Providing graduated corrective feedback in an intelligent computer-assisted language learning environment

ReCALL

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 313-334

  Ai, Haiyang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

Chinese as a foreign language; corrective feedback; individualized feedback; intelligent computer assisted language learning; sociocultural theory; the ba construction

Indexed keywords

EID: 85019614934     PISSN: 09583440     EISSN: 14740109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S095834401700012X     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Ai, H. (2015) Promoting second language development with concept-based instruction and intelligent computer-assisted language learning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
2. Aljaafreh, A. and Lantolf, J. P. (1994) Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78: 465-483. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02064
3. Amaral, L., Meurers, D. and Ziai, R. (2011) Analyzing learner language: Towards a flexible NLP architecture for intelligent language tutor. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1: 1-16. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.520674
4. Bitchener, J. (2008) Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17: 102-118. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.004
5. Bitchener, J. and Ferris, D. (2012) Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. New York, NY: Routledge.
6. Bitchener, J. and Knoch, U. (2010a) Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19: 207-217. https://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jslw.2010.10.002
7. Bitchener, J. and Knoch, U. (2010b) The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten month investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31: 193-214. https://doi.org/10.1093/ applin/amp016
8. Bitchener, J. and Storch, N. (2016) Written corrective feedback for L2 development. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
9. Bitchener, J., Young, S. and Cameron, D. (2005) The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL students. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3): 191-205. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.jslw.2005.08.001
10. Blin, F. (2004) CALL and the development of learner autonomy: Towards an activity-theoretical perspective. ReCALL, 16(2): 377-395. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344004000928
11. Cornillie, F., Clarebout, G. and Desmet, P. (2012) Between learning and playing Exploring learners' perceptions of corrective feedback in an immersive game for English pragmatics. ReCALL, 24(3): 257-278. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344012000146
12. Dekeyser, R. (2003) Implicit and explicit learning. In: Doughty, C. and Long, M. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell, 313-348.
13. Dickinson, M., Eom, S., Kang, Y., Leeb, C. M., Sachs, R. and Lee, C. M. (2008) A balancing act: How can intelligent computer-generated feedback be provided in learner-to-learner interactions Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(4): 369-382. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588220802 343702
14. Ellis, N. C. (2005) At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2): 305-352. https://doi.org/10.1017/S02722 6310505014
15. Ellis, R. (2009) A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2): 97-107.
16. Ellis, R. and Sheen, Y. (2006) Reexamining the role of recasts in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(4): 575-600. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310606027
17. Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M. and Takashima, H. (2008) The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36: 353-371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.001
18. Ellis, R., Loewen, S. and Erlam, R. (2006) Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2): 339-368. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0272263106060141
19. Ferris, D. R. (1997) The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2): 315-339. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588049
20. Ferris, D. R. (1999) One size does not fit all: Response and revision issues for immigrant student writers. In: Harklau, L., Losey, K. and Siegal, M. (eds.), Generation 1.5 meets college composition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 143-157.
21. Ferris, D. R. (2006) Does error feedback help student writers New evidence on the shortand long-term effects of written error correction. In: Hyland, K. and Hyland, F. (eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 81-104.
22. Ferris, D. R. (2010) Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA: Intersections and practical applications. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32: 181-201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990490
23. Ferris, D. R. and Roberts, B. J. (2001) Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be Journal of Second Language Writing, 10: 161-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039
24. Ferris, D. R., Liu, H., Sinha, A. and Senna, M. (2013) Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3): 307-329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jslw.2012.09.009
25. Han, Z. H. (2002) Rethinking of corrective feedback in communicative language teaching. RELC Journal, 33(1): 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368820203300101
26. Heift, T. (2002) Learner control and error correction in ICALL: Browsers, peekers, and adamants. CALICO Journal, 19(2): 295-313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/cj.v19i2.295-313
27. Heift, T. (2004) Corrective feedback and learner uptake in CALL. ReCALL, 16(2): 416-431. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344004001120
28. Heift, T. (2010a) Developing an intelligent language tutor. CALICO Journal, 27(3): 443-459. http://dx.doi.org/10.11139/cj.27.3.443-459
29. Heift, T. (2010b) Prompting in CALL: A longitudinal study of learner uptake. The Modern Language Journal, 94(2): 198-216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01017
30. Heift, T. and Schulze, M. (2007) Errors and intelligence in computer-assisted language learning: Parsers and pedagogues. New York, NY: Routledge.
31. Hyland, K. and Hyland, F. (2006) Context and issues in feedback on L2 writing: An introduction. In: Hyland, K. and Hyland, F. (eds.), Feedback in second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-20.
32. Jin, H. G. (1992) Pragmaticization and the L2 acquisition of Chinese ba-constructions. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 28(3): 33-52.
33. Kepner, C. G. (1991) An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second language writing skills. The Modern Language Journal, 75: 305-313. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05359
34. Lantolf, J. P. (ed.) (2000) Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Lantolf, J. P. and Poehner, M. E. (2004) Dynamic assessment: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1: 49-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/japl.v1i1.49
36. Lantolf, J. P. and Poehner, M. E. (2011) Dynamic Assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for L2 development. Language Teaching Research, 15: 11-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810383328
37. Lantolf, J. P. and Thorne, S. L. (2006) Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. Li, S. (2010) The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2): 309-365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561
39. Long, M. H. (2007) Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Lyster, R. and Ranta, L. (1997) Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19: 37-66.
41. Mackey, A. (2012) Input, interaction, and corrective feedback in L2 learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Meurers, D. (2012) Natural language processing and language learning. In: Carol A. Chapelle (ed.), Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 4193-4205.
43. Meurers, D., Ziai, R., Amaral, L., Boyd, A., Mimitrov, A., Metcalf, V. and Ott, N. (2010). Enhancing authentic web pages for language learners. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, NAACL-HLT 2010, Los Angeles, CA.
44. Nagata, N. (2009) Robo-Sensei's NLP-based error detection and feedback generation. CALICO Journal, 26(3): 562-579. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/cj.v26i3.562-579
45. Nassaji, H. (2007) Elicitation and reformulation and their relationship with learner repair in dyadic interaction. Language Learning, 57(4): 511-548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00427
46. Newman, D., Griffin, P. and Cole, M. (1989) The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Ohta, A. S. (2000) Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. In: J. P. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 51-78.
48. Oxford, R. L. (1993) Intelligent computers for learning languages: The view for language acquisition and instructional methodology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 6(2): 173-188.
49. Panova, I. and Lyster, R. (2002) Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4): 573-595. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588241
50. Park, K. and Kinginger, C. (2010) Writing/thinking in real time: Digital video and corpus query analysis. Language Learning & Technology, 14(3): 31-50. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2010/ parkkinginger.pdf
51. Poehner, M. E. (2007) Beyond the test: L2 dynamic assessment and the transcendence of mediated learning. The Modern Language Journal, 91: 323-340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781. 2007.00583
52. Poehner, M. E. (2008) Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development. Berlin: Springer.
53. Poehner, M. E. (2011) Validity and interaction in the ZPD: Interpreting learner development through L2 Dynamic Assessment. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 21(2): 244-263. http://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1473-4192.2010.00277
54. Poehner, M. E. and Lantolf, J. P. (2013) Bringing the ZPD into the equation: Capturing L2 development during computerized dynamic assessment. Language Teaching Research, 17(3): 323-342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813482935
55. Poehner, M. E. and Ableeva, R. (2011) Dynamic Assessment: From display of knowledge to engagement in the activity of development. In: Tsagari, D. and Csepes, I. (eds.), Classroom-based language assessment. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
56. Poehner, M. E., Zhang, J. and Lu, X. (2015) Computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA): Diagnosing L2 development according to learner responsiveness to mediation. Language Testing, 32(3): 337-357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214560390
57. Polio, C., Fleck, N. and Leder, N. (1998) "If only I had more time": ESL learners' changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7: 43-68. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90005-4
58. Reynolds, D. (2010) Beyond texts: A research agenda for quantitative research on second language writers and readers. In: Silva, T. and Matsuda, P. K. (eds.), Practicing theory in second language writing. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press, 159-175.
59. Russell, J. and Spada, N. (2006) The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar: A meta-analysis of the research. In: Norris, J. and Ortega, L. (eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
60. Sauro, S. (2009) Computer-mediated corrective feedback and the development of L2 grammar. Language Learning & Technology, 13(1): 96-120. http://llt.msu.edu/vol13num1/sauro.pdf
61. Schmidt, R. W. (1990) The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2): 219-258. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129
62. Schulze, M. (2008) AI in CALL-artificially inflated or almost imminent CALICO Journal, 25(3): 510-527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/cj.v25i3.510-527
63. Sheen, Y. (2007) The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners' acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2): 255-283. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00059
64. Truscott, J. (1996) The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46: 327-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238
65. Truscott, J. (2007) The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(4): 255-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.06.003
66. van Compernolle, R. A. (2011) Developing second language sociopragmatic knowledge through concept-based instruction: A microgenetic case study. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(13): 3267-3283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.009
67. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68. Wen, X. (2012) A daunting task The acquisition of the Chinese ba-construction by nonnative speakers of Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 40(1): 216-240.