Muscle relaxant effects on insertion efficacy of the laryngeal mask ProSeal® in anesthetized patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Journal of Anesthesia

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 580-584

  Fujiwara, Atsushi ^a   Komasawa, Nobuyasu ^a   Nishihara, Isao ^b   Miyazaki, Shinichiro ^a   Tatsumi, Shinichi ^a   Nishimura, Wataru ^a   Minami, Toshiaki ^a  

^a OSAKA MEDICAL COLLEGE   (Japan)

^b Hokusetsu General Hospital   (Japan)

Author keywords

Insertion efficacy; LMA ProSeal ; Muscle relaxant; Sealing pressure

Indexed keywords

FENTANYL; PROPOFOL; ROCURONIUM; ANDROSTANE DERIVATIVE;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BISPECTRAL INDEX; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; FEMALE; HOARSENESS; HUMAN; LARYNGEAL MASK; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SORE THROAT; AGED; ANESTHESIA; ANESTHESIOLOGY; PRESSURE; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; ANDROSTANOLS; ANESTHESIA; ANESTHESIOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRESSURE; PROPOFOL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL;

EID: 84939564426     PISSN: 09138668     EISSN: 14388359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00540-015-1982-3     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Brimacombe J, Keller C. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:104–9.
2. Asai T, Murao K, Shingu K. Efficacy of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway during manual in-line stabilisation of the neck. Anaesthesia. 2002;57:918–20.
3. Goldmann K, Hechtfischer C, Malik A, Kussin A, Freisburger C. Use of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in 2,114 adult patients: a prospective study. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:1856–61.
4. Brimacombe J, Keller C. A proposed algorithm for the management of airway obstruction with the Proseal laryngeal mask airway. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:298–9.
5. Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Hohlrieder M, Stadlbauer KH, Keller C. Gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital and introducer tool techniques in patients with simulated difficult laryngoscopy using a rigid neck collar. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:1253–6.
6. Okutani R, Ogawa S. Utility of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway creating a 90 degree angle with an intubating stylet. J Anesth. 2010;24:492–3.
7. Ikeda A, Isono S, Sato Y, Yogo H, Sato J, Ishikawa T, Nishino T. Effects of muscle relaxants on mask ventilation in anesthetized persons with normal upper airway anatomy. Anesthesiology. 2012;117:487–93.
8. Warters RD, Szabo TA, Spinale FG, DeSantis SM, Reves JG. The effect of neuromuscular blockade on mask ventilation. Anaesthesia. 2011;66:163–7.
9. ® to 42°C facilitates successful insertion and ventilation efficacy with muscle relaxation: a randomized study. J Clin Anesth 2014;26:663–667.
10. Wright PM, Caldwell JE, Miller RD. Onset and duration of rocuronium and succinylcholine at the adductor pollicis and laryngeal adductor muscles in anesthetized humans. Anesthesiology. 1994;81:1110–5.
11. ® laryngeal mask for airway management by novice doctors during infant chest compression: a manikin study. Resuscitation. 2012;83:365–8.
12. Natalini G, Lanza G, Rosano A, Dell’Agnolo P, Bernardini A. Standard laryngeal mask airway and LMA-ProSeal during laparoscopic surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2003;15:428–32.
13. Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature. Can J Anaesth. 2005;52:739–60.
14. ® intubating supraglottic devices by novice physicians: a randomized crossover simulation study. J Anesth. 2014;28:676–80.
15. Howath A, Brimacombe J, Keller C, Kihara S. Gum elastic bougie-guided placement of the ProSeal laryngeal mask. Can J Anaesth. 2002;49:528–9.
16. Howath A, Brimacombe J, Keller C. Gum-elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a new technique. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2002;30:624–7.
17. Keller C, Brimacombe J. Influence of neuromuscular block, mode of ventilation and respiratory cycle on pharyngeal mucosal pressures with the laryngeal mask airway. Br J Anaesth. 1999;83:480–2.
18. Chen BZ, Tan L, Zhang L, Shang YC. Is muscle relaxant necessary in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery with a ProSeal LMA™? J Clin Anesth. 2013;25:32–5.
19. Kuna ST. Respiratory-related activation and mechanical effects of the pharyngeal constrictor muscles. Respir Physiol. 2000;119:155–61.
20. Asai T, Brimacombe J. Review article: cuff volume and size selection with the laryngeal mask. Anaesthesia. 2000;55:1179–84.
21. Kihara S, Brimacombe JR, Yaguchi Y, Taguchi N, Watanabe S. A comparison of sex- and weight-based ProSeal laryngeal mask size selection criteria: a randomized study of healthy anesthetized, paralyzed adult patients. Anesthesiology. 2004;101:340–3.
22. Asai T, Murao K, Yukawa H, Shingu K. Re-evaluation of appropriate size of the laryngeal mask airway. Br J Anaesth. 1999;83:478–9.