TITER: Predicting translation initiation sites by deep learning

Bioinformatics

Volumn 33, Issue 14, 2017, Pages i234-i242

  Zhang, Sai ^a   Hu, Hailin ^b   Jiang, Tao ^a,c,d   Zhang, Lei ^b   Zeng, Jianyang ^a  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Tsinghua University   (China)

^c University of California Riverside   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; HUMAN; MACHINE LEARNING; MOUSE; OPEN READING FRAME; PROCEDURES; SOFTWARE; START CODON; TRANSLATION INITIATION;

ANIMALS; CODON, INITIATOR; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; HUMANS; MACHINE LEARNING; MICE; MODELS, GENETIC; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); OPEN READING FRAMES; PEPTIDE CHAIN INITIATION, TRANSLATIONAL; SOFTWARE;

EID: 85024488858     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx247     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (53)

1. Aken, B.L. et al. (2016) The Ensembl gene annotation system. Database, 2016.
2. Alipanahi, B. et al. (2015) Predicting the sequence specificities of DNA-and RNA-binding proteins by deep learning. Nat. Biotech., 33, 831-838.
3. Barbosa, C. et al. (2013) Gene expression regulation by upstream open reading frames and human disease. PLOS Genet., 9, e1003529.
4. Bengio, Y. (2012). Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade. In: Practical Recommendations for Gradient-Based Training of Deep Architectures, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 437-478.
5. Bergstra, J.S. et al. (2011). Algorithms for hyper-parameter optimization. In Shawe-Taylor, J. et al., eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 24. Curran Associates, Inc, pp. 2546-2554.
6. Calviello, L. et al. (2016) Detecting actively translated open reading frames in ribosome profiling data. Nat. Methods, 13, 165-170.
7. Calvo, S.E. et al. (2009) Upstream open reading frames cause widespread reduction of protein expression and are polymorphic among humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 106, 7507-7512.
8. Chew, G.-L. et al. (2016) Conservation of uORF repressiveness and sequence features in mouse, human and zebrafish. Nat. Commun., 7, 11663.
9. Collobert, R. et al. (2011) Natural language processing (almost) from scratch. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 12, 2493-2537.
10. UniProt Consortium (2015) Uniprot: A hub for protein information. Nucleic Acids Res., 43, D204-D212.
11. Denil, M. et al. (2012) Learning where to attend with deep architectures for image tracking. Neural Comput., 24, 2151-2184.
12. Ferreira, J.P. et al. (2013) Tuning gene expression with synthetic upstream open reading frames. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 110, 11284-11289.
13. Forbes, S.A. et al. (2015) COSMIC: Exploring the world's knowledge of somatic mutations in human cancer. Nucleic Acids Res., 43, D805-D811.
14. Gao, X. et al. (2015) Quantitative profiling of initiating ribosomes in vivo. Nat. Methods, 12, 147-153.
15. Geiger, T. et al. (2012) Comparative proteomic analysis of eleven common cell lines reveals ubiquitous but varying expression of most proteins. Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 11
16. Hassanzadeh, H.R., and Wang, M.D. (2016). DeeperBind: enhancing prediction of sequence specificities of DNA binding proteins. In: IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, BIBM 2016, Shenzhen, China, December 15-18, 2016, pp. 178-183.
17. Hatzigeorgiou, A.G. (2002) Translation initiation start prediction in human cDNAs with high accuracy. Bioinformatics, 18, 343-350.
18. Hershey, J.W. et al. (2012) Principles of translational control: an overview. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol., 4, a011528.
19. Hinnebusch, A.G. et al. (2016) Translational control by 5'-untranslated regions of eukaryotic mRNAs. Science, 352, 1413-1416.
20. Hinton, G. et al. (2012) Deep neural networks for acoustic modeling in speech recognition: The shared views of four research groups. IEEE Signal Process Mag., 29, 82-97.
21. Hinton, G.E., and Salakhutdinov, R.R. (2006) Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science, 313, 504-507.
22. Hinton, G.E. et al. (2006) A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Comput., 18, 1527-1554.
23. Ingolia, N.T. et al. (2009) Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nu-cleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science, 324, 218-223.
24. Ingolia, N.T. et al. (2012) The ribosome profiling strategy for monitoring translation in vivo by deep sequencing of ribosome-protected mRNA frag-ments. Nat. Protoc., 7, 1534-1550.
25. Jackson, R.J. et al. (2010) The mechanism of eukaryotic translation initiation and principles of its regulation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol., 11, 113-127.
26. Kozak, M. (1989) Context effects and inefficient initiation at non-AUG codons in eucaryotic cell-free translation systems. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 9, 5073-5080.
27. Kozak, M. (2002) Emerging links between initiation of translation and human diseases. Mamm. Genome, 13, 401-410.
28. Larochelle, H., and Hinton, G. (2010). Learning to combine foveal glimpses with a third-order boltzmann machine. In Lafferty, J. et al. eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, NY 12571, Vol. 23, pp. 1243-1251.
29. Lee, S. et al. (2012) Global mapping of translation initiation sites in mammalian cells at single-nucleotide resolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 109, E2424-E2432.
30. Lehninger, A. et al. (2008). Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry. W. H. Freeman, New York.
31. Li, H., and Jiang, T. (2005) A class of edit kernels for SVMs to predict translation initiation sites in eukaryotic mRNAs. J. Comput. Biol., 12, 702-718.
32. Lundberg, E. et al. (2010) Defining the transcriptome and proteome in three functionally different human cell lines. Mol. Syst. Biol., 6, 450.
33. Michel, A.M. et al. (2014) Computational approach for calculating the probability of eukaryotic translation initiation from ribo-seq data that takes into account leaky scanning. BMC Bioinform., 15, 380.
34. Nam, J.-W. et al. (2014) Global analyses of the effect of different cellular contexts on MicroRNA targeting. Mol. Cell, 53, 1031-1043.
35. Noderer, W.L. et al. (2014) Quantitative analysis of mammalian translation initiation sites by FACS-seq. Mol. Syst. Biol., 10, 748.
36. Peabody, D.S. (1989) Translation initiation at non-AUG triplets in mammalian cells. J. Biol. Chem., 264, 5031-5035.
37. Pedregosa, F. et al. (2011) Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 12, 2825-2830.
38. Quang, D., and Xie, X. (2016) DanQ: A hybrid convolutional and recurrent deep neural network for quantifying the function of DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res., 44, e107.
39. Reuter, K. et al. (2016) PreTIS: A tool to predict non-canonical 5' UTR transla-tional initiation sites in human and mouse. PLOS Comput. Biol., 12, e1005170.
40. Rumelhart, D.E. et al. (1986) Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323, 533-536.
41. Simonyan, K. et al. (2013). Deep inside convolutional networks: visualising image classification models and saliency maps. Workshop at International Conference on Learning Representations, CoRR, abs/1312.6034.
42. Sonenberg, N., and Hinnebusch, A.G. (2009) Regulation of translation initiation in eukaryotes: mechanisms and biological targets. Cell, 136, 731-745.
43. Srebro, N. et al. (2005). Maximum-margin matrix factorization. Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst., 17, 1329-1336.
44. Srivastava, N. et al. (2014) Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 15, 1929-1958.
45. Thomsen, M.C.F., and Nielsen, M. (2012) Seq2Logo: A method for construction and visualization of amino acid binding motifs and sequence profiles including sequence weighting, pseudo counts and two-sided representation of amino acid enrichment and depletion. Nucleic Acids Res., 40, W281-W287.
46. Wallace, B. et al. (2011). Class imbalance, redux. In: 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 754-763.
47. Waterman, M., and Smith, T. (1978) RNA secondary structure: A complete mathematical analysis. Math. Biosci., 42, 257-266.
48. Wolf, A. et al. (2011) Single base-pair substitutions at the translation initiation sites of human genes as a cause of inherited disease. Hum. Mutat., 32, 1137-1143.
49. Zhang, S. et al. (2015) A deep learning framework for modeling structural features of RNA-binding protein targets. Nucleic Acids Res., 44, e32.
50. Zhang, S. et al. (2016). ROSE: A deep learning based framework for predicting ribosome stalling. bioRxiv.
51. Zhou, J., and Troyanskaya, O.G. (2015) Predicting effects of noncoding variants with deep learning-based sequence model. Nat. Methods, 12, 931-934.
52. Zien, A. et al. (2000) Engineering support vector machine kernels that recognize translation initiation sites. Bioinformatics, 16, 799-807.
53. Zur, H., and Tuller, T. (2013) New universal rules of eukaryotic translation initiation fidelity. PLOS Comput. Biol., 9, e1003136.