A balancing act: How can intelligent computer-generated feedback be provided in learner-to-learner interactions?

Computer Assisted Language Learning

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 369-382

  Dickinson, Markus ^a   Eom, Soojeong ^b   Kang, Yunkyoung ^b   Lee, Chong Min ^b   Sachs, Rebecca ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Communicative tasks; Corrective feedback; Intelligent computer assisted language learning; Korean postpositional particles; Synchronous computer mediated communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 53349141552     PISSN: 09588221     EISSN: 17443210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09588220802343702     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Amaral, L., Metcalf, V., & Meurers, D. (2006, May). Language awareness through re-use of NLP technology. Talk given at pre-conference workshop on NLP in CALL - Computational and Linguistic Challenges, CALICOUniversity of Hawai'i.
2. Amaral, L., & Meurers, D. (2006, May). Where does ICALL fit into foreign language teaching? Talk given at CALICO. University of Hawai'i.
3. Amaral, L., & Meurers, D. (2007a, September). Putting activity models in the driver's seat: Towards a demand-driven NLP architecture for ICALL. Talk given at EUROCALL 2007, Symposium on NLP in CALL. University of Ulster, Coleraine Campus, Northern Ireland.
4. Amaral, L., & Meurers, D. (2007b). Conceptualizing student models for intelligent computer-assisted language learning. In C. Conati, & K.F. McCoy (Eds.), User Modeling 2007: Proceedings of the eleventh international conference, lecture notes in computer science (pp. 340-344). New York: Springer.
5. Blake, R. (2000). Computer-mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 120-136.
6. Brooks, R. (1993). Principles for effective hypermedia design. Technical Communication, 40(3), 422-428.
7. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293-332.
8. Cowan, R., & Leeser, M. (2007). The structure of corpora in SLA research. In R. Facchinetti (Ed.), Corpus linguistics 25 years on (pp. 289-304). Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.
9. Dickinson, M., & Lee, C. (2008, March). Korean particle error detection via probabilistic parsing. Paper presented at the CALICO pre-conference workshop on automatic analysis of learner language: Bridging foreign language teaching needs and NLP possibilities. San Francisco, CA.
10. Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206-257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Doughty, C.J., & Long, M.H. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 50-80.
12. Egi, T. (2004). Recasts, learner perceptions, and L2 development. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
13. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Heift, T., & Nicholson, D. (2001). Web delivery of adaptive and interactive language tutoring. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12(4), 310-325.
16. Heift, T., & Schulze, M. (2003). Student modeling and ab initio language learning. System, 31(4), 519-535.
17. Heift, T., & Schulze, M. (2007). Errors and intelligence in computer-assisted language learning: Parsers and pedagogues. New York: Routledge.
18. Hwang, S.H. (2007). The different effects of two types of corrective feedback in oral production accuracy. Unpublished manuscript, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
19. Jang, S., Lee, S., & Seo, S. (2008, March). Annotation of Korean learner corpora for particle error detection. Paper presented at the CALICO pre-conference workshop on automatic analysis of learner language: Bridging foreign language teaching needs and NLP possibilities. San Francisco, CA.
20. Kern, R.G. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 457-473.
21. Ko, S., Kim, M., Kim, J., Seo, S., Chung, H., & Han, S. (2004). An analysis of Korean learner corpora and errors. Hanguk Publishing Co.
22. Lee, L. (2001). Online interaction: Negotiation of meaning and strategies used among learners of Spanish. ReCALL Journal, 13(2), 232-244.
23. Leow, R.P. (1997). Attention, awareness, and foreign language behavior. Language Learning, 47, 467-506.
24. L'Haire, S. (2004). Vers un feedback plus intelligent. Les enseignements du project FreeText. Proceedings of the Journée d'Etude de l'ATALA on NLP and Language Learning (pp. 1-12). Paris: ATALA.
25. Lyster, R. (1998). Form in immersion classroom discourse: In or out of focus? Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 53-82.
26. Lyster, R., Lightbown, P.M., & Spada, N. (1999). A response to Truscott's 'What's wrong with oral grammar correction'. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 55, 457-467.
27. Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction and second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 407-452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. MacWhinney, B. (2001). The competition model: The input, the context, and the brain. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 69-90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Nagata, N. (1995). An effective application of natural language processing in second language instruction. CALICO Journal, 13(1), 47-67.
30. Nagata, N. (2002). BANZAI: An application of natural language processing to web based language learning. CALICO Journal, 19(3), 583-599.
31. National Council of Less Commonly Taught Languages. (2004). Shared solutions for common problems. Retrieved May 14, 2008, from http://www.councilnet.org/council/objectives.htm
32. National Virtual Translation Center. (2007). Languages of the world: Critical languages. Retrieved May 5, 2008, from http://www.nvtc.gov/lotw/ months/november/criticalLanguages.html
33. Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P.M., & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51, 719-758.
34. Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Oliver, R., & Herrington, J. (1995). Developing effective hypermedia instructional materials. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2), 8-22. Retrieved May 5, 2008, from http:// www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ ajetll/oliver.html
36. Payne, J.S., & Whitney, P.J. (2002). Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: Output, working memory, and interlanguage development. CALICO Journal, 20(1), 7-32.
37. Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence in the virtual foreign language classroom. In M. Warschauer, & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 59-86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Petersen, K. (2006, December). Measuring L2 development in an ICALL context. Paper presented at workshop on interfaces of intelligent computer-assisted language learning. The Ohio State University.
39. Rosa, E.M., & O'Neill, M.D. (1999). Explicitness, intake, and the issue of awareness: Another piece to the puzzle. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 511-556.
40. Russell, J., & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar. A meta-analysis of the research. In J.M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133-164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
41. Sachs, R., & Suh, B-R. (2007). Textually enhanced recasts, learner awareness, and L2 outcomes in synchronous computer-mediated interaction. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction and second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 197-227). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Salaberry, M.R. (2000). L2 morphosyntactic development in text-based computer-mediated communication. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(1), 5-27.
43. Schmidt, R.W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
44. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Song, J.J., (Ed.). (2006). Frontiers of Korean language acquisition. London: Saffron Books.
46. Truscott, J. (1999). What's wrong with oral grammar correction. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 55, 437-456.
47. VanPatten, B. (1989). Can learners attend to form and content while processing input? Hispania, 72, 409-417.
48. VanPatten, B. (2007). Input processing in adult second language acquisition, In B. VanPatten, & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 115-135). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49. Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2), 7-26.