Structural basis of signal sequence surveillance and selection by the SRP-FtsY complex

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 604-610

  Von Loeffelholz, Ottilie ^a,b   Knoops, Kèvin ^a,b   Ariosa, Aileen ^c   Zhang, Xin ^c,d   Karuppasamy, Manikandan ^a,b   Huard, Karine ^a,b   Schoehn, Guy ^b,e   Berger, Imre ^a,b   Shan, Shu Ou ^c   Schaffitzel, Christiane ^a,b  

^a EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (France)

^b UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^c California Institute of Technology   (United States)

^d SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; ESPP PROTEIN; FFH PROTEIN; FTSY PROTEIN; HETERODIMER; PROTEIN; RECEPTOR; SIGNAL RECOGNITION PARTICLE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; DISSOCIATION; ESCHERICHIA COLI; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TARGETING; RIBOSOME;

EID: 85027954333     PISSN: 15459993     EISSN: 15459985     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.2546     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Gilmore, R., Walter, P. & Blobel, G. Protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum. II. Isolation and characterization of the signal recognition particle receptor. J. Cell Biol. 95, 470-477 (1982).
2. Keenan, R.J., Freymann, D.M., Stroud, R.M. & Walter, P. The signal recognition particle. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70, 755-775 (2001).
3. Nagai, K. et al. Structure, function and evolution of the signal recognition particle. EMBO J. 22, 3479-3485 (2003).
4. Doudna, J.A. & Batey, R.T. Structural insights into the signal recognition particle. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 73, 539-557 (2004).
5. Poritz, M.A. et al. An E. coli ribonucleoprotein containing 4.5S RNA resembles mammalian signal recognition particle. Science 250, 1111-1117 (1990).
6. Freymann, D.M., Keenan, R.J., Stroud, R.M. & Walter, P. Structure of the conserved GTPase domain of the signal recognition particle. Nature 385, 361-364 (1997).
7. Batey, R.T., Rambo, R.P., Lucast, L., Rha, B. & Doudna, J.A. Crystal structure of the ribonucleoprotein core of the signal recognition particle. Science 287, 1232-1239 (2000).
8. Janda, C.Y. et al. Recognition of a signal peptide by the signal recognition particle. Nature 465, 507-510 (2010).
9. Hainzl, T., Huang, S., Merilainen, G., Brannstrom, K. & Sauer-Eriksson, A.E. Structural basis of signal-sequence recognition by the signal recognition particle. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 389-391 (2011).
10. Montoya, G., Svensson, C., Luirink, J. & Sinning, I. Crystal structure of the NG domain from the signal-recognition particle receptor FtsY. Nature 385, 365-368 (1997).
11. Angelini, S., Deitermann, S. & Koch, H.G. FtsY, the bacterial signal-recognition particle receptor, interacts functionally and physically with the SecYEG translocon. EMBO Rep. 6, 476-481 (2005).
12. Weiche, B. et al. A cleavable N-terminal membrane anchor is involved in membrane binding of the Escherichia coli SRP receptor. J. Mol. Biol. 377, 761-773 (2008).
13. Egea, P.F. et al. Substrate twinning activates the signal recognition particle and its receptor. Nature 427, 215-221 (2004).
14. Focia, P.J., Shepotinovskaya, I.V., Seidler, J.A. & Freymann, D.M. Heterodimeric GTPase core of the SRP targeting complex. Science 303, 373-377 (2004).
15. Zhang, X., Rashid, R., Wang, K. & Shan, S.O. Sequential checkpoints govern substrate selection during cotranslational protein targeting. Science 328, 757-760 (2010).
16. Holtkamp, W. et al. Dynamic switch of the signal recognition particle from scanning to targeting. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 1332-1337 (2012).
17. Halic, M. et al. Following the signal sequence from ribosomal tunnel exit to signal recognition particle. Nature 444, 507-511 (2006).
18. Peluso, P., Shan, S.O., Nock, S., Herschlag, D. & Walter, P. Role of SRP RNA in the GTPase cycles of Ffh and FtsY. Biochemistry 40, 15224-15233 (2001).
19. Zhang, X., Schaffitzel, C., Ban, N. & Shan, S.O. Multiple conformational switches in a GTPase complex control co-translational protein targeting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 1754-1759 (2009).
20. Estrozi, L.F., Boehringer, D., Shan, S.O., Ban, N. & Schaffitzel, C. Structure of the E. coli co-translational targeting complex in the stable early conformation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 88-90 (2011).
21. Lam, V.Q., Akopian, D., Rome, M., Henningsen, D. & Shan, S.O. Lipid activation of the signal recognition particle receptor provides spatial coordination of protein targeting. J. Cell Biol. 190, 623-635 (2010).
22. Shen, K., Arslan, S., Akopian, D., Ha, T. & Shan, S.O. Activated GTPase movement on an RNA scaffold drives co-translational protein targeting. Nature 492, 271-275 (2012).
23. Ataide, S.F. et al. The crystal structure of the signal recognition particle in complex with its receptor. Science 331, 881-886 (2011).
24. Connolly, T., Rapiejko, P. & Gilmore, R. Requirement of GTP hydrolysis for dissociation of the signal recognition particle from its receptor. Science 252, 1171-1173 (1991).
25. Tian, H., Boyd, D. & Beckwith, J. A mutant hunt for defects in membrane protein assembly yields mutations affecting the bacterial signal recognition particle and Sec machinery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 4730-4735 (2000).
26. Valent, Q.A. et al. Early events in preprotein recognition in E. coli: interaction of SRP and trigger factor with nascent polypeptides. EMBO J. 14, 5494-5505 (1995).
27. Lee, H.C. & Bernstein, H.D. The targeting pathway of Escherichia coli presecretory and integral membrane proteins is specified by the hydrophobicity of the targeting signal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 3471-3476 (2001).
28. Peterson, J.H., Szabady, R.L. & Bernstein, H.D. An unusual signal peptide extension inhibits the binding of bacterial presecretory proteins to the signal recognition particle, trigger factor, and the SecYEG complex. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 9038-9048 (2006).
29. Szabady, R.L., Peterson, J.H., Skillman, K.M. & Bernstein, H.D. An unusual signal peptide facilitates late steps in the biogenesis of a bacterial autotransporter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 221-226 (2005).
30. Schuwirth, B.S. et al. Structures of the bacterial ribosome at 3.5 A resolution. Science 310, 827-834 (2005).
31. Rosendal, K.R., Wild, K., Montoya, G. & Sinning, I. Crystal structure of the complete core of archaeal signal recognition particle and implications for interdomain communication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 14701-14706 (2003).
32. Schaffitzel, C. et al. Structure of the E. coli signal recognition particle bound to a translating ribosome. Nature 444, 503-506 (2006).
33. Powers, T. & Walter, P. Co-translational protein targeting catalyzed by the Escherichia coli signal recognition particle and its receptor. EMBO J. 16, 4880-4886 (1997).
34. Shan, S.O., Chandrasekar, S. & Walter, P. Conformational changes in the GTPase modules of the signal reception particle and its receptor drive initiation of protein translocation. J. Cell Biol. 178, 611-620 (2007).
35. Zhang, X., Kung, S. & Shan, S.O. Demonstration of a multistep mechanism for assembly of the SRP x SRP receptor complex: implications for the catalytic role of SRP RNA. J. Mol. Biol. 381, 581-593 (2008).
36. Braig, D. et al. Signal sequence-independent SRP-SR complex formation at the membrane suggests an alternative targeting pathway within the SRP cycle. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 2309-2323 (2011).
37. Shen, K. & Shan, S.O. Transient tether between the SRP RNA and SRP receptor ensures efficient cargo delivery during cotranslational protein targeting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 7698-7703 (2010).
38. Scheres, S.H. et al. Disentangling conformational states of macromolecules in 3D-EM through likelihood optimization. Nat. Methods 4, 27-29 (2007).
39. Shaikh, T.R. et al. SPIDER image processing for single-particle reconstruction of biological macromolecules from electron micrographs. Nat. Protoc. 3, 1941-1974 (2008).
40. Zhang, X. et al. Direct visualization reveals dynamics of a transient intermediate during protein assembly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 6450-6455 (2011).
41. Knoops, K., Schoehn, G. & Schaffitzel, C. Cryo-electron microscopy of ribosomal complexes in cotranslational folding, targeting, and translocation. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 3, 429-441 (2012).
42. Cross, B.C., Sinning, I., Luirink, J. & High, S. Delivering proteins for export from the cytosol. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 255-264 (2009).
43. Bradshaw, N., Neher, S.B., Booth, D.S. & Walter, P. Signal sequences activate the catalytic switch of SRP RNA. Science 323, 127-130 (2009).
44. Peterson, J.H., Woolhead, C.A. & Bernstein, H.D. The conformation of a nascent polypeptide inside the ribosome tunnel affects protein targeting and protein folding. Mol. Microbiol. 78, 203-217 (2010).
45. Raine, A. et al. Targeting and insertion of heterologous membrane proteins in E. coli. Biochimie 85, 659-668 (2003).
46. Flanagan, J.J. et al. Signal recognition particle binds to ribosome-bound signal sequences with fluorescence-detected subnanomolar affinity that does not diminish as the nascent chain lengthens. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 18628-18637 (2003).
47. Miyazaki, E., Kida, Y., Mihara, K. & Sakaguchi, M. Switching the sorting mode of membrane proteins from cotranslational endoplasmic reticulum targeting to posttranslational mitochondrial import. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 1788-1799 (2005).
48. del Alamo, M. et al. Defining the specificity of cotranslationally acting chaperones by systematic analysis of mRNAs associated with ribosome-nascent chain complexes. PLoS Biol. 9, e1001100 (2011).
49. Lauring, B., Sakai, H., Kreibich, G. & Wiedmann, M. Nascent polypeptide-associated complex protein prevents mistargeting of nascent chains to the endoplasmic reticulum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 5411-5415 (1995).
50. Schaffitzel, C. & Ban, N. Generation of ribosome nascent chain complexes for structural and functional studies. J. Struct. Biol. 158, 463-471 (2007).
51. Heymann, J.B. & Belnap, D.M. Bsoft: image processing and molecular modeling for electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 3-18 (2007).
52. Tang, G. et al. EMAN2: an extensible image processing suite for electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 38-46 (2007).
53. Valle, M. et al. Incorporation of aminoacyl-tRNA into the ribosome as seen by cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Struct. Biol. 10, 899-906 (2003).
54. Valle, M. et al. Locking and unlocking of ribosomal motions. Cell 114, 123-134 (2003).
55. Fischer, N., Konevega, A.L., Wintermeyer, W., Rodnina, M.V. & Stark, H. Ribosome dynamics and tRNA movement by time-resolved electron cryomicroscopy. Nature 466, 329-333 (2010).
56. Rosenthal, P.B. & Henderson, R. Optimal determination of particle orientation, absolute hand, and contrast loss in single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 333, 721-745 (2003).
57. Scheres, S.H., Nunez-Ramirez, R., Sorzano, C.O., Carazo, J.M. & Marabini, R. Image processing for electron microscopy single-particle analysis using XMIPP. Nat. Protoc. 3, 977-990 (2008).
58. Penczek, P.A., Kimmel, M. & Spahn, C.M. Identifying conformational states of macromolecules by eigen-analysis of resampled cryo-EM images. Structure 19, 1582-1590 (2011).
59. Pettersen, E.F. et al. UCSF Chimera-a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605-1612 (2004).
60. Brunger, A.T. et al. Crystallography & NMR system: a new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 54, 905-921 (1998).