Activated GTPase movement on an RNA scaffold drives co-translational protein targeting

Nature

Volumn 492, Issue 7428, 2012, Pages 271-275

  Shen, Kuang ^a   Arslan, Sinan ^b   Akopian, David ^a   Ha, Taekjip ^b,c   Shan, Shu Ou ^a  

^a California Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

^c HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GUANOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; GUANOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; PROTEIN SECYEG; PROTEOME; RIBONUCLEOPROTEIN; RNA; SIGNAL PEPTIDE; SIGNAL RECOGNITION PARTICLE; TRANSLOCON; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; COLIFORM BACTERIUM; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FLUORESCENCE; HYDROLYSIS; MEMBRANE; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MOVEMENT; PLASMA; PROTEIN; RNA;

ARTICLE; CELL MEMBRANE; COMPLEX FORMATION; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM; ENZYME ACTIVATION; ESCHERICHIA COLI; EUKARYOTE; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; HYDROLYSIS; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN TARGETING; TRANSLATION REGULATION;

ENZYME ACTIVATION; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FLUORESCENCE RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER; GTP PHOSPHOHYDROLASES; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; PROTEIN BIOSYNTHESIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; RNA, BACTERIAL; SIGNAL RECOGNITION PARTICLE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); ESCHERICHIA COLI; EUKARYOTA;

EID: 84870979537     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature11726     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Keenan, R. J., Freymann, D. M., Stroud, R. M. & Walter, P. The signal recognition particle. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70, 755-775 (2001).
2. Pool, M. R., Stumm, J., Fulga, T. A., Sinning, I. & Dobberstein, B. Distinct modes of signal recognition particle interaction with the ribosome. Science 297, 1345-1348 (2002).
3. Halic, M. et al. Following the signal sequence from ribosomal tunnel exit to signal recognition particle. Nature 444, 507-511 (2006).
4. Schaffitzel, C. et al. Structure of the E. coli signal recognition particle bound to a translating ribosome. Nature 444, 503-506 (2006).
5. Focia, P. J., Shepotinovskaya, I. V., Seidler, J. A. & Freymann, D. M. Heterodimeric GTPase core of the SRP targeting complex. Science 303, 373-377 (2004).
6. Egea, P. F. et al. Substrate twinning activates the signal recognition particle and its receptor. Nature 427, 215-221 (2004).
7. Becker, T. et al. Structure of monomeric yeast and mammalian Sec61 complexes interacting with the translating ribosome. Science 326, 1369-1373 (2009).
8. Peluso, P., Shan, S. O., Nock, S., Herschlag, D. & Walter, P. Role of SRP RNA in the GTPase cycles of ffh and FtsY. Biochemistry 40, 15224-15233 (2001).
9. Zhang, X., Rashid, R., Wang, K. & Shan, S. O. Sequential checkpoints govern substrate selection during cotranslational protein targeting. Science 328, 757-760 (2010).
10. Janda, C. Y. et al. Recognition of a signal peptide by the signal recognition particle. Nature 465, 507-510 (2010).
11. Batey, R. T., Rambo, R. P., Lucast, L., Rha, B. & Doudna, J. A. Crystal structure of the ribonucleoprotein core of the signal recognition particle. Science 287,1232-1239 (2000).
12. Zhang, X., Kung, S. & Shan, S. O. Demonstration of a multistep mechanism for assembly of the SRP?SRP receptor complex: implications for the catalytic role of SRP RNA. J. Mol. Biol. 381, 581-593 (2008).
13. Shen, K. & Shan, S. O. Transient tether between the SRP RNA and SRP receptor ensures efficient cargo delivery during cotranslational protein targeting. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 7698-7703 (2010).
14. Shen, K., Zhang, X. & Shan, S. O. Synergistic actions between the SRP RNA and translating ribosome allow efficient delivery of the correct cargos during cotranslational protein targeting. RNA 17, 892-902 (2011).
15. Estrozi, L. F., Boehringer, D., Shan, S., Ban, N. & Schaffitzel, C. Cryo-EMstructure of the E. coli translating ribosome in complex withSRP and its receptor. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 88-90 (2011).
16. Althoff, S., Selinger, D. & Wise, J. A. Molecular evolution of SRP cycle components: functional implications. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 1933-1947 (1994).
17. Ataide, S. F. et al. The crystal structure of the signal recognition particle in complex with its receptor. Science 331, 881-886 (2011).
18. Ha, T. et al. Probing the interaction between two single molecules: fluorescence resonance energy transfer between a single donor and a single acceptor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 6264-6268 (1996).
19. Roy, R., Hohng, S. & Ha, T. A practical guide to single-molecule FRET. Nature Methods 5, 507-516 (2008).
20. McKinney, S. A., Joo, C.& Ha, T. Analysis of single-molecule FRET trajectories using hidden Markov modeling. Biophys. J. 91, 1941-1951 (2006).
21. Shan, S. O., Chandrasekar, S. & Walter, P. Conformational changes in the GTPase modules of the signal reception particle and its initiation of protein translocation. J. Cell Biol. 178, 611-620 (2007).
22. Shan, S. O., Stroud, R. M. & Walter, P. Mechanism of association and reciprocal activation of two GTPases. PLoS Biol. 2, e320 (2004).
23. Zhang, X., Schaffitzel, C.,Ban, N.&Shan,S. O.Multiple conformational switches in a GTPase complex control co-translational protein targeting. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 1754-1759 (2009).
24. Zhang, X. et al. Direct visualization reveals dynamics of a transient intermediate during protein assembly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 6450-6455 (2011).
25. Halic, M. et al. Signal recognition particle receptor exposes the ribosomal translocon binding site. Science 312, 745-747 (2006).
26. Hoskins, A. A., Gelles, J. & Moore, M. J. New insights into the spliceosome by single molecule fluorescence microscopy. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 15, 864-870 (2011).
27. Lohman, T. M. & Bjornson, K. P. Mechanisms of helicase-catalyzed DNA unwinding. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65, 169-214 (1996).
28. Yodh, J. G., Schlierf, M. & Ha, T. Insight into helicase mechanism and function revealed through single-molecule approaches. Q. Rev. Biophys. 43, 185-217 (2010).
29. Yuan, R. Structure and mechanism of multifunctional restriction endonucleases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 50, 285-315 (1981).
30. Murray, N. E. Type I restriction systems: sophisticated molecular machines (a legacy of Bertani and Weigle). Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 64, 412-434 (2000).
31. Schaffitzel, C. & Ban, N. Generation of ribosome nascent chain complexes for structural and functional studies. J. Struct. Biol. 158, 463-471 (2007).
32. van der Sluis, E. O., Nouwen, N. & Driessen, A. J. SecY-SecY and SecY-SecG contacts revealed by site-specific crosslinking. FEBS Lett. 527, 159-165 (2002).
33. Ferré-D'Amaré, A. R.& Doudna, J. A. Use of cis-andtrans-ribozymes to remove 59 and 39 heterogeneities frommilligrams of in vitro transcribed RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 977-978 (1996).
34. Dalal, K.&Duong, F. Reconstitution of the SecY translocon in nanodiscs.Methods Mol. Biol. 619, 145-156 (2010).
35. Van den Berg, B. et al. X-ray structure of a protein-conducting channel. Nature 427, 36-44 (2004).
36. Mothes, W., Jungnickel, B., Brunner, J. & Rapoport, T. A. Signal sequence recognition in cotranslational translocation by protein components of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. J. Cell Biol. 142, 355-364 (1998).
37. Duong, F. Binding, activation and dissociation of the dimeric SecA ATPase at the dimeric SecYEG translocase. EMBO J. 22, 4375-4384 (2003).
38. Powers, T. & Walter, P. Co-translational protein targeting catalyzed by the Escherichia coli signal recognition particle and its receptor. EMBO J. 16, 4880-4886 (1997).