ISWI chromatin remodellers sense nucleosome modifications to determine substrate preference

Nature

Volumn 548, Issue 7669, 2017, Pages 607-611

  Dann, Geoffrey P ^a   Liszczak, Glen P ^a   Bagert, John D ^a   Müller, Manuel M ^a,c   Nguyen, Uyen T T ^a,d   Wojcik, Felix ^a   Brown, Zachary Z ^a   Bos, Jeffrey ^a   Panchenko, Tatyana ^b,e   Pihl, Rasmus ^a,f   Pollock, Samuel B ^a,g   Diehl, Katharine L ^a   Allis, C David ^b   Muir, Tom W ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d BAYER PHARMA AG   (Germany)

^e NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; ARGININE; LATENCY ASSOCIATED NUCLEAR ANTIGEN; RESTRICTION ENDONUCLEASE; HISTONE; ISWI PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

BIOCHEMISTRY; CELLS AND CELL COMPONENTS; GENETIC ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PROTEIN; SUBSTRATE PREFERENCE;

ARTICLE; BIOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; DNA BARCODING; DNA CLEAVAGE; HISTONE MODIFICATION; HUMAN; NUCLEOSOME; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN QUATERNARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN SUBUNIT; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SENSORY STIMULATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; CHEMISTRY; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR MODEL;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASES; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; DNA BARCODING, TAXONOMIC; HISTONES; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NUCLEOSOMES; PROTEIN SUBUNITS; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 85028727142     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature23671     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Jiang, C. & Pugh, B. F. Nucleosome positioning and gene regulation: advances through genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 161-172 (2009).
2. Clapier, C. R. & Cairns, B. R. The biology of chromatin remodeling complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78, 273-304 (2009).
3. Luger, K., Mäder, A. W., Richmond, R. K., Sargent, D. F. & Richmond, T. J. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature 389, 251-260 (1997).
4. Morgan, M. T. et al. Structural basis for histone H2B deubiquitination by the SAGA DUB module. Science 351, 725-728 (2016).
5. Makde, R. D., England, J. R., Yennawar, H. P. & Tan, S. Structure of RCC1 chromatin factor bound to the nucleosome core particle. Nature 467, 562-566 (2010).
6. Armache, K. J., Garlick, J. D., Canzio, D., Narlikar, G. J. & Kingston, R. E. Structural basis of silencing: Sir3 BAH domain in complex with a nucleosome at 3.0 Å resolution. Science 334, 977-982 (2011).
7. McGinty, R. K., Henrici, R. C. & Tan, S. Crystal structure of the PRC1 ubiquitylation module bound to the nucleosome. Nature 514, 591-596 (2014).
8. Barbera, A. J. et al. The nucleosomal surface as a docking station for Kaposi's sarcoma herpesvirus LANA. Science 311, 856-861 (2006).
9. Kato, H. et al. A conserved mechanism for centromeric nucleosome recognition by centromere protein CENP-C. Science 340, 1110-1113 (2013).
10. Tan, M. et al. Identification of 67 histone marks and histone lysine crotonylation as a new type of histone modification. Cell 146, 1016-1028 (2011).
11. Ferreira, H., Flaus, A. & Owen-Hughes, T. Histone modifications influence the action of Snf2 family remodelling enzymes by different mechanisms. J. Mol. Biol. 374, 563-579 (2007).
12. Neumann, H. et al. A method for genetically installing site-specific acetylation in recombinant histones defines the effects of H3 K56 acetylation. Mol. Cell 36, 153-163 (2009).
13. North, J. A. et al. Phosphorylation of histone H3(T118) alters nucleosome dynamics and remodeling. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 6465-6474 (2011).
14. Chatterjee, N. et al. Histone H3 tail acetylation modulates ATP-dependent remodeling through multiple mechanisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 8378-8391 (2011).
15. Shogren-Knaak, M. et al. Histone H4-K16 acetylation controls chromatin structure and protein interactions. Science 311, 844-847 (2006).
16. Chatterjee, N. et al. Histone acetylation near the nucleosome dyad axis enhances nucleosome disassembly by RSC and SWI/SNF. Mol. Cell. Biol. 35, 4083-4092 (2015).
17. Goldman, J. A., Garlick, J. D. & Kingston, R. E. Chromatin remodeling by imitation switch (ISWI) class ATP-dependent remodelers is stimulated by histone variant H2A.Z. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 4645-4651 (2010).
18. Nguyen, U. T. et al. Accelerated chromatin biochemistry using DNA-barcoded nucleosome libraries. Nat. Methods 11, 834-840 (2014).
19. He, X., Fan, H. Y., Narlikar, G. J. & Kingston, R. E. Human ACF1 alters the remodeling strategy of SNF2h. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 28636-28647 (2006).
20. Clapier, C. R., Nightingale, K. P. & Becker, P. B. A critical epitope for substrate recognition by the nucleosome remodeling ATPase ISWI. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 649-655 (2002).
21. Tropberger, P. & Schneider, R. Scratching the (lateral) surface of chromatin regulation by histone modifications. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 657-661 (2013).
22. Tallant, C. et al. Molecular basis of histone tail recognition by human TIP5 PHD finger and bromodomain of the chromatin remodeling complex NoRC. Structure 23, 80-92 (2015).
23. Filippakopoulos, P. et al. Histone recognition and large-scale structural analysis of the human bromodomain family. Cell 149, 214-231 (2012).
24. Ruthenburg, A. J. et al. Recognition of a mononucleosomal histone modification pattern by BPTF via multivalent interactions. Cell 145, 692-706 (2011).
25. Müller, M. M. & Muir, T. W. Histones: at the crossroads of peptide and protein chemistry. Chem. Rev. 115, 2296-2349 (2015).
26. Taverna, S. D., Li, H., Ruthenburg, A. J., Allis, C. D. & Patel, D. J. How chromatinbinding modules interpret histone modifications: lessons from professional pocket pickers. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 1025-1040 (2007).
27. McGinty, R. K. & Tan, S. Nucleosome structure and function. Chem. Rev. 115, 2255-2273 (2015).
28. Fujiki, R. et al. GlcNAcylation of histone H2B facilitates its monoubiquitination. Nature 480, 557-560 (2011).
29. Clapier, C. R. & Cairns, B. R. Regulation of ISWI involves inhibitory modules antagonized by nucleosomal epitopes. Nature 492, 280-284 (2012).
30. Zhao, S. et al. Mutational landscape of uterine and ovarian carcinosarcomas implicates histone genes in epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 12238-12243 (2016).
31. Casadio, F. et al. H3R42me2a is a histone modification with positive transcriptional effects. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 14894-14899 (2013).
32. McGinty, R. K. et al. Structure-Activity analysis of semisynthetic nucleosomes: mechanistic insights into the stimulation of Dot1L by ubiquitylated histone H2B. ACS Chem. Biol. 4, 958-968 (2009).
33. Biron, E., Chatterjee, J. & Kessler, H. Optimized selective N-methylation of peptides on solid support. J. Pept. Sci. 12, 213-219 (2006).
34. Brown, Z. Z. et al. Strategy for "detoxification" of a cancer-derived histone mutant based on mapping its interaction with the methyltransferase PRC2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 13498-13501 (2014).
35. Hackeng, T. M., Griffin, J. H. & Dawson, P. E. Protein synthesis by native chemical ligation: expanded scope by using straightforward methodology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 10068-10073 (1999).
36. Li, X. Q., Kawakami, T. & Aimoto, S. Direct preparation of peptide thioesters using an Fmoc solid-phase method. Tetrahedr. Lett. 39, 8669-8672 (1998).
37. Mitchell, S. A., Pratt, M. R., Hruby, V. J. & Polt, R. Solid-phase synthesis of O-linked glycopeptide analogues of enkephalin. J. Org. Chem. 66, 2327-2342 (2001).
38. Thompson, R. E. et al. Trifluoroethanethiol: an additive for efficient one-pot peptide ligation-desulfurization chemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 8161-8164 (2014).
39. Li, Y. et al. Molecular coupling of histone crotonylation and active transcription by AF9 YEATS domain. Mol. Cell 62, 181-193 (2016).
40. Xiong, X. et al. Selective recognition of histone crotonylation by double PHD fingers of MOZ and DPF2. Nat. Chem. Biol. 12, 1111-1118 (2016).
41. Batjargal, S., Walters, C. R. & Petersson, E. J. Inteins as traceless purification tags for unnatural amino acid proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 1734-1737 (2015).
42. Barak, O., Lazzaro, M. A., Cooch, N. S., Picketts, D. J. & Shiekhattar, R. A tissue-specific, naturally occurring human SNF2L variant inactivates chromatin remodeling. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 45130-45138 (2004).
43. Phelan, M. L., Sif, S., Narlikar, G. J. & Kingston, R. E. Reconstitution of a core chromatin remodeling complex from SWI/SNF subunits. Mol. Cell 3, 247-253 (1999).
44. Dyer, P. N. et al. Reconstitution of nucleosome core particles from recombinant histones and DNA. Methods Enzymol. 375, 23-44 (2004).
45. Flaus, A. & Richmond, T. J. Positioning and stability of nucleosomes on MMTV 3?LTR sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 275, 427-441 (1998).