Published GMO studies find no evidence of harm when corrected for multiple comparisons

Critical Reviews in Biotechnology

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 213-217

  Panchin, Alexander Y ^a   Tuzhikov, Alexander I ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE FOR INFORMATION TRANSMISSION PROBLEMS   (Russian Federation)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Genetic engineering; genetic modification; GMO; health; safety; statistics; transgenic

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; HEALTH; SAFETY ENGINEERING; SOCIAL ASPECTS; STATISTICS;

GENETIC MODIFICATIONS; GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD; GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS; GMO; HEALTH CONCERNS; MULTIPLE COMPARISON; PUBLIC OPINIONS; TRANSGENICS;

FOOD SAFETY;

DNA MODIFICATION; FOOD INDUSTRY; FOOD SAFETY; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD; HEALTH HAZARD; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TRANSGENIC ORGANISM; ANIMAL; HUMAN; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TOXICITY TESTING;

ANIMALS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; ORGANISMS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; TOXICITY TESTS;

EID: 84954235773     PISSN: 07388551     EISSN: 15497801     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/07388551.2015.1130684     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Herring RJ., On risk and regulation:Bt crops in India. GM Crops Food. 2014;5:204–209
2. Kuntz M., The GMO case in France:politics, lawlessness and postmodernism. GM Crops Food. 2014;5:163–169
3. Bennett C, Baird A, Miller M, et al. Neural correlates of interspecies perspective taking in the post-mortem Atlantic salmon:an argument for proper multiple comparisons correction. J Serendipitous Unexpected Results. 2010;1:1–5
4. Ford I., Can statistics cause brain damage? J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1983;3:259–262
5. Abdi H., Bonferroni test. In N. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics. Thousand Oaks, CA:SAGE Publications, 104–108
6. Armstrong R., When to use the Bonferroni correction. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2014;34:502–508
7. Nicolia A, Manzo A, Veronesi F, et al. An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2014;34:77–88
8. Snell C, Bernheim A, Berge JB, et al Assessment of the health impact of GM plant diets in long-term and multigenerational animal feeding trials:a literature review. Food Chem Toxicol. 2012;50:1134–1148
9. European_Comission. A decade of EU-funded GMO research. 2010. Available from:http://ec.europa.eu/research/biosociety/pdf/a_decade_of_eufunded_gmo_research.pdf
10. Van Eenennaam AL, Young AE., Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations. J Anim Sci. 2014;92:4255–4278
11. Tyshko NV, Zhminchenko VM, Pashorina VA, et al Assessment of the impact of GMO of plant origin on rat progeny development in 3 generations. Vopr Pitan. 2011;80:14–28
12. Ewen SW, Pusztai A., Effect of diets containing genetically modified potatoes expressing Galanthus nivalis lectin on rat small intestine. Lancet. 1999;354:1353–1354
13. Miyake K, Tanaka T, McNeil PL., Lectin-based food poisoning:a new mechanism of protein toxicity. PLoS One. 2007;2:e687
14. Cordain L, Toohey L, Smith MJ, et al. Modulation of immune function by dietary lectins in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Nutr. 2000;83:207–217
15. Royal Society UK. Review of data on possible toxicity of GM potatoes. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 1999;59:771–812
16. Kuiper HA, Noteborn HP, Peijnenburg AA., Adequacy of methods for testing the safety of genetically modified foods. Lancet. 1999;354:1315–1316
17. Xu W, Li L, Lu J, et al Analysis of caecal microbiota in rats fed with genetically modified rice by real-time quantitative PCR. J Food Sci. 2011;76:M88–M93
18. Hashimoto N, Nakamura Y, Noda T, et al Effects of feeding potato pulp on cholesterol metabolism and its association with cecal conditions in rats. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2011;66:401–407
19. Seralini GE, Clair E, Mesnage R, et al Long term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize. Food Chem Toxicol. 2012;50:4221–4231
20. Panchin AY., Toxicity of Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize is not supported by statistical tests. Food Chem Toxicol. 2013;53:475
21. Trewavas A., Science requires the dispassionate presentation of information. Food Chem Toxicol. 2013;53:449
22. Seralini GE, Mesnage R, Defarge N, et al Answers to critics:why there is a long term toxicity due to a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize and to a Roundup herbicide. Food Chem Toxicol. 2013;53:476–483
23. Prejean JD, Peckham JC, Casey AE, et al Spontaneous tumors in Sprague-Dawley rats and Swiss mice. Cancer Res. 1973;33:2768–2773
24. Carman J, Vlieger H, Steeg L, et al A long-term toxicology study on pigs fed a combined genetically modified (GM) soy and GM maize diet. J Org Syst. 2013;8:38–54
25. Malatesta M, Boraldi F, Annovi G, et al A long-term study on female mice fed on a genetically modified soybean:effects on liver ageing. Histochem Cell Biol. 2008;130:967–977
26. Ioannidis JP., Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e124
27. Bohn T, Cuhra M, Traavik T, et al Compositional differences in soybeans on the market:glyphosate accumulates in Roundup Ready GM soybeans. Food Chem. 2014;153:207–215
28. Retraction notice to “Long term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize” [Food Chem Toxicol. 2012;50:4221–4231]. Food Chem Toxicol. 2014;63:244