Conservation of uORF repressiveness and sequence features in mouse, human and zebrafish

Nature Communications

Volumn 7, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Chew, Guo Liang ^a,e   Pauli, Andrea ^a,f   Schier, Alexander F ^a,b,c,d  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BROAD INSTITUTE OF MIT AND HARVARD   (United States)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d HARVARD STEM CELL INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e USA   (United States)

^f RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYPRINID; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOME; HUMAN BEHAVIOR; RODENT;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; DNA FLANKING REGION; DNA TRANSCRIPTION; HUMAN VERSUS ANIMAL COMPARISON; LEADERSHIP; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OPEN READING FRAME; PREVALENCE; RIBOSOME; STATISTICAL MODEL; ZEBRA FISH; 5' UNTRANSLATED REGION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; GENETICS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; REGULATORY RNA SEQUENCE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

DANIO RERIO; VERTEBRATA;

MESSENGER RNA;

5' UNTRANSLATED REGIONS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MICE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; OPEN READING FRAMES; PROTEIN BIOSYNTHESIS; REGULATORY SEQUENCES, RIBONUCLEIC ACID; RIBOSOMES; RNA, MESSENGER; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, RNA; ZEBRAFISH;

EID: 84969919834     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11663     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Jackson, R. J., Hellen, C. U. T. & Pestova, T. V. The mechanism of eukaryotic translation initiation and principles of its regulation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 113-127 (2010).
2. Hinnebusch, A. G. Molecular mechanism of scanning and start codon selection in eukaryotes. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 75, 434-467 (2011).
3. Kozak, M. Pushing the limits of the scanning mechanism for initiation of translation. Gene 299, 1-34 (2002).
4. Sonenberg, N. & Hinnebusch, A. G. Regulation of translation initiation in eukaryotes: mechanisms and biological targets. Cell 136, 731-745 (2009).
5. Hood, H. M., Neafsey, D. E., Galagan, J. & Sachs, M. S. Evolutionary roles of upstream open reading frames in mediating gene regulation in fungi. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 63, 385-409 (2009).
6. Iacono, M., Mignone, F. & Pesole, G. uAUG and uORFs in human and rodent 50untranslated mRNAs. Gene 349, 97-105 (2005).
7. Matsui, M., Yachie, N., Okada, Y., Saito, R. & Tomita, M. Bioinformatic analysis of post-transcriptional regulation by uORF in human and mouse. FEBS Lett. 581, 4184-4188 (2007).
8. Calvo, S. E., Pagliarini, D. J. & Mootha, V. K. Upstream open reading frames cause widespread reduction of protein expression and are polymorphic among humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 7507-7512 (2009).
9. Chew, G.-L. et al. Ribosome profiling reveals resemblance between long non-coding RNAs and 50 leaders of coding RNAs. Development 140, 2828-2834 (2013).
10. Ingolia, N. T., Lareau, L. F. & Weissman, J. S. Ribosome profiling of mouse embryonic stem cells reveals the complexity and dynamics of mammalian proteomes. Cell 147, 789-802 (2011).
11. Stumpf, C. R., Moreno, M. V, Olshen, A. B., Taylor, B. S. & Ruggero, D. The translational landscape of the mammalian cell cycle. Mol. Cell 52, 574-582 (2013).
12. Lee, S. et al. Global mapping of translation initiation sites in mammalian cells at single-nucleotide resolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E2424-E2432 (2012).
13. Fritsch, C. et al. Genome-wide search for novel human uORFs and N-terminal protein extensions using ribosomal footprinting. Genome Res. 22, 2208-2218 (2012).
14. Bazzini, A. A. et al. Identification of small ORFs in vertebrates using ribosome footprinting and evolutionary conservation. EMBO J. 33, 981-993 (2014).
15. Ingolia, N. T. et al. Ribosome profiling reveals pervasive translation outside of annotated protein-coding genes. Cell Rep. 8, 1365-1379 (2014).
16. Fields, A. P. et al. A regression-based analysis of ribosome-profiling data reveals a conserved complexity to mammalian translation. Mol. Cell 60, 816-827 (2016).
17. Oyama, M. et al. Analysis of small human proteins reveals the translation of upstream open reading frames of mRNAs. Genome Res. 14, 2048-2052 (2004).
18. Slavoff, S. A. et al. Peptidomic discovery of short open reading frame-encoded peptides in human cells. Nat. Chem. Biol. 9, 59-64 (2013).
19. Menschaert, G. et al. Deep proteome coverage based on ribosome profiling aids mass spectrometry-based protein and peptide discovery and provides evidence of alternative translation products and near-cognate translation initiation events. Mol. Cell Proteomics 12, 1780-1790 (2013).
20. Kim, M.-S. et al. A draft map of the human proteome. Nature 509, 575-581 (2014).
21. Ingolia, N. T., Brar, G. A., Rouskin, S., McGeachy, A. M. & Weissman, J. S. The ribosome profiling strategy for monitoring translation in vivo by deep sequencing of ribosome-protected mRNA fragments. Nat. Protoc. 7, 1534-1550 (2012).
22. Kozak, M. Effects of intercistronic length on the efficiency of reinitiation by eucaryotic ribosomes. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 3438-3445 (1987).
23. Neafsey, D. E. & Galagan, J. E. Dual modes of natural selection on upstream open reading frames. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1744-1751 (2007).
24. Pestova, T. V. & Kolupaeva, V. G. The roles of individual eukaryotic translation initiation factors in ribosomal scanning and initiation codon selection. Genes Dev. 16, 2906-2922 (2002).
25. Lorenz, R. et al. ViennaRNA Package 2.0. Algorithms Mol. Biol. 6, 26 (2011).
26. Jackson, R. J., Kaminski, A. & Pöyry, T. A. A. in Translational Control in Biology and Medicine (eds Mathews, M. B., Sonenberg, N. & Hershey, J. W. B.) 197-223 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2007).
27. Zur, H. & Tuller, T. New universal rules of eukaryotic translation initiation fidelity. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1003136 (2013).
28. Brar, G. A. et al. High-resolution view of the yeast meiotic program revealed by ribosome profiling. Science 335, 552-557 (2012).
29. Fraser, C. S. Quantitative studies of mRNA recruitment to the eukaryotic ribosome. Biochimie 114, 58-71 (2015).
30. Chan, E. T. et al. Conservation of core gene expression in vertebrate tissues. J. Biol. 8, 33 (2009).
31. Pelechano, V., Wei, W. & Steinmetz, L. M. Extensive transcriptional heterogeneity revealed by isoform profiling. Nature 497, 127-131 (2013).
32. Arribere, J. A. & Gilbert, W. V. Roles for transcript leaders in translation and mRNA decay revealed by transcript leader sequencing. Genome Res. 23, 977-987 (2013).
33. Wethmar, K., Barbosa-Silva, A., Andrade-Navarro, M. A. & Leutz, A. UORFdb - A comprehensive literature database on eukaryotic uORF biology. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D60-D67 (2014).
34. Noderer, W. L. et al. Quantitative analysis of mammalian translation initiation sites by FACS-seq. Mol. Syst. Biol. 10, 748 (2014).
35. Pop, C. et al. Causal signals between codon bias, mRNA structure, and the efficiency of translation and elongation. Mol. Syst. Biol. 10, 770 (2014).
36. Darnell, J. C. et al. FMRP stalls ribosomal translocation on mRNAs linked to synaptic function and autism. Cell 146, 247-261 (2011).
37. Gkogkas, C. G. et al. Autism-related deficits via dysregulated eIF4E-dependent translational control. Nature 493, 371-377 (2013).
38. Thoreen, C. C. et al. A unifying model for mTORC1-mediated regulation of mRNA translation. Nature 485, 109-113 (2012).
39. Trinh, L. A., Meyer, D. & Stainier, D. Y. R. The Mix family homeodomain gene bonnie and clyde functions with other components of the Nodal signaling pathway to regulate neural patterning in zebrafish. Development 130, 4989-4998 (2003).
40. Xue, S. et al. RNA regulons in Hox 50 UTRs confer ribosome specificity to gene regulation. Nature 517, 33-38 (2015).
41. Andreev, D. E. et al. Translation of 50 leaders is pervasive in genes resistant to eIF2 repression. Elife 4, e03971 (2015).
42. Meyer, K. D. et al. 50 UTR m6A Promotes Cap-Independent Translation. Cell 163, 999-1010 (2015).
43. Atger, F. et al. Circadian and feeding rhythms differentially affect rhythmic mRNA transcription and translation in mouse liver. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E6579-E6588 (2015).
44. Li, G. W., Burkhardt, D., Gross, C. & Weissman, J. S. Quantifying absolute protein synthesis rates reveals principles underlying allocation of cellular resources. Cell 157, 624-635 (2014).
45. Ghaemmaghami, S. et al. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425, 737-741 (2003).
46. Li, J. J., Bickel, P. J. & Biggin, M. D. System wide analyses have underestimated protein abundances and the importance of transcription in mammals. PeerJ 2, e270 (2014).
47. Jovanovic, M. et al. Dynamic profiling of the protein life cycle in response to pathogens. Science 347, 1259038 (2015).
48. Battle, A. et al. Impact of regulatory variation from RNA to protein. Science 347, 664-667 (2015).
49. Barbosa, C., Peixeiro, I. & Romaõ, L. Gene expression regulation by upstream open reading frames and human disease. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003529 (2013).
50. Trapnell, C. et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat. Protoc. 7, 562-578 (2012).
51. Pérez, F. & Granger, B. E. IPython: A system for interactive scientific computing. Comput. Sci. Eng. 9, 21-29 (2007).
52. Michel, A. M., Andreev, D. E. & Baranov, P. V. Computational approach for calculating the probability of eukaryotic translation initiation from ribo-seq data that takes into account leaky scanning. BMC Bioinformatics 15, 380 (2014).
53. Crooks, G. E., Hon, G., Chandonia, J. M. & Brenner, S. E. WebLogo: A sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 14, 1188-1190 (2004).
54. Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Mach. Learn. 12, 2825-2830 (2012).