Analysing the scientific evolution of e-Government using a science mapping approach

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 545-555

  Alcaide–Muñoz, Laura ^a   Rodríguez–Bolívar, Manuel Pedro ^a   Cobo, Manuel Jesús ^b   Herrera–Viedma, Enrique ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CÁDIZ   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bibliometric studies; Co word analysis; e Government; Science mapping; Thematic evolution

Indexed keywords

EID: 85027411360     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2017.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Akkaya, C., Wolf, P., Krcmar, H., The role of trust in e-government adoption: literature review. AMCIS 2010 proceeding, 2010, 297.
2. Alcaide Muñoz, L., Rodríguez Bolívar, M.P., Understanding e-government research. Internet Research 25:4 (2015), 633–673.
3. Alcaide Muñoz, L., Rodríguez Bolívar, M.P., Garde Sánchez, R., Estudio cienciométrico de la investigación en transparencia informativa, participación ciudadana y prestación de servicios públicos mediante la implementación del e-Gobierno. Revista de Contabilidad 17:2 (2014), 130–142.
4. Alcaide Muñoz, L., Rodríguez Bolívar, M.P., López Hernández, A.M., Transparency in government a meta-analytic review of incnetives for digital versus hard-copy public financial disclosures. American Review of Public Administration, 2016, 10.1177/0275074016629008.
5. Allwinkle, S., Cruickshank, P., Creating smart-er cities: An overview. Journal of Urban Technology 18:2 (2011), 1–16.
6. Andersen, K.V., Henriksen, H.Z., The first leg of e-government research: Domains and application areas 1998–2003. Anttiroiko, A.V., (eds.) Electronic government: Concepts, methodologies, tools and applications, 2005, IGI Global, Hershey, New York, 8–22.
7. Andersen, K.V., Henriksen, H.Z., E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model. Government Information Quarterly 232:2 (2006), 236–248.
8. Anttiroiko, A.V., Valkama, P., Bailey, S.J., Smart cities in the new service economy: Building platforms for smart services. AI & Society 29:3 (2014), 323–334.
9. Archambeault, J., Bidian, C., Evans, M., Mapping knowledge domains to better forecast the future: Challenges at the National Research Council Canada. In proceedings of the annual conference of CAIS/Actes du congrès annuel de l'ACSI, 2016, August.
10. Arduini, D., Zanfei, A., An overview of scholarly research on public e-services? A meta-analysis of the literature. Telecommunications Policy 38:5–6 (2014), 476–495.
11. Armstrong, C.L., Providing a clearer view: An examination of transparency on local government websites. Government Information Quarterly 28:1 (2011), 11–16.
12. Banaszak, B., Rodziewicz, K., Trust and security. Digital citizen cardas in Poland. Electronic government: 3rd international conference EGOV Lectures notes in computer science, 3183, 2004, 342–346.
13. Bannister, F., Connolly, R., A risk assessment framwork for electronic voting. International Journal of Tecnology, Policy and Management 7:2 (2007), 190–208.
14. Bélanger, F., Carter, L., Digitizing government interactions with constituents: An historical review of e-government research in information systems. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 13 (2012), 363–394 Special Issues.
15. Börner, K., Chen, C., Boyack, K.W., Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science 37:1 (2003), 179–255.
16. Callon, M., Courtial, J.P., Laville, F., Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics 22:1 (1991), 155–205.
17. Callon, M., Courtial, J.P., Turner, W.A., Bauin, S., From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information 22:2 (1983), 191–235.
18. Cegarra, N.J.G., Córdaba, P.J.R., Moreno, C.J.L., E-government and citizen's engagement with local affairs through e-websites: The case of Spanish municipalities. International Journal of Information Management 32 (2012), 469–478.
19. Chan, H.S., Chow, K.W., Public management policy and practice in western China: Metapolicy, tacit knowledge, and implications for management innovation transfer. American Review of Public Administration 37:4 (2007), 479–497.
20. Chen, P., Redner, S., Community structure of the physical review citation network. Journal of Informetrics 4:3 (2010), 278–290.
21. Cobo, M.J., López-Herrera, A.G., Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics 5:1 (2011), 146–166.
22. Cobo, M.J., López-Herrera, A.G., Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62:7 (2011), 1382–1402.
23. Cocosila, M., Serenko, A., Turel, O., Exploring the management information systems discipline: A scientometric study of ICIS, PACIS and ASAC. Scientometrics 87:1 (2011), 1–16.
24. Coulter, N., Monarch, I., Konda, S., Software engineering as seen through its research literature: A study in co-word analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49:13 (1998), 1206–1223.
25. Criado, J.L., Sandoval-Almazan, R., Gil-García, J.R., Government innovation through social media. Government Information Quarterly 30:4 (2013), 319–326.
26. Dawes, S.S., The evolution and continuing challenges of e-governance. Public Administration Review 68:s1 (2008), S86–S102.
27. Dwivedi, Y.K., Singh, M., Williams, M.D., Developing a demographic profile of scholarly community contributing to the electronic government, an International Journal. Electronic Government 8:2/3 (2011), 259–270.
28. Dwivedi, Y.K., Weerakkody, V., A profile of scholarly community contributing to the international Journal of electronic government research. International Journal of Electronic Government Research 6:4 (2010), 1–11.
29. Gant, J., Chen, Y.C., Transforming local e-government services: The use of application services providers. Government Information Quarterly 18:4 (2001), 343–355.
30. Garfield, E., Scientography: Mapping the tracks of science. Current Contents 7:45 (1994), 5–10.
31. Gasco, M., New technologies and institutional change in public administration. Social Science Computer Review 21:1 (2003), 6–14.
32. Gil-García, J., Pardo, T.A., E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government Information Quarterly 22:2 (2005), 187–216.
33. Girish, J.G., Williams, C.R., Yates, D.J., Predictors of on-line services and e-participation: A cross-national comparison. Government Information Quarterly 31:4 (2014), 526–533.
34. Granier, B., Kudo, H., How are citizens involved in smart cities? Analyzing citizen participation in Japanese “smart communities”. Information Polity 22:1 (2016), 61–76.
35. Grönlund, A., State of the art in e-gov research – A survey. Traunmüller, R., (eds.) EGOV 2004, lecture notes in computer science, 3183, 2004, Springer, Heidelberg, 178–185.
36. Haldenwang, C.V., Electronic government (e-government) and development. The European Journal of Development Research 16:2 (2004), 417–432.
37. Harder, C.T., Jordan, M.M., The transparency of county websites: A content analysis. Public Administration Quarterly 37:1 (2013), 103–128.
38. Harrison, T.M., Sayogo, D.S., Transparency, participation and accountability practices in open government: A comparative study. Government Information Quarterly 31:4 (2014), 513–525.
39. Hartley, J., Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money & Management 25:1 (2005), 27–34.
40. He, Q., Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends 48:1 (1999), 133–159.
41. Heeks, R., Bailur, S., Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Goverment Information Quarterly 24:2 (2007), 243–265.
42. Hofman, S., Räckers, M., Becker, J., Identifying factors of e-government acceptance – A literature review. Proceedings international conference on information systems (ICIS), 2012 Orlando, Florida, USA.
43. Holgersson, J., Karlsson, F., Public e-service development: Understanding citizens' conditions for participation. Government Information Quarterly 31:3 (2014), 396–410.
44. Hung, S.Y., Chang, C.M., Yu, T.J., Determinants of user acceptance of the e-government services: The case of online tax filing and payment system. Government Information Quarterly 23:1 (2006), 97–122.
45. Jaeger, P.T., Bertot, J.C., Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information. Government Information Quarterly 27:4 (2010), 371–376.
46. James, O., Evaluation the expectations disconfirmation and expectations anchoring approaches to citizen satisfaction with local public services. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19:1 (2009), 107–123.
47. Janssen, M., Scholl, H.J., Interoperability for electronic governance. Proceeding of the 1st international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance, 2007, 45–48.
48. Joseph, R.C., A structured analysis of e-government studies: Trends and opportunities. Government Information Quarterly 30:4 (2013), 435–440.
49. Kropczynski, J., Guoray, C., Carroll, J.M., Crating public value through open government: Perspectives, experiences and applications. Information Polity 20:2–3 (2015), 151–165.
50. Lakhal, N.B., Kobayashi, T., Yokota, H., An architecture for highly available distributed execution of web services compositions. Proceedings 14th international workshop on research issues on data engineering, 2004, 103–110.
51. Lee, W.H., How to identify emerging research fields using scientometrics: An example in the field of information security. Scientometrics 76:3 (2008), 503–525.
52. Linders, D., From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly 29:4 (2012), 446–454.
53. Lindgren, I., Jansson, G., Electronic services in the public sector: A conceptual framework. Government Information Quarterly 30:2 (2013), 163–172.
54. Mahrer, H., Krimer, R., Towards the enhancement of e-democracy: Identifying the notion of the “middleman paradox”. Information Systems Journal 15:1 (2005), 27–42.
55. Medaglia, R., eParticipation research: Moving characterization forward (2006–2011). Government Information Quarterly 29:3 (2012), 346–360.
56. Meijer, A., Rodríguez Bolívar, M.P., Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences 82:2 (2016), 392–408.
57. Melitski, J., Capacity and e-government performance: An analysis based on early adopters of internet technologies in New Jersey. Public Performance & Management Review 26:4 (2003), 376–390.
58. Michener, G., Bersch, K., Identifying transparency. Information Policy 18 (2013), 233–242.
59. Noyons, E.C.M., Moed, H.F., Van Raan, A.F.J., Integrating research performance analysis and science mapping. Scientometrics 46:3 (1999), 591–604.
60. Ntaliani, M., Costopoulou, C., Karetsos, S., Mobile government: A challenge for agriculture. Government Information Quarterly 25:4 (2008), 699–716.
61. Orlikowski, W.J., Iacono, C.S., Research commentary: Desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research – A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research 2:12 (2001), 121–134.
62. Parvez, Z., Informatization of local democracy: A structuration perspective. Information Policy 11:1 (2006), 67–83.
63. Picazo-Vela, S., Gutiérrez-Martínez, I., Luna-Reyes, L.F., Understanding risks, benefits, and strategic alternatives of social media applications in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly 29 (2012), 504–511.
64. Piro, G., Gianci, I., Grieco, L.A., Boggia, G., Camarda, P., Information centric services in smart cities. Journal of Systems and Software 88 (2014), 169–188.
65. Price, D., Gürsey, S., Studies in scientometrics I: Transience and continuance in scientific authorship. Ci. Informatics Rio de Janeiro 4:1 (1975), 27–40.
66. Puron-Cid, G., Factors for a successful adoption of budgetary transparency innovations: A questionnaire report of an open government initiative in Mexico. Government Information Quarterly 31:S1 (2014), S49–S62.
67. Rana, N.P., Dwivedi, Y.K., Williams, M.D., A meta-analysis of existing research on citizen adoption of e-government. Information Systems Frontiers 17:3 (2015), 547–563.
68. Reddick, C.G., Public-sector e-commerce and state financial management. Social Science Computer Review 22:3 (2004), 293–306.
69. Rodríguez Bolívar, M.P., Governance models for the delivery of public services through the web 2.0 technologies: A political view in large Spanish municipalities. Social Science Computer Review, 2015, 10.1177/0894439315609919.
70. Rodríguez Bolívar, M.P., The influence of political factors in policymakers' perception on the implementation of web 2.0 technologies for citizen participation and knowledge sharing in public sector delivery. Information Polity 20:2–3 (2015), 199–220.
71. Rodríguez Bolívar, M.P., Alcaide Muñoz, L., López Hernández, A.M., Determinants of financial transparency in government. International Public Management Journal 16:4 (2013), 557–602.
72. Rodríguez Bolívar, M.P., Alcaide Muñoz, L., López Hernández, A.M., Scientometric study of the progress and development of e-government research during the period 2000–2012. Information Technology for Development 22:1 (2016), 36–74.
73. Rose, A.K., Stanley, T.D., A meta-analysis of the effect of common currencies on international trade. Journal of Economic Surveys 19:3 (2005), 347–365.
74. Rosenthal, R., The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin 86:3 (1979), 638–641.
75. Sannarnes, M.K., Henrinken, H.Z., Andersen, K.V., The e-government melting pot: Lacking new public management and innovation flavor?. Wimmer, M.A., Scholl, H.J., Grönlund, A., Andersen, K.V., (eds.) EGOV 2006. Lecture notes in computer science, 4084, 2006, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
76. Scholl, H.J., Profiling the EG research community and its core. Wimmer, M.A., Scholl, H.J., Janssen, M., Traunmüller, R., (eds.) Electronic Government: 8th International Conference (EGOV 2009), 5693, 2009, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1–12.
77. Scholl, H.J., Electronic government. A study domain past its infancy. Scholl, H.J., (eds.) E-government: Information, technology, and transformation, 17, 2010, M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY, 11–32.
78. Scholl, H.J., Electronic government. Introduction to the domain. Scholl, H.J., (eds.) E-government: Information, technology, and transformation, 17, 2010, M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY, 3–10.
79. Scholl, H.J., Electronic goverment research: Topical directions and preferences. Wimmer, M.A., Janssen, M., Scholl, H.J., (eds.) Electronic government: Proceedings of the 12th IFIP WG 8.5 conference, EGOV 2013, 8074, 2013, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 1–13.
80. Scholl, H.J., Dwivedi, Y.K., Forums for electronic government scholars: Insight from a 2012/2013 study. Government Information Quarterly 31 (2014), 229–242.
81. The EGOV research community: An update on where we stand. Scholl, H.J., Janssen, M., Scholl, H.J., Wimmer, M., Bannister, F., (eds.) Electronic government: proceedings of the 13th IFIP WG 8.5 conference, EGOV 2014, 8653, 2014, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 1–16.
82. Sidorova, A., Evangelopoulos, N., Valacich, J.S., Ramakrishnan, T., Uncovering the intellectual core of the information systems discipline. MIS Quarterly 32:3 (2008), 467–482 Sepsis 2003.
83. Small, H., Update on science mapping: Creating large document spaces. Scientometrics 38:2 (1997), 275–293.
84. Small, H., Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50:9 (1999), 799–813.
85. Small, H., Tracking and predicting growth areas in science. Scientometrics 68:3 (2006), 595–610.
86. Smith, D.A., Fridkin, D., Delegating direct democracy: Interparty legislative competition and the adoption of the initiative in the American States. American Political Science Review 102 (2008), 333–350.
87. Snead, J.T., Wright, E., E-government research in the United States. Government Information Quarterly 31:1 (2014), 129–136 Jan.
88. Van Raan, A.F., Advances in bibliometric analysis: Research performance assessment and science mapping. Bibliometrics, 2014, 17–28.
89. Verdegem, P., Verleye, G., User-centered E-government in practice: A comprehensive model for measuring user satisfaction. Government Information Quarterly 26:3 (2009), 487–497.
90. Welch, E.W., Hinnant, C.C., Moon, M.J., Linking citizen satisfaction with E-government and trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15:3 (2005), 371–391.
91. West, D.M., E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review 64:1 (2004), 15–27.
92. Williams, C.B., Gulate, G.J., Social networks in political campaigns: Facebook and the congressional elections of 2006 and 2008. New Media & Society 15:1 (2013), 52–71.
93. Zheng, Y., Schachter, H.L., Holzer, M., The impact of government form on e-participation: A study of New Jersey municipalities. Government Information Quarterly 31:4 (2014), 653–659.