SCA with rotation to distinguish common and distinctive information in linked data

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 822-833

  Schouteden, Martijn ^a   Van Deun, Katrijn ^a   Pattyn, Sven ^b   Van Mechelen, Iven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Common information; Distinctive information; Multigroup factor analysis; Rotation; Simultaneous component analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CULTURAL FACTOR; EMOTION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; ROTATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EMOTIONS; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; RESEARCH DESIGN; ROTATION;

EID: 84881581739     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: 15543528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0295-9     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Allik, J., Laidra, K., Realo, A., & Pullmann, H. (2004). Personality development from 12 to 18 years of age: Changes in mean levels and structure of traits. European Journal of Personality, 18, 445-462. doi: 10. 1002/per. 524.
2. Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397-438. doi: 10. 1080/10705510903008204.
3. Bernaards, C. A., & Jennrich, R. I. (2005). Gradient projection algorithms and software for arbitrary rotation criteria in factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 676-696. doi: 10. 1177/0013164404272507.
4. Bierhoff, H. (1989). Person perception and attribution. New York, NY: Springer.
5. Browne, M. W. (1972). Orthogonal rotation to a partially specified target. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 25, 115-120.
6. Buja, A., & Eyuboglu, N. (1992). Remarks on parallel analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 509-540. doi: s15327906mbr27042/s15327906mbr27042.
7. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Caprara, G., Barbaranelli, C., Bermudez, J., Maslach, C., & Ruch, W. (2000). Multivariate methods for the comparison of factor structures in cross-cultural research-An illustration with the big five questionnaire. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 437-464. doi: 10. 1177/0022022100031004002.
9. Curran, P., & Hussong, A. (2009). Integrative data analysis: The simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets. Psychological Methods, 14, 81-100. doi: 10. 1037/a0015914.
10. Estabrook, G. E. (1984). A canonical correlation analysis of the Wechsler intelligence scale for children-revised and the Woodcock-Johnson tests of cognitive ability in a sample referred for suspected learning disabilities. Journal of Education Psychology, 76, 1170-1177. doi: 10. 1037/0022-0663. 76. 6. 1170.
11. Flury, B. K. (1987). Two generalizations of the common principal component model. Biometrika, 74, 59-69. doi: 10. 2307/2336021.
12. Fransella, F. (2003). An international handbook of personal construct psychology. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
13. Fransella, F. (2005). The essential practitioner's handbook of personal construct psychology. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
14. Funder, D. (1999). Personality judgment: A realistic approach to person perception. London, UK: Academic Press.
15. Hagedoorn, M., van Yperen, N. W., van De Vliert, E., & Buunk, B. P. (1999). Employees' reactions to problematic events: A circumplex structure of five categories of responses, and the role of job satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 309-321. doi: 10. 1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199905)20: 3<309:: AID-JOB895>3. 0. CO;2-P.
16. Herr, R. (1969). Review: Jean G. Peristiany, "Honour and shame: The values of Mediterranean society" (Book review). Journal of Social History, 3, 89-92.
17. Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185. doi: 10. 1007/BF02289447.
18. Jennrich, R. I. (2001). A simple general procedure for orthogonal rotation. Psychometrika, 66, 289-306. doi: 10. 1007/BF02294840.
19. Joiner, T. E., Sandin, B., Chorot, P., Lostao, L., & Marquina, G. (1997). Development and factor analytic validation of the SPANAS among women in Spain: (More) cross-cultural convergence in the structure of mood. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 600-615. doi: s15327906mbr27042/s15327752jpa68038.
20. Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36, 409-426. doi: 10. 1007/BF02291366.
21. Kiers, H. A. L. (1991). Hierarchical relations among three-way methods. Pschometrika, 56, 449-470. doi: 10. 1007/BF02294485.
22. Kiers, H. A. L., & ten Berge, J. M. F. (1989). Alternating least squares algorithms for simultaneous components analysis with equal component weight matrices in 2 or more populations. Psychometrika, 54, 467-473. doi: 10. 1007/BF02294629.
23. Kiers, H. A. L., & ten Berge, J. M. F. (1994). Hierarchical relations between methods for simultaneous component analysis and a technique for rotation to a simple structure. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 47, 109-126.
24. Kuppens, P., Ceulemans, E., Timmerman, M. E., Diener, E., & Kim-Prieto, C. (2006). Universal intracultural and intercultural dimensions of the recalled frequency of emotional experience. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 491-515. doi: 10. 1177/0022022106290474.
25. Lee, Y., McCauley, C. R., & Draguns, J. G. (1999). Personality and person perception across cultures. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A. J. S., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2010). A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22, 471-491. doi: 10. 1037/a0019227.
27. Marsh, H. W., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A. J. S., & Trautwein, U. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students' evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 439-476. doi: 10. 1080/10705510903008220.
28. McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr., Terracciano, A., Parker, W. D., Mills, C. J., De Fruyt, F., & Mervielde, I. (2002). Personality trait development from age 12 to age 18: Longitudinal, cross-sectional and cross-cultural analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1456-1468. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 83. 6. 1456.
29. Millsap, R. E., & Meredith, W. (1988). Component analysis in cross-sectional and longitudinal data. Psychometrika, 53, 123-134. doi: 10. 1007/BF02294198.
30. Özkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2005). Masculinity, femininity, and the Bem Sex Role Inventory in Turkey. Sex Roles, 52, 103-110. doi: 10. 1007/s11199-005-1197-4.
31. Peres-Neto, P. R., Jackson, D. A., & Somers, K. M. (2005). How many principal components? Stopping rules for determining the number of non-trivial axes revisited. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 49, 974-997. doi: 10. 1016/j. csda. 2004. 06. 015.
32. Rodriguez Mosquera, P. M., Manstead, A. S. R., & Fischer, A. H. (2002). Honor in the Mediterranean and Northern Europe. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 16-36. doi: 10. 1177/0022022102033001002.
33. Rossier, J., de Stadelhofen, F. M., & Berthoud, S. (2004). The hierarchical structures of the NEO PI-R and the 16 PF 5. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20, 27-38. doi: 10. 1027/1015-5759. 20. 1. 27.
34. Silva, F., Martinez-Arias, R., Rapaport, E., Ertle, A., & Ortet, G. (1997). Dimensions of interpersonal orientation: Cross-cultural studies regarding the structure of the "DOI Kit. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 973-985. doi: 10. 1016/S0191-8869(97)00127-X.
35. Spikman, J., Kiers, H., Deelman, B., & van Zomeren, A. (2001). Construct validity of concepts of attention in healthy controls and patients with CHI. Brain and Cognition, 47, 446-460. doi: 10. 1006/brcg. 2001. 1320.
36. Tagiuri, R. (1969). Person perception. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (The individual in a social context, Vol. 3, pp. 395-449). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
37. ten Berge, J. M. F. (1977). Optimizing factorial invariance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Gröningen, the Netherlands.
38. ten Berge, J. M. F., Kiers, H. A. L., & van der Stel, V. (1992). Simultaneous components analysis. Statistica Applicata, 4, 377-392.
39. Terracciano, A., McCrae, R., & Costa, P. (2003). Factorial and construct validity of the Italian Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 131-141. doi: 10. 1027/1015-5759. 19. 2. 131.
40. Timmerman, M. E., & Kiers, H. A. L. (2003). Four simultaneous component models for the analysis of multivariate time series from more than one subject to model intraindividual and interindividual differences. Psychometrika, 68, 105-121. doi: 10. 1007/BF02296656.
41. van Deun, K., Smilde, A. K., van der Werf, M. J., Kiers, H. A. L., & van Mechelen, I. (2009). A structured overview of simultaneous component based data integration. BMC Bioinformatics, 10, 246-261. doi: 10. 1186/1471-2105-10-246.
42. van Mechelen, I., & Smilde, A. K. (2010). A generic linked-mode decomposition model for data fusion. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 104, 83-94. doi: 10. 1016/j. chemolab. 2010. 04. 012.
43. Zimprich, D., Martin, M., Kliegel, M., Dellenbach, M., Rast, P., & Zeintl, M. (2008). Cognitive abilities in old age: Results from the Zurich longitudinal study on cognitive aging. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 67, 177-195. doi: 10. 1024/1421-0185. 67. 3. 177.
44. Zwick, R. W., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432-442. doi: 10. 1037/0033-2909. 99. 3. 432.