PreTIS: A Tool to Predict Non-canonical 5’ UTR Translational Initiation Sites in Human and Mouse

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 12, Issue 10, 2016, Pages

  Reuter, Kerstin ^a   Biehl, Alexander ^a   Koch, Laurena ^a   Helms, Volkhard ^a  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORECASTING; MACROMOLECULES; MAMMALS;

HEK-293; INITIATION SITES; MICE EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; OPEN READING FRAME; PREDICTION ACCURACY; PROPERTY; SEQUENCE INFORMATIONS; START CODONS; STATISTICAL EVALUATION; TRANSLATIONAL INITIATION;

STEM CELLS;

5' UNTRANSLATED REGION; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL STRESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENETIC DATABASE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MEASUREMENT PRECISION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OPEN READING FRAME; PRETIS DATABASE; RNA SEQUENCE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; START CODON; STOP CODON; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; TRANSLATION INITIATION; TRANSLATION INITIATION SITE; VALIDATION PROCESS; WEB BROWSER; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; GENETICS; HEK293 CELL LINE; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROCEDURES; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION SITE;

5' UNTRANSLATED REGION; MESSENGER RNA;

5' UNTRANSLATED REGIONS; ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; HEK293 CELLS; HUMANS; MICE; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; RNA, MESSENGER; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, RNA; SOFTWARE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION SITE;

EID: 84994187965     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005170     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Peabody DS, Translation initiation at non-AUG triplets in mammalian cells. J Biol Chem. 1989Mar;264(9):5031–5035. 2538469
2. Kozak M, Context effects and inefficient initiation at non-AUG codons in eucaryotic cell-free translation systems. Mol Cell Biol. 1989Nov;9(11):5073–5080. doi: 10.1128/MCB.9.11.50732601709
3. Lee S, Liu B, Lee S, Huang SX, Shen B, Qian SB, Global mapping of translation initiation sites in mammalian cells at single-nucleotide resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:E2424–2432. doi: 10.1073/pnas.120784610922927429
4. Ingolia NT, Lareau LF, Weissman JS, Ribosome profiling of mouse embryonic stem cells reveals the complexity and dynamics of mammalian proteomes. Cell. 2011Nov;147(4):789–802. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.00222056041
5. Calviello L, Mukherjee N, Wyler E, Zauber H, Hirsekorn A, Selbach M, et al. Detecting actively translated open reading frames in ribosome profiling data. Nat Methods. 2015Dec;. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.368826657557
6. Ivanov IP, Firth AE, Michel AM, Atkins JF, Baranov PV, Identification of evolutionarily conserved non-AUG-initiated N-terminal extensions in human coding sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:4220–4234. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr00721266472
7. Ingolia NT, Ribosome profiling: new views of translation, from single codons to genome scale. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15:205–213. doi: 10.1038/nrg364524468696
8. Ingolia NT, Ghaemmaghami S, Newman JR, Weissman JS, Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science. 2009;324:218–223. doi: 10.1126/science.116897819213877
9. Brar GA, Weissman JS, Ribosome profiling reveals the what, when, where and how of protein synthesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015Nov;16(11):651–664. doi: 10.1038/nrm406926465719
10. Hann SR, Dixit M, Sears RC, Sealy L, The alternatively initiated c-Myc proteins differentially regulate transcription through a noncanonical DNA-binding site. Genes Dev. 1994;8:2441–2452. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.20.24417958908
11. Vagner S, Touriol C, Galy B, Audigier S, Gensac MC, Amalric F, et al. Translation of CUG- but not AUG-initiated forms of human fibroblast growth factor 2 is activated in transformed and stressed cells. J Cell Biol. 1996;135:1391–1402. doi: 10.1083/jcb.135.5.13918947560
12. Touriol C, Bornes S, Bonnal S, Audigier S, Prats H, Prats AC, et al. Generation of protein isoform diversity by alternative initiation of translation at non-AUG codons. Biol Cell. 2003;95:169–178. doi: 10.1016/S0248-4900(03)00033-912867081
13. Hatzigeorgiou AG, Translation initiation start prediction in human cDNAs with high accuracy. Bioinformatics. 2002;18:343–350. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.2.34311847092
14. Saeys Y, Abeel T, Degroeve S, Van de Peer Y, Translation initiation site prediction on a genomic scale: beauty in simplicity. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:i418–423. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm17717646326
15. Sparks ME, Brendel V, MetWAMer: eukaryotic translation initiation site prediction. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:381. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-38118801175
16. Chen W, Feng PM, Deng EZ, Lin H, Chou KC, iTIS-PseTNC: a sequence-based predictor for identifying translation initiation site in human genes using pseudo trinucleotide composition. Anal Biochem. 2014;462:76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2014.06.02225016190
17. Tatusov T, Tatusov R. ORF Finder; accessed 14-1-2015.
18. Min XJ, Butler G, Storms R, Tsang A, OrfPredictor: predicting protein-coding regions in EST-derived sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:W677–680. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki39415980561
19. Crappe J, Van Criekinge W, Trooskens G, Hayakawa E, Luyten W, Baggerman G, et al. Combining in silico prediction and ribosome profiling in a genome-wide search for novel putatively coding sORFs. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:648. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-64824059539
20. Michel AM, Andreev DE, Baranov PV, Computational approach for calculating the probability of eukaryotic translation initiation from ribo-seq data that takes into account leaky scanning. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014;15:380. doi: 10.1186/s12859-014-0380-425413677
21. Kinsella RJ, Kahari A, Haider S, Zamora J, Proctor G, Spudich G, et al. Ensembl BioMarts: a hub for data retrieval across taxonomic space. Database (Oxford). 2011;2011:bar030. doi: 10.1093/database/bar03021785142
22. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-42120003500
23. Edgar RC, MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics. 2004;5:113. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-5-11315318951
24. Kozak M, Compilation and analysis of sequences upstream from the translational start site in eukaryotic mRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984;12:857–872. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.2.8576694911
25. Kozak M, Point mutations define a sequence flanking the AUG initiator codon that modulates translation by eukaryotic ribosomes. Cell. 1986;44:283–292. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90762-23943125
26. Noderer WL, Flockhart RJ, Bhaduri A, Diaz de Arce AJ, Zhang J, Khavari PA, et al. Quantitative analysis of mammalian translation initiation sites by FACS-seq. Mol Syst Biol. 2014;10:748. doi: 10.15252/msb.2014513625170020
27. Kozak M, Circumstances and mechanisms of inhibition of translation by secondary structure in eucaryotic mRNAs. Mol Cell Biol. 1989;9:5134–5142. doi: 10.1128/MCB.9.11.51342601712
28. Kozak M, Downstream secondary structure facilitates recognition of initiator codons by eukaryotic ribosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:8301–8305. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.21.83012236042
29. Kozak M, Structural features in eukaryotic mRNAs that modulate the initiation of translation. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:19867–19870. 1939050
30. Lorenz R, Bernhart SH, Honer Zu Siederdissen C, Tafer H, Flamm C, Stadler PF, et al. ViennaRNA Package 2.0. Algorithms Mol Biol. 2011;6:26. doi: 10.1186/1748-7188-6-2622115189
31. Zhang L, Kasif S, Cantor CR, Broude NE, GC/AT-content spikes as genomic punctuation marks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:16855–16860. doi: 10.1073/pnas.040782110115548610
32. Gould IR, Kollman PA, Theoretical Investigation of the Hydrogen Bond Strengths in Guanine-Cytosine and Adenine-Thymine Base Pairs. J Am Chem Soc. 1994;116:2493–2499. doi: 10.1021/ja00085a033
33. Liu H, Wong L, Data mining tools for biological sequences. J Bioinform Comput Biol. 2003;1:139–167. doi: 10.1142/S021972000300021615290785
34. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, et al. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2011;12:2825–2830.
35. Kozak M, The scanning model for translation: an update. J Cell Biol. 1989;108:229–241. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.2.2292645293
36. The UniProt ConsortiumUniProt: a hub for protein information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:D204–212. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku98925348405
37. Boeck R, Kolakofsky D, Positions +5 and +6 can be major determinants of the efficiency of non-AUG initiation codons for protein synthesis. EMBO J. 1994Aug;13(15):3608–3617. 8062835
38. Kozak M, At least six nucleotides preceding the AUG initiator codon enhance translation in mammalian cells. J Mol Biol. 1987;196:947–950. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90418-93681984
39. Kozak M, An analysis of 5’-noncoding sequences from 699 vertebrate messenger RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987;15:8125–8148. 3313277