Structure of RCC1 chromatin factor bound to the nucleosome core particle

Nature

Volumn 467, Issue 7315, 2010, Pages 562-566

  Makde, Ravindra D ^a,b   England, Joseph R ^a,c   Yennawar, Hemant P ^a   Tan, Song ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BHABHA ATOMIC RESEARCH CENTRE   (India)

^c TEMPLE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME PROTEIN; GUANOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; GUANOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; HISTONE; PROTEIN RCC1; RAN PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; BJ1 PROTEIN, DROSOPHILA; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; DROSOPHILA PROTEIN; GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE EXCHANGE FACTOR; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; NUCLEOSOME;

CHROMOSOME; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EUKARYOTE; FLY; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BASE PAIRING; CELL FUNCTION; CHROMATIN; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DNA SEQUENCE; DROSOPHILA; EUKARYOTE; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOSOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DNA INTERACTION; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; METABOLISM; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; XENOPUS;

ANIMALS; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DROSOPHILA PROTEINS; GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE EXCHANGE FACTORS; HISTONES; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; NUCLEOSOMES; RAN GTP-BINDING PROTEIN; XENOPUS;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 77957367439     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature09321     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Carazo-Salas, R. E. et al. Generation of GTP-bound Ran by RCC1 is required for chromatin-induced mitotic spindle formation. Nature 400, 178-181 (1999).
2. Clarke, P. R. and Zhang, C. Spatial and temporal coordination of mitosis by Ran GTPase. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 464-477 (2008).
3. Kalab, P. and Heald, R. The RanGTP gradient-a GPS for the mitotic spindle. J. Cell Sci. 121, 1577-1586 (2008).
4. Renault, L. et al. The 1.7Å crystal structure of the regulator of chromosome condensation(RCC1) reveals a seven-bladedpropeller.Nature392,97- 101(1998).
5. Nemergut, M. E., Mizzen, C. A., Stukenberg, T., Allis, C. D. and Macara, I. G. Chromatin docking and exchange activity enhancement of RCC1 by histones H2A and H2B. Science 292, 1540-1543 (2001).
6. Chen, T. et al. N-terminal a-methylation of RCC1 is necessary for stable chromatin association and normal mitosis. Nature Cell Biol. 9, 596-603 (2007).
7. Hao, Y.&Macara, I. G. Regulation of chromatin binding by a conformational switch in the tail of the Ran exchange factor RCC1. J. Cell Biol. 182, 827-836 (2008).
8. Luger, K., Mader, A. W., Richmond, R. K., Sargent, D. F. and Richmond, T. J. Crystal structure of the nucleosomecore particle at 2.8 Åresolution. Nature389,251-260 (1997).
9. Bao, Y.,White, C. L.& Luger, K.Nucleosomecore particles containing a poly(dA.dT) sequence element exhibit a locally distorted DNA structure. J. Mol. Biol. 361, 617-624 (2006).
10. Chakravarthy, S. and Luger, K. The histone variant macro-H2A preferentially forms hybrid nucleosomes. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 25522-25531 (2006).
11. Clapier, C. R. et al. Structure of the Drosophila nucleosome core particle highlights evolutionary constraints on the H2A-H2B histone dimer. Proteins 71, 1-7 (2008).
12. Davey, C. A., Sargent, D. F., Luger, K., Maeder, A. W. and Richmond, T. J. Solvent mediated interactions in the structure of the nucleosome core particle at 1.9 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 319, 1097-1113 (2002).
13. Ong, M. S., Richmond, T. J.&Davey, C. A.DNAstretching and extremekinking in the nucleosome core. J. Mol. Biol. 368, 1067-1074 (2007).
14. Richmond, T. J.&Davey, C. A. The structure ofDNA in the nucleosome core. Nature 423, 145-150 (2003).
15. Suto, R. K., Clarkson, M. J., Tremethick, D. J. and Luger, K. Crystal structure of a nucleosome core particle containing the variant histone H2A.Z. Nature Struct. Biol. 7, 1121-1124 (2000).
16. Tsunaka, Y., Kajimura, N., Tate, S. and Morikawa, K. Alteration of the nucleosomal DNA path in the crystal structure of a human nucleosome core particle. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 3424-3434 (2005).
17. White, C. L., Suto, R. K. and Luger, K. Structure of the yeast nucleosome core particle reveals fundamental changes in internucleosome interactions. EMBO J. 20, 5207-5218 (2001).
18. Barbera, A. J. et al. The nucleosomal surface as a docking station for Kaposis sarcoma herpesvirus LANA. Science 311, 856-861 (2006).
19. Suto, R. K. et al. Crystal structures of nucleosome core particles in complex with minor groove DNA-binding ligands. J. Mol. Biol. 326, 371-380 (2003).
20. Lowary, P. T. and Widom, J. New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence-directed nucleosome positioning. J. Mol. Biol. 276, 19-42 (1998).
21. Davis, T. L., Bonacci, T. M., Sprang, S. R. and Smrcka, A. V. Structural and molecular characterization of a preferred protein interaction surface on G protein bc subunits. Biochemistry 44, 10593-10604 (2005).
22. Lodowski, D. T., Pitcher, J. A., Capel, W. D., Lefkowitz, R. J. and Tesmer, J. J. Keeping G proteins at bay: a complex between G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 and Gbc. Science 300, 1256-1262 (2003).
23. Orlicky, S., Tang, X., Willems, A., Tyers, M. and Sicheri, F. Structural basis for phosphodependent substrate selection and orientation by the SCFCdc4 ubiquitin ligase. Cell 112, 243-256 (2003).
24. Renault, L., Kuhlmann, J., Henkel, A. and Wittinghofer, A. Structural basis for guanine nucleotide exchange on Ran by the regulator of chromosome condensation (RCC1). Cell 105, 245-255 (2001).
25. England, J. R., Huang, J., Jennings, M. J., Makde, R. D. and Tan, S. RCC1 uses a conformationally diverse loop region to interact with the nucleosome: a model for the RCC1-nucleosome complex. J. Mol. Biol. 398, 518-529 (2010).
26. Dorigo, B. et al. Nucleosome arrays reveal the two-start organization of the chromatin fiber. Science 306, 1571-1573 (2004).
27. Shogren-Knaak, M. et al. Histone H4-K16 acetylation controls chromatin structure and protein interactions. Science 311, 844-847 (2006).
28. Koerber, R. T., Rhee, H. S., Jiang, C. and Pugh, B. F. Interaction of transcriptional regulators with specific nucleosomes across the Saccharomyces genome. Mol. Cell 35, 889-902 (2009).
29. Edayathumangalam, R. S., Weyermann, P., Dervan, P. B., Gottesfeld, J. M. and Luger, K.Nucleosomes in solutionexist as a mixture of twist-defect states. J.Mol. Biol.345, 103-114 (2005).
30. Gangaraju, V. K., Prasad, P., Srour, A., Kagalwala, M. N. and Bartholomew, B. Conformational changes associated with template commitment in ATPdependent chromatin remodeling by ISW2. Mol. Cell 35, 58-69 (2009).
31. Saha, A., Wittmeyer, J. and Cairns, B. R. Chromatin remodeling through directional DNA translocation from an internal nucleosomal site. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 747-755 (2005).
32. Bilbao-Cortes, D., Hetzer, M., Langst, G., Becker, P. B. and Mattaj, I. W. Ran binds to chromatin by two distinct mechanisms. Curr. Biol. 12, 1151-1156 (2002).
33. Zhang, C., Goldberg, M. W., Moore, W. J., Allen, T. D. and Clarke, P. R. Concentration of Ran on chromatin induces decondensation, nuclear envelope formation and nuclear pore complex assembly. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 81, 623-633 (2002).
34. Partridge, J. R. and Schwartz, T. U. Crystallographic and biochemical analysis of the Ran-binding zinc finger domain. J. Mol. Biol. 391, 375-389 (2009).
35. Chook, Y. M. and Blobel, G. Structure of the nuclear transport complex karyopherinb2- Ran.GppNHp. Nature 399, 230-237 (1999).
36. Seewald, M. J., Korner, C., Wittinghofer, A. and Vetter, I. R. RanGAP mediates GTP hydrolysis without an arginine finger. Nature 415, 662-666 (2002).
37. Vetter, I. R., Nowak, C., Nishimoto, T., Kuhlmann, J. and Wittinghofer, A. Structure of a Ran-binding domain complexed with Ran bound to a GTP analogue: implications for nuclear transport. Nature 398, 39-46 (1999).
38. Otwinoski, Z. and Minor, W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276, 307-326 (1997).
39. McCoy,A. J. et al.Phasercrystallographic software. J.Appl.Cryst.40,658- 674(2007).
40. Murshudov, G. N., Vagin, A. A. and Dodson, E. J. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 53, 240-255 (1997).
41. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: building new software for automated crystallographic structure determination. ActaCrystallogr.DBiol. Crystallogr. 58, 1948-1954(2002).
42. Emsley, P. and Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126-2132 (2004).
43. Delano, W. L. The PyMOL molecular graphics system http://www.pymol.org.
44. Baker, N. A., Sept, D., Joseph, S., Holst, M. J. and McCammon, J. A. Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 10037-10041 (2001).
45. Luger, K., Rechsteiner, T. J. and Richmond, T. J. Expression and purification of recombinant histones and nucleosome reconstitution. Methods Mol. Biol. 119, 1-16 (1999).
46. Laskowski, R. A., MacArthur, M. W., Moss, D. S. and Thornton, J. M. PROCHECK-a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Cryst. 26, 283-291 (1993).
47. Brunger, A. T. et al. Crystallography and NMR system: a new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 54, 905-921 (1998).
48. Lavery, R., Moakher, M., Maddocks, J. H., Petkeviciute, D. and Zakrzewska, K. Conformational analysis of nucleic acids revisited: Curves1. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 5917-5929 (2009).
49. Kleywegt, G. J. Use of non-crystallographic symmetry in protein structure refinement. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 52, 842-857 (1996).
50. Tan, S., Kern, R. C. and Selleck, W. The pST44 polycistronic expression system for producing protein complexes in Escherichia coli. Protein Expr. Purif. 40, 385-395 (2005).