Comparison of dexmedetomidine-propofol versus fentanyl-propofol on insertion conditions of proseal laryngeal mask airway

Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research

Volumn 10, Issue 11, 2016, Pages UC06-UC09

  Nellore, Shalaka Sandeep ^a   Waychal, Abhijeet Dattatray ^a   Rustagi, Preeti Sachin ^a  

^a Lokmanya Tilak Medical College and General Hospital   (India)

Author keywords

Haemodynamic; Supraglottic airway device; Upper airway reflexes

Indexed keywords

DEXMEDETOMIDINE; FENTANYL; GLYCOPYRRONIUM; ISOFLURANE; MIDAZOLAM; NITROUS OXIDE PLUS OXYGEN; PROPOFOL;

ARTICLE; BREATHING RATE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COUGHING; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; EYELID REFLEX; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOM; HEART RATE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; LACRIMATION; LARYNGEAL MASK; LARYNX SPASM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SWALLOWING;

EID: 84994853630     PISSN: 2249782X     EISSN: 0973709X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/23244.8934     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Misra MN, Ramamurthy B. The Pro-seal LMATm and the tracheal tube: AComparison of events at insertion of airway device. International J Anesthesiol. 2008;16
2. Saraswat N, Kumar A, Mishra A, Gupta A, Saurabh G, Srivastava U. The comparison of proseal laryngeal mask airway andendotracheal tube in patients undergoing laproscopic surgeries under general anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth. 2011;55(2):129–34.
3. Patel MG, Swadia VN, Raghavendra S. Comparison of propofol and sevoflurane for insertion of PLMA. J Anaesth Clin Pharmacol. 2010;26(1):74-78.
4. Khanduja S, Ohri A, Panwar M. Dexmedetomidine decreases requirement of thiopentone sodium and pentazocine followed with improved recovery in patientsundergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology. 2014;30(2):208.
5. Yousef GT, Elsayed KM. A clinical comparison of ketofol (a ketamineand Propofol admixture) versus Propofol as an induction agent on quality ofinsertion of laryngeal mask airway insertion and haemodynamic stability in children. Anesthesia: essay and Researches. 2013;7(2):194-99.
6. Cheam EWS, Chui PT. Randomised double-blind comparison of Fentanyl, mivacurium or placebo to facilitate laryngeal mask airway insertrion. Anaesthesia. 2000;55:323-26.
7. Scalon P, Carey M, Power M, Kirby F. Patient response to laryngeal maskinsertion after induction of anaesthesia with Propofol or Thiopentone. CanadianJournal of Anaesthesia. 1993;40:816-18.
8. Begec Z, Demirbilek S, Onal D, Erdil F, IlksenToprak H, Ozcan Ersoy M. Ketamine or alfentanil administration prior to propofol anaesthesia: the effects on ProSeal TM laryngeal mask airway insertion conditions and haemodynamic changes in children. Anaesthesia. 2009;64(3):282–86.
9. Paul AK. Essentials of anaesthesiology. 7th ed. Jaypee publishers; c2006. Pp.74-75.
10. Dorsch JA. Understanding anaesthesia equipment. 5th ed.Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; c2012. Pp. 476.
11. Parasa M. Ideal induct. IJSR. 2014;3(11):7-8. ion agent for LMA insertion: A comparative study between Thiopentone sodium and Propofol
12. Bapat P, Joshi RN, Young E, Roger HJ. Comparison of Propofol versus Thiopentone with midazolam or lidocaine to facilitate laryngeal mask insertion. Can J Anaesth. 1996;43(6):564-68.
13. Krishnappa S, Kundra P. Optimal anaesthetic depth for LMA insertion. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2011;55:504-07.
14. Jayaram SA, Subhadra J, Hanumantha R. Comparison of Dexmedetomidine combined with Propofol versus Fentanyl combined with Propofol for laryngeal mask insertion. J Clin Sci Res. 2014;3:228-36.
15. Driver IK, Wiltshire S, Mills P, Lillywhite N, Howard-Griffin R. Midazolam co induction and laryngeal mask insertion. Anaesthesia. 1996;51:782-84.
16. Aghamohammadi D, Eydi M, Hosseinzadeh H, Rahimi MA. Assessment of mini-dose succinylcholine effect on facilitatinglaryngeal mask airway. Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research. 2013;5(1):17-21.
17. Joad A, Dutt A, Sharma M. Induction for classic laryngeal mask airway insertion: Does low-dose fentanyl work? Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology. 2012;28(2):210.
18. Tan ASB, Wang CY. Fentanyl dose for the insertion of laryngeal mask airways innon-paralysed patients induced with Propofol 2.5 mg/kg. Anaesthesia Intensive care. 2010;38:65-69.
19. Uzumcugil F, Canbay O, Celebi N, Karagoz AH, Ozgen S. Comparison of Dexmedetomidine-Propofol vs. Fentanyl-Propofol for Laryngeal Mask insertion. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2008;25(8):675-80.
20. Lande SA, Gadkari CP, Bhure AR, Aich S. Comparison of dexmedetomidine propofol versus fentanyl – propofol for conditions of laryngeal mask airway insertion inelective surgeries. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences. 2014;3(15):4042–51.
21. Gupta A, Kaur S. Comparative evaluation of ketamine-Propofol, Fentanyl-propofol and butarphanol-propofol on haemodynamics and LMA insertion conditions. J Anaesth Clin Pharmacol. 2011;27(1):74-78.
22. Wong CM, Critchley LA, Lee A, Khaw KS, Kee WDN. Fentanyl dose response curves when inserting the LMA Classic. Anaesthesia. 2007;62(7):654–60.
23. Suparto, Flores OC, Angela CA. Layusa. A randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of dexmedetomedine versus fentanyl in attenuating the sympathetic response in laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. MajKdot Indon. 2010;3(60).