Effectiveness of tobacco control television advertisements with different types of emotional content on tobacco use in England, 2004–2010

Tobacco Control

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 21-26

  Sims, M ^a   Langley, T ^b   Lewis, S ^b   Richardson, S ^b   Szatkowski, L ^b   McNeill, A ^c   Gilmore, Anna B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BATH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c UK CENTRE FOR TOBACCO AND ALCOHOL STUDIES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVERTISING; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EMOTION; ENGLAND; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; SMOKING; TELEVISION; TIME FACTOR;

ADVERTISING AS TOPIC; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EMOTIONS; ENGLAND; HUMANS; SMOKING; TELEVISION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 85028273819     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: 14683318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051454     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Durkin S, Brennan E, Wakefield M. Mass media campaigns to promote smoking cessation among adults: an integrative review. Tob Control 2012; 21: 127-38.
2. Sims M, Salway R, Langley T, et al. Effectiveness of tobacco control television advertising in changing tobacco use in England: a population-based cross-sectional study. Addiction 2014; 109: 986-94.
3. McAfee T, Davis KC, Alexander RL, et al. Effect of the first federally funded US antismoking national media campaign. Lancet 2013; 382: 2003-11.
4. Langley TE, McNeill A, Lewis S, et al. The impact of media campaigns on smoking cessation activity: a structural vector autoregression analysis. Addiction 2012; 107: 2043-50.
5. Dunlop SM, Perez D, Cotter T. The natural history of antismoking advertising recall: the influence of broadcasting parameters, emotional intensity and executional features. Tob Control 2012; 23: 215-22.
6. Niederdeppe J, Farrelly MC, Nonnemaker J, et al. Socioeconomic variation in recall and perceived effectiveness of campaign advertisements to promote smoking cessation. Soc Sci Med 2011; 72: 773-80.
7. Carroll T, Rock B. Generating quitline calls during Australia's National Tobacco Campaign: effects of television advertisement execution and programme placement. Tob Control 2003; 12: ii40-4.
8. Durkin SJ, Wakefield MA, Spittal MJ. Which types of televised anti-tobacco campaigns prompt more quitline calls from disadvantaged groups? Health Educ Res 2011; 26: 998-1009.
9. Durkin SJ, Biener L, Wakefield MA. Effects of different types of antismoking ads on reducing disparities in smoking cessation among socioeconomic subgroups. Am J Public Health 2009; 99: 2217-23.
10. Farrelly MC, Duke JC, Davis KC, et al. Promotion of smoking cessation with emotional and/or graphic antismoking advertising. Am J Prev Med 2012; 43: 475-82.
11. Niederdeppe J, Fiore MC, Baker TB, et al. Smoking-cessation media campaigns and their effectiveness among socioeconomically advantaged and disadvantaged populations. J Info 2008; 98; 916-24.
12. Farrelly MC, Davis KC, Nonnemaker JM, et al. Promoting calls to a quitline: quantifying the influence of message theme, strong negative emotions and graphic images in television advertisements. Tob Control 2011; 20: 279-84.
13. Heath R, Hyder P. Measuring the hidden power of emotive advertising. Int J Market Res 2005; 47: 467-86.
14. Heath R, Nairn A. Measuring affective advertising: implications of low attention processing on recall. J Advertising Res 2005; 45: 269-81.
15. Office for National Statistics. Opinions and lifestyle survey. http: //www. ons. gov. uk/ ons/about-ons/products-and-services/opn/index. html (accessed 9 Dec 2013)
16. Jarvis MJ. Monitoring cigarette smoking prevalence in Britain in a timely fashion. Addiction 2003; 98: 1569-74.
17. Langley T, Lewis S, McNeill A, et al. Characterising tobacco control mass media campaigns in England. Addiction 2013; 108: 2001-8.
18. Gilmore AB, Tavakoly B, Taylor G, et al. Understanding tobacco industry pricing strategy and whether it undermines tobacco tax policy: the example of the UK cigarette market. Addiction 2013; 108: 1317-26.
19. Council Directive 2011/64/EU of 21 June 2011 on the structure and rates of excise duty applied to manufactured tobacco. http: //eur-lex. europa. eu/LexUriServ/ LexUriServ. do?uri=OJ: L: 2011: 176: 0024: 0036: EN: PDF (accessed 9 Dec 2013)
20. Joossens L, Raw M. The tobacco control scale: a new scale to measure country activity. Tob Control 2006; 15: 247-53.
21. Wakefield MA, Durkin S, Spittal MJ, et al. Impact of tobacco control policies and mass media campaigns on monthly adult smoking prevalence. Am J Public Health 2008; 98: 1443-50.
22. Wakefield MA, Spittal MJ, Yong H-H, et al. Effects of mass media campaign exposure intensity and durability on quit attempts in a population-based cohort study. Health Educ Res 2011; 26: 988-97.
23. Borland R, Balmford J. Understanding how mass media campaigns impact on smokers. Tob Control 2003; 12: ii45-52.
24. Wood SN. Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2006.
25. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Best practices for comprehensive tobacco control programs-2007. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2007.
26. National Cancer Institute. The role of the media in promoting and reducing tobacco use. US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute. NIH Pub. No. 07-6242, June 2008.
27. Durkin SJ, Biener L, Wakefield MA. Effects of different types of antismoking ads on reducing disparities in smoking cessation among socioeconomic subgroups. Am J Public Health 2009; 99: 2217-23.
28. Manyiwa S, Brennan R. Fear appeals in anti-smoking advertising: how important is self-efficacy? J Mark Manag 2012; 28: 1419-37.
29. Witte K, Allen M. A meta-analysis of fear appeals: implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Educ Behav 2000; 27: 591-615.