Common and distinct components in data fusion

Journal of Chemometrics

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2017, Pages

  Smilde, Age K ^a   Måge, Ingrid ^b   Næs, Tormod ^b   Hankemeier, Thomas ^c   Lips, Mirjam Anne ^d   Kiers, Henk A L ^e   Acar, Ervim ^f   Bro, Rasmus ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b NOFIMA   (Norway)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^f UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

DISCO; GSVD; JIVE; O2PLS

Indexed keywords

FOOD PRODUCTS; LINEAR ALGEBRA; ONLINE SYSTEMS;

BIOPROCESSES; COMMON GROUND; DATA SET; DISCO; GENOMICS; GLOBAL VIEW; GSVD; JIVE; MULTIPLE SET; O2PLS;

DATA FUSION;

EID: 85020011847     PISSN: 08869383     EISSN: 1099128X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cem.2900     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Kettenring JR. Canonical analysis of several sets of variables. Biometrika. 1971;58:433–460.
2. Van de Geer JP. Linear relations among k sets of variables. Psychometrika. 1984;49(1):79–94.
3. Alter O, Brown PO, Botstein D. Generalized singular value decomposition for comparative analysis of genome-scale expression data sets of two different organisms. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:3351–3356.
4. Trygg J, Wold S. O2-PLS, a two-block (x-y) latent variable regression (LVR) method with an integral OSC filter. J Chemometr. 2003;17(1):53–64.
5. Van Deun K, Van Mechelen L, Thorrez I, et al. DISCO-SCA and properly applied GSVD as swinging methods to find common and distinctive processes. PLoS One. 2012;7:5.
6. Lock EF, Hoadley KA, Marron JS, Nobel AB. Joint and individual variation explained (JIVE) for integrated analysis of multiple data types. Ann Appl Stat. 2013;7(1):523–542.
7. Acar E, Papalexakis EE, Gurdeniz G, et al. Structure-revealing data fusion. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014;15:239.
8. Van Mechelen I, Smilde AK. A generic linked-mode decomposition model for data fusion. Chemometr Intell Lab. 2010;104:83–94.
9. Lahat D, Adali T, Jutten C. Multimodal data fusion: an overview of methods, challenges and prospects. Proc IEEE. 2015;103(9):1449–1477.
10. Westerhuis JA, Kourti T, MacGregor JF. Analysis of multiblock and hierarchical PCA and PLS models. J Chemometr. 1998;12(5):301–321.
11. Naes T, Tomic O, Afseth NK, Segtnan V, Mage I. Multi-block regression based on combinations of orthogonalisation, PLS-regression and canonical correlation analysis. Chemometr Intell Lab. 2013;124:32–42.
12. Schouteden M, Van Deun K, Pattyn S, Van Mechelen I. SCA with rotation to distinguish common and distinctive information in linked data. Behav Res Methods. 2013;45(3):822–833.
13. Golub GH, Van Loan C. Matrix Computations. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press; 1996.
14. Van Deun K, Smilde AK, Thorrez L, Kiers HAL, Van Mechelen I. Identifying common and distinctive processes underlying multiset data. Chemometr Intell Lab. 2013;129:40–51.
15. Van der Kloet FM, Sebastian-Leon P, Conesa A, Smilde AK, Westerhuis JA. Separating common from distinct variation. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016;17(5):195.
16. Acar E, Bro R, Smilde AK. Data fusion in metabolomics using coupled matrix and tensor factorizations. Proc IEEE. 2015;103(9):1602–1620.
17. Lynch CJ, Adams SH. Branched-chain amino acids in metabolic signalling and insulin resistance. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014;10:723–736.
18. Sidiropoulos N, Bro R. On communication diversity for blind identifiability and uniqueness of low-rank decompositions of N-way arrays. Proc Int Conf Acoust Speech and Signal Process. 2000;5:2449–2452.
19. Tauler R, Smilde AK, Kowalski BR. Selectivity, local rank, three-way data analysis and ambiguity in multivariate curve resolution. J Chemometr. 1995;9(1):31–58.
20. Schott JR. Matrix Analysis for Statistics. New York, NY: Wiley and Sons; 1997.
21. Yanai H, Takeuchi K, Takane Y. Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: Springer; 2011.
22. Peres-Neto PR, Legendre P, Dray S, Borcard D. Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. Ecology. 2006;87(10):2614–2625.
23. Van den Berg RA, Rubingh CM, Westerhuis JA, van der Werf MJ, Smilde AK. Metabolomics data exploration guided by prior knowledge. Anal Chim Acta. 2009;651(2):173–181.
24. Mage I, Menichelli E, Naes T. Preference mapping by PO-PLS: separating common and unique information in several data blocks. Food Qual Prefer. 2012;24(1):8–16.
25. Bro R, Smilde AK. Centering and scaling in component analysis. J Chemometr. 2003;17:16–33.
26. Van den Berg RA, Hoefsloot HCJ, Westerhuis JA, Smilde AK, van der Werf MJ. Centering, scaling, and transformations: improving the biological information content of metabolomics data. BMC Genomics. 2006;7(142).
27. Van Deun K, Smilde AK, van der Werf MJ, Kiers HAL, Van Mechelen I. A structured overview of simultaneous component based data integration. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:246.
28. Simsekli U, Ermis B, Cemgil AT, Acar E. Optimal weight learning for coupled tensor factorization with mixed divergences. Proc. 21st. Eur. Signal Process. Conf. Marrakech, Morocco; 2013.
29. Wilderjans TF, Ceulemans E, van Mechelen I, van den Berg RA. Simultaneous analysis of coupled data matrices subject to different amounts of noise. British J Math Stat Psychol. 2011;64:277–290.
30. Timmerman ME, Hoefsloot HCJ, Smilde AK, Ceulemans E. Scaling in ASCA. Metabolomics. 2015;accepted.
31. Smilde AK, Westerhuis JA, de Jong S. A framework for sequential multiblock component methods. J Chemometr. 2003;17(6):323–337.
32. Timmerman ME, Kiers HAL. Four simultaneous component models of multivariate times series from more than one subject to model intraindividual and interindividual differences. Psychometrika. 2003;86:105–122.
33. Smilde AK, Bro R, Geladi P. Multi-way Analysis: Applications in the Chemical Sciences. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 2004.
34. Singh A, Gordon GJ. Relational learning via collective matrix factorization. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), Las Vegas; 2008.
35. Smilde AK, Jansen JJ, Hoefsloot HCJ, Lamers RJAN, van der Greef J, Timmerman ME. ANOVA–simultaneous component analysis (ASCA): a new tool for analyzing designed metabolomics data. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(13):3043–3048.
36. Jansen JJ, Hoefsloot HCJ, van der Greef J, Timmerman ME, Smilde AK. Multilevel component analysis of time-resolved metabolic fingerprinting data. Anal Chim Acta. 2005;530(2):173–183.
37. de Noord OE, Theobald EH. Multilevel component analysis and multilevel PLS of chemical process data. J Chemometr. 2005;19(5-7):301–307.
38. Bevilacqua M, Bucci R, Materazzi S, Marini F. Application of near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy coupled to chemometrics for dried egg–pasta characterization and egg content quantification. Food Chem. 2013734;140(4):726.
39. Tao Y, Wu D, Sun DW, et al. Quantitative and predictive study of the evolution of wine quality parameters during high hydrostatic pressure processing. Innov Food Sci Emerg. 201390;20:81.
40. Tomassini A, Vitalone A, Marini F, et al. H-1 NMR-based urinary metabolic profiling reveals changes in nicotinamide pathway intermediates due to postnatal stress model in rat. J Proteome Res. 20145859;13(12):5848.
41. Shan RF, Zhao Y, Fan ML, Liu XW, Cai WS, Shao XG. Multilevel analysis of temperature dependent near-infrared spectra. Talanta. 2015;131(170):174.
42. Pages J. Collection and analysis of perceived product inter-distances using multiple factor analysis: application to the study of 10 white wines from the Loire Valley. Food Qual Prefer. 2005;16(7):642–649.
43. Dahl T, Naes T. A bridge between Tucker-1 and Carroll's generalized canonical analysis. Comput Stat Data An. 2006;50(11):3086–3098.
44. Bro R, Qannari EM, Kiers HAL, Naes T, Frøst MB. Multi-way models for sensory profiling data. J Chemom. 2008;22:36–45.
45. van der Burg E, Dijksterhuis G. Generalized canonical analysis of individual sensory profiles and instrumental data. In: Naes T, Risvik E, eds. Multivariate Analysis of Data in Sensory Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1996.
46. Hotelling H. Relations between two sets of variates. Biometrika. 1936;28:321–377.
47. Tenenhaus A, Tenenhaus M. Regularized generalized canonical correlation analysis for multiblock or multigroup data analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 2014;238(2):391–403.
48. Correa N, Adali T, Calhou VD. Canonical correlation analysis for data fusion and group inference: examining applications of medical imaging data. IEEE Signal Proc Mag. 2010;27:39–50.
49. Trygg J. O2-PLS for qualitative and quantitative analysis in multivariate calibration. J Chemometr. 2002;16(6):283–293.
50. Lofstedt T, Trygg J. OnPLS—a novel multiblock method for the modelling of predictive and orthogonal variation. J Chemometr. 2011;25(8):441–455.
51. Lofstedt T. OnPLS. Ph.D. Thesis, Umea University, Umea, Sweden, 2012.
52. De Moor B, Zha H. A tree of generalizations of the ordinary singular value decomposition. Linear Algebra Appl. 1991;147:469–500.
53. De Moor B. On the structure and geometry of the product singular value decomposition. Linear Algebra Appl. 1992;168:95–136.
54. Bookstein FL. Partial least squares: a dose response model for measurement in the behavioral and brain sciences. Psycoloquy. 1994;5(23):1.
55. Hanafi M, Kiers HAL. Analysis of k sets of data, with differential emphasis on agreement between and within sets. Comput Stat Data An. 2006;51(3):1491–1508.
56. Mattarucchi E, Stocchero M, Moreno-Rojas JM, Giordano G, Reniero F, Guillou C. Authentication of trappist beers by LC-MS fingerprints and multivariate data analysis. J Agr Food Chem. 2010;58(23):12089–12095.
57. Consonni R, Cagliani LR, Stocchero M, Porretta S. Evaluation of the production year in Italian and Chinese tomato paste for geographical determination using O2PLS models. J Agr Food Chem. 2010;58(13):7520, 7525.
58. Kirwan GM, Hancock T, Hassell K, et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance metabonomic profiling using tO2PLS. Anal Chim Acta. 201340;781:33.
59. Petrakis EA, Cagliani LR, Polissiou MG, Consonni R. Evaluation of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) adulteration with plant adulterants by H-1 NMR metabolite fingerprinting. Food Chem. 2015;173(890):896.
60. Bylesjo M, Eriksson D, Kusano M, Moritz T, Trygg J. Data integration in plant biology: the O2PLS method for combined modeling of transcript and metabolite data. Plant J. 2007;52(6):1181–1191.
61. Szymanski J, Brotman Y, Willmitzer L, Cuadros-Inostroza A. Linking gene expression and membrane lipid composition of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2014;26(3):915–928.
62. Srivastava V, Obudulu O, Bygdell J, et al. OnPLS integration of transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic data shows multi-level oxidative stress responses in the cambium of transgenic hipi-superoxide dismutase Populus plants. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:893.
63. Lofstedt T, Hoffman D, Trygg J. Global, local and unique decompositions in OnPLS for multiblock data analysis. Anal Chim Acta. 2013;791:13–24.
64. Van Loan CF. Generalizing the singular value decomposition. SIAM J Numer Anal. 1976;13:76–83.
65. Paige CC, Saunders MA. Towards a generalized singular value decomposition. SIAM J Numer Anal. 1981;18(3):398–405.
66. De Lathauwer L. An extension of the generalized SVD for more than two matrices. Internal Report 09-206, Leuven, Belgium, ESAT-SISTA, KU Leuven; 2009.
67. Ponnapalli SP, Saunders MA, Van Loan CF, Alter O. A higher-order generalized singular value decomposition for comparison of global mRNA expression from multiple organisms. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28072.
68. Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso: a retrospective. J Roy Stat Soc B. 2011;73:273–282.
69. Lips MA, Van Klinken JB, Van Harmelen V, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery, but not calorie restriction, reduces plasma branched-chain amino acids in obese women independent of weight loss or the presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(12):3150–3156.
70. Ray P, Zheng LL, Lucas J, Carin L. Bayesian joint analysis of heterogeneous genomics data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(10):1370–1376.
71. Schonemann PH. A generalized solution of the orthogonal procrustes problem. Psychometrika. 1966;31:1–10.
72. Ten Berge JMF. Orthogonal procrustes rotation for 2 or more matrices. Psychometrika. 1977;42(2):267–276.