Genetic variation in adaptability and pleiotropy in budding yeast

eLife

Volumn 6, Issue , 2017, Pages

  Jerison, Elizabeth R ^a,b,c   Kryazhimskiy, Sergey ^d   Mitchell, James Kameron ^b   Bloom, Joshua S ^e   Kruglyak, Leonid ^e   Desai, Michael M ^a,b,c  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d University of California at San Diego   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUDDING YEAST; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; HERITABILITY; NONHUMAN; PLEIOTROPY; PROGENY; ADAPTATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; FUNGAL GENE; GENETICS; INHERITANCE; MUTATION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; GENES, FUNGAL; GENETIC FITNESS; GENETIC PLEIOTROPY; GENETIC VARIATION; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 85029173267     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2050084X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.27167     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Adams A, Gottschling DE, Kaiser CA, Stearns T. 1998. Methods in Yeast Genetics: A Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Course Manual. Vol. 12 Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Cold Spring.
2. Araya CL, Fowler DM, Chen W, Muniez I, Kelly JW, Fields S. 2012. A fundamental protein property, thermodynamic stability, revealed solely from large-scale measurements of protein function. PNAS 109:16858-16863. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1209751109, PMID: 23035249
3. Babu M, Arnold R, Bundalovic-Torma C, Gagarinova A, Wong KS, Kumar A, Stewart G, Samanfar B, Aoki H, Wagih O, Vlasblom J, Phanse S, Lad K, Yeou Hsiung Yu A, Graham C, Jin K, Brown E, Golshani A, Kim P, Moreno-Hagelsieb G, et al. 2014. Quantitative genome-wide genetic interaction screens reveal global epistatic relationships of protein complexes in Escherichia coli. PLoS Genetics 10:e1004120. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1371/journal.pgen.1004120, PMID: 24586182
4. Barrick JE, Kauth MR, Strelioff CC, Lenski RE. 2010. Escherichia coli rpoB mutants have increased evolvability in proportion to their fitness defects. Molecular Biology and Evolution 27:1338-1347. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1093/molbev/msq024, PMID: 20106907
5. Baym M, Kryazhimskiy S, Lieberman TD, Chung H, Desai MM, Kishony R. 2015. Inexpensive multiplexed library preparation for megabase-sized genomes. PLoS One 10:e0128036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0128036, PMID: 26000737
6. Becks L, Agrawal AF. 2012. The evolution of sex is favoured during adaptation to new environments. PLoS Biology 10:e1001317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001317, PMID: 22563299
7. Bloom JS, Ehrenreich IM, Loo WT, Lite TL, Kruglyak L. 2013. Finding the sources of missing heritability in a yeast cross. Nature 494:234-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11867, PMID: 23376951
8. Bloom JS, Kotenko I, Sadhu MJ, Treusch S, Albert FW, Kruglyak L. 2015. Genetic interactions contribute less than additive effects to quantitative trait variation in yeast. Nature Communications 6:8712. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1038/ncomms9712, PMID: 26537231
9. Blount ZD, Barrick JE, Davidson CJ, Lenski RE. 2012. Genomic analysis of a key innovation in an experimental Escherichia coli population. Nature 489:513-518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11514, PMID: 22992527
10. Blount ZD, Borland CZ, Lenski RE. 2008. Historical contingency and the evolution of a key innovation in an experimental population of Escherichia coli. PNAS 105:7899-7906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 0803151105, PMID: 18524956
11. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30: 2114-2120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170, PMID: 24695404
12. Bridgham JT, Ortlund EA, Thornton JW. 2009. An epistatic ratchet constrains the direction of glucocorticoid receptor evolution. Nature 461:515-519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08249, PMID: 19779450
13. Burch CL, Chao L. 2000. Evolvability of an RNA virus is determined by its mutational neighbourhood. Nature 406:625-628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35020564, PMID: 10949302
14. Chou HH, Chiu HC, Delaney NF, Segrè D, Marx CJ. 2011. Diminishing returns epistasis among beneficial mutations decelerates adaptation. Science 332:1190-1192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1203799, PMID: 21636771
15. Ciliberti S, Martin OC, Wagner A. 2007. Robustness can evolve gradually in complex regulatory gene networks with varying topology. PLoS Computational Biology 3:e15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030015, PMID: 17274682
16. Colegrave N. 2002. Sex releases the speed limit on evolution. Nature 420:664-666. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1038/nature01191, PMID: 12478292
17. Cooper TF. 2007. Recombination speeds adaptation by reducing competition between beneficial mutations in populations of Escherichia coli. PLoS Biology 5:e225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050225, PMID: 17713986
18. Costanzo M, Baryshnikova A, Bellay J, Kim Y, Spear ED, Sevier CS, Ding H, Koh JL, Toufighi K, Mostafavi S, Prinz J, St Onge RP, VanderSluis B, Makhnevych T, Vizeacoumar FJ, Alizadeh S, Bahr S, Brost RL, Chen Y, Cokol M, et al. 2010. The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 327:425-431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science. 1180823, PMID: 20093466
19. Costanzo M, VanderSluis B, Koch EN, Baryshnikova A, Pons C, Tan G, Wang W, Usaj M, Hanchard J, Lee SD, Pelechano V, Styles EB, Billmann M, van Leeuwen J, van Dyk N, Lin ZY, Kuzmin E, Nelson J, Piotrowski JS, Srikumar T, et al. 2016. A global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function. Science 353:aaf1420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf1420, PMID: 27708008
20. Couce A, Tenaillon OA. 2015. The rule of declining adaptability in microbial evolution experiments. Frontiers in Genetics 6:99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00099, PMID: 25815007
21. Cowperthwaite MC, Economo EP, Harcombe WR, Miller EL, Meyers LA. 2008. The ascent of the abundant: how mutational networks constrain evolution. PLoS Computational Biology 4:e1000110. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1371/journal.pcbi.1000110, PMID: 18636097
22. Deatherage DE, Barrick JE. 2014. Identification of mutations in laboratory-evolved microbes from next-generation sequencing data using breseq. Methods in molecular biology 1151:165-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0554-6_12, PMID: 24838886
23. Draghi JA, Parsons TL, Wagner GP, Plotkin JB. 2010. Mutational robustness can facilitate adaptation. Nature 463:353-355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08694, PMID: 20090752
24. Engel SR, Dietrich FS, Fisk DG, Binkley G, Balakrishnan R, Costanzo MC, Dwight SS, Hitz BC, Karra K, Nash RS, Weng S, Wong ED, Lloyd P, Skrzypek MS, Miyasato SR, Simison M, Cherry JM. 2014. The reference genome sequence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: then and now. G3 4:389-398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.113. 008995, PMID: 24374639
25. Goddard MR, Godfray HC, Burt A. 2005. Sex increases the efficacy of natural selection in experimental yeast populations. Nature 434:636-640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03405, PMID: 15800622
26. Gong LI, Suchard MA, Bloom JD. 2013. Stability-mediated epistasis constrains the evolution of an influenza protein. eLife 2:e00631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00631, PMID: 23682315
27. Good BH, Desai MM. 2015. The impact of macroscopic epistasis on long-term evolutionary dynamics. Genetics 199:177-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.114.172460, PMID: 25395665
28. Gray JC, Goddard MR. 2012. Sex enhances adaptation by unlinking beneficial from detrimental mutations in experimental yeast populations. BMC Evolutionary Biology 12:43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-12-43, PMID: 22462622
29. Harms MJ, Thornton JW. 2014. Historical contingency and its biophysical basis in glucocorticoid receptor evolution. Nature 512:203-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13410, PMID: 24930765
30. Hietpas RT, Jensen JD, Bolon DN. 2011. Experimental illumination of a fitness landscape. PNAS 108:7896-7901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1016024108, PMID: 21464309
31. Jacquier H, Birgy A, Le Nagard H, Mechulam Y, Schmitt E, Glodt J, Bercot B, Petit E, Poulain J, Barnaud G, Gros PA, Tenaillon O. 2013. Capturing the mutational landscape of the beta-lactamase TEM-1. PNAS 110:13067-13072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1215206110, PMID: 23878237
32. Jarosz DF, Lindquist S. 2010. Hsp90 and environmental stress transform the adaptive value of natural genetic variation. Science 330:1820-1824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1195487, PMID: 21205668
33. Jasnos L, Korona R. 2007. Epistatic buffering of fitness loss in yeast double deletion strains. Nature Genetics 39: 550-554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1986, PMID: 17322879
34. Jerison E, Kryazhimskiy S. 2017. Adaptability. b71d3b9. github. https://github.com/erjerison/adaptability
35. Khan AI, Dinh DM, Schneider D, Lenski RE, Cooper TF. 2011. Negative epistasis between beneficial mutations in an evolving bacterial population. Science 332:1193-1196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1203801, PMID: 21636772
36. Kirschner M, Gerhart J. 1998. Evolvability. PNAS 95:8420-8427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.15.8420, PMID: 9671692
37. Kryazhimskiy S, Rice DP, Jerison ER, Desai MM. 2014. Microbial evolution. Global epistasis makes adaptation predictable despite sequence-level stochasticity. Science 344:1519-1522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250939, PMID: 24970088
38. Kvitek DJ, Sherlock G. 2013. Whole Genome, Whole Population Sequencing Reveals That Loss of Signaling Networks Is the Major Adaptive Strategy in a Constant Environment. PLoS Genetics 9:e1003972-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003972
39. Lang GI, Botstein D, Desai MM. 2011. Genetic variation and the fate of beneficial mutations in asexual populations. Genetics 188:647-661. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111.128942, PMID: 21546542
40. Lang GI, Rice DP, Hickman MJ, Sodergren E, Weinstock GM, Botstein D, Desai MM. 2013. Pervasive genetic hitchhiking and clonal interference in forty evolving yeast populations. Nature 500:571-574. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1038/nature12344, PMID: 23873039
41. Lauring AS, Frydman J, Andino R. 2013. The role of mutational robustness in RNA virus evolution. Nature Reviews Microbiology 11:327-336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3003, PMID: 23524517
42. Masel J, Bergman A. 2003. The evolution of the evolvability properties of the yeast prion [PSIþ+]. Evolution 57: 1498-1512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00358.x, PMID: 12940355
43. Masel J, Trotter MV. 2010. Robustness and evolvability. Trends in Genetics 26:406-414. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.tig.2010.06.002, PMID: 20598394
44. McDonald MJ, Hsieh YY, Yu YH, Chang SL, Leu JY. 2012. The evolution of low mutation rates in experimental mutator populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Current Biology 22:1235-1240. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.cub.2012.04.056, PMID: 22727704
45. McDonald MJ, Rice DP, Desai MM. 2016. Sex speeds adaptation by altering the dynamics of molecular evolution. Nature 531:233-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17143, PMID: 26909573
46. Montville R, Froissart R, Remold SK, Tenaillon O, Turner PE. 2005. Evolution of mutational robustness in an RNA virus. PLoS Biology 3:e381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030381, PMID: 16248678
47. Palmer AC, Toprak E, Baym M, Kim S, Veres A, Bershtein S, Kishony R. 2015. Delayed commitment to evolutionary fate in antibiotic resistance fitness landscapes. Nature Communications 6:7385. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1038/ncomms8385, PMID: 26060115
48. Perfeito L, Sousa A, Bataillon T, Gordo I. 2014. Rates of fitness decline and rebound suggest pervasive epistasis. Evolution 68:150-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12234, PMID: 24372601
49. Quandt EM, Deatherage DE, Ellington AD, Georgiou G, Barrick JE. 2014. Recursive genomewide recombination and sequencing reveals a key refinement step in the evolution of a metabolic innovation in Escherichia coli. PNAS 111:2217-2222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1314561111, PMID: 24379390
50. Quandt EM, Gollihar J, Blount ZD, Ellington AD, Georgiou G, Barrick JE. 2015. Fine-tuning citrate synthase flux potentiates and refines metabolic innovation in the Lenski evolution experiment. eLife 4:e09696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09696, PMID: 26465114
51. Salverda ML, Dellus E, Gorter FA, Debets AJ, van der Oost J, Hoekstra RF, Tawfik DS, de Visser JA. 2011. Initial mutations direct alternative pathways of protein evolution. PLoS Genetics 7:e1001321. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1371/journal.pgen.1001321, PMID: 21408208
52. Sniegowski PD, Gerrish PJ, Lenski RE. 1997. Evolution of high mutation rates in experimental populations of E. coli. Nature 387:703-705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/42701, PMID: 9192894
53. Soyer OS, Pfeiffer T. 2010. Evolution under fluctuating environments explains observed robustness in metabolic networks. PLoS Computational Biology 6:e1000907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000907, PMID: 20865149
54. Stern A, Bianco S, Yeh MT, Wright C, Butcher K, Tang C, Nielsen R, Andino R. 2014. Costs and benefits of mutational robustness in RNA viruses. Cell Reports 8:1026-1036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2014. 07.011, PMID: 25127138
55. Szamecz B, Boross G, Kalapis D, Ková cs K, Fekete G, Farkas Z, Lázár V, Hrtyan M, Kemmeren P, Groot Koerkamp MJ, Rutkai E, Holstege FC, Papp B, Pál C, Koerkamp MJG. 2014. The genomic landscape of compensatory evolution. PLoS Biology 12:e1001935. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001935, PMID: 25157590
56. Szappanos B, Ková cs K, Szamecz B, Honti F, Costanzo M, Baryshnikova A, Gelius-Dietrich G, Lercher MJ, Jelasity M, Myers CL, Andrews BJ, Boone C, Oliver SG, Pá l C, Papp B. 2011. An integrated approach to characterize genetic interaction networks in yeast metabolism. Nature Genetics 43:656-662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.846, PMID: 21623372
57. van Nimwegen E, Crutchfield JP, Huynen M. 1999. Neutral evolution of mutational robustness. PNAS 96:9716-9720. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.17.9716, PMID: 10449760
58. van Opijnen T, Bodi KL, Camilli A. 2009. Tn-seq: high-throughput parallel sequencing for fitness and genetic interaction studies in microorganisms. Nature Methods 6:767-772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1377, PMID: 19767758
59. Venkataram S, Dunn B, Li Y, Agarwala A, Chang J, Ebel ER, Geiler-Samerotte K, Hérissant L, Blundell JR, Levy SF, Fisher DS, Sherlock G, Petrov DA. 2016. Development of a comprehensive genotype-to-fitness map of adaptation-driving mutations in yeast. Cell 166:1585-1596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.002, PMID: 27594428
60. Visscher PM, Medland SE, Ferreira MA, Morley KI, Zhu G, Cornes BK, Montgomery GW, Martin NG. 2006. Assumption-free estimation of heritability from genome-wide identity-by-descent sharing between full siblings. PLoS Genetics 2:e41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0020041, PMID: 16565746
61. Wang Y, Diaz Arenas C, Stoebel DM, Flynn K, Knapp E, Dillon MM, Wünsche A, Hatcher PJ, Moore FB, Cooper VS, Cooper TF. 2016. Benefit of transferred mutations is better predicted by the fitness of recipients than by their ecological or genetic relatedness. PNAS 113:5047-5052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1524988113, PMID: 27091964
62. Weinreich DM, Delaney NF, Depristo MA, Hartl DL. 2006. Darwinian evolution can follow only very few mutational paths to fitter proteins. Science 312:111-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1123539, PMID: 16601193
63. Weinreich DM, Lan Y, Wylie CS, Heckendorn RB. 2013. Should evolutionary geneticists worry about higher-order epistasis? Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 23:700-707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2013. 10.007, PMID: 24290990
64. Weinreich DM, Watson RA, Chao L. 2005. Perspective: Sign epistasis and genetic constraint on evolutionary trajectories. Evolution; international journal of organic evolution 59:1165-1174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1554/04-272, PMID: 16050094
65. Wielgoss S, Barrick JE, Tenaillon O, Wiser MJ, Dittmar WJ, Cruveiller S, Chane-Woon-Ming B, Médigue C, Lenski RE, Schneider D. 2013. Mutation rate dynamics in a bacterial population reflect tension between adaptation and genetic load. PNAS 110:222-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1219574110, PMID: 23248287
66. Wilke CO, Wang JL, Ofria C, Lenski RE, Adami C. 2001. Evolution of digital organisms at high mutation rates leads to survival of the flattest. Nature 412:331-333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35085569, PMID: 11460163
67. Woods RJ, Barrick JE, Cooper TF, Shrestha U, Kauth MR, Lenski RE. 2011. Second-order selection for evolvability in a large Escherichia coli population. Science 331:1433-1436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1198914, PMID: 21415350
68. Wünsche A, Dinh DM, Satterwhite RS, Arenas CD, Stoebel DM, Cooper TF. 2017. Diminishing-returns epistasis decreases adaptability along an evolutionary trajectory. Nature Ecology & Evolution 1:0061. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1038/s41559-016-0061, PMID: 28812657
69. Xiao Y, Rouzine IM, Bianco S, Acevedo A, Goldstein EF, Farkov M, Brodsky L, Andino R. 2016. RNA Recombination Enhances Adaptability and Is Required for Virus Spread and Virulence. Cell Host & Microbe 19: 493-503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2016.03.009, PMID: 27078068
70. Yang J, Benyamin B, McEvoy BP, Gordon S, Henders AK, Nyholt DR, Madden PA, Heath AC, Martin NG, Montgomery GW, Goddard ME, Visscher PM. 2010. Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nature Genetics 42:565-569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.608, PMID: 20562 875
71. Zeyl C, Bell G. 1997. The advantage of sex in evolving yeast populations. Nature 388:465-468. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1038/41312, PMID: 9242403
72. Zuk O, Hechter E, Sunyaev SR, Lander ES. 2012. The mystery of missing heritability: Genetic interactions create phantom heritability. PNAS 109:1193-1198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1119675109, PMID: 22223662