A structured analysis of e-government studies: Trends and opportunities

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 435-440

  Joseph, Rhoda C ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

E government; Electronic government; Methodology; Methods; Mixed methods

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890160140     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.006     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Andersen K.V., Henriksen H.Z. The first leg of e-government research: Domains and application areas 1998-2003. International Journal of Electronic Government Research 2005, 1(14):26-44.
2. Cao J., Crews J.M., Lin M., Deokar A., Burgoon J., Nunamaker J.F. Interactions between system evaluation and theory testing: A demonstration of the power of a multifaceted approach to information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems 2006, 22(4):207-235.
3. Creswell J.W., Plano Clark V.L. Designing and conducting mixed methods research 2007, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.
4. Crotty M. The foundations of social research 2003, SAGE Publications, London.
5. Dwivedi Y.K. An analysis of e-government research published in Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy (TGPPP?). Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 2009, 3(1):7-15.
6. Esteves J., Joseph R.C. A comprehensive framework for the assessment of egovernment projects. Government Information Quarterly 2008, 25(1):118-132.
7. Evans D., Yen D.C. E-government: Evolving relationship of citizens and government, domestic, and international development. Government Information Quarterly 2006, 23(2):207-235.
8. Frandsen T.F., Nicolaisen J. Intradisciplinary differences in database coverage and the consequences for bibliometric research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2008, 59(10):1570-1581.
9. Gil-Garcia J.R., Pardo T.A. Multi-method approaches to digital government research: Value lessons and implementation challenges. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii 2006.
10. Heeks R., Bailur S. Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government Information Quarterly 2007, 24(2):243-265.
11. Helbig N., Gil-García J.R., Ferro E. Understanding the complexity of electronic government: Implications from the digital divide literature. Government Information Quarterly 2009, 26(1):89-97.
12. Hellriegel D., Slocum J.W. Organizational behavior 2008, South-Western Cengage Learning, Mason, OH.
13. Joseph R.C., Jeffers P.I. E-government maturity in the Caribbean nations. Journal of Global Information Technology Management 2009, 12(1):52-70.
14. Journal Citation Reports Journal summary list http://admin-apps.webofknowledge.com/JCR/JCR.
15. Ke W., Wei K.K. Understanding e-government project management: A positivist case study of Singapore. Journal of Global Information Technology Management 2006, 9(2):45-61.
16. Lau T.Y., Aboulhoson M., Lin C., Atkin D.J. Adoption of e-government in three Latin American countries: Argentina, Brazil and Mexico. Telecommunications Policy 2008, 32(2):88-100.
17. Lee S.M., Tan X., Trimi S. Current practices of leading e-government countries. Communications of the ACM 2005, 48(10):99-104.
18. Luk S.C.Y. The impact of leadership and stakeholders on the success/failure of e-government service: Using the case study of e-stamping service in Hong Kong. Government Information Quarterly 2009, 26(4):594-604.
19. Luna-Reyes L.F., Gil-Garcia J.R., Romero G. Towards a multidimensional model for evaluating electronic government: Proposing a more comprehensive and integrative perspective. Government Information Quarterly 2012, 29(3):324-334.
20. Potnis D.D. Measuring e-governance as an innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly 2010, 27(1):41-48.
21. Schneider J.W., Borlund P. Introduction to bibliometrics for construction and maintenance of thesauri: Methodical considerations. Journal of Documentation 2004, 60(5):524-549.
22. Senge P. The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization 2006, Doubleday/Currency, New York.
23. Sharifi M., Manian A. The study of the success indicators for pre-implementation activities of Iran's e-government development projects. Government Information Quarterly 2010, 27(1):63-69.
24. Teddlie C., Tashakkori A. Foundations of mixed methods research 2009, SAGE Publications Ltd., Thousand Oaks, CA.
25. Titah R., Barki H. E-government adoption and acceptance: Literature review. International Journal of Electronic Government Research 2006, 2(3):23-57.
26. Trkman P., Turk T. A conceptual model for the development of broadband and e-government. Government Information Quarterly 2009, 26(2):233-432.
27. Twinomurinzi H., Phahlamohlaka J., Byrne E. The small group subtlety of using ICT for participatory governance: A South African experience. Government Information Quarterly 2012, 29(2):203-211.
28. UNPAN United Nations e-government survey 2008: From e-government to connected governance. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Division for Public Administration and Development Management 2008, 246. [electronic version], (from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/UN/UNPAN028607.pdf).
29. UNPAN United Nations e-government survey 2012: E-government for the people. Department of Economic and Social Affairs 2012, 160. [electronic version], (http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan048065.pdf).
30. Vessey I., Ramesh V., Glass R.L. A unified classification system for research in the computing disciplines. Information and Software Technology 2005, 47:245-255.
31. Weber R. The rhetoric of positivism versus interpretivism: A personal view. MIS Quarterly 2004, 28(1):iii-xii.
32. Yin R.K. Case study research, design and methods 1994, Sage Publications, Newbury Park.