions of Canadian cigarette package warning labels: investigating the effects of message framing. Health Commun 2008; 23: 117-27.
101. Hastings G, MacFadyen L. Controversies in tobacco control: the limitations of fear messages. Tob Control 2002; 11: 73-5.
102. Biener L, Taylor TM. The continuing importance of emotion in tobacco control media campaigns: a response to Hastings and MacFadyen. Tob Control 2002; 11: 75-7.
103. Ruiter RAC. Saying is not (always) doing: cigarette warning labels are useless. Eur J Public Health 2005; 15: 329-30.
104. Ruiter RAC, Abraham C, Kok G. Scaring warnings and rational precautions: a review of the psychology of fear appeals. Psychol Health 2001; 16: 613-30.
105. Witte K, Allen M. A meta-analysis of fear appeals: implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Educ Behav 2000; 27: 591-615.
106. Brehm JW. A Theory of Psychological Reactance. Academic Press, 1966.
107. Robinson TN, Killen JD. Do cigarette warning labels reduce smoking? Paradoxical effects among adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1997; 151: 267-72.
108. CRÉATEC + Market Studies. Effectiveness of Health Warning Messages on Cigarette Packages in Informing Less-literate Smokers, Final Report. Prepared for Communication Canada, 2003.
109. Malouff J, Gabrilowitz D, Schutte N. Readability of health warnings on alcohol and tobacco products. Am J Public Health 1992; 82: 464.
110. Reid JL, Hammond D, Driezen P. Socioeconomic status and smoking in Canada, 1999e2006: Has there been any progress on disparities in tobacco use? Can J Public Health 2010; 101: 73-8.
111. Siahpush M, McNeill A, Hammond D, et al. Socioeconomic and country variations in knowledge of health risks of tobacco smoking and toxic constituents of smoke: results from the 2002 International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey. Tob Control 2006;15 (Suppl III): iii65-70.
112. Stark E, Kim A, Miller C, et al. Effects of including a graphic warning label in advertisements for reduced-exposure products: implications for persuasion and policy. J Appl Soc Psychol 2008; 38: 281-93.
113. Henderson B. Wear out: an empirical investigation of advertising wear-in and wear-out. J Advert Res 2000; 6: 95-100.
114. Bornstein RF. Exposure and affect: overview and meta-analysis of research. Psychol Bull 1989; 106: 265-89.
115. Brubaker RG, Mitby SK. Health-risk warning labels on smokeless tobacco products: are they effective? Addict Behav 1990; 15: 115-18.
116. Thrasher JF, Rousu MC, Ocampo-Anaya R, et al. Estimating the impact of graphic warning labels on cigarette packs: the auction method. Salud Publica Mex 2006;48 (Suppl 1): S155-66.
117. Goldberg ME, Liefeld J, Madill J, et al. The effect of plain packaging on response to health warnings. Am J Public Health 1999; 89: 1434-5.
118. Beede P, Lawson R. The effect of plain packages on the perception of cigarette health warnings. Public Health 1992;106:315-22.
119. Cecil H, Evans RI, Standley MA. Perceived believability among adolescents of health warning labels on cigarette packs. J Appl Soc Psychol 1996; 26: 502-19.
120. Reid. Canadians Welcome New Graphic Warnings on Cigarette Packages, 2011. http://www.angus-reid.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/2011.01.10_Tobacco_CAN.pdf (accessed 20 Jan 2011).
121. Borland R, Hill D. The path to Australia's tobacco health warnings. Addiction 1997; 92: 1151-7.
122. Callery WE, Hammond D, O'Connor RJ, et al. The appeal of smokeless tobacco products among young Canadian smokers: the impact of pictorial health warnings and relative risk messages. Nicotine Tob Res. Published Online First: 28 February 2011 doi:10.1093/ntr/ntr013.
123. Les Études de Marche Createc. Health Warning Messages on Smokeless Tobacco, Cigars and Pipe Products A Qualitative Study with Consumers. Prepared for Health Canada Tobacco Control Programme, 2003.
124. Environics Research Group. Testing of Mock-ups of Health Warning Messages and Warning Notices on Tobacco Product Advertisements for Smokeless Tobacco. Prepared for Health Canada, 2007. http://www.tobaccolabels.ca/healt/canada2007w2 (accessed 12 Apr 2010).
125. Terry-McElrath Y, Wakefield M, Ruel E, et al. The effect of antismoking advertisement executional characteristics on youth comprehension, appraisal, recall, and engagement. J Health Commun 2005; 10: 127-43.
126. Wakefield M, Durrant R, Terry-McElrath Y, et al. Appraisal of anti-smoking advertising by youth at risk for regular smoking: a comparative study in the United States, Australia, and Britain. Tob Control 2003;12 (Suppl 2): ii82-6.
127. de Wit JBF, Das E, Vet R. What works best: objective statistics or a personal testimonial? An assessment of the persuasive effects of different types of message evidence on risk perception. Health Psychol 2008;27 (1): 110-15.
128. Slater MD, Rouner D. Value-affirmative and value-protective processing of alcohol education messages that include statistical evidence or anecdotes. Commun Res 1996; 23: 210-35.
129. Broemer P. Ease of imagination moderates reactions to differently framed health messages. Eur J Soc Psychol 2004; 34: 103-19.
130. Devlin E, Eadie D, Stead M, et al. Comparative study of young people response to anti-smoking messages. Int J Advert 2007;26:99-128.
131. Sattler B, Lippy B, Jordan TG. Hazard Communication: A Review of the Science Underpinning the Art of Communication for Health and Safety. U.S. Department of Labor Occupational Safety & Health Administration, 1997. http://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/hc2inf2.html.
132. Cowburn G, Stockley L. Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr 2005; 8: 21-8.
133. Kristal AR, Levy L, Patterson RE, et al. Trends in food label use associated with new nutrition labeling regulations. Am J Public Health 1998; 88: 1212-15.
134. MacKinnon DP. Review of the effects of the alcohol warning label. In: Watson RR, ed. Drug and Alcohol Abuse Reviews, Vol. 7: Alcohol, Cocaine, and Accidents. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press Inc, 1995: 131-61.
135. MacKinnon DP, Nohre L, Pentz MA, et al. The alcohol warning and adolescents: 5-year effects. Am J Public Health 2000; 90: 1589-94.