Effects of mass media campaign exposure intensity and durability on quit attempts in a population-based cohort study

Health Education Research

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 988-997

  Wakefield, M A ^a   Spittal, M J ^b   Yong, H H ^a   Durkin, S J ^a   Borland, R ^a  

^a CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY CENTRE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ADVERTIZING; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; AUSTRALIA; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MASS MEDIUM; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TELEVISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ADVERTISING AS TOPIC; AUSTRALIA; BEHAVIOR, ADDICTIVE; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MASS MEDIA; MIDDLE AGED; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TELEVISION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 82155191633     PISSN: 02681153     EISSN: 14653648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/her/cyr054     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. National Cancer Institute. The Role of the Media in Promoting and Reducing Tobacco Use. Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, 2008. (NIH Pub No 07-6242).
2. Wakefield MA, Loken B, Hornik RC. Use of mass media campaigns to change health behaviour. Lancet 2010; 376: 1261-71.
3. Miller CL, Wakefield M, Roberts L. Uptake and effectiveness of the Australian telephone quitline service in the context of a mass media campaign. Tob Control 2003; 12(Suppl. 2):ii53-8. (Pubitemid 39456679)
4. Erbas B, Bui Q, Huggins R et al. Investigating the relation between placement of quit antismoking advertisements and number of telephone calls to quitline: a semiparametric modeling approach. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006; 60: 180-2. (Pubitemid 43131941)
5. Mosbaek CH, Austin DF, Stark MJ et al. The association between advertising and calls to a tobacco quitline. Tob Control 2007; 16(Suppl. 1):i24-9.
6. Farrelly MC, Hussin A, Bauer UE. Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of television, radio and print advertisements in promoting the New York smokers' quitline. Tob Control 2007; 16(Suppl. 1):i21-3.
7. Chapman S. Accelerating smoking cessation and prevention in whole communities. In: Chapman S, (ed.). Public Health Advocacy and Tobacco Control: Making Smoking History. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2007, 127-52.
8. Emery S, Wakefield MA, Terry-McElrath Y et al. Televised state-sponsored antitobacco advertising and youth smoking beliefs and behavior in the united states, 1999-2000. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005; 159: 639-45. (Pubitemid 41003085)
9. Farrelly MC, Davis KC, Haviland ML et al. Evidence of a dose-response relationship between "truth" antismoking ads and youth smoking prevalence. Am J Public Health 2005; 95: 425-31. (Pubitemid 40315117)
10. Terry-McElrath YM, Wakefield MA, Emery S et al. State anti-tobacco advertising and smoking outcomes by gender and race/ethnicity. Ethn Health 2007; 12: 339-62. (Pubitemid 47300292)
11. Hyland A, Wakefield M, Higbee C et al. Anti-tobacco television advertising and indicators of smoking cessation in adults: a cohort study. Health Educ Res 2006; 21: 296-302.
12. Durkin S, Biener L, Wakefield M. Effects of different types of antismoking ads on reducing disparities in smoking cessation among socioeconomic subgroups. Am J Public Health 2009; 99: 2217-23.
13. Tellis GJ. Effective Advertising: Understanding When, How, and Why Advertising Works. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2004.
14. Borland R, Balmford J. Understanding how mass media campaigns impact on smokers. Tob Control 2003; 12(Suppl. 2):ii45-52. (Pubitemid 39456678)
15. Sly DF, Arheart K, Dietz N et al. The outcome consequences of defunding the Minnesota youth tobacco-use prevention program. Prev Med 2005; 41: 503-10. (Pubitemid 40732365)
16. Wakefield MA, Durkin S, Spittal MJ et al. Impact of tobacco control policies and mass media campaigns on monthly adult smoking prevalence. Am J Public Health 2008; 98: 1443-50.
17. Zhu S-H. Differential cessation rates across populations: what explains it and how to reduce it. Presentation to the Oceania Tobacco Control Conference. Auckland, New Zealand, 2007.
18. Thompson ME, Fong GT, Hammond D et al. Methods of the international tobacco control (ITC) four country survey. Tob Control 2006; 15(Suppl. 3):iii12-8.
19. Kozlowski LT, Porter CQ, Orleans CT et al. Predicting smoking cessation with self-reported measures of nicotine dependence: FTQ, FTND, and HSI. Drug Alcohol Depend 1994; 34: 211-6.
20. Scollo M, Winstanley M. Social marketing and public education campaigns. In: Scollo M, Winstanley M (eds). Tobacco in Australia: Facts and Issues, 3rd edn. Melbourne, Australia: The Cancer Council Victoria, 2008.
21. Hill D, Carroll T. Australia's national tobacco campaign. Tob Control 2003; 12(Suppl. 2):ii9-14.
22. Quitline Victoria. Quit Victoria Resource & Media Centre. Available at: =1585. Accessed: 9 November 2010.
23. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression Analysis, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Wiley Series in probability and statistics, 2000.
24. Hill D, Marks R. Health promotion programs for melanoma prevention: screw or spring? Arch Dermatol 2008; 144: 538-40. (Pubitemid 351581114)
25. Larabie LC. To what extent do smokers plan quit attempts? Tob Control 2005; 14: 425-8. (Pubitemid 41759619)
26. West R, Sohal T. Catastrophic pathways to smoking cessation: findings from national survey. BMJ 2006; 332: 458-60. (Pubitemid 43342044)
27. Murray RL, Lewis SA, Coleman T et al. Unplanned attempts to quit smoking: missed opportunities for health promotion? Addiction 2009; 104: 1901-9.
28. Cooper J, Borland R, Yong HH et al. To what extent do smokers make spontaneous quit attempts and what are the implications for smoking cessation maintenance? Findings from the international tobacco control four country survey. Nicotine Tob Res 2010; 12(Suppl):S51-7.
29. Borland R, Hyland A, Cummings KM et al. One size does not fit all when it comes to smoking cessation: observations from the international tobacco control policy evaluation project. Nicotine Tob Res 2010; 12(Suppl):S1-3.
30. Southwell BG, Barmada CH, Hornik RC et al. Can we measure encoded exposure? Validation evidence from a national campaign. J Health Commun 2002; 7: 445-53.
31. Niederdeppe J. Assessing the validity of confirmed ad recall measures for public health communication campaign evaluation. J Health Commun 2005; 10: 635-50. (Pubitemid 43154605)
32. Donovan RJ, Boulter J, Borland R et al. Continuous tracking of the Australian national tobacco campaign: advertising effects on recall, recognition, cognitions, and behaviour. Tob Control 2003; 12(Suppl. 2):ii30-9. (Pubitemid 39456676)
33. Biener L, McCallum-Keeler G, Nyman AL. Adults' response to Massachusetts anti-tobacco television advertisements: impact of viewer and advertisement characteristics. Tob Control 2000; 9: 401-7