The evolution and continuing challenges of E-governance

Public Administration Review

Volumn 68, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2008, Pages

  Dawes, Sharon S ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54249097925     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: 15406210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00981.x     Document Type: Review

References (91)

1. Andersen, David F., Salvatore Belardo, and Sharon S. Dawes. 1994. Conceptual Frameworks for Strategic Information Management in the Public Sector. Public Productivity and Management Review 17 (4 335 53.
2. Andersen, David F., and Sharon S. Dawes. 1991. Government Information Management: A Primer and Casebook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice Hall.
3. Brown, Mary M. 2007. Understanding E-Government Benefits: An Examination of Leading-Edge Local Governments. American Review of Public Administration 37 (2 178 97.
4. Brown, Mary M., and Jeffrey L. Brudney. 2004. Achieving Advanced Electronic Government Services: Opposing Environmental Constraints. Public Performance and Management Review 28 (1 96 113.
5. Caudle, Sharon L., Wilpen L. Gorr, and Kathryn E. Newcomer. 1991. Key Information Systems Management Issues for the Public Sector. MIS Quarterly 15 (2 171 88.
6. Center for Digital Government. 2008. Digital States Survey 2006. http://www.centerdigitalgov.com/surveys.php?survey=states [accessed August 6, 2008].
7. Chen, Yu-Che, and James Perry. 2003. Outsourcing E-Government: Managing for Success. Public Performance and Management Review 26 (4 404 21.
8. Computer Science and Telecommunications Board. 2002. Information Technology Research, Innovation, and E-Government. Washington, DC : National Research Council.
9. Council for Excellence in Government. 2001. E-Government: The Next American Revolution. Washington, DC : Council for Excellence in Government.
10. Cresswell, Anthony M., G. Brian Burke, and Theresa A. Pardo. 2006. Advancing Return on Investment Analysis for Government IT: A Public Value Framework. Albany : Center for Technology in Government. http://www.ctg.albany. edu/publications/reports/advancing_roi [accessed August 6, 2008].
11. Cresswell, Anthony M., Theresa A. Pardo, Donna S. Canestraro, and Sharon S. Dawes. 2005. Why Assess Information Sharing Capability? Albany: Center for Technology in Government. http://www.ctg.albany.edu/publications/guides/ why_assess [accessed August 6, 2008].
12. Dawes, Sharon S. 1996. Interagency Information Sharing: Expected Benefits, Manageable Risks. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 15 (3 377 94.
13. Dawes, Sharon S., and Theresa A. Pardo. 2002. Building Collaborative Digital Government Systems: Systemic Constraints and Effective Practices. In Advances in Digital Government: Technology, Human Factors, and Policy, edited by William J. McIver, Jr., and Ahmed K. Elmagarmid, 259 74. Boston : Kluwer Academic.
14. Dawes, Sharon S., Peter A. Bloniarz, Kristine L. Kelly. 1999. Some Assembly Required: Building a Digital Government for the 21st Century. Albany : Center for Technology in Government.
15. Dawes, Sharon S., Natalie Helbig, Russell Hassan, and J. Ramon Gil-Garcia. 2006. New York State Information Technology Workforce Skills Assessment Statewide Survey Results. Albany : Center for Technology in Government.
16. Dorobek, Christopher J. 2007. 20 Things in 20 Years That Changed Government IT. Federal Computer Week, January 8.
17. Edmiston, Kelly D. 2003. State and Local E-Government: Prospects and Challenges. American Review of Public Administration 33 (1 20 45.
18. Eglene, Ophelia, Sharon S. Dawes, and Carrie A. Schneider. 2007. Authority and Leadership Patterns in Public Sector Knowledge Networks. American Review of Public Administration 37 (1 91 113.
19. Feinberg, Lotte F. 2004. FOIA, Federal Information Policy, and Information Availability in a Post-9/11 World. Government Information Quarterly 21 (4 439 60.
20. Fountain, Jane E. 2001. Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Washington, DC : Brookings Institution Press.
21. Fountain, Jane E. 2002. Information, Institutions and Governance: Advancing a Basic Social Science Research Program for Digital Government. Working Paper no. RWP03-004, National Center for Digital Government, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
22. Fountain, Jane E. 2007. Bureaucratic Reform and E-Government in the United States: An Institutional Perspective. Working Paper no. 7, National Center for Digital Government, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
23. Franzel, Joshua M., and David H. Coursey. 2004. Government Web Portals: Management Issues and the Approaches of Five States. In Digital Government: Principles and Best Practices, edited by Alexei Pavlichev and G. David Garson, 63 77. Hershey, PA : Idea Group.
24. Friedman, Batya, Alan Borning, Janet Davis, Brian Gill, Peter Kahn, Travis Kriplean, and Peyina Lin. 2008. Laying the Foundations for Public Participation and Value Advocacy: Interaction Design for a Large Scale Urban Simulation. Paper presented at the 9th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, Montreal, Canada. http://www.urbansim.org/papers/ friedman-dgo2008-foundations.pdf [accessed August 6, 2008].
25. Gil-Garcia, J. Ramon, James R. Costello, Theresa A. Pardo, and Derek Werthmuller. 2007. Invigorating E-Government through Emergent Technologies: XML as a Website Management Tool. International Journal of Electronic Governance 1 (1 52 78.
26. Gore, Al. 1993. From Red Tape to Results: Creating a Government That Works Better and Costs Less. Washington, DC : Government Printing Office.
27. Government Innovators Network. 2008. Innovation Awards Program, Ash Institute, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. http://www.innovations.harvard.edu/award_landing.html [accessed August 6, 2008].
28. Herrnson, Paul S., Richard G. Niemi, Michael J. Hanmer, Benjamin B. Bederson, and Frederick C. Conrad. 2008. Voting Technology: The Not-So-Simple Act of Casting a Ballot. Washington, DC : Brookings Institution Press.
29. Ho, Alfred Tat-Kei. 2002. Reinventing Local Governments and the E-Government Initiative. Public Administration Review 62 (4 434 44.
30. Holzer, Marc, Lung-Teng Hu, and Seok-Hwi Song. 2004. Digital Government and Citizen Participation in the United States. In Digital Government: Principles and Best Practices, edited by Alexei Pavlichev and G. David Garson, 306 19. Hershey, PA : Idea Group.
31. Jaeger, Paul T. 2002. Constitutional Principles and E-Government: An Opinion about Possible Effects of Federalism and the Separation of Powers on E-Government Policies. Government Information Quarterly 19 (4 357 68.
32. Jain, Abhijit, Munir Mandviwalla, and Rajiv D. Banker. 2007. Can Governments Create Universal Internet Access? The Philadelphia Municipal Wireless Network Story. Washington, DC : IBM Center for the Business of Government.
33. Kaylor, Charles, Randy Deshazo, and David Van Eck. 2001. Gauging E-Government: A Report on Implementing Services among American Cities. Government Information Quarterly 18 (4 293 307.
34. Kim, Soonhee. 2005. Factors Affecting State Government Information Technology Employee Turnover Intentions. American Review of Public Administration 35 (2 137 56.
35. Kohno, Tadayoshi, Adam Stubblefield, Aviel D. Rubin, and Dan S. Wallach. 2004. Analysis of an Electronic Voting System. Paper presented at the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, May 9-12. http://avirubin.com/vote.pdf [accessed August 6, 2008].
36. Kraemer, Kenneth L., and Jason Dedrick. 2003. Computing and Public Organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 7 (1 89 112.
37. Krysiak, Mark K., Carla Tucker, David Spitzer, and Kevin Hollland. 2004. E-Procurement: State Government Learns from the Private Sector. In Digital Government: Principles and Best Practices, edited by Alexei Pavlichev and G. David Garson, 149 68. Hershey, PA : Idea Group.
38. Layne, Karen, and Jungwoo Lee. 2001. Developing Fully Functional E-Government: A Four-Stage Model. Government Information Quarterly 18 (2 122 36.
39. Moon, M. Jae. 2004. From E-Government to M-Government? Emerging Practices in the Use of Mobile Technology by State Governments. Washington, DC : IBM Center for the Business of Government.
40. Moynihan, Donald P. 2004. Building Secure Elections: E-Voting, Security, and Systems Theory. Public Administration Review 64 (5 515 28.
41. Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC). 2008. Cybersecurity Awareness. http://www.msisac.org/awareness/oct05/csab05.pdf [accessed August 6, 2008].
42. National Association of State Chief Information Officers (NASCIO). 2005. 2004-05 NASCIO Compendium of Digital Government in the States. http://www.nascio.org/publications/compendium.cfm [accessed August 6, 2008].
43. National Association of State Chief Information Officers (NASCIO). 2007a. 2007 Recognition Awards for Outstanding Achievement in the Field of Information Technology. http://www.nascio.org/awards/2007awards/ [accessed August 6, 2008].
44. National Association of State Chief Information Officers (NASCIO). 2007b. Seek and Ye Shall Find? State CIOs Must Prepare Now for E-Discovery! http://www.nascio.org/publications/documents/NASCIO-EDiscovery.pdf [accessed August 6, 2008].
45. National Association of State Chief Information Officers (NASCIO). 2007c. State IT Workforce: Here Today, Gone Tomorrow? http://www.nascio.org/ publications/documents/NASCIO-HereTodayGone%20Tomorrow.pdf [accessed August 6, 2008].
46. National Commission on the State and Local Public Service (Winter Commission). 1993. Hard Truths/Tough Choices: An Agenda for State and Local Reform. Albany, NY : Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government.
47. National Governors Association, National Conference of State Legislatures, and American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (NGA/NCSL/AAMVA). 2006. The Real ID Act: National Impact Analysis. http://www.nga.org/files/pdf/0609realid.pdf [accessed August 6, 2008].
48. National Performance Review (NPR). 1993. Reengineering through Information Technology. Washington, DC : Government Printing Office.
49. National Science Foundation. 1999. Digital Government Program Announcement NSF 99-103. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/1999/nsf99103/nsf99103.txt [accessed August 6, 2008].
50. National Telecommunications and Information Administration. 1995. Falling through the Net: A Survey of the "Have Nots" in Rural and Urban America. http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fallingthru.html [accessed August 6, 2008].
51. Norris, Donald F., and M. Jae Moon. 2005. Advancing E-Government at the Grassroots: Tortoise or Hare? Public Administration Review 65 (1 64 75.
52. ODF Alliance. n.d. "Why ODF?" - The Importance of Open Document Format for Governments. http://www.odfalliance.org/resources/whyODF.pdf [accessed August 6, 2008].
53. O'Looney, John. 2003. Using Technology to Increase Citizen Participation in Government: The Use of Models and Simulation. Washington, DC : IBM Center for the Business of Government.
54. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2001. The Hidden Threat to E-Government: Avoiding Large Government IT failures. PUMA Policy Brief no. 8. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/19/12/1901677.pdf [accessed August 6, 2008].
55. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2003. The E-Government Imperative. Paris : OECD.
56. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2008. The E-Government Project. http://webdomin01.0ecd.org/COMNET/PUM/egovproweb.nsf [accessed August 6, 2008].
57. Osborne, David, and Ted Gaebler. 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley.
58. Pardo, Theresa A., G. Brian Burke, and Hyuckbin Kwon. 2006. Preserving State Government Digital Information: A Baseline Report. Albany : Center for Technology in Government http://www.ctg.albany.edu/publications/reports/ digital_preservation_baseline [accessed August 6, 2008].
59. Pardo, Theresa A., and Giri Tayi. 2007. Interorganizational Information Integration: A Key Enabler for Digital Government. Government Information Quarterly 24 (1 691 715.
60. Perry, James L., and Kenneth L. Kraemer. 1993. The Implications of Changing Technology. In Revitalizing State and Local Public Service: Strengthening Performance, Accountability, and Citizen Confidence, edited by Frank J. Thompson, 225 45. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
61. Pew Center on the States. 2007. Government Performance Project. http://www.gpponline.org/ [accessed August 6, 2008].
62. Prager, Jonas. 1994. Contracting out Government Services: Lessons from the Private Sector. Public Administration Review 54 (2 176 84.
63. Public Technology Institute (PTI). 2007. 2006-2007 Technology Solutions Awards. http://www.pti.org/index.php/ptiee1/more/44 [accessed August 6, 2008].
64. Quinn, Aimée C., and Laxmi Ramasubramanian. 2007. Information Technologies and Civic Engagement: Perspectives from Librarianship and Planning. Government Information Quarterly 24 (3 595 610.
65. Reed, B. J. 2005. Information Technology Management. In Paths to Performance in State and Local Government. Syracuse, NY : Maxwell School, Syracuse University.
66. Relyea, Harold C. 2002. E-Gov: Introduction and Overview. Government Information Quarterly 19 (1 9 35.
67. Rethemeyer, R. Karl. 2006. Policymaking in the Age of Internet: Is the Internet Tending to Make Policy Networks More or Less Inclusive? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17 (2 259 84.
68. Rocheleau, Bruce, ed. 2007. Case Studies on Digital Government. Hershey, PA : Idea Group.
69. Scholl, Hans. J. 2005. E-Government-Induced Business Process Change (BPC): An Empirical Study of Current Practices. International Journal of Electronic Government Research 1 (2 25 47.
70. Schorr, Herbert, and Salvatore Stolfo. 1997. Towards the Digital Government of the 21st Century: A Report from the Workshop on Research and Development Opportunities in Federal Information Services. Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California. http://dgsociety.org/library/ 1997_May_TOWARDS.pdf [accessed August 7, 2008].
71. Scott, James K. 2006. "E" the People: Do U.S. Municipal Government Web Sites Support Public Involvement? Public Administration Review 66 (3 341 53.
72. Seifert, Jeffrey W., and Glenn J. McLoughlin. 2007. State E-Government Strategies: Identifying Best Practices and Applications. Washington, DC : Congressional Research Service.
73. Stark, David, and Monique Girard. 2007. Socio-Technologies of Assembly: Sense-Making and Demonstration in Rebuilding Lower Manhattan. In Governance and Information: The Rewiring of Governing and Deliberation in the 21st Century, edited by David Lazer and Victor Mayer-Schoenberger, 145 75. New York : Oxford University Press.
74. State of New York. 2007. Executive Order 3, Promotion of Public Access to Government Decisionmaking. http://www.ny.gov/executive_orders/exeorders/3.html [accessed August 6, 2008].
75. Stowers, Genie. 2004. Measuring the Performance of E-Government. Washington, DC : IBM Center for the Business of Government.
76. Streib, Gregory D., and Katherine G. Willoughby. 2005. Local Governments as E-Governments: Meeting the Implementation Challenge. Public Administration Quarterly 29 (1 78 110.
77. Stromer-Galley, Jennifer, and Kirsten A. Foot. 2002. Citizen Perceptions of Online Interactivity and Implications for Political Campaign Communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 8 (1). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol8/ issue1/stromerandfoot.html [accessed August 6, 2008].
78. Tehan, Rita. 1999. Spinning the Web: The History and Infrastructure of the Internet. Washington, DC : Congressional Research Service.
79. UCLA Online Institute for Cyberspace Law and Policy (Archive). 2004. http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/iclp/hp/html [accessed August 6, 2008].
80. U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB). 2001. Report on Information Technology Spending for the Federal Government for Fiscal Years 2000, 2001, and 2002. Washington, DC : Government Printing Office.
81. U.S. Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). 1993. Making Government Work: Electronic Delivery of Federal Services. Washington, DC : Government Printing Office. OTA-TCT-578.
82. Van der Veen, Chad. 2007. Well, How Did We Get Here? Government Technology, December 17. http://www.govtech.com/gt/207181 [accessed August 6, 2008].
83. Waddell, Paul, and Alan Borning. 2004. A Case Study in Digital Government: Developing and Applying UrbanSim, a System for Simulating Urban Land Use, Transportation, and Environmental Impacts. Social Science Computer Review 22 (1 37 51.
84. Weaver, Matthew, Lois M. L. Delcambre, Marianne Lykke Nielsen, Susan Price, David Maier, and Timothy Tolle. 2007. Supporting Domain-Specific Digital Libraries in Government. Digital Government: E-Government Research, Case Studies, and Implementation no. 17. New York : Springer.
85. Welch, Eric W., and Sanjay K. Pandey. 2006. E-Government and Bureaucracy: Toward a Better Understanding of Intranet Implementation and Its Effect on Red Tape. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17 (3 379 404.
86. West, Darrell M. 2007. State and Federal E-Government in the United States, 2007. Taubman Center for Public Policy, Brown University. http://www.insidepolitics.org/egovt07us.pdf [accessed August 6, 2008].
87. White House. 1998. Presidential Decision Directive/NSC-63, Critical Infrastructure Protection. http://fas.org/irp/offdocs/pdd/pdd-63.htm [accessed August 6, 2008].
88. World Bank. n.d. Definition of E-Government. http://go.worldbank.org/ M1JHE0Z280 [accessed August 6, 2008].
89. World Wide Web Consortium. n.d. Extensible Markup Language (XML). http://www.w3.org/XML/ [accessed August 6, 2008].
90. Yang, Kaifeng, and James Melitski. 2007. Competing and Complementary Values in Information Technology Strategic Planning. Public Performance and Management Review 30 (3 426 52.
91. Zhang, Jing, and Sharon S. Dawes. 2006. Expectations and Perceptions of Benefits, Barriers, and Success in Public Sector Knowledge Networks. Public Performance and Management Review 29 (4 433 66.