Factors for a successful adoption of budgetary transparency innovations: A questionnaire report of an open government initiative in Mexico

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 31, Issue SUPPL.1, 2014, Pages

  Puron Cid, Gabriel ^a  

^a CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN Y DOCENCIA ECONÓMICAS   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Budgeting; Factors of adoption; Open government; Questionnaire

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905560309     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.007     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Agranoff R., McGuire M. Big questions in public network management research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2001, 11:295-326.
2. Al-Khamauseh S., Lawrence E. Mobile government-Converging technologies and transition strategies. Article presented at DEXA 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 2006, 358-365.
3. Al-Khamayseh S., Lawrence E., Zmijewska A. Towards understanding success factors in interactive mobile government Available from:, ([Accessed December 13, 2013]). http://www.mgovernment.org.
4. Allen D., Kern T., Havenhand M. ERP critical success factors: An exploration of the contextual factors in public sector institutions, article presented at HICSS 2002. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference 2002.
5. Alton Y.K.Ch, Dion H.G., Rebecca P.A. Web 2.0 applications in government websites: Prevalence, use and correlations with perceived website quality. Online Information Review 2012, 36(2):175-195.
6. Al-Wohaibi M.A., et al. Fundamental risk factors in deploying IT/IS projects in Omani government organizations. Journal of Global Information Management 2002, 10(4):1-22.
7. Ambite J.L., et al. Data integration and access. Advances in digital government technology, human factors, and policy 2002, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA. W.J. McIver, A.K. Elmagarmid (Eds.).
8. Antlova K. Critical success factors for the implementation of ICT projects. CENTERIS 2010, part I, CCIS 2010, 151-157. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. J.E. Quintela Varajão (Ed.).
9. Bryman A. Social research methods 2004, Oxford University Press.
10. Byun D.-H., Finnie G. Evaluating usability, user satisfaction and intention to revisit for successful e-government websites. Electronic Government, and International Journal (EG) 2011, 8(1).
11. Carter L., Belanger F. The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance. Information Systems Journal 2005, 15:5-25.
12. Choudrie J., Weerakkody V., Jones S. Realising e-government in the UK: Rural and urban challenges. The Journal of Enterprise Information Management 2005, 18(5):568-585.
13. Cresswell A.M., Pardo T.A., Canestraro D.S., Dawes S.S. Why assess information sharing capability? 2005, Center for Technology in Government.
14. Cresswell A.M., Pardo T.A., Hassan S. Assessing capability for justice information sharing. The Proceedings of the 8th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference 2000.
15. Davenport E., Hall H. Organizational knowledge and communities of practice. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 2002, 36:171-222.
16. Dawes S.S. Interagency information sharing: Expected benefits, manageable risks. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 1996, 15(3):377-394.
17. Dawes S.S. Stewardship and usefulness: Policy principles for information-based transparency. Government Information Quarterly 2010, 27(4):377-383.
18. Dawes S.S., Eglene O. New models of collaboration for delivering government services: A dynamic model drawn from multi-national research. CTG working paper no. 01-2008 2008.
19. Dawes S.S., Helbig N. Information strategies for open government: Challenges and prospects for deriving public value from government transparency. Proceedings of EGOV 2010 2010, Vol. 6228/2010:50-60. Springer LNCS.
20. Dawes S.S., Helbig N., Gil-García J.R. Highlights: Exploring the feasibility of a digital government journal 2004, Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, NY.
21. Dawes S.S., Pardo T.A. Building collaborative digital government systems. Systematic constraints and effective practices. Advances in digital government. Technology, human factors, and policy 2002, 259-273. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA. W.J. McIver, A.K. Elmagarmid (Eds.).
22. De Lancer Julnes P., Holzer M. Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review 2001, 61(6):693-708.
23. Dirks K.T., Ferrin D.L. The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science 2001, 12(4):450-467.
24. Ewusi-Mensah K., Przasnyski Z.H. Factors contributing to the abandonment of. information systems development projects. Journal of Information Technology 1994, 9(3):185-201.
25. Finney S., Corbett M. ERP implementation: A compilation and analysis of critical success factors. Business Process Management Journal 2007, 13(3):329-347.
26. Fountain J.E. Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change 2001, The Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
27. Fu J.R., Farn C.K., Chao W.P. Acceptance of electronic tax filing: A study of taxpayer intentions. Information & Management 2006, 43:109-126.
28. Garson G.D. The promise of digital government. Digital government: Principles and best practices 2004, 2-15. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA. A. Pavlichev, G.D. Garson (Eds.).
29. Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2005). Enacting state websites: A mixed method study exploring open government success in multi-organizational settings. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY.
30. Gil-Garcia J.R., Pardo T.A. Open government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government Information Quarterly 2005, 22(2):187-216.
31. Grizzle G.A., Pettijohn C.D. Implementing performance-based program budgeting: A system-dynamics perspective. Public Administration Review 2002, 62(1). (January/February 2(X)2).
32. Harrison T.M., Guerrero S., Burke G.B., Cook M., Cresswell A., Helbig N., et al. Open government and e-government: Democratic challenges from a public value perspective. Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o 2011), June 12 2011.
33. Heeks R. Reinventing government in the information age 2001, Routledge, London.
34. Heeks Implementing and managing e-government. An international text 2006, Sage Publications, London.
35. Janssen M., Klievink Bram ICT-project failure in public administration: The need to include risk management in enterprise architectures. Article presented at the 11th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference (dg.o 2010) 2010.
36. Jiang J., Klein G. Software development risks to project effectiveness. The Journal of Systems and Software 2000, 52:3-10.
37. Joyce P.G. Linking performance and budgeting: Opportunities in the federal budget process 2004, IBM Center for the Business of Government, (October 2003-2nd Printing January 2004).
38. Joyce P.G., Lee R.D., Johnson R.W. Public budgeting systems 2004, Jones and Bartlett Publishers. 7th ed.
39. Kamal M.M. IT innovation adoption in the government sector: Identifying the critical success factors. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 2006, 19(2):192-222.
40. Koh L., Maguire S. Critical success factors for ICT development. Chapter in Koh and Maguire. Information science reference 2009, IGI Global Snippet.
41. Lathrop D., Ruma L. Open government. Collaboration, transparency and participation in practice 2010, O'Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol, CA: USA.
42. Melkers J.E., Willoughby K.G. Budgeters' view of state performance-budgeting systems: Distinctions across branches. Public Administration Review 2001, 61(1). (January/February).
43. Merkel I. Social media in the public sector. A guide to participation, collaboration and transparency in the networked world 2013, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA: USA.
44. Noveck B.S. Wiki government: How technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful 2009, Brookings Institution Press.
45. OECD Performance budgeting in OECD countries 2007, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.
46. Pardo T.A., Cresswell A.M., Dawes S.S., Burke G.B. Modeling the social and technical processes of interorganizational information integration. HICSS2004, 37th Hawaiian International Conference on System Sciences 2004.
47. Pardo T.A., Cresswell A.M., Thompson F., Zhang J. Knowledge sharing in cross-boundary information systems development. Journal of Information Technology and Management 2006, 7(4).
48. Pardo T.A., Gil-Garcia J.R., Burke G.B. Informal leadership and networks: Lessons from the response to the West Nile Virus outbreak. Expanding the knowledge economy: Issues, applications, case studies 2007, IOS Press, Amsterdam. P. Cunningham, M. Cunningham (Eds.).
49. Peterson R. Crafting information technology governance. Information Systems Management 2004, 21(4):7-22.
50. Pilling D., Boeltzing H. Moving toward e-government: effective strategies for increasing access and use of the internet among non-Internet users in the U.S. and U.K. The Proceedings of the 8th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference 2007, 35-46.
51. Puron-Cid G. Extending structuration theory: A study of an IT-enabled budget reform in Mexico 2010, (Ph.D.), University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York.
52. Puron-Cid G. Interdisciplinary application of structuration theory for e-government: A case study of an IT-enabled budget reform. Government Information Quarterly 2013, 30(2013):S46-S58.
53. Rocheleau B. Politics, accountability, and governmental information systems. Public information technology: Policy and management issues 2003, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA. G.D. Garson (Ed.).
54. Rockart J.F. Chief executives define their own data needs. Harvard Business Review 1979, 57:81-92.
55. Schaupp L.C., Carter L. E-voting: From apathy to adoption. The Journal of Enterprise Information Management 2005, 18(5):586-601.
56. Schick A. Getting performance budgeting to perform. Paper presented at the Conferencia Internacional de Presupuesto por Resultados, Mexico City 2008.
57. Scholl Hans J. Electronic government: A study domain past its infancy. Electronic government: Information, technology and transformation 2009, M.E. Sharpe, Armonk. H.J. Scholl (Ed.).
58. Titah R., Barki H. E-government adoption and acceptance: A literature review. International Journal of Electronic Government Research 2006, 2(3):23-57.
59. Van Reeth W. The bearable lightness of budgeting. An explorative research on the uneven implementation of performance oriented budget reform 2002, (Ph.D. Doctoral Degree Thesis), Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Germany.
60. Van Veenstra A.F., Marijn J., Tan Y.H. Towards an understanding of open government induced change-Drawing on organization and structuration theories. EGOV 2010. LCNS 6228 2010, 1-12. International Federation for Information Processing. M.A. Wimmer (Ed.).
61. West D.M. Digital government. Technology and public sector performance 2005, Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.
62. Yang T.-M., Maxwell T.A. Information-sharing in public organizations: A literature review of interpersonal, intra-organizational and inter-organizational success factors. Government Information Quarterly 2011, 28(2):164-175. (April 2011).
63. Zhang Y.J., Hsieh Ch.-T. Chinese citizens's opinions on e-government benefits, issues and critical success factors. Electronic Government, an international Journal (EG) 2010, 7(2).