Let’s stop the pretence of consistent marking: exploring the multiple limitations of assessment criteria

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 466-481

  Bloxham, Sue ^a   den Outer, Birgit ^b   Hudson, Jane ^b   Price, Margaret ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CUMBRIA   (United Kingdom)

^b OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

assessment criteria; grading; marking; standards

Indexed keywords

EID: 84961137502     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1024607     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. J.Baird,, J.Greatorex, and J.F.Bell. 2004. “What Makes Marking Reliable? Experiments with UK Examinations.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 11 (3): 331–348. doi:10.1080/0969594042000304627.
2. D.Baume,, M.Yorke, and M.Coffey. 2004. “What is Happening When We Assess, and How Can We Use Our Understanding of This to Improve Assessment?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29 (4): 451–477. doi:10.1080/02602930310001689037.
3. A.Bell,, R.Mladenovic, and M.Price. 2013. “Students’ Perceptions of the Usefulness of Marking Guides, Grade Descriptors and Annotated Exemplars.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (7): 769–788. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.714738.
4. S.Bloxham,, P.Boyd, and S.Orr. 2011. “Mark My Words: The Role of Assessment Criteria in UK Higher Education Grading Practices.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (6): 655–670. doi:10.1080/03075071003777716.
5. S.Bloxham,, B.den Outer, J.Hudson, and M.Price. Forthcoming. “External Peer Review of Assessment: An Effective Approach to Verifying Standards?” Higher Education Research and Development.
6. B.Broad, 2003. What We Really Value: Beyond Rubrics in Teaching and Assessing Writing. Logan: Utah State University Press.
7. V.Crisp, 2008. “Exploring the Nature of Examiner Thinking During the Process of Examination Marking.” Cambridge Journal of Education 38 (2): 247–264. doi:10.1080/03057640802063486.
8. K.Ecclestone, 2001. “I Know a 2:1 When I See It: Understanding Criteria for Degree Classifications in Franchised University Programmes.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 25 (3): 301–313. doi:10.1080/03098770126527.
9. F.Fransella,, D.Bannister, and R.Bell. 2003. A Manual for Repertory Grid Technique. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley.
10. P.Grainger,, K.Purnell, and R.Zipf. 2008. “Judging Quality Through Substantive Conversations Between Markers.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33 (2): 133–142. doi:10.1080/02602930601125681.
11. J.Greatorex, 2000. “Is the Glass Half Full or Half Empty? What Examiners Really Think of Candidates’ Achievement.” Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Conference, Cardiff, September 7–10, 2000.
12. L.Hand,, and D.Clewes. 2000. “Marking the Difference: An Investigation of the Criteria Used for Assessing Undergraduate Dissertations in a Business School.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 25 (1): 5–21. doi:10.1080/713611416.
13. I.P.Herbert,, J.Joyce, and T.Hassall. 2014. “Assessment in Higher Education: The Potential for a Community of Practice to Improve Inter-marker Reliability.” Accounting Education 23 (6): 542–561. doi:10.1080/09639284.2014.974195.
14. J.Heywood, 2000. Assessment in Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley.
15. K.Hunter,, and P.Docherty. 2011. “Reducing Variation in the Assessment of Student Writing.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (1): 109–124. doi:10.1080/02602930903215842.
16. P.A.Moss,, and A.Schutz. 2001. “Educational Standards, Assessment, and the Search for Consensus.” American Educational Research Journal 38 (1): 37–70. doi:10.3102/00028312038001037.
17. S.R.O’Hagan,, and G.Wigglesworth. 2014. “Who’s Marking My Essay? The Assessment of Non-native-speaker and Native-speaker Undergraduate Essays in an Australian Higher Education Context.” Studies in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.896890.
18. J.Orrell, 2008. “Assessment Beyond Belief: The Cognitive Process of Grading.” In Balancing Dilemmas in Assessment and Learning in Contemporary Education, edited by A.Havnes and L.McDowell, 251–263. London: Routledge.
19. M.Price, 2005. “Assessment Standards: The Role of Communities of Practice and the Scholarship of Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (3): 215–230. doi:10.1080/02602930500063793.
20. B.Read,, B.Francis, and J.Robson. 2005. “Gender, Bias, Assessment and Feedback: Analyzing the Written Assessment of Undergraduate History Essays.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (3): 241–260. doi:10.1080/02602930500063827.
21. D.R.Sadler, 1989. “Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems.” Instructional Science 18 (2): 119–144.10.1007/BF00117714
22. D.R.Sadler, 2009. “Indeterminancy in the Use of Preset Criteria for Assessment and Grading.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (2): 159–179. doi:10.1080/02602930801956059.
23. S.Shay, 2005. “The Assessment of Complex Tasks: A Double Reading.” Studies in Higher Education 30 (6): 663–679. doi:10.1080/03075070500339988.
24. E.Smith,, and K.Coombe. 2006. “Quality and Qualms in the Marking of University Assignments by Sessional Staff: An Exploratory Study.” Higher Education 51 (1): 45–69. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-6376-7.
25. J.Swann,, and K.Ecclestone. 1999. “Litigation and Learning: Tensions in Improving University Lecturers’ Assessment Practice.” Assessment in Education 6 (3): 357–375. doi:10.1080/09695949992801.
26. K.Watty,, M.Freeman, B.Howieson, P.Hancock, B.O’Connell, P.de Lange, and A.Abraham. 2013. “Social Moderation, Assessment and Assuring Standards for Accounting Graduates.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (4): 461–478. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.848336.
27. F.Webster,, D.Pepper, and A.Jenkins. 2000. “Assessing the Undergraduate Dissertation.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 25 (1): 71–80. doi:10.1080/02602930050025042.
28. A.Wolf, 1995. Competence-based Assessment. Buckingham: Open University Press.
29. M.Yorke, 2008. Grading Student Achievement in Higher Education: Signals and Shortcomings. Abingdon: Routledge.
30. M.Yorke, 2011. “Summative Assessment: Dealing with the ‘Measurement Fallacy’.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (3): 251–273. doi:10.1080/03075070903545082.