Comparison of laryngeal mask airway supreme and laryngeal mask airway proseal with respect to oropharyngeal leak pressure during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomised controlled trial

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 119-123

  Beleña, José M ^a   Núñez, Mónica ^b   Anta, Diego ^a   Carnero, Maria ^a   Gracia, José L ^a   Ayala, José L ^c   Alvarez, Raquel ^a   Yuste, Javier ^a  

^a Hospital Universitario del Sureste de Madrid   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL RAMÓN Y CAJAL   (Spain)

^c HOSPITAL INFANTA ELENA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Laryngeal mask airway proseal; Laryngeal mask airway supreme

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AIRWAY PRESSURE; ARTICLE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DYSPHAGIA; DYSPHONIA; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; HIATUS HERNIA; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LARYNGEAL MASK; LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY PROSEAL; LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY SUPREME; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OROPHARYNGEAL LEAK PRESSURE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SORE THROAT; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; TIDAL VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; ANESTHESIOLOGY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRESSURE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; TIDAL VOLUME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84876239161     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: 13652346     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32835aba6a     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Maltby JR, Beriault MT, Watson NC, et al. The LMA-ProSeal is an effective alternative to tracheal intubation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Can J Anesth 2002; 49:857-862.
2. Maltby JR, Beriault MT, Watson NC, et al. LMA-Classic and LMA-ProSeal are effective alternatives to endotracheal intubation for gynecologic laparoscopy. Can J Anesth 2003; 50:71-77.
3. Natalini G, Lanza G, Rosano A, et al. Standard Laryngeal Mask Airway and LMA-ProSeal during laparoscopic surgery. J Clin Anesth 2003; 15:428- 432.
4. Lee AK, Tey JB, Lim Y, Sia AT. Comparison of the single-use LMA Supreme with the reusable Proseal LMA for anaesthesia in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care 2009; 37:815-819.
5. The LMA Supreme. Instruction manual. Maidenhead, Berkshire, UK: Intavent Orthofix Ltd; 2007.
6. Keller C, Brimacombe JR, Keller K, Morris R. Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82:286-287.
7. Teoh WH, Lee KM, Suhitharan T, et al. Comparison of the LMA Supreme vs I-gel in paralysed patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic surgery with controlled ventilation. Anaesthesia 2010; 65:1173-1179.
8. Seet E, Rajeev S, Firoz T, et al. Safety and efficacy of Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme versus Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27:602-607.
9. Lu PP, Brimacombe J, Yang C, Shyr M. ProSeal versus the Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway for positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88:824-827.
10. Abdi W, Amathieu R, Adhoum A, et al. Sparing the larynx during gynaecological laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing the LMA Supreme and the EET. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2010; 54:141-146.
11. Yao T, Yang XL, Zhang F, et al. The feasibility of Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway in gynaecological laparoscopy surgery. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2010; 90:2048-2051.
12. Sharma B, Sehgal R, Sahai C, Sood J. PLMA vs. I-gel: a comparative evaluation of respiratory mechanics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2010; 26:451-457.
13. Timmermann A, Cremer S, Eich C, et al. Prospective clinical and fiberoptic evaluation of the Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway. Anesthesiology 2009; 110:262-265.
14. Verghese C, Ramaswamy B. LMA-Supreme: a new single-use LMA with gastric access - a report on its clinical efficacy. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101:405-410.
15. Hosten T, Gurkan Y, Ozdamar D, et al. A new supraglottic airway device: LMA Supreme, comparison with LMA-ProSeal. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009; 53:852-857.
16. Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Hohlrieder M, Keller C. The Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme: a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomized, cross-over study with the Laryngeal Mask Airway ProSeal in paralyzed, anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia 2009; 64:79-83.
17. Beleña JM, Gracia JL, Ayala JL, et al. The Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme for positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Clin Anesth 2011; 23:456-460.
18. Goldmann K, Hoch N, Wulf H. Influence of neuromuscular blockade on the airway leak pressure of the Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2006; 41:228-232.
19. Strube PJ. The LMA Supreme and LMA Proseal. Anaesthesia 2009; 64:691.
20. Brimacombe J, Keller C. Gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway. Anaesth Intensive Care 2004; 32:681-684.
21. Pearson DM, Young PJ. Use of the LMA-Supreme for airway rescue. Anesthesiology 2008; 109:356-357.
22. López AM, Valero R, Hurtado P, et al. Comparison of the LMA Supreme with the LMA Proseal for airway management in patients anaesthetized in prone position. Br J Anaesth 2011; 107:265-271.
23. Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP. The ProSeal LaryngealMask Airway: a review of the literature. Can J Anaesth 2005; 52:739-760.
24. Alexander CA, Leach AB. Incidence of sore throats with the LMA. Anaesthesia 1989; 44:791.
25. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Fullekrug B, et al. A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal and Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients. Anesthesiology 2002; 96:289-295.