Supraglottic airway devices: The search for the best insertion technique or the time to change our point of view?;Supraglottik havayolu araçları: En iyi cihaz yerleştirme tekniğini araştı rmak mı, yoksa bakış açımızı değiştirme zamanı mı?

Turk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Dernegi Dergisi

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 76-82

  Sorbello, Massimiliano ^a   Petrini, Flavia ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CATANIA   (Italy)

^b Chieti University Hospital   (Italy)

Author keywords

Airway management; Laryngeal mask airway; Sore throat; Supraglottic airway devices

Indexed keywords

EID: 85018522530     PISSN: 13040871     EISSN: 1305614X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5152/TJAR.2017.67764     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Dhulkhed PV, Khyadi SV, Jamale PB, Dhulkhed VK. A Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial for the Comparison of Two Techniques for the Insertion of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway in Adults-Index Finger Insertion Technique versus 90° Rotation Technique. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 2017; 45: 98-102.
2. Brimacombe J, Keller C. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesiology Clin N Am 2002; 20: 871-91. [CrossRef]
3. Beleña JM, Núñez M, Anta D, Carnero M, Gracia JL, Ayala JL, et al. Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme and Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal with respect to oropharyngeal leak pressure during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2013; 30: 119-23. [CrossRef]
4. Brimacombe JR, Wenzel V, Keller C. The proseal laryngeal mask airway in prone patients: a retrospective audit of 245 patients. Anaesth Intensive Care 2007; 35: 222-5.
5. Halaseh BK, Sukkar ZF, Hassan LH, Sia AT, Bushnaq WA, Adarbeh H. The use of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in caesarean section--experience in 3000 cases. Anaesth Intensive Care 2010; 38: 1023-8.
6. Petrini F, Di Giacinto I, Cataldo R, Esposito C, Pavoni V, Donato P, et al. Perioperative and periprocedural airway management and respiratory safety for the obese patient: 2016 SIAARTI Consensus. Minerva Anestesiol 2016; 82: 1314-35.
7. Baxter S, Brooks A, Cook T. Use of a Proseal LMA for maintenance after failed intubation during a modified rapid sequence induction. Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 1132-3. [CrossRef]
8. Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C; Fourth National Audit Project. Major complication of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 617-31.
9. Beydeş T, Küçükgüçlü S, Özbilgin S, Kuvaki B, Ademoğlu M, Sarı M. Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway SupremeTM Versus UniqueTM in Edentulous Geriatric Patients. Turk J Anaesth Reanim 2016; 44: 32-6. [CrossRef]
10. Theiler L, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Urwyler N, Graf T, Luyet C, Greif R. Randomized clinical trial of the i-gel™ and Magill tracheal tube or single-use ILMA™ and ILMA™ tracheal tube for blind intubation in anaesthetized patients with a predicted difficult airway. Br J Anaesth 2011; 107: 243-50. [CrossRef]
11. Peker G, Takmaz SA, Baltacı B, Başar H, Kotanoğlu M. Comparison of Four Different Supraglottic Airway Devices in Terms of Efficacy, Intra-ocular Pressure and Haemodynamic Parameters in Children Undergoing Ophthalmic Surgery. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 2015; 43: 304-12. [CrossRef]
12. Robak O, Leonardelli M, Zedtwitz-Liebenstein K, Rützler K, Schuster E, Vaida S, et al. Feasibility and speed of insertion of seven supraglottic airway devices under simulated airway conditions. CJEM 2012; 14: 330-4. [CrossRef]
13. nd generation supraglottic airway devices for airway management performed by novice military operators. Biomed Res Int 2015; 201898.
14. Bergold MN, Kahle S, Schultzik T, Bücheler M, Byhahn C. Intubating laryngeal tube suction disposable: Initial clinical experiences with a novel device for endotracheal intubation. Anaesthesist 2016; 65: 30-5. [CrossRef]
15. Yun MJ, Hwang JW, Park SH, Han SH, Park HP, Kim JH, et al. The 90° rotation technique improves the ease of insertion of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in children. Can J Anaesth 2011; 58: 379-83. [CrossRef]
16. Hwang JW, Park HP, Lim YJ, Do SH, Lee SC, Jeon YT. Comparison of two insertion techniques of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: standard versus 90-degree rotation. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 905-7. [CrossRef]
17. Jeon YT, Na HS, Park SH, Oh AY, Park HP, Yun MJ, et al. Insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is more successful with the 90 degrees rotation technique. Can J Anaesth 2010; 57: 211-5. [CrossRef]
18. Ghai B, Wig J. Comparison of different techniques of laryngeal mask placement in children. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009; 22: 400-4. [CrossRef]
19. Mutch WA. Facilitated insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway using a lightwand. Can J Anaesth 2006; 53: 635-6. [CrossRef]
20. Nalini KB, Shivakumar S, Archana S, Sandhya Rani DC, Mohan CV. Comparison of three insertion techniques of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A randomized clinical trial. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2016; 32: 510-4. [CrossRef]
21. Micaglio M, Parotto M, Trevisanuto D, Zanardo V, Ori C. Glidescope/gastric-tube guided technique: a back-up approach for ProSeal LMA insertion. Can J Anaesth 2006; 53: 1063-4. [CrossRef]
22. Chen HS, Yang SC, Chien CF, Spielberger J, Hung KC, Chung KC. Insertion of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway is more successful with the Flexi-Slip™ stylet than with the introducer. Can J Anaesth 2011; 58: 617-23. [CrossRef]
23. Lee LW. Insertion of the LMA ProSeal using the Satin-Slip intubating stylet. Can J Anaesth 2007; 54: 81-2. [CrossRef]
24. Howath A, Brimacombe J, Keller C. Gum-elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a new technique. Anaesth Intensive Care 2002; 30: 624-7.
25. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Judd DV. Gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital and introducer tool techniques. Anesthesiology 2004; 100: 25-9. [CrossRef]
26. Critchley LA, Khaw KS. Bougie assisted insertion of ProSeal LMA. Anaesth Intensive Care 2006; 34: 514-5.
27. Kido H, Komasawa N, Deguchi S, Minami T. Successful LMA-ProSeal insertion using a tracheal tube introducer in a patient with severe rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Anesth 2016; 33: 501-2. [CrossRef]
28. Gasteiger L, Brimacombe J, Perkhofer D, Kaufmann M, Keller C. Comparison of guided insertion of the LMA ProSeal vs the i-gel. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 913-6. [CrossRef]
29. García-Aguado R, Viñoles J, Brimacombe J, Vivó M, López-Estudillo R, Ayala G. Suction catheter guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital technique. Can J Anaesth 2006; 53: 398-403. [CrossRef]
30. Hernandez MR, Klock PA, Ovassapian A. Evolution of the Extraglottic Airway: A Review of Its History, Applications, and Practical Tips for Success. Anesth Analg 2012; 114: 349-68. [CrossRef]
31. Wenqing L, Jijian Z, Lingqi G, Yingtian W. A comparison of classic laryngeal mask airway insertion between lightwand- and standard index finger-guided techniques. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 2016; 33: 309-14. [CrossRef]
32. L’Hermite J, Dubout E, Bouvet S, Bracoud LH, Cuvillon P, Coussaye JE, Ripart J. Sore throat following three adult supraglottic airway devices: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2016; [Epub ahead of print].
33. Saraçoğlu A, Dal D, Baygın O, Göğüş FY, Airtraq, LMA CTrach and Macintosh Laryngoscopes in Tracheal Intubation Training: A Randomized Comparative Manikin Study. Turk J Anaesth Reanim 2016; 44: 76-80. [CrossRef]
34. Choo CY, Koay CK, Yoong CS. A randomised controlled trial comparing two insertion techniques for the Laryngeal Mask Airway Flexible™ in patients undergoing dental surgery. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 986-90. [CrossRef]
35. Alexiev V, Ochana A, Abdelrahman D, Coyne J, McDonnell JG, O’Toole DP, et al. Comparison of the Baska® mask with the single-use laryngeal mask airway in low-risk female patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. Anaesthesia 2013; 68: 102632. [CrossRef]
36. Sorbello M, Pulvirenti GS, Pluchino D, Skinner M. State of the Art in Airway Management During GI Endoscopy: The Missing Pieces. Dig Dis Sci 2017; [Epub ahead of print]
37. Daşkaya H, Uysal H, Çiftçi T, Baysal B, İdin K, Karaaslan K. Use of the gastro-laryngeal tube in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography cases under sedation/analgesia. Turk J Gastroenterol 2016; 27: 246-51. [CrossRef]
38. Russo SG, Cremer S, Eich C, Jipp M, Cohnen J, Strack M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging study of the in vivo position of the extraglottic airway devices i-gel™ and LMA-Supreme™ in anaesthetized human volunteers. Br J Anaesth 2012; 109: 996-1004. [CrossRef]
39. Kriege M, Piepho T, Zanker S, Alflen C, Heid F, Noppens RR. LMA SupremeTM, and Ambu AuraGainTM in anesthetized adult patients: a prospective observational study. Minerva Anestesiol 2017; 83: 165-74.
40. Townsend R, Brimacombe J, Keller C, Wenzel V, Herff H. Jaw thrust as a predictor of insertion conditions for the proseal laryngeal mask airway. Middle East J Anaesthesiol 2009; 20: 5962.
41. Nellore SS, Waychal AD, Rustagi PS. Comparison of Dexmedetomidine-Propofol versus Fentanyl-Propofol on Insertion Conditions of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway. J Clin Diagn Res 2016; 10: UC06-UC09.
42. Fujiwara A, Komasawa N, Nishihara I, Miyazaki S, Tatsumi S, Nishimura W, et al. Muscle relaxant effects on insertion efficacy of the laryngeal mask ProSeal(®) in anesthetized patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Anesth 2015; 29: 580-4. [CrossRef]
43. Handa-Tsutsui F, Kodaka M. Propofol concentration requirement for laryngeal mask airway insertion was highest with the ProSeal, next highest with the Fastrach, and lowest with the Classic type, with target-controlled infusion. J Clin Anesth 2005; 17: 344-7. [CrossRef]
44. Galgon RE, Schroeder K, Joffe AM. The self-pressurising air-Q® Intubating Laryngeal Airway for airway maintenance during anaesthesia in adults: a report of the first 100 uses. Anaesth Intensive Care 2012; 40: 1023-7.
45. Yun MJ, Hwang JW, Kim SH, Hong HJ, Jeon YT, Park HP. Head elevation by 3 vs. 6 cm in ProSeal laryngeal mask airway insertion: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2016; 16: 57. [CrossRef]
46. Huang YH, Cherng CH. Optimal size selection of the classic laryngeal mask airway by tongue width-based method in male adults. J Chin Med Assoc 2014; 77: 422-5. [CrossRef]
47. Saito T, Chew STH, Liu WL, Thinn KK, Asai T, Ti LK. A proposal for a new scoring system to predict difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway. Br J Anaesth 2016; 117(Suppl 1): i83-6.
48. Mohr S, Weigand MA, Hofer S, Martin E, Gries A, Walther A, et al. Developing the skill of laryngeal mask insertion: prospective single center study. Anaesthesist 2013; 62: 447-52. [CrossRef]
49. Brimacombe JR. Laryngeal mask anesthesia. Principles and Practise. 1st Ed. New York. Elsevier-Saunders, 2005.
50. Cook TM, Kelly FE. Time to abandon the ‘vintage’ laryngeal mask airway and adopt second-generation supraglottic airway devices as first choice. Br J Anaesth 2015; 115: 4979. [CrossRef]
51. Hensel M, Güldenpfennig T, Schmidt A, Krumm M, Kerner T, Kox WJ. Digital palpation of the pilot balloon vs. continuous manometry for controlling the intracuff pressure in laryngeal mask airways. Anaesthesia 2016; 71: 1169-76. [CrossRef]
52. Frova G, Sorbello M. Algorithms for difficult airway management: a review. Minerva Anestesiol 2009; 75: 201-9.
53. Maktabi MA, Smith RB, Todd MM. Is routine endotracheal intubation as safe as we think or wish? Anesthesiology 2003; 99: 247-8.
54. Griffiths JD, Nguyen M, Lau H, Grant S, Williams DI. A prospective randomised comparison of the LMA ProSeal™ versus endotracheal tube on the severity of postoperative pain following gynaecological laparoscopy. Anaesth Intensive Care 2013; 41: 46-50.
55. Sorbello M, Frova G. When the end is really the end? The extubation in the difficult airway patient. Minerva Anestesiol 2013; 79: 194-9.