Future challenges feeding transgenic plants

Animal Frontiers

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 15-23

  Flachowsky, Gerhard ^a   Reuter, Tim ^b  

^a FEDERAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR ANIMAL HEALTH   (Germany)

^b ALBERTA AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT   (Canada)

Author keywords

DNA transfer; Feeding studies; Future challenges; Genetic modification; Plant composition

Indexed keywords

EID: 85029228076     PISSN: 21606056     EISSN: 21606064     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2527/af.2017.0114     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Aerts, S. 2012. Agriculture's 6 F's and the need for more intensive agriculture. In: T. Potthast and S. Meisch, editors, Climate change and sustainable development. Wageningen Acad Publ. p. 192-195. doi:10.3920/978-90-8686-753-0_27
2. Ahloowalia, B.S., M. Maluszynski, and K. Nichterlein. 2004. Global impact of mutation-derived varieties. Euphytica 135:187-204. doi:10.1023/ B:EUPH.0000014914.85465.4f
3. Albaugh, J.M. 2016. Golden rice: Effectiveness and safety. A literature review. Paper 382. Honors Research Projects. University of Akron
4. Alexander, T.W., T. Reuter, K. Aulrich, R. Sharma, E.K. Okine, W.T. Dixon, and T.A. McAllister. 2007. A review of the detection and fate of novel plant molecules derived from biotechnology in livestock production. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 133:31-62. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.08.003
5. Aulrich, K., G. Pahlow, and G. Flachowsky. 2004. Influence of ensiling on the DNAdegradation in isogenic and transgenic corn. Proc. Soc. Nutr. Physiol. 13:112 (Abstract)
6. Bedada, L.T., M.S. Seth, S.M. Runo, W. Teffera, C. Mugoya, C.W. Masiga, R.O. Oduor, E. Blumewald, and F. Wachira. 2016. Drought tolerant tropical maize (Zea Mays L.) developed through genetic transformation with isopentenyltransferase gene. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 15:2447-2464. doi:10.5897/AJB2016.15228
7. Berger, B., K. Aulrich, G. Fleck, and G. Flachowsky. 2003. Influence of processing of isogenic and transgenic rapeseed on DNA-degradation. Proc. Soc. Nutr. Physiol. 12:108 (Abstract)
8. Brookes, G., and P. Barfoot. 2015. Environmental impacts of genetically modified (GM) crops use 1996-2013: Impacts on pesticide use and carbon emissions. GM Crops Food. doi:10.1080/21645698.2015.1025193
9. Brookes, G., and P. Barfoot. 2016. GM crops: Global socio-economic and environmental impacts 1996-2014. PG Economics Ltd, Dorchester, UK
10. Buzoianu, S.G. 2011. Fate of transgenic DNA and protein in pigs fed genetically modified BT maize and effects on growth and health. p. 307. Ph.D. thesis, Waterford Institute of Technology
11. Clive, J. 2015. 20th Anniversary (1996 to 2015) of the Global Commercialization of Biotech Crops and Biotech Crop Highlights in 2015. ISAAA Brief No. 51. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY
12. Czerwinski, J., M. Bogacki, B.M. Jalali, P. Konieczka, and S. Smulikowska. 2015a. The use of genetically modified Roundup Ready soyabean meal and genetically modified MON 810 maize in broiler chicken diets. Part 1. Effects on performance and blood lymphocyte subpopulations. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 24:134-143. doi:10.22358/ jafs/65640/2015
13. Czerwinski, J., M. Slupecka-Ziemilska, J. Wolinski, M. Barszcz, P. Konieczka, and S. Smulikowska. 2015b. The use of genetically modified Roundup Ready soyabean meal and genetically modified MON 810 maize in broiler chicken diets. Part 2. Functional status of the small intestine. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 24:144-152. doi:10.22358/jafs/65641/2015
14. Deikman, J., M. Petracek, and J.E. Heard. 2012. Drought tolerance through biotechnology: Improving translation from the laboratory to farmers' fields. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 23:243-250. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2011.11.003
15. EFSA. 2008. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plant derived food and feed. The role of animal feeding trials. Food Chem. Toxicol. 46:S2-S70. doi:10.1016/j. fct.2008.02.008
16. EFSA. 2012. Guidance on the risk assessment of food and feed from genetically modified animals and on animal health and welfare aspects. EFSA Journal 10(1):2501. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2501
17. Einspanier, R. 2013. The fate of transgenic DNA and newly expressed proteins. In: G. Flachowsky, editor, Animal nutrition with transgenic plants. CABI Biotechnology Series. p. 130-139. doi:10.1079/9781780641768.0130
18. Einspanier, R., A. Klotz, J. Kraft, K. Aulrich, R. Poser, F. Schwägele, G. Jahreis, and G. Flachowsky. 2001. The fate of forage plant DNA in farm animals: A collaborative case-study investigating cattle and chicken fed recombinant plant material. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 212:129-134. doi:10.1007/s002170000248
19. FAO. 2016. The state of food and agriculture. Climate change, agriculture and food security. FAO, Rome
20. FAO, IFAD, and WFP. 2014. The state of food insecurity in the world 2014. Strengthening the enabling environments for food security and nutrition. FAO, Rome
21. FAO/WHO. 2000. Safety aspects of genetically modified foods of plant origin. ftp://ftp. fao.org/docrep/nonfao/ae584e/ae584e00.pdf. (Accessed 20 Dec. 2016.)
22. Fischer, T., D. Byerlee, and G. Edmeades. 2014. Crop yields and global food security-Will yield increase continue to feed the world? Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR)
23. Flachowsky, G. 1987. Straw as feed. (In German.) Deutscher Landwirtschaftsverlag, Berlin
24. Flachowsky, G., editor. 2013. Animal nutrition with transgenic plants. Vol. 1. Biotechnology Series. CAB International. doi:10.1079/9781780641768.0000
25. Flachowsky, G. 2017. Influence of feed from genetically modified plants (GMP) on composition and quality of food of animal origin. In: A. Grumezescu, editor, Handbook of food bioengineering (in press). Chapter 6. Elsevier
26. Flachowsky, G., and K. Aulrich. 2001. Nutritional assessment of feeds from genetically modified organism (GMO). J. Anim. Feed Sci. 10(1):181-194
27. Flachowsky, G., I. Halle, and K. Aulrich. 2005. Long term feeding of Btcorn-a ten generation study with quails. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 59:449-451. doi:10.1080/17450390500353549
28. Flachowsky, G., and U. Meyer. 2015. Challenges for plant breeders from the view of animal nutrition. Agriculture 5:1252-1276. doi:10.3390/agriculture5041252
29. Flachowsky, G., H. Schafft, and U. Meyer. 2012. Animal feeding studies for nutritional and safety assessments of feeds from genetically modified plants: A review. J. Cons. Prot. Food Safety 7:179-194
30. Furgal-Dierzuk, I., J. Strzetelski, K. Kwiatek, M. Twardowska, M. Mazur, Z. Sieradzki, W. Kozaczynski, and M. Reichert. 2014. The effect of genetically modified maize (MON 810) and soyabean meal (Rundup Ready) on rearing performance and transfer of transgenic DNA to calf tissues. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 23:13-22. doi:10.22358/ jafs/65711/2014
31. Furgal-Dierzuk, I., J. Strzetelski, M. Twardowska, K. Kwiatek, and M. Mazur. 2015. The effect of genetically modified feeds on productivity, milk composition, serum metabolite profiles and transfer of tDNA into milk of cows. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 24:19-30. doi:10.22358/jafs/65649/2015
32. Gawienowski, M.C., S.R. Eckhoff, P. Yang, P.J. Raypati, T. Binder, and D.P. Briskin. 1999. Fate of maize DNA during steeping, wet milling, and processing. Cereal Chem. 76:371-374. doi:10.1094/CCHEM.1999.76.3.371
33. Guillemaud, T., E. Lombaert, and D. Bourguet. 2016. Conflicts of interest in GM Bt crop efficacy and durability studies. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0167777
34. Guillou, M., and G. Matheron. 2014. The world's challenge-Feeding 9 billion people. Springer
35. Halle, I., and G. Flachowsky. 2014. A four-generation feeding study with genetically modified (Bt) maize in laying hen. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 23:58-63. doi:10.22358/ jafs/65717/2014
36. Harvie, A. 2015. Food security: Challenges, role of biotechnologies and implications for developing countries. Nova Science Publishers
37. High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition (HLPE). 2014. Note on critical and emerging issues for food security and nutrition. FAO, Rome. http:// www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/hlpe/hlpe_documents/HLPE_Reports/ HLPE_Note-to-CFS_Critical-and-Emerging-Issues_6-August-2014.pdf (accessed March 7, 2017)
38. Hoekstra, A.Y. 2013. The water footprint of modern consumer society. Routledge, London
39. Hristov, A.N., J. Oh, J.L. Firkins, J. Dijkstra, E. Kebreab, C. Waghorn, H.P.S. Makkar, A.T. Adesogan, W. Yang, C. Lee, P.J. Gerber, B. Henderson, and J.M. Tricarico. 2013. Mitigation of methane and nitrous emissions from animal operations. A review of enteric methane mitigation options. J. Anim. Sci. 91:5045-5069. doi:10.2527/jas.2013-6583
40. Hupfer, C., J. Mayer, H. Hotzel, K. Sachse, and K.-H. Engel. 1999. The effect of ensiling on PCR-based detection of GM Bt maize. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 209:301-304. doi:10.1007/s002170050498
41. ILSI. 2003. Best practices for the conduct of animal studies to evaluate crops genetically modified for input traits. International Life Sciences Institute, Washington, DC
42. ILSI. 2007. Best practices for the conduct of animal studies to evaluate crops genetically modified for output traits.International Life Sciences Institute, Washington, DC
43. JRC. 2016. Framework for assessing the socio-economic impacts of Bt maize cultivation. European GMO Socio-Economics Bureau (ESEB)
44. Kharkwal, M.C., and Q.Y. Shu. 2009. The role of induced mutation in world food security. In: Q.Y. Shu, editor, Induced plant mutation in the genomics era. FAO, Rome. p. 33-38
45. Korwin-Kossakowska, A., K. Sartowska, G. Tomczyk, B. Prusak, and G. Sender. 2016. Health status and potential uptake of transgenic DNA by Japanese quail fed diets containing genetically modified plant ingredients over 10 generation. Br. Poult. Sci. 57:415-423. doi:10.1080/00071668.2016.1162281
46. Ladics, G.S., L.M. Knippels, and A.H. Penninks. 2010. Review of animal models to predict the potential allergenicity of novel proteins in genetically modified crops. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 56:212-224. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.09.018
47. Li, Z., Y. Gao, M. Zhang, J. Feng, and Y. Xiong. 2015. Effect of a diet containing genetically modified rice ex pressing the Cry1Ab/1Ac protein (Bacillus thuringiensis toxin) on boiler chickens. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 69:487-498. doi:10.1080/174503 9X.2015.1087749
48. Lucas, D.M., M.L. Taylor, G.F. Hartnell, M.A. Nemeth, K.C. Glenn, and S.W. Davis. 2007. Broiler performance and carcass characteristics when fed diets containing lysine maize (Ly038 or Ly038 x Mon 810), control, or conventional reference maize. Poult. Sci. 86:2152-2161. doi:10.1093/ps/86.10.2152
49. Makkar, H.P.S., editor. 2012. Biofuel co-products as livestock feed-opportunities and challenges. FAO, Rome
50. Malik, P.K., R. Bhatta, J. Takahashi, R. Kohn, and C.S. Prasad. 2015. Livestock production and climate change. CAB International, Wallingford and Boston. doi:10.1079/9781780644325.0000
51. McNaughton, J., M. Roberts, D. Rice, B. Smith, M. Hinds, and B. Delaney. 2011a. Nutritional equivalence of transgenic maize grain from event DP-O9814O-6 and transgenic soybeans containing event DP-356O43-5: Laying hen performance and egg quality measures. Poult. Sci. 90:377-389. doi:10.3382/ps.2010-00973
52. McNaughton, J., M. Roberts, D. Rice, B. Smith, M. Hinds, and B. Delaney. 2011b. Comparison of broiler performance and carcass yields when fed transgenic maize grain containing event DP-O9814O-6 and processed fractions from transgenic soybeans containing event DP-356O43-5. Poult. Sci. 90:1701-1711. doi:10.3382/ ps.2010-00917
53. Morera, P., L. Basirico, B. Ronchi, and U. Bernabucci. 2016. Fate of transgenic deoxyribonucleic acid fragments in digesta and tissues of rabbits fed genetically modified soybean meal. J. Anim. Sci. 94:1287-1295. doi:10.2527/jas.2015-0025
54. NASEM. 2016. Genetically engineered crops: Experiences and prospects. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. doi:10.17226/23395
55. Newman, J.A., H. Anand, M. Hal, S. Hunt, and Z. Gedalof. 2011. Climate change biology. CAB International, Wallingford/Cambridge
56. Nicolia, A., A. Manzo, F. Veronesi, and D. Rosellini. 2014. An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 34:77-88. doi:10.3109/07388551.2013.823595
57. NRC. 2015. Critical role of animal science research in food security and sustainability. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
58. OECD. 1993. Safety evaluation of foods derived by modern biotechnology. Concepts and principles. OECD, Paris
59. Panchin, A.Y., and A.I. Tuzhikov. 2016. Published GMO studies find no evidence of harm when corrected for multiple comparisons. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 37(2):213-217. doi:10.3109/07388551.2015.1130684
60. Pape, H.-C. 2006. Futtermittelzusatzstoffe-Technologie und Anwendung. Agrimedia GmbH, Bergen/Damme
61. Parisi, C., P. Tillie, and E. Rodriguez-Cerezo. 2016. The global pipeline of GM crops out up 2020. Nat. Biotechnol. 34:31-36. doi:10.1038/nbt.3449
62. Qaim, M. 2016. Genetically modified crops and agricultural development. Palgrave Studies in Agricultural Economics and Food Policy. DOI doi:10.1057/9781137405722
63. Quetier, F. 2016. The CRISPR-Cas9 technology: Closer to the ultimate toolkit for targeted genome editing. Plant Sci. 242:65-76. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.09.003
64. Reuter, T., and K. Aulrich. 2003. Investigations on genetically modified maize (Btmaize) in pig nutrition: Fate of feed ingested foreign DNA in pig bodies. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 216:185-192. doi:10.1007/s00217-002-0642-7
65. Reuter, T., K. Aulrich, A. Berk, and G. Flachowsky. 2002a. Investigations on genetically modified maize (Bt-maize) in pig nutrition: Chemical composition and nutritional evaluation. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 56:23-31
66. Reuter, T., K. Aulrich, and A. Berk. 2002b. Investigations on genetically modified maize (Bt-maize) in pig nutrition: Fattening performance and slaughtering results. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 56:319-326
67. Reynolds, M.P. 2010. Climate change and crop production. CAB International, Wallingford/ Cambridge. doi:10.1079/9781845936334.0000
68. Ricroch, A.E., and M.-C. Henard-Damave. 2016. Next biotech plants; new traits, crops, developers and technologies for addressing global challenges. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 36(4):675-690
69. Royal Society. 2016. GM plants: Questions and answers. https://royalsociety.org/~/ media/policy/projects/gm-plants/gm-plant-q-and-a.pdf. (Accessed February 2017.)
70. Rymer, C., G.F. Hartnell, and D.I. Givens. 2011. The effect of feeding modified soyabean oil enriched with C18:4n-3 to broilers on the deposition of n-3 fatty acids in chicken meat. Br. J. Nutr. 105:866-878. doi:10.1017/S0007114510004502
71. Samanta, M.K., A. Dey, and S. Gayan. 2016. CRISPR/Cas: An advanced tool for editing plant genomes. Transgenic Res. 25(5):561-573. doi:10.1007/s11248-016-9953-5
72. Sanden, M., L.E. Johannessen, K.G. Berdal, N. Sissener, and G.I. Hemre. 2011. Uptake and clearance of dietary DNA in the intestine of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) fed conventional or genetically modified soybeans. Aqua. Nutr. 17:E750-E759. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2095.2010.00842.x
73. Sartowska, K.E., A. Korwin-Kossakowska, and G. Sender. 2015. Genetically modified crops in a 10-generation feeding trial on Japanese quails-Evaluation of its influence on birds' performance and body composition. Poult. Sci. 79:1-8
74. Scholtz, N., S. Kuura, U. Steiner, H.-W. Dehne, I. Halle, G. Flachowsky, and H. Sauerwein. 2006. Metabolic characteristics in layer quails fed with Bt-transgenic maize. Proc. Soc. Nutr. Physiol. 15:89
75. Scholtz, N., U. Müller, I. Halle, G. Flachowsky, and H. Sauerwein. 2008. Metabolic and histological traits in quails fed with either transgebic (Bt) or isogenic maize for several generations. Proc. Soc. Nutr. Physiol. 17:105
76. Scholz, R.W., and F.-H. Wellmer. 2013. Approaching a dynamic view on the availability of mineral sources: What we may learn from the case of phosphorus. Glob. Environ. Change 23:11-27. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.10.013
77. Smyth, S.J., W.A. Kerr, and P.W.B. Phillips. 2015. Global economic, environmental and health benefits from GM crop adoption. Glob. Food Secur. 7:24-29. doi:10.1016/j. gfs.2015.10.002
78. Snell, C., A. Bernheim, J.B. Berge, M. Kuntz, P. Gerard, A. Paris, and A.E. Ricroch. 2012. Assessment of the health impact of GM plant diets in long-term and multigenerational animal feeding trials. A literature review. Food Chem. 50:1134-1148. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2011.11.048
79. Song, G., M. Jia, K. Chen, X. Kong, B. Khattak, C. Xie, A. Li, and L. Mao. 2016. CRISPR/Cas9: A powerful tool for crop genome editing. Crop J. 4(2):75-82. doi:10.1016/j.cj.2015.12.002
80. Sundstol, F., and E. Owen. 1984. Straw and other fibrous by-products as feed. Developments in animal and veterinary sciences. Elsevier
81. Swiatkiewicz, S., M. Swiatkiewicz, J. Koreleski, and K. Kwiatek. 2010. Nutritional efficiency of genetically-modified insect resistant corn (MON810) and glyphosate-tolerant soybean meal (Roundup Ready) for broilers. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy 54:43-48
82. Tester, M., and P. Langridge. 2010. Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Sci. 327:818-822. doi:10.1126/science.1183700
83. Thompson, B., and L. Amoroso. 2014. Improving diets and nutrition-Food-based approaches. CAB International, Wallingford and Boston. doi:10.1079/9781780642994.0000
84. Tillie, P., K. Dillen, and E. Rodriguez-Cerezo. 2013. The pipeline of GM crops for improved animal feed: Challenges for commercial use. In: G. Flachowsky, editor, Animal nutrition with transgenic plants. CABI Biotechnology. p. 166-192. doi:10.1079/9781780641768.0166
85. van Eenennaam, A.L., and A.E. Young. 2014. Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations. J. Anim. Sci. 92:4255-4278. doi:10.2527/jas.2014-8124
86. Walsh, M.C., S.G. Buzoianu, and G.E. Gardiner. 2011. Fate of trans-genic DNA from orally administered BT MON810 maize and effects on immune response and growth in pigs. PLoS One 6(11):e27177. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027177
87. Watson, R.R., and V.R. Preedy. 2015. Genetically modified organisms in food. In: Production, safety, regulation and public health. Elsevier and Academic Press, Amsterdam. p. 516