Do the Ends Justify the Means? A Test of Alternatives to the FDA Proposed Cigarette Warning Labels

Health Communication

Volumn 30, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 680-693

  Byrne, Sahara ^a   Katz, Sherri Jean ^a   Mathios, Alan ^a   Niederdeppe, Jeff ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEAR; FEMALE; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; HUMAN; MALE; PACKAGING; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TOBACCO; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEAR; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTENTION; MALE; PRODUCT LABELING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TOBACCO PRODUCTS; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84928582224     PISSN: 10410236     EISSN: 15327027     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2014.895282     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. 44 Liquormart Inc. v. Rhode Island. (1996). 517 US 484.
2. Americans for Nonsmokers’ Rights. (2012). History and goals. Retrieved from http://www.no-smoke.org/aboutus.php?id=436
3. Azagba, S., & Sharaf, M. F. (2013). The effect of graphic cigarette warning labels on smoking behavior: Evidence from the Canadian experience. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 15, 708–717. doi:10.1093/ntr/nts194
4. Bansal-Travers, M., Hammond, D., Smith, P., & Cummings, K. M. (2011). The impact of cigarette pack design, descriptors, and warning labels on risk perception in the U.S. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40, 674–82. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.01.021
5. Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. (2012). Enforcing laws prohibiting cigarette sales to kids reduces youth smoking. Retrieved from http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/research/factsheets/pdf/0049.pdf
6. Caplan, N., Morrison, A., & Stambaugh, R. J. (1975). The use of social science knowledge in policy decisions at the national level: A report to respondents. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012). State cigarette excise taxes—United States, 2010–2011. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6112a1.htm
8. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission. (1980). 447 US 557.
9. Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act of 1965, Pub. L. No. Section 1331–1341. (1965). Retrieved from http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/chapter-36?quicktabs_8=1#quicktabs-8
10. Commonwealth Brands Inc., et al v. United States of America, et al. (2009). 1:2009cv00117.
11. Comprehensive Smoking Education Act. (1984). H.R. 98–474, 98th Cong. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
12. Cook, K., King, G., & Laitin, D. (2010). Providing the web of social science knowledge for the future: a network of social science data collaboratories. NSF-SBE white paper, 1–5. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/sbe_2020/2020_pdfs/Cook_Karen_225.pdf
13. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993). 509 U.S. 579.
14. Dillard, J. P., & Nabi, R. L. (2006). The persuasive influence of emotion in cancer prevention and detection messages. Journal of Communication, 56, S123–S139.
15. Dillard, J. P., Shen, L., & Vail, R. G. (2007). Does perceived message effectiveness cause persuasion or vice versa? 17 Consistent answers. Human Communication Research, 33, 467–488. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00308.x
16. Entertainment Software Association v. Blagojevich. (2006). 469 F.3d 6.
17. Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. (2009). H.R. 1256 (111th). Retrieved from http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr1256/text
18. Food and Drug Adminstration. (2012). Tobacco products. Retrieved from http://www.fda.gov/TobaccoProducts/ResourcesforYou/ucm292043.htm
19. Food and Drug Adminstration. (2013). Tobacco products: Product requirements, marketing & labeling. Retrieved from http://www.fda.gov/tobaccoproducts/labeling/ucm259214.htm
20. Gilson, L., Hanson, K., Sheikh, K., Agyepong, I. A., Ssengooba, F., & Bennett, S. (2011). Building the field of health policy and systems research: Social science matters. PLoS Medicine, 8, e10011079. doi:10.1371/jour-nal.pmed.1001079
21. Givel, M. (2007). A comparison of the impact of U.S. and Canadian cigarette pack warning label requirements on tobacco industry profitability and the public health. Health Policy, 83, 343–352. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.12.003
22. Hammond, D. (2011). Health warning messages on tobacco products: a review. Tobacco Control, 20, 327–337. doi:10.1136/tc.2010.037630
23. Hammond, D., Fong, G. T., McNeill, A., Borland, R., & Cummings, K. M. (2006). Effectiveness of cigarette warning labels in informing smokers about the risks of smoking: Findings from the international tobacco control (ITC) four country survey. Tobacco Control, 15(Suppl. 3), iii19–25. doi:10.1136/tc.2005.012294
24. Hayes, A. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
25. Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (in press). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. doi:10.1111/bmsp.12028
26. Hoefges, M., & Sanchez, M. R. (2000). “Vice” advertising under the Supreme Court’s commercial speech doctrine: The shifting Central Hudson analysis. Hastings Communication and Entertainment Law Journal, 22, 345–390.
27. Holder, E. H. (2013, March 15). Letter to The Honorable John Boehner, Speaker, U.S. House of Representatives, in regards to R. J. Reynolds v. Food & Drug Administration, No. 11-5332 (D.C. Cir).
28. Ibanez v. Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation. (1994). 512 U.S. 1.
29. Kees, J., Burton, S., Andrews, J. C., & Kozup, J. (2011). Work on cigarette packaging. Journal of Public Policy, 29, 265–276.
30. King, G. (2011). Ensuring the data-rich future of the social sciences. Science, 331, 719–721. doi:10.1126/science.1197872
31. Langleben, D. D. & Moriarty, J. C. (2012). Using brain imaging for lie detection: Where science, law, and policy collide. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/jane_moriarty/18
32. McCool, J., Webb, L., Cameron, L. D., & Hoek, J. (2012). Graphic warning labels on plain cigarette packs: Will they make a difference to adolescents? Social Science & Medicine, 74, 1269–1273. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.12.043
33. Mertz, E. (2011). Undervaluing interdeterminacy: Translating social science into law. DePaul Law Review, 397, 1–28. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1988179
34. Monahan, J., & Walker, L. (2010). Twenty-five years of social science in law. Law and Human Behavior. Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2010-09. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1559927
35. Moran, S., Wechsler, H., & Rigotti, N. A. (2004). Social smoking among US college students. Pediatrics, 114, 1028–1034. doi:10.1542/peds.2003-0558-L
36. Morgan, J. M., & Pullin, D. (2010). Social science and the courts: Challenges and strategies for bridging gaps between law and research. Educational Researcher, 39, 515–524. doi:10.3102/0013189X10383334
37. Morley, K. I., Hall, W. D., Hausdorf, K., & Owen, N. (2006). “Occasional” and “social” smokers: Potential target groups for smoking cessation campaigns? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 30, 550–554. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17209271
38. Nonnemaker, J., Farrelly, M., Kamyab, K., Busey, A., & Mann, N. (2010). Experimental study of graphic cigarette warning labels: Final results report. RTI project number 0212305.007.003; contract no. HHSF-223-2009-10135G, task order 7. Prepared for Center for Tobacco Products Food and Drug Administration. Available at http://www.tobaccolabels.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/USA-2010-Experimental-Study-of-Graphic-Cigarette-Warning-Labels-Final-Results-Report-FDA.pdf
39. O’Hegarty, M., Pederson, L. L., Nelson, D. E., Mowery, P., Gable, J. M., & Wortley, P. (2006). Reactions of young adult smokers to warning labels on cigarette packages. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 30, 467–73. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2006.01.018
40. Peters, E., Romer, D., Slovic, P., Jamieson, K. H., Wharfield, L., Mertz, C. K., & Carpenter, S. M. (2007). The impact and acceptability of Canadian-style cigarette warning labels among U.S. smokers and nonsmokers. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 9, 473–81. doi:10.1080/14622200701239639
41. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al., v. United States Food and Drug Administration,. (2011). 1:11 cv-01.
42. Rogers, R. W. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Psychology, 91, 93–114.
43. Schneider, S., Gadinger, M., & Fischer, A. (2012). Does the effect go up in smoke? A randomized controlled trial of pictorial warnings on cigarette packaging. Patient Education and Counseling, 86, 77–83. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2011.03.005
44. Shectman, M. (2011). Smoking out big tobacco: Can the family smoking prevention and tobacco control act equip the FDA to regulate tobacco without infringing on the first amendment? Emory Law Review, 60, 705–748.
45. Thrasher, J. F., Carpenter, M. J., Andrews, J. O., Gray, K. M., Alberg, A. J., Navarro, A., … Cummings, K. M. (2012). Cigarette warning label policy alternatives and smoking-related health disparities. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43, 590–600. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.08.025
46. Wakefield, M., Morley, C., Horan, J. K., & Cummings, K. M. (2002). The cigarette pack as image: New evidence from tobacco industry documents. Tobacco Control, 11 (suppl. 1), I73–I80. Retrieved from http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1766062&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
47. Waters, B. J. (1997). A doctrine in disarray: Why the first amendment demands the abandonment of the central Hudson test for commercial speech. Seton Hall Law Review, 27, 1626–1657.
48. White, V., Webster, B., & Wakefield, M. (2008). Do graphic health warning labels have an impact on adolescents’ smoking-related beliefs and behaviours? Addiction, 103, 1562–71. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02294.x
49. Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59, 329–349.
50. Witte, K. (1994). Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 61, 113–134.
51. Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000). Meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health. Health Education Behavior, 27, 591–615.
52. World Health Organization. (2013). WHO framework convention on tobacco control. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/fctc/en
53. Yzer, M. C., Southwell, B. G., & Stephenson, M. T. (2013). Inducing fear as a public communication campaign strategy. In R. E. Rice & C. K. Atkin (Eds.), Public communication campaigns (4th ed., pp. 163–176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54. Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel. (1985). 471 U. S. 626.